Dana-mite🎱25

5.7K posts

Dana-mite🎱25 banner
Dana-mite🎱25

Dana-mite🎱25

@Danamite25

God. Family. Politics. True Crime. Billiards. Insurance agent. Common Sense. Anti-War. America First. Independent.

Philadelphia, PA Katılım Haziran 2024
2.5K Takip Edilen934 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dana-mite🎱25
Dana-mite🎱25@Danamite25·
@akafacehots He should! JD will have the moderators cheering for him. He killed it here in PA yesterday. He would destroy Kamala & Walz both!
English
26
61
623
42.9K
Dana-mite🎱25 retweetledi
theleahfiles
theleahfiles@leahfiles·
Celebrate now because your short term gain mentality just cost you the midterms. We are staying home or voting Democrat . You all lost a majority of people who got you elected tonight. And for what? Money and 1/435 Congressmen? The party is trash.
theleahfiles tweet media
English
244
275
1.7K
21.8K
Graham Allen
Graham Allen@GrahamAllen·
LET THIS BE A LESSON TO EVERY RINO… Thomas Massie consistently BETRAYED THE PRESIDENT and became a distraction— WE THE PEOPLE STAND WITH TRUMP!!!
Graham Allen tweet media
English
296
133
807
7.9K
Dana-mite🎱25 retweetledi
Freshie
Freshie@JenniferLe47190·
ITS ALL ABOUT TPUSA WITH THIS PSYCHO. WHAT ABOUT HIS KIDS? WHAT ABOUT HIS PARENTS? CHARLIE WOULD CHOOSE THEM OVER TPUSA IN A SECOND. EVIL WOMAN.
English
78
80
821
13.8K
Dana-mite🎱25 retweetledi
Stew Peters
Stew Peters@realstewpeters·
MASSIE: “They tried to buy my vote for 14 years and it was never for sale. Now they're trying to buy a seat here in Kentucky. I'm talking about the Israeli lobby, AIPAC, Republican Jewish Coalition, Miriam Adelson, Paul Singer, and John Paulson.” Massie just dropped names.
English
414
7.1K
32.2K
387.7K
theleahfiles
theleahfiles@leahfiles·
I know the games played on the Hill, and I'm always skeptical of last minute accusations before campaigns. Did a follow the money, and turns out, the Massie accuser, is not who they're telling us she is. 1. She is running for school board in Florida and raised $82K for her race that's in August. - $65K is a self-loan, which is a red flag considering she is a "substance abuse counselor" and makes nothing a year. Getting a loan for that much would be hard to get on her own...Campaign financing should look into this. - $9K of her donations is stacked across 9 LLCs that share two addresses, one being her neighbor and the other his business partner, including a Bingo hall. - In Q1 2026 all of a sudden, Republican PAC money came flowing in. - Hired a comms director who was also comms director for "Americans for Prosperity" and the "Florida Republican Party"...interesting how a "substance abuse counselor" who's running for the SCHOOL BOARD gets those resources - This is her third school board district. Looks like she hopped around until she found one she could win maybe? 2. In Aug 2025 she opened a Florida LLC called ATSAT, the exact same unusual name as a dissolved 2006 political org LLC out of Roy, Utah owned by a guy who was a military relocation realtor out of the Hill AFB community, same place where her ex-husband appears to have been stationed. 3. She is a documented MMTLP shareholder and naked-shorting activist who has lobbied Congress for years. Her own MMTLP community is publicly saying she was a "valued member of our movement" who tried to recruit Massie. He didn't sign their letter. Did she get mad? Watch out for her rise in the political realm after this, including how they position her, her campaign contributions, and lifestyle. My guess is that she was promised a lot to do this....
theleahfiles tweet mediatheleahfiles tweet mediatheleahfiles tweet mediatheleahfiles tweet media
English
145
860
2.3K
67.1K
Dana-mite🎱25
Dana-mite🎱25@Danamite25·
@jacktronprime @leahfiles And what did she say exactly? She was so vague in the interview with Loomer. She dodged questions she was asked so awkwardly.
English
0
0
1
12
Jacktron
Jacktron@jacktronprime·
@leahfiles Correction: She WAS running for a school board seat and has now dropped out. Also this doesn’t disprove anything’s she’s said.
English
7
0
10
444
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
This is disappointing. JD Vance attacks Thomas Massie, claiming he always votes against “the party” and he did it at a Turning Point event of all places. 1. Charlie Kirk supported Thomas Massie and would have been opposed to Trump primarying him with Israel funding. 2. Massie votes against “the party” when the party is trying to pass BAD America Last legislation like funding foreign wars, protecting poisons like glyphosate and covid vaccines, violating our second amendment, hurting small farmers and small businesses and creators with patents, and empowering the surveillance state. 3. Thomas Massie is not the problem. “The Party” is the problem. And demanding loyalty to “the party” is the most repulsive cult behavior we’ve ever seen in American politics. x.com/21WIRE/status/…
English
2.9K
4.7K
29.3K
627.4K
Annefy
Annefy@Annefy1·
@CarriePrejean1 Erika is not taking on the same dangerous role. For one thing, Erika isn't doing campus tours, arguably the most dangerous job CK had.
English
6
0
98
805
Carrie Prejean Boller
Carrie Prejean Boller@CarriePrejean1·
Blake, You mean to tell me that Charlie believing he would be killed as CEO of turning point USA would then want the mother of his children and his widow to then take on that same “dangerous” role as CEO that got Charlie killed and not be home raising Charlie’s children, essentially leaving them orphaned and parentless? You really think Charlie was stupid don’t you? And you think we are all stupid. We don’t believe you. We don’t trust TPUSA. We all believe the video you played ushering in Erika as CEO is AI. Charlie wouldn’t want his widow stepping in to the girl boss CEO role especially if it was as dangerous as being murdered. Oh and weird number of likes Blake. 33K. You guys are shameless. Candace was Charlie’s only true friend.
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff

