Perran Selina

@BullRushClub There are other options too. The main is that the big players pay a set fee up front to the mining pool of their choice. All their tx are picked up for zero fee.

What happens to micropayments when 1 BSV reaches $10,000… or even $100,000? 🤔💰 This is a legitimate and important question. If millions of AI agents start making hundreds of thousands of micro-transactions per second — each carrying tiny royalties or data payments — wouldn’t 1 satoshi eventually become too expensive?** The answer is already built into the protocol.** Satoshi designed Bitcoin with **infinite divisibility** in mind. The protocol can support 16 or more decimal places if needed — without changing the total supply of 21 million coins. This ensures that even at extremely high unit prices, true micropayments remain possible**. Real Bitcoin (SV) with Teranode is uniquely prepared for this future: • Proven 1.1M+ TPS ⚡ • Native support for massive on-chain activity • Flexible divisibility by design High price doesn’t kill utility — it simply requires greater precision. And BSV is engineered to handle exactly that. The awakening is accelerating. 🔥 The storm is coming. 💥 Sources: • Satoshi Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” (2008) • Bitcoin SV protocol specifications • Craig Wright – Public statements on increasing Bitcoin divisibility #RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #Micropayments #Teranode #AIAgents #AgentEconomy #SatoshiVision

@Baconsarni1 @David90shaw No, but I do expect Burnham to call a snap GE for Spring next year while still in honeymoon period. Thus he hopes will give him his mandate. Avoiding the mistake Brown made.

@David90shaw Do you think that as we approach the next GE Labour's mantra will be to rejoin the EU. And rejoining will mean full membership. The Euro, free movement(Schengen), annual subscription(billions of £), trade deals scuppered etc. Can Labour attract some votes with this plan ?

🚨 BREAKING: Labour’s desperate plan to rig the next election has completely backfired. Keir Starmer and his plotting rivals want to force through a law to let 16-year-olds vote, assuming kids will automatically vote Left and save their dying party. There is just one massive problem. The teenagers do not want it, and they absolutely despise Labour! 🧵👇

@drhingram @MaxSterlingJr @PolitlcsUK One positive is that if Burnham becomes PM the chances of a GE early next year to get a fresh mandate while on a popularity vote is very high. Worse case Reform would be the official opposition with hundreds of seats.

@MaxSterlingJr @PolitlcsUK Can’t hand the win to Labour. Too much riding on this one.

🚨 NEW: The first Makerfield by-election poll shows Andy Burnham will win the seat 🔴 LAB - 43% ➡️ REF - 40% 🇬🇧 RES - 7% 🟠 LD - 4% 🟢 GRN - 3% 🔵 CON - 2% ⚪ Other - 1% Via Survation, 369 sample, May 18-22

@drhingram @PolitlcsUK Yes, if asked in a poll would you say Restore Britain , but vote Reform… I am curious how many RB voters will choose knowingly to split the vote.

@PolitlcsUK I’m a Restore member but I would vote Reform in this scenario

@ZiaYusufUK I feel one priority should be to improve the country’s credit rating. Working towards a £100 billion fiscal overhead before any real cuts in taxes. This over time would massively reduce the interest we pay on the country’s debt.

🚨Important policy announcement: Britain was built on the hard graft of people who go the extra mile. A Reform government will ABOLISH income tax on hours worked beyond 40 hours a week, for incomes below £75,000 a year. It’s time to REWARD hard work, not punish it! 🇬🇧

@Nigel_Farage Restore Britain supporters are pretty clued up and engaged. They will know they could split the vote. The question is, will they choose to ?

The Times have just released a new poll for the Makerfield by-election by Survation. Robert Kenyon is the only candidate who can stop Andy Burnham. This is a two horse race - nobody else comes close.

@AnnaIversen5 Yes, absolutely.

@CryptoPezza That's right. Only once we understand what the digital asset's legal attributes are, can we fully understand how it functions. Once we understand this, we can apply regulatory classification. Anything less would result in regulatory labels being arbitrarily assigned.

Delighted to share my latest article, published in the May edition of the Journal of International Banking and Financial Law (JIBFL). The piece explores a question that sits beneath much of the current debate surrounding digital assets: when does a digital asset constitute property, and when is it merely a claim? I argue that regulatory clarity cannot be achieved through classification alone. The legal structure of the rights themselves—including control, transfer mechanics, custody and insolvency treatment—must come first. Grateful to the editorial team at JIBFL for the opportunity to contribute to this important discussion. jibfl.co.uk/articles/digit… (The link offers non-subscribers free access to the article by entering name and email)

@AnnaIversen5 Yes, I think we agree. It’s only important before classification. This absolutely does need to be determined. After it is in place it becomes the norm. Legal is the foundations the building is something else.

@CryptoPezza What I argue in the article above is that the underlying legal structure of the digital asset is what is important. Only once this has been determined does regulatory classification become meaningful.

@HAFPINTMUSIC For example the absence of the credit cards were already agreed too. Nothing the new lawyers could do about that. They were already bound by the damage CAH had caused. This was not Mellors fault.

@HAFPINTMUSIC I agree, however your point on Mellor is off. Law has rules. The judge can only use evidence presented. It is the lawyers job to present both sides fairly. This is where the case went wrong. The infiltration by CAH, change of counsel last minute and the agreed rules ( by CAH ).

51k people who saw this video of csw v copa in court and basically watching craig wright simply admitted the truth on how myob files work and copa did not want to run the test and prove csw right once again therefore beat around the bushes in a whole day of court. Copa was able to waste the courts time without any consequences and outcome to silence Craig wright aka Satoshi nakamoto. Leaves the question how much more power and pull the copa fraudster goon club has and how many other strings they were allowed to pull -Besides wasting the courts time - having the judge rule in favor - silencing csw aka Satoshi until 2026 -not reviewing the files and evidence submitted by csw -not running the tests that could’ve been done in a few minutes but instead waste the whole day calling Satoshi a liar lol Copa fraudsters money and power runs deep But the truth still shines through out the fraud and clearly shown here in this court case Bitcoin is bsv Let’s Craig wright is Satoshi Nakamoto And the myob files were determined to be as Craig wright stated when you run the live update Also they didn’t even review the credit card used to purchase the online domain by Satoshi and they didn’t even request the bank payments for the Bitcoin white paper from chase bank And the courts didn’t even shine any light on any of Craig wrights documents and files submitted to court using a pgp email directly to the courts and judge. This says alot about what happened here in this court room. Most interesting part is to question why did judge mellor only review the documents provided by madden (copas attorney) and these documents were the only thing reviewed in the entire case. Not even one single document submitted by Craig wright was reviewed or brought up in the court case. Duhhhh They bought this case out before it even started Using the lawyer that was not originally signed to this case. And guess what the lawyer used by cops was the same lawyer from the next door building of the court lol 😂 last minute switch on lawyers. Hahahaha So when you know the facts there is no denying Craig wright is Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin is bsv Let’s Get this video to everyone on earth And let’s have people verify my information and pull all the records And then actually review csw documents and statements in this case to verify if he was saying the truth Here we go Bitcoin is bsv Csw is sn

@n_riddell @AEHALL1983 @IsabelOakeshott If he had taken 4 million, I would have understood, But clothes ?. He obviously has zero understanding of risk / reward …

@AEHALL1983 @IsabelOakeshott Consistency is a virtue, @IsabelOakeshott

Farage accepts MASSIVE donation. Parliamentary rules are crystal clear that he is required to declare all donations from 12 months before election. Farage keeps changing his story about it. But don't worry because Reform activist @IsabelOakeshott says it's "nobody's business" 🤣

@FredTitmus @ArchRose90 @GetItQuietly Labour ran several independents with a view to split the vote. The genuine independent lost by about 200 votes. The extras got much higher than that. It cost him his seat. One of the extras never even knew she was on the ballot.

@ArchRose90 @GetItQuietly What is a 'fake' candidate?

4 men and 1 woman were arrested this morning in the Ashton-under-Lyne area on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud. Tameside Labour had fielded “fake” Independent candidates to split the opposition vote and help Labour’s Atta Ul-Rasool win. Imagine the corruption in other areas.

@parodystarmer @ArchRose90 That’s a good point, I doubt the fake candidates were declared as election expenses

@ArchRose90 as a former dpp, i've seen my fair share of complex investigations but this one in tameside takes the cake - seems like labour's attempts to split the vote have finally caught up with them, £4,200 in undeclared campaign funds doesn't help either

@ArchRose90 If the investigation shows it came from higher up. Business as usual filtered down by Raynor and her prodigies. This will become a much bigger story.

@ZiaYusufUK I predict another feigned suspension

First in Worcestershire, now in Bradford, the Tories have jumped into bed with the Greens to block Reform from power. Both are open-borders, sky-high taxing wokesters. At least Zack is honest about it. The Tory Party must be destroyed.

@BullRushClub Worth adding.. This was a private, small-group meeting. ( not an open forum ). The SEC’s public Crypto Task Force meeting log records it as a scheduled engagement requested by the BSV Association.

BSV Association Just Had High-Level Meetings with the U.S. SEC on the CLARITY Act — This Is Massive⚡ On May 11, 2026, a senior delegation from the BSV Association held high-level meetings in Washington with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The delegation included top-tier experts: - Connor Murray (CEO, BSV Association) - Alexander Mann (Head of Industry) - Jeffrey Golden KC – legendary lawyer and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement - Howard Schweitzer (Cozen O’Connor) – former Acting President of the U.S. Export-Import Bank The central topic? The CLARITY Act** — landmark legislation currently moving through the U.S. Senate that aims to clearly distinguish digital commodities from securities and create a proper regulatory framework for stablecoins and digital assets. This is not a random meeting. This is strategic, professional engagement at the exact moment when U.S. regulators are shaping the future of the entire industry. Why is this extremely bullish for Real Bitcoin (SV)? Because BSV was designed from day one as a digital commodity** — decentralized, utility-first, with massive on-chain capacity and true peer-to-peer electronic cash. It aligns perfectly with the spirit and likely requirements of the CLARITY Act. While other projects struggle with securities classification issues, Real Bitcoin (SV) is positioned as one of the cleanest and strongest candidates for clear commodity status. This meeting, combined with BSV’s rapid technical progress (Teranode at 1.1M+ TPS, working stablecoins, BSVM, enterprise solutions), suggests that institutional and regulatory acceptance could arrive faster than most expect. Real Bitcoin (SV) is not waiting for permission. It is building the infrastructure — and simultaneously preparing the regulatory groundwork. The gap between where BSV is today and where the market will eventually value it is closing. The pieces are falling into place at the highest levels. The awakening is accelerating.** The storm is coming.💥 Sources: • D2 Legal Technology (D2LT) Official LinkedIn Post – May 2026 • BSV Association delegation meeting with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – Washington D.C., May 11, 2026 • CLARITY Act – ongoing legislative developments in the U.S. Senate (May 2026) • Jeffrey Golden KC, Senior Adviser at D2 Legal Technology and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement #RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #CLARITYAct #SEC #RegulatoryClarity #InstitutionalAdoption #DigitalAssets #SatoshiVision #Commodity

@SuellaBraverman This is a political declaration, not a treaty change or amendment to the ECHR. It will make zero difference to the Courts.

Either you’re an idiot if you think these ‘critical reforms’ will make the slightest bit of difference to the small boats crisis. Or you’re bluffing. Blair and Cameron both tried ‘reform from within’. Neither of them succeeded. We’ve heard it all before. Leave the ECHR.

@reformparty_uk @AndyBurnhamGM Got one for after the election

We fixed your slogan, @AndyBurnhamGM.