
Crypto Corleone
645 posts





🦊 @MetaMask <> @HathorNetwork 🟣 Snap integration is underway, bringing MetaMask support to Hathor’s ecosystem. This unlocks: 🔹 Seamless wallet interactions 🔹 Nano Contracts deployment via MetaMask 🔹 Future integration other EVM tools 🔹 Powering @Uniswap 🛠️ These few screens are WIP. 🧵





Exclusive at @quorumreport: GOP pollsters who have worked for President Trump for years found @GregAbbott_TX got an approval ratings bump after vetoing THC ban while the numbers for @DanPatrick went down bit.ly/4lq7rNF #TxLege


Did Texas Senate Bill 3 go too far? Yes. This lotion would have been a crime.



Texans are universally unhappy with leaders, per the @TXPolProject poll


“If people want to vote me out of office for that, so be it.” - Dan Patrick. You heard it Texans, let’s vote him out!


🚨 EXPOSED: The Doctor, The Ban, and The Dirty Deal 🚨 Meet Rep. Tom Oliverson — ✅ A Texas Republican lawmaker ✅ A licensed anesthesiologist ✅ Dan Patrick’s friend and neighbor ✅ And now... your soon-to-be TCUP doctor Oh — and did we mention? He’s also the guy who sponsored SB3, the bill that bans hemp-derived THC and wipes out thousands of small Texas businesses. So let’s break this down: 👨⚕️ A doctor writes the law that kills the competition 🏥 Then turns around and profits from the very system (TCUP) he just forced everyone into 💸 While standing shoulder to shoulder with Dan Patrick, who’s handing the industry to insiders This isn’t “compassionate care.” This is a crooked monopoly — built on lies, backroom deals, and betrayal of everyday Texans. 🔥 You don’t get to destroy people’s livelihoods, then pretend to be their savior. Tom Oliverson didn’t protect anyone. He helped ban safe, legal products — and made sure the only way forward was through his own prescription pad. Texans deserve better than this corrupt power grab. @GregAbbott_TX @GovAbbottPress #vetosb3

.@GregAbbott_TX’s SB 3 veto proclamation: gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/… “SB 3 is well-intentioned. But it would never go into effect because of valid constitutional challenges.”




