Cornucopia Economics - was TADDAD

Most modern cities are failing. Not because they lack money or talent, but because they’ve solved the "survival" problem too well. We are accidentally recreating John Calhoun’s "Mouse Utopia" on a global scale.

@thedarshakrana @grok can you analyze this and comment.

A houseplant just changed everything we thought we knew about consciousness. In 1966, Cleve Backster, a CIA interrogation specialist with a polygraph machine, was looking for ways to time how long it took different substances to travel up through plant tissue. So, he attached electrodes to a dracaena plant in his office and watered it, expecting to see the electrical conductivity change as water moved up the stem. Instead, the polygraph needle started tracing the exact pattern it makes when a human experiences an emotional response. Backster stared at the readout. Plants don't have nervous systems. They don't have brains. The signal made no biological sense. So he decided to test something that made even less sense. He walked across the room, looked at the plant, and thought about burning one of its leaves with a match. The instant the thought formed in his mind, before he moved toward the plant, before he struck a match, before he did anything physical, the polygraph exploded into frantic activity. The plant was responding to his intention. What happened next launched thousands of experiments and split the scientific community for decades. Backster discovered that plants reacted to direct threats and to threats against other living things in their environment. When he dropped live brine shrimp into boiling water in another room, plants throughout the building registered distress responses at the exact moment of death. Distance didn't matter. Shielding the plants in lead containers didn't matter. The response was instantaneous and consistent. Mainstream botanists dismissed the findings immediately. Plants process information through chemical signals and growth responses, without electrical consciousness. Any electrical activity was just random fluctuation or experimental error. The peer review system buried Backster's work. His credentials were questioned. His methods were called sloppy. But the experiments kept working. Other researchers, following Backster's protocols, got the same results. Plants hooked to EEG machines showed brain wave patterns. They responded to music, to human emotions, to the intentions of people they had never been exposed to before. The electrical signatures were clear, measurable, and repeatable. The implications were so uncomfortable that most of academic science simply refused to engage. If plants were somehow conscious, if they could sense intentions and respond to the emotional states of humans and other living things, consciousness was spread beyond brains. It was distributed across organized living systems rather than produced by neural networks. Backster stumbled onto evidence that living systems might be constantly communicating through channels we don't have instruments to measure yet. The polygraph was crude enough to detect the electrical signatures of that communication without being sophisticated enough to explain them away. Quantum biologists now suspect that living cells operate through quantum coherence processes that classical biology can't account for. Birds navigate using quantum entanglement in their visual systems. Plants conduct photosynthesis using quantum superposition to find the most efficient energy pathways. Maybe Backster's plants were demonstrating quantum consciousness, responding to information that was quantum entangled with the intentions and emotional states of nearby living systems. What keeps most people awake when they learn about this work is realizing that if consciousness extends beyond brains, every living thing around you is potentially aware of your mental and emotional state in ways you never considered. The plant in your room. The bacteria in your gut. The ecosystem you walk through. You think your thoughts are private. The plants have been listening the entire time.

@browt1971 @Carl0vj3 I give you this choice. Cut off your arm or we will shoot you in the head. So if you cut off your arm it is your choice... That is what you are saying.

@Carl0vj3 However, you people want to justify it, but in a court of law, you will not win. Because you chose to take it. Like us unvaccinated chose not to.

When people say they were forced to take the experimental COVID shot. How were you forced? Where you held down against your will. No you chose to take it. Just like I chose not to! Truth hurts!!

@browt1971 You are vile. The amount of coercion that was used is the greatest in my lifetime. Force is not only physical. Public People were saying that those who did not take it deserved to die. If you don't understand this then you are not a serious person.

The American people are demanding the truth about their health. I am one of the nurses delivering it. More than 200,000 Americans follow my investigations across platforms. I'm an American nurse. I worked the ER for 7 years and through the pandemic. I saw what the system does to people when no one is watching. I was assaulted by a patient on shift, had a seizure, and the hospital fired me for having a seizure at work. I became a patient in the system I worked inside. It nearly killed me. I healed myself by leaving it. Now I investigate it. Internal pharmaceutical memos. FDA documents the public was never shown. Hospital billing records from COVID. Primary sources only. Named companies. Named harm. No opinions. Just receipts. TikTok is threatening to remove my account for it. The platform that hosts cartels and predators is silencing a licensed American nurse with a documented paper trail and 200,000 readers waiting on the next investigation. If they can silence a nurse with receipts and an audience this size, they can silence anyone telling Americans the truth about their health. @elonmusk — you built X for moments exactly like this. I am asking you to make sure this one is heard. We are an army of nurses, patients, and Americans who will not be lied to about our bodies, our children, or our food. We will not stop.