@RealCandaceO Nailed it.

English
373
598
4.3K
105.9K
PureStress
PureStress@PureStress7f·
@JohnMappin @RealCandaceO @charliespiering Assuming the video is real, another question arises. Who brought up the possibility of Charlie dying? Would whomever that person is lead to more speculation? Would it implicate someone or some group? I mean, it's a strange question for a 31 year old coming from a donor.
English
1
1
11
404
John Mappin
John Mappin@JohnMappin·
Dear Charlie, @charliespiering I hope you are well. I have spoken to a donor who was at the event in Aspen, and they have no recollection at all of what you have reported. I spoke to them again today in light of your article, and they reiterated this once more. They are quite certain. They also said that afterwards, following the main filmed Aspen meeting that you reported on, there was a smaller private meeting with Charlie where this subject was raised again, and that there was no mention of the version that you present. I knew Charlie Kirk well, and I know Candace well. This point of truth matters. It will affect Turning Point going forward and conservative politics more broadly. It can affect the presidency and future presidencies. The logical and rational thing to do is simply to release the raw video footage publicly, with any donors who do not wish to be seen blacked out and, if truly necessary, their voices altered if they are keen to retain privacy. You have stated that the Turning Point cameras were rolling, as have others. No one would be more pleased to see that what you are saying is true than Candace, ourselves, and all those who love Charlie and his family. It would give thousands of people great relief. No one wanted, or wants, to believe that untruths or half truths could or would be told on such a subject, or that the deceptions that have been suggested may have occurred. Certainly not us. Several people who have been donors, including the individuals with whom I spoke this afternoon, whom we personally introduced to Charlie as TP donors, are now saying that because of this, and other inconsistencies in what has been said, they will no longer participate in political donations across the conservative spectrum. They are that frustrated by it. These are usually calm, reasoned people. This was reiterated again today when we spoke. Such are the consequences of mishandling communications with donors. They do not like it. Of course, I do not know what happened at the event, as I was not present. I am simply reporting what I was told previously and again today by this person, who was there with another donor. I am not implying that what you have written in your article is either true or false. I am not suggesting that anyone is being untruthful. But the idea that the article you wrote will somehow put all of this to bed is naïve beyond expectation. Whoever is making this dog’s dinner of Turning Point’s PR should be fired. Our personal purpose in all this is solely the preservation of Charlie’s legacy and to help, if we can — and I believe we can — to allow those whom Charlie truly loved to find a route through to sanity and peace via truth and transparency. My elderly mother (88) is a great fan of the Daily Mail. I cannot, in all honesty, profess the same, but I do try to help. I can also extrapolate the consequences to journalistic reputation were one to find oneself on the wrong side of an issue engaging such a vast number of truth seeking Americans, and even a few Brits and Europeans. We live in a new media world, after all. I have advised our good friends at TPUSA that honest and open communication works best with Candace, even when she is in full truth seeking mode. I would continue to suggest to all parties concerned that this is the best, and probably the only, workable approach. Frankly, I do not know how we place ourselves in a position where we can be of assistance, but duty and noblesse oblige compel us to try to help resolve this if we can. It is now 43 days since Candace’s first public request for the film to be made available. What on earth does anyone have to lose by airing it? Thank you for taking an interest in the subject, though. The truth is important. And you have helped us all see more. I hope this helps you. Kind regards, John @RealCandaceO @Nero
Charlie Spiering@charliespiering

You’re right, Candace. The video is crucial, which is why I asked @TPUSA to see it. I approached them in good faith, and they agreed. It’s real, and multiple people who were in Aspen that day remember the moment. The video does matter, but it’s not the only reason the board voted to appoint Erika. I spoke to several Turning Point donors and close friends of Charlie who revealed that after Butler, there was a very real fear about his safety and the future of his organization. Charlie reassured them: He would leave Turning Point to Erika and the board to carry on the mission if the worst happened.

