Faithingod

Check out this post on Nextdoor: nextdoor.com/p/9sMJfSBkb7Wp…

Free for all???!!! Huh? This says $300 to register?

@hoopes_leah I mean six years seven years later she’s married two kids no problems. Nice home now they’re telling her they want to put her back in jail? Why why you railroaded her into accepting a plea she had no attorney you had an attorney assigned from your courthouse in media.

RIGHT-TO-KNOW LAW REQUEST (REFILED – COMPARATOR EVIDENCE OF DISPARATE TREATMENT) 65 P.S. § 67.101 et seq. To: Delaware County Open Records Officer OpenRecords@co.delaware.pa.us Date: April 20th 2026 Requester: Leah Hoopes I. REQUEST Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law, Requester seeks: All communications, including but not limited to emails, email attachments, text messages, internal memoranda, and external correspondence, that contain or reference the name “Leah Hoopes,” including any variation thereof, from January 1, 2020 through the date of search. This includes: - Internal County communications - Communications between County officials and third parties - Communications involving advocacy organizations, media, or outside entities - Complete email chains (sent and received) II. COMPARATOR: AMERICAN OVERSIGHT REQUEST (DISPARATE TREATMENT) Attached as Exhibit A is a Right-to-Know request submitted by American Oversight. That request: - Explicitly identifies “Leah Hoopes” as a search term and subject of records; - Requests communications across multiple custodians and external entities; - Seeks multi-year records beginning in 2024; - Is broader in scope and complexity than the present request. Attached as Exhibit B is the County’s response demonstrating: - The County conducted the search; - The County produced responsive records; - The County completed production within approximately 30 days. III. DISPARATE TREATMENT AND BAD FAITH INDICATORS The County has: 1. Demonstrated capability to search for and produce communications referencing “Leah Hoopes”; 2. Completed production for a third-party requester involving the same subject matter; 3. Processed a broader request than the present request. In contrast, in response to Requester’s prior requests: - The County invoked repeated extensions citing “staffing limitations” and “volume”; - The County sought delay despite a narrower request (single name search); - The County relied on generalized, non-specific justifications; - The County failed to produce records within the same timeframe as comparator requests. This constitutes evidence of: - Lack of good faith search (65 P.S. § 67.901); - Improper reliance on boilerplate extensions; - Disparate treatment of requesters seeking the same category of records. V. LIMITATION ON EXTENSIONS Any extension under 65 P.S. § 67.902 must: - Be specific to this request; - Identify actual burdens unique to this request; - Not rely on generalized staffing or volume claims already contradicted by prior production. Requester does not consent to delay unsupported by specific, fact-based justification. V. FORMAT Records shall be produced electronically in native format, including metadata and complete email chains. VI. PRESERVATION NOTICE The County is on notice to preserve all records responsive to this request, including: - Email servers - Backup systems - Mobile device communications Archived and deleted materials VII. CONCLUSION This request is: - Narrower than prior fulfilled requests; - Based on demonstrated County capability; - Supported by documentary evidence of prior production. A timely and complete response is required. Failure to comply will result in immediate appeal and further action as permitted by law. Leah Hoopes

I need help from someone in Delaware County… My daughter was railroaded. Back in 2017. She went on probation while we were doing Covid lockdowns she checked in every week with her probation officer for three years because she didn’t pay a $10,000 fine they’re trying to put her back in jail six years later. I don’t think so.

@grey4626 The American people are not having it any longer. I don’t know what anybody don’t see here. Do you really think there’s gonna be a Congress and the Senate absolutely not none of these people anyway but it’s over it’s all over for them.