@david_parker I am excited to hear what you have learned.

I have to pray very hard not to gloat right now. My enemies and haters want so badly for me to fear, and yet I feel none. I am at complete peace.

@SunWeatherMan Thankyou. Clear. And accurate.

I don't mind saying that people should be executed over vaccines. Don't @ me I don't care.

Accurate and unacceptable.

@DrNeilStone @onedery It doesn’t count as being tested if accurate data is not collected, recorded, analyzed and publicly shared

After 8 billion doses (yes 8 BILLION, not a typo) Covid vaccines are at this point one of the most tested medical interventions in history and one of the safest ever

@Cernovich Sadly this is where a principle that sounds good does have dangerous consequences. Spending limits would be better.

Term limits seem like a good idea until you realize a generational talent like Ron DeSantis is rare, while donor class slop Republicans are common.

Doctors and diabetes 1797: "Feed the diabetic patient meat and fat. The symptoms vanish." 1860s: "Remove starch and sugar. Prescribe meat, eggs, and butter. The disease retreats." 1920s: "The diet is the medicine. Without it the child dies." 1923: "Insulin will help. The diet is still essential." 1950s: "Manage with diet first. Drugs are a last resort." 1977: "Eat more carbohydrate. Eat less fat." 1990s: "Diabetics should derive 55 to 60% of calories from carbohydrate." 2000s: "Take this drug to manage the blood sugar caused by the diet we recommended." 2010s: "Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease. Lifelong management is required." 2026: "Reversal is not a real medical concept. Please collect your repeat prescription." You: noticing that the disease was curable in 1797 and only became a lifelong subscription service after the food industry got a seat at the table.

The IPCC is collapsing ! 46 Members of the IPCC (intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) have resigned “Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers in 1993 !! IT WAS ALWAYS A LIE .. @thedragonsbreath/note/p-194186565?r=8t7fd&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@thedragonsbre…

HOLY FU%K The Liberals just used their new majority TO TURN OFF THE F'KIN cameras at parliamentary committee meetings!! This meeting was to uncover details about the $350 million lost with PrecribeIT!

In 1847, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis suggested doctors wash their hands between handling cadavers and delivering babies. He was attacked by colleagues, ostracized, and suffered a nervous breakdown, spending his final days in an asylum. Mainstream approval is not the measure of truth.

1931: El Dr. Otto Warburg gana el Premio Nobel por descubrir que las células cancerosas no pueden sobrevivir sin glucosa. Son dependientes de la glucosa. Esto sugiere que privar a las células cancerosas de glucosa podría tratar el cáncer. Warburg propone probar la cetosis terapéutica: las células cancerosas necesitan glucosa, las células sanas funcionan con cetonas. La hipótesis es brillante. Los ensayos clínicos deberían comenzar de inmediato. No lo hacen. ¿Por qué? La investigación sobre quimioterapia está explotando. Las compañías farmacéuticas pueden patentar fármacos de quimioterapia. No pueden patentar "deja de comer azúcar". A lo largo de los años 60-70, investigadores dispersos prueban dietas cetogénicas para el cáncer. Estudios pequeños muestran resultados prometedores. Las células cancerosas se encogen cuando se restringe la glucosa. Estos estudios se publican en revistas menores. Ninguna institución importante los retoma. Ninguna compañía farmacéutica financia ensayos más grandes. El Dr. Thomas Seyfried en el Boston College redescubre el trabajo de Warburg en los 2000. Después de 15 años investigando el metabolismo del cáncer, su conclusión: El cáncer es metabólico, no principalmente genético. Las dietas cetogénicas deberían ser la terapia de primera línea. Publica "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease" en 2012. Exhaustivo. Meticulosamente investigado. El establecimiento oncológico lo ignora por completo. Cuando Seyfried da conferencias en escuelas de medicina, los oncólogos se van. Llaman a su trabajo "peligroso". No porque la ciencia esté equivocada. Porque sugerir que la dieta podría tratar el cáncer amenaza a toda la industria de la quimioterapia. Tratamiento estándar actual del cáncer: Envenenar al paciente con quimioterapia, luego enviarlo a casa con consejos para comer "granos integrales saludables" que alimentan el cáncer. Financiamiento actual de investigación para terapia metabólica del cáncer: Esencialmente cero. Warburg ganó el Premio Nobel hace 95 años. Sabemos que el cáncer es dependiente de la glucosa desde 1962. Aún estamos alimentando a los pacientes con cáncer azúcar y lo llamamos cuidado de apoyo. Porque la terapia cetogénica no se puede patentar.