English
256
546
3.7K
266.2K
Dana-mite🎱25 retweetledi
John Mappin
John Mappin@JohnMappin·
The Daily Mail has been a ridiculous newspaper since its foundation as a propaganda tool for some of the darkest forces in our world. It has been the number one go to, deep state controlled, or willing sidekick publication for whitewashing evil in propaganda operations for decades. One would have thought that the new and “improved” public relations handlers for Turning Point would know this, but no. Not satisfied with the existing public relations nightmare, they are managing to turn the self inflicted foot bullet of PR disasters into a gangrenous, festering sore of public relations idiocy. If you were observing from afar, you would imagine that they are attempting to brand TPUSA as permanently toxic, so that anything or anyone that comes into its proximity is immediately politically poisoned. 🤢 It is hard to imagine what they will conceive of next to wreck what Charlie founded, but rest assured, they will think of something. If this new and improved public relations team thinks that this will handle the matter, think again. It smacks of inauthentic yellow journalism, and people just do not buy this anymore. But there is something else that is becoming obvious. It is most revealing. Those who covertly managed Charlie, and who secretly, deep down, despised him in his absence, cannot simply respect his legacy and continue his honest thought constructs and patterns. They have to publicly destroy them. So we are witnessing not only the public execution of his body in front of the world, but also the public humiliation of him through the perversion of his philosophical legacy. It is SO incompetent that it can only be deliberate. And what is really sick is that they are controlling and managing those whom he loved to do that job. When you really think about it, it is totally evil and sick. And it shows just how much those who pretended to support Charlie, and some of those who placed people around him, actually hated and despised him and all he stood for. They always wanted to do this, and now they are. If we witness this and say nothing, more fool us. Spot on, Candace. 43 today, I believe. @RealCandaceO @Nero
English
12
40
314
5K
Byl Holte
Byl Holte@SirBylHolte·
The 15 Greatest Movie Catchphrases: 1. Get away from her you bitch! 2. I’m your huckleberry. 3. It puts the lotion on its skin. 4. You talkin’ to me? 5. Here’s looking at you, kid. 6. We’re gonna need a bigger boat. 7. Say hello to my little friend! 8. You can’t handle the truth! 9. Houston, we have a problem. 10. May the Force be with you. 11. Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker! 12. I love the smell of napalm in the morning. 13. Hasta la vista, baby. 14. I see dead people. 15. KHAAAAAN! What did I leave out?
Byl Holte tweet media
English
6.2K
394
3.6K
279.7K
Dana-mite🎱25
Dana-mite🎱25@Danamite25·
@LauraLoomer @laurenboebert @RepThomasMassie You and your followers are deranged. So no one can have a different opinion than Trump without being called a backstabber? And I voted for him 3 times. Mark my words, republicans will lose the midterms bigly and it will all be thanks to Trump and his MIGA base.
English
0
0
1
46
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
NEW: Congresswoman Lauren Boebert @laurenboebert will be backstabbing President Trump tonight while she is campaigning with Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie in Kentucky. Making Boebert’s betrayal even more disgusting is the fact that on May 5th, Boebert was featured in the @nytimes in a spread about how she is taking on male members of Congress who are sexually inappropriate with young female staffers in Congress. She even posted the following to her X account in March: “To all the members of Congress that voted today to continue to conceal Congress’s sexual harassment slush fund, go home and tell your daughters what you’ve done.” In May, Boebert appeared in the New York Times, where she advertised being a resource for staffers on the Hill who are being sexually assaulted or harassed by their powerful bosses . Source: nytimes.com/2026/05/02/us/… Despite her big talk, Boebert is still choosing to appear in Kentucky with Massie, an individual who has been accused by Cynthia West @Cyntaxed007 of dating her, helping her obtain a congressional job, and then being the force behind her firing by @RepSpartz when Cynthia no longer wanted to date or have sex with Massie. Massie has been accused of the exact same behavior Boebert claims to be fighting against. Yet, she won’t stand with Massie’s accuser, Cynthia West… Isn’t that strange? Seems to me like Lauren Boebert is full of shit. But, I think we have all known that for a long time. RECEIPTS 👇🏻
Laura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet media
Loomer Unleashed@LoomerUnleashed

President Trump endorsed Lauren Boebert @RepBoebert for reelection in July of 2025. Today Boebert is campaigning with Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie. Trump gave Boebert an endorsement and major fundraising support. Boebert repays Trump by campaigning with someone Trump wants voted out. Talk about disgusting disloyalty.

English
684
3.3K
8.1K
240.8K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
As if the Ben Shapiro crash out over the New York Magazine article couldn’t get more hilarious. Someone fed Ben Shapiro bad intel and he ran to his show to giddily report on it. 😂 To the express contrary, we actually just increased our production staff by 2. Also Tucker is big in Pakistan? The cope here is