WAKE THE FUCK UP, AMERICA. Listen to James Carville. He didn’t mumble it. He didn’t dog-whistle it. He screamed it from the mountaintop on his own goddamn podcast: Day One. Grant statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico. Pack the Supreme Court to thirteen...justices-for-life turned justices-for-the-Party. Torch the Senate’s filibuster, rewrite the rules, and lock in permanent structural dominance while the rest of us are still blinking at the ballot box. “F— it,” he said. “Eat our dust. Don’t run on it. Don’t talk about it. Just do it.” That’s not politics. That’s pathology. This is the same institutional arson that has toppled republics since the dawn of time. The Athenians watched their democracy devolve into demagoguery and judicial murder. The Romans let their Senate become a rubber stamp for emperors who first “expanded” the courts, then owned them. Weimar Germany’s elites thought they could game the system with emergency powers and emergency majorities...until the emergency swallowed the Constitution whole. Every time a ruling class decides the written charter is an inconvenience to their permanent majority, the body count starts with norms and ends with nations. Carville isn’t having a senior moment. He’s performing the tell. Authoritarians always do. They confess their intentions with the serene confidence of predators who believe their prey is too domesticated to notice the teeth. Psychology 101: projection wrapped in contempt. They accuse you of “threats to democracy” while openly plotting to repeal the electoral college, abolish the Senate’s equal representation, and turn the judiciary into a nine-to-thirteen-member super-legislature that answers to one party only. It’s not hypocrisy. It’s strategic sadism...the pleasure of watching you pretend it’s still 1787 while they rewrite 2029 in real time. They don’t hate the Constitution because it’s old. They hate it because it works. It was engineered by men who studied every failed republic in history and built in firewalls: separation of powers, federalism, enumerated rights, an amendment process deliberately slower than a Senate filibuster on a Tuesday. Those firewalls are the only thing standing between you and a one-party state where the Supreme Court becomes the DNC’s legal department and the Senate becomes a rubber stamp for whatever coastal oligarchs and academic clerisy decide is “progress.” Believe them. They are telling you exactly how they will torch it...because they’ve already done the math. Slim majority? Doesn’t matter. They’ll nuke the rules, flood the map with new blue senators-for-life, and dare you to stop them. And when you scream “unconstitutional,” they’ll smile and say the Constitution is whatever they say it is on Day One. This isn’t hyperbole. This is history on a collision course with denial. FUCK AROUND. FIND THE FUCK OUT. The American experiment doesn’t survive contact with people who view the founding document as an obstacle instead of the operating system. They want you demoralized, distracted, and gaslit into believing it can’t happen here. It already is. The only question left is whether the sleeping giant finally opens its eyes before the match hits the fuse. They told you. They meant it. They’re coming for the hardware. Time to decide if you’re going to watch the Constitution burn or finally grow the spine to put the fire out.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 💀⚔️⚖️🦅

Trump is calling for the six Democrats who committed Sedition to be jailed immediately @JudgeJeanine is the US Atty for DC, if you want these traitors put in jail, let her know She's tagged, She will see this if we get enough of a response... this cannot go unpunished W.H.G

Every single House Seat in Pennsylvania is up for election November 3, 2026.

HOLY CR*P 🚨 Maine Governor candidate Bobby Charles exposes “There are more than 4,500 contracts that were non-compete, sole source, given to FRIENDS AND FAMILY OF DEMOCRATS” The audit showed “$2.1 billion in questionable contracts” Democrat money laundering is INSANE “That is normalized public corruption”

@QThe76 Anyhow

IF YOU CAN SEE THIS ON YOUR TIMELINE REPLY ANYHOW 👻

We want an avalanche of resignations. Every Member of Congress who has used their position of power to cover up misconduct needs to go. We don't care what party you are in. Let's do it now. No exceptions.

@realannapaulina Perfect

After 3/4 of Congress voted to block the release of the congressional slush fund files pre-dating 2017 (2017 - current is online), I and House Oversight voted to subpoena the records. We should receive them this week and I will post the link here once they give it to us. 🕵🏻‍♀️

🚨 Wanna puke? There are over 40,000 foreign professors with temporary visas in America. It would be a profound understatement to suggest that many of these professors pose a national security risk. Professor Sumith Gunasekera was at Ferris State University in Michigan. He's an illegal alien and convicted sex offender from Sri Lanka. Gunasekera was arrested by ICE for multiple sex crimes and overstaying his visa since 2004. Over 40,000 foreign professors are unleashed on our students, and a large chunk of them are from nations hostile to the United States of America. @EDSecMcMahon @StateDept

I would love that opportunity.

🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup @PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat. They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't. I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera. As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

@nicksortor Get them TF out of here

🚨 Congolese “refugees” BLOCKED THE ROADS in Washington, DC today, raging that America “isn’t doing enough” for them THIS IS WHY WE CAN’T KEEP UP THIS THIRD WORLD “REFUGEE” PROGRAM No matter how much you give them, they ALWAYS demand more! DEPORT

America goes two ways. Option A: Muslims and globalists institute THEIR laws on our society. OPTION B: Christian men stand up and take their country back. I’m going with option B.

@hoopes_leah I’m sure Delaware County… I went in to vote for Trump and they actually tried to scare me away ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha I guess they don’t know people from Delco do they

This is our sting operation in Delaware County, PA. I was a contributor to Project Veritas after I reached out to them directly. I was working directly with Spencer Meads. This operation was developed by Gregory Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes and we brought in the whistleblower directing her at every point. FORMAL POSITION STATEMENT The issue is being deliberately mischaracterized. This is not about recognition, ego, or attribution in the colloquial sense. This is about evidentiary integrity and credibility of source material. Where individuals with first-hand knowledge and direct involvement in the development of evidence are omitted, misidentified, or dismissed, the consequences are not superficial they are fatal to the reliability of the record. 1. Authorship establishes foundation. Evidence does not exist in a vacuum. It must be tied to a competent witness or originating party who can authenticate its creation, methodology, and accuracy. 2. Misattribution undermines admissibility. When third parties republish, summarize, or distort investigative findings without proper identification of the original source, they sever the evidentiary chain. That is not a social slight—it is a legal defect. 3. This is not “credit”—it is chain of custody. Labeling originators as “seeking attention” is a deliberate tactic used to avoid engaging with the substance of the evidence. It reframes a structural legal requirement as a personality flaw. That argument is frivolous and should be rejected outright. 4. Anger is not disqualifying—it is contextual. When individuals invest substantial time, resources, and risk exposure to develop evidence of serious wrongdoing, objection to its misuse or misrepresentation is not “jealousy.” It is a rational response to the degradation of the evidentiary record. 5. Unauthorized use creates liability. Any party leveraging investigative work while stripping attribution or altering context assumes risk, including: Misrepresentation of facts Inability to authenticate evidence Exposure in any proceeding where foundation is challenged. CONCLUSION The position is simple: If you intend to use the work, you identify the source. If you cannot identify the source, you cannot validate the evidence. If you cannot validate the evidence, it collapses. Attempts to reduce this to personality attacks or accusations of ego are not only irrelevant—they are indicative of a lack of substantive rebuttal. If you strip out the people who developed it, you destroy the chain of custody and the ability to prove it. Labeling that concern as “jealousy” is a deflection tactic used by people who don’t want to deal with the facts. You don’t get to use the work and erase the source. I have been blocked by Patrick Byrne—an individual who has used evidence developed through our work, obtained through our former attorney Stefanie Lambert, and then leveraged that material to raise money. That is not advocacy. That is exploitation. Stop reframing this as an issue of “credit.” That characterization is false and it is being used to dismiss a far more serious problem. This conduct: Misappropriates investigative work developed through substantial time, risk, and resources Breaks the chain of custody of critical evidence Distorts underlying facts, including timelines, participants, and third-party involvement Places the original investigators at risk while removing their ability to authenticate the record Those are not minor issues. Those are defects that can destroy the evidentiary value of the work entirely. And yet, the public is being told this is acceptable—as long as the information “gets out.” No. That standard is reckless. Evidence that cannot be properly sourced, verified, and authenticated is compromised. Once compromised, it is vulnerable to attack, dismissal, and exclusion. That does not advance any cause—it undermines it. Being told to “eat crow for the sake of the movement” is not strategy. It is complicity in misconduct. My standard is not negotiable: If you use the work, you identify the source. If you alter the facts, you disclose it. If you raise money on the back of that work, you answer for it. Anything less is dishonest and corrosive to the integrity of the record. If anyone believes this conduct is defensible, then take the position publicly. I am inviting an open, public discussion on the record.

John Thune has denied Trump recess appt's, took (60) days to fund DHS & CBP and won't nuke the filibuster I'm calling on @SenMikeLee @SenEricSchmitt @SenTedCruz @HawleyMO @SenRickScott It's time to get loud folks... if you want Thune out, let them know, they'll see this