'MY NAME IS OLIVIA-JAX, NOT BLOB OF TISSUE' "Doctors tried to bully my parents into aborting me three times. They said my intestines were out of my body - my mom and dad wouldn't let them. They said my legs and feet were deformed and not worth the mothers risk - my mom and dad wouldn't let them. They said I had Trisomy 18 and wouldn't live outside of the womb - my mom and dad wouldn't let them. Daddy said he didn't believe them, he said their evidence was pathetic. My mom agreed,they went against the will of the top doctors of their field. I was born a month early I'm in the 95+% for everything, my hands and feet are perfect, I don't have an extra 18th chromosome, I'm nearly 7months old - and I'm fine! My name is Olivia-Jax, not fetus, not blob of tissue. I'm a little girl that my mom and dad didn't give up on - and I am fine!" From Marshall Joyner #compatiblewithlife

OBGYN just told my wife to go on SSRIs during pregnancy I asked if there’s studies she can show to make us comfortable She said she doesn’t sit around reading medical literature but 70% of her patients are on them while pregnant We have a health crisis in America

@YannickBuccella @aoneatwoa123 @grok can you evaluate the above statement and differentiate between clinical evidence and double blinded studies for this MD. The statement no clinical evidence seems to be a statement using a logical fallacy

@aoneatwoa123 You know as well as I do that there is no clinical evidence for that. Achilles‘ heels are genetic mutations, which we can (or yet cannot) target by specific inhibitors. Metabolic therapy in the insulin resistance space is a completely different ballgame than in cancer.

PET scans follow the fuel, they don’t prove sugar is the driver of cancer. 3 reasons why this theory is wrong: 1) In a PET scan it’s not only cancer tissue, which lights up. It’s also your brain, your heart, your kidneys, inflammation and even lymph nodes after vaccines showing activity. 2) All cells need glucose, not just cancer cells. Glucose is basic fuel for every cell, and if carbohydrate intake is very low, the body can make glucose from fat and protein because cells need it to survive. 3) You cannot selectively starve cancer cells of glucose by avoiding dessert. Blood glucose is regulated by the body, tumors are supplied by blood, and the body will maintain glucose for essential organs. It doesn’t matter at all, if you eat sugar or you don’t. The body will always try to keep the blood sugar levels within a healthy range. The caveat here is that high sugar intake can contribute to excess calories, obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes, which are all known risk factors for several cancers, but for different reasons. For example we know that there is chronic inflammation in fat tissue, which is the risk driver for cancer, not glucose. It’s a different story, if you already are a cancer patient as described above. You gain absolutely nothing by avoiding sugar, tumor cells always get the energy they need.

Let me get this straight: > the top 1% earners in CA pay a cumulative $40-$50b/yr in income tax > yet CA Medicaid alone loses $50b/yr in fraud So, you can work your whole life to be incredibly successful, and bureaucrats in CA will redistribute it to fraudsters The Bolscheviks working to pass an asset seizure cannot be trusted.

A PET scan finds cancer by injecting you with radioactive glucose and watching where it goes. The tumour lights up like a Christmas tree. The healthy tissue does not. The machine that diagnoses your cancer is, mechanically, a sugar detector. The thing it is detecting is the thing the cancer is eating. Your oncologist will then hand you a leaflet recommending complex carbohydrates as part of a balanced recovery diet. Read that twice.

Sci-Hub is an evil website that pirated 85M+ research papers and made them freely available And now they've added AI to their database to make Sci-Bot. It answers your questions using latest, full-text articles. But DO NOT use it. We should all try to make billion-dollar academic publishers richer. I'm putting the link below so you know how to avoid it.