CryZe

@coderChoren @nafonsopt They must've used it long enough to know that glibc is completely awful, which is very true.

There is so much wrong information. Have you even used linux for more than 3 minutes? I used it for years and not once did I care about X11/wayland until I decided to. Except for games, there is almost nothing you can’t either run directly or find an open source alternative. I never compiled anything, because package managers, you know? Go and get real experience with a tool before saying its trash

For anybody saying "Just use Linux", you need to realise that Linux is worse than Windows. Windows has all the bloat, and while you can have Linux without any of that you still don't have tools like Remedybg, RAD Debugger and Super Luminal. Once you have such tools, then Linux is a suitable app development environment. But _it is still trash_ because of the whole Linux model of you needing to compile everything. The fact that you cannot run an app built using a newer version of glibc is an insane decision. I shouldn't have to upgrade my whole machine in order to run something built on a newer version. I shouldn't be worried that an upgrade will break my machine. I shouldn't be forced to compile things from scratch to work on my machine. I shouldn't be forced to install N packages, I just want self contained binaries I can just download and run. I shouldn't be forced to develop with an old distro to have "max glibc compatibility". I shouldn't have to worry about X11 / Wayland / Window Managers. I shouldn't have to worry about asking the user to select a folder, display a dialog or show notifications. Linux is such a huge waste of potential, if they got their shit together they would completely obliterate Windows. I first got into Linux in 2000, and even back then there was this "it will take over Windows any time now!". It's been _26 years_! The same way I'd pay quite a lot for Windows without any bloat, I'd be willing to pay for a distro that gives me all this.

@MaplePeache That makes absolutely no sense. Everyone knew NFTs had no actual use and the metaverse never even launched. AI is here and is useful for tons of work.

@virtual_method @IanCutress You almost certainly can choose how much each pixel gets affected by this, as that‘s the most obvious simple shader you could do on top of this. So you almost certainly could for example turn it off for faces if you don‘t like how it changes those.

@IanCutress You’re missing the point: you can precisely control tesselation and displacement - exactly how much, where, and how. That’s where the “art” resides. People are (rightfully, imho) concerned about how controllable this thing is.

"It changes the models! It affects the art!" So does tesselation. We've had that since DX11. x.com/IanCutress/sta…

@MelkeyDev You can safely assume most verified replies are bots

I honestly can't tell anymore who in the replies are bots and who are actual humans

@Dinklegaming @Senninsage When they say materials they don‘t mean that they change the actual materials and instead they do more complex lighting calculations on them like proper subsurface scattering that might‘ve been too expensive to do otherwise

@Senninsage It's definitely not just lighting

It's not an AI filter, which you would know if you took even the smallest bit of time to read and learn about it, but where would the clicks come from for doing so?

@MikeyJayRaymond @Ian_Fisch @_BlessedRed yes please

@CryZe107 @Ian_Fisch @_BlessedRed It's actually not. Need me to draw a pixel point by point to show it, or will you look closer?

Literally all that was changed is lighting and shading. Its funny watching people that have no idea what they are talk about just disregard HOW MUCH lighting can change a person or how something looks.

@TakiVan1 @SMetaldave64 Every game the last 15 years or so has been doing that.

@SMetaldave64 It "infuses pixels", which are 2D. It's recreating 3D lighting from pixels, which requires a lot of guessing to say the least.

"DLSS 5 only changes lighting" False. Nvidia themselves says that it uses "Photoreal" Lighting AND Materials: nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-dl… Most watched the cringe DF video, when it should have been Nvidia explaining. Saying DLSS 5 can be used as an AI filter is actually correct.

@Ian_Fisch @_BlessedRed The actual jaw "line" is literally identical. So idk what you are talking about. The jawline is highlighted differently, but it's still the exact same.

@_BlessedRed Her jawline literally changes (among other things). You're so very confidently wrong here.

@MPLocke @LokiJarson @pcgamer Pretty sure they haven't shown it on GTA V.

@LokiJarson @pcgamer He's not, it fucking draws vans wrong in GTA V and that's a 13 year old game. It isn't referencing anything but the surface image; adds facial details not at all present on model, as well as changes and adds lighting that doesn't exist on scene. You're a louse.

'If that was shown as a next-gen hardware reveal and not AI you guys would be going nuts': Epic Games lead producer says the idea DLSS 5 looks bad or detracts from art direction is 'absolutely insane' pcgamer.com/software/ai/ep…

@fufubiruta @JayDook You know what alters the image without changing its geometry? The entire shading pipeline of every game for ages now.

@JayDook Do you know what else alters an image without changing its geometry? Instagram/Snapshat/TikTok filters.

There seems to be some confusion about DLSS 5. Based on available information, it does not alter underlying character models or geometry. Differences seen in comparison screenshots can be explained by movement between captures when toggling DLSS on or off.

@HayDawg2006 @Big__TeeJ @DaReelSebas @Kneckt @FonzGaming You are just angry and that‘s okay

@CryZe107 @Big__TeeJ @DaReelSebas @Kneckt @FonzGaming You have no clue what any of this tech gobbledygook means, do you?

Did people just learn today that DLSS was Ai?

@Eight_Brit @diosHD_ @Pirat_Nation It‘s not the same frame. I think they massively messed up this reveal by not showing the same frames and a ground truth (done via an offline renderer).

@diosHD_ @Pirat_Nation Lmao her mouth is a different shape and it's adding details and features that aren't even there what are you on about.

This genuinely ruins the art direction. Thanks, NVIDIA.

@thattallguy I don't know a single person IRL that hates it. Though everyone on here seems to, so idk, seems vice versa to me.

I think folks on this app are greatly underestimating how much the general public hates AI. Like, haaaaaaates it.

@HayDawg2006 @Big__TeeJ @DaReelSebas @Kneckt @FonzGaming It's most probable (though I wish Nvidia would release some more technical details) that they trained this by simply rendering the same scene with "Unreal" and a production grade offline renderer, with no changes to any assets, so it really focuses on improving lighting.

@Big__TeeJ @DaReelSebas @Kneckt @FonzGaming that's just straight up not true. Everything you said was wrong

@pheenoh So unlike your average gen AI model, this one almost certainly (though I wish they would clarify) is trained by diffing the same scenes with real time and offline rendering, with no changes to any assets.

@pheenoh I hate to disagree, cause it seems to be a model that's specifically only trained to change the lighting. So as long as the game devs have some control over the changed lighting (which at least supposedly they do), then I don't see it as a bad thing.

This shit is gonna be the thing that finally makes the AI bubble pop isn’t it

@jennokki Die haben mir mittlerweile schon 4 Mails geschickt, dass ich dringend den neuen Preisen zustimmen soll... obwohl ich schon vor längerem gekündigt hab xD

Oh uh ih. Crunchyroll erhöht die Preise. 👁️👄👁️

@KirPinkFury I think it's so they can't reply that he stole it from them, exposing him to his audience.

@CryZe107 Interesting.

This guy blocked me. I have no idea why since I haven't interacted with him before. Anyway, let's assume that this Legends: Galar rumor is real. I like how each Legends game experiments with new mechanics. Arceus is perfect, but they decided to keep changing the formula.

@notrealm2 @wariocolosseum It‘s realistically more like 50 years. And your normal game cards die way before that.

@wariocolosseum You can for 20 years until Nintendo shuts down the eShop, at which point you have a decorative piece of plastic.

i don’t even like game key cards but aren’t they literally fine to resell lol