DebTraina
47 posts


Vote: Who is the Houston/SE Texas High School Football Player of the Week ow.ly/zp8g106lWJ8
English

@ChrisVanHollen Your obsession with illegals rather than the innocent victims that have been harmed, raped, and even murdered is DISGUSTING! Your constituents should elect someone that actually cares about them..
English

@RepJimmyGomez Are you stupid? When you marry, you have your name changed with Social Security…and show your marriage license with your birth certificate …
English

Republicans who vote FOR the SAVE Act should be asked why they are opposed to married women voting.
House Republicans@HouseGOP
Democrats who vote AGAINST the SAVE Act should be asked why they are opposed to securing our elections from illegal aliens.
English

Was Stefanik’s failed bid for UN Ambassador worth selling out upstate NY’s healthcare?
No.
Is she worth re-electing after her “farewell” tour?
Also no.
NY-21, you deserve so much better than someone who will gut your Medicaid & Medicare for their own career ambitions.
Jake Sherman@JakeSherman
W.H. is now officially pulling Stefanik's nomination.
English

@realJennaEllis Really, Jenna?!? I thought you were better than this….disappointing…
English

@Prolotario1 It’s sickening…The behavior from the left is deplorable. Did you see that the guy from CA, Garcia, went on CNN and MSNBC and basically threatened Musk with physical harm? He should be arrested.
English

Why You Shouldn't Be Surprised: Maintaining Territory
Mike Benz, executive director of the Foundation for Internet Freedom, detailed USAID’s role in global media censorship. According to Benz, the agency instructs media outlets worldwide to enforce “strategic silence” policies to control narratives on social media. You thought it was the WEF? In part yes. Why? Who gave 70 million to WEF? USAID.
Additionally, USAID operates a global internet surveillance program that brings together hundreds of NGOs to pressure foreign governments into passing laws enabling online speech control.
Benz exposed that USAID establishes political control structures over societies, functioning similarly to the CIA. He said that USAID funded heroin production in Afghanistan, while its partner, the U.S. Institute of Peace, worked to ensure that the Taliban maintained 95% of the world’s heroin supply all while receiving $56 million annually from U.S. taxpayers.
USAID has been instrumental in financing the global narcotics trade. The agency’s deep involvement in Afghanistan’s heroin industry is well-documented. Do you now see what DOGE is up against?
USAID funded terrorist regimes that killed thousands of US soldiers USAID sent $9.3B to Islamic terror states that killed 3,000 American sol-diers. Do you all see how huge this is? We now know USAID gave tax money to WEF, Clintons, DEI, BBC, Terrorist, etc. We all found out your favorite conservative were getting paid by USAID.
DOGE will end next year. By that time we should have removed most of the Deep State funding.

English

@RepAlGreen @cspanwj Keep going with your idiotic tantrums….YOU ARE AN EMBARRASSMENT TO TEXAS!!!🤬
English

MEDIA ADVISORY: Congressman Al Green on @cspanwj Discusses Impeachment Efforts Concerning President Trump's Proposed Takeover of Gaza. Watch Rep. Green's C-SPAN interview by clicking here: c-span.org/program/washin…

English

@GerryConnolly How’s that working out for you?!? Nothing unlawful….do your homework! How much did YOU “earn” from USAID?!? Is that why you and your Dem friends freaking out?!?
English

@RepJasmine STOP EMBARRASSING TEXAS! Maybe you should LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS!🤬
English

@RodDMartin Wow! I keep wondering when Bondi will be sworn in. It’s really funny to see Dem responses as they see how idiotic the last administration actions were….especially when Trump points out every single thing they did!!!
English

@lisamurkowski No surprise….just wondering how you justify voting consistently with the Democrats? Your Alaskan constituents must be so disappointed and regret putting their trust in you. You willingly approved Austin, Garland and Levine….but feel compelled to judge and vote NO to Pete.
English

Since Mr. Hegseth’s nomination last November, I have met with him and carefully reviewed his writings, various reports, and other pertinent materials. I closely followed his hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee and gathered substantial feedback from organizations, veterans, and Alaskans. After thorough evaluation, I must conclude that I cannot in good conscience support his nomination for Secretary of Defense. I did not make this decision lightly; I take my constitutional responsibility to provide advice and consent with the utmost seriousness.
I commend Pete Hegseth’s service to our nation, including leading troops in combat and advocating for our veterans. However, these accomplishments do not alleviate my significant concerns regarding his nomination. Managing the Department of Defense requires vast experience and expertise as the department is one of the most complex and powerful organizations in the world, and Mr. Hegseth’s prior roles in his career do not demonstrate to me that he is prepared for such immense responsibility. His leadership of two veteran organizations was marked with accusations of financial mismanagement and problems with the workplace culture he fostered.
Although he has recently revised his statements on women in combat since being nominated, I remain concerned about the message that confirming Mr. Hegseth sends to women currently serving and those aspiring to join. Women have served our nation with distinction, overcoming immense obstacles to excel in combat and leadership roles, and they deserve to know that their leader honors and values their commitment to our nation.
While the allegations of sexual assault and excessive drinking do nothing to quiet my concerns, the past behaviors Mr. Hegseth has admitted to, including infidelity on multiple occasions, demonstrate a lack of judgment that is unbecoming of someone who would lead our armed forces. These behaviors starkly contrast the values and discipline expected of servicemembers. Men and women in uniform are held accountable for such actions, and they deserve leaders who uphold these same standards.
Above all, I believe that character is the defining trait required of the Secretary of Defense, and must be prioritized without compromise. The leader of the Department of Defense must demonstrate and model the standards of behavior and character we expect of all servicemembers, and Mr. Hegseth’s nomination to the role poses significant concerns that I cannot overlook. Given the global security environment we’re operating in, it is critical that we confirm a Secretary of Defense, however, I regret that I am unable to support Mr. Hegseth.
English

@bennyjohnson She had a rally there AND her husband accepted the Dem nomination there…UNBELIEVABLY CRAZY!
English

Follow along for a transcript of the first presidential debate between Vice Pres. Kamala Harris and former Pres. Donald Trump. #ABCDebate
trib.al/VhANSaB
English

@SenatorCollins You coming out to say you’re not supporting Trump….Really?
English

@notcapnamerica @MuellerSheWrote This is great! Just goes to show Biden's honesty, and substance over trump's rants and lies..... WINS! Joe Biden is the trustworthy one, and NOT a hater and traitor as is his *unworthy* opponent!
English

CBS News Post Debate Reactions from Black voters:
1. Debate Performance - Who Won:
- Biden: 39%
- Trump: 25%
2. Better Debate Performance - Told the Truth:
- Biden: 63%
- Neither: 19%
- Trump: 10%
- Both: 8%
3. U.S. Democracy and Rule of Law:
- Only if Joe Biden wins: 60%
- Only if Donald Trump wins: 12%
- It will be safe if either wins: 13%
- It will not be safe either way: 14%
4. Better Debate Performance - Addressed Important Issues:
- Biden: 42%
- Both: 21%
- Neither: 21%
- Trump: 15%
5. Mental and Cognitive Health:
- Only Joe Biden: 38%
- Neither: 31%
- Both: 15%
- Only Donald Trump: 16%
6. Biden Should Run for President:
- Biden should be running: 55%
- Biden should not be running: 45%
7. Trump Should Run for President:
- Trump should not be running: 74%
- Trump should be running: 26%
8. Better Debate Performance - Appeared Presidential:
- Biden: 42%
- Neither: 27%
- Both: 12%
- Trump: 19%
9. Financial Condition if Biden Wins:
- Stay about the same: 54%
- Financially better off: 28%
- Financially worse off: 18%
10. Better Debate Performance - Explained Plans and Policies:
- Biden: 38%
- Both: 23%
- Neither: 25%
- Trump: 14%
11. Better Debate Performance - Inspired Confidence:
- Neither: 42%
- Biden: 28%
- Trump: 17%
- Both: 13%
12. Better Debate Performance - Presented Ideas Clearly:
- Both: 21%
- Neither: 30%
- Biden: 27%
- Trump: 22%
13. Financial Condition if Trump Wins:
- Financially worse off: 56%
- Stay about the same: 21%
- Financially better off: 22%
English

@notcapnamerica Yeah, right! Nobody believes this…sorry CBS…your partiality is showing AGAIN! Pathetic!
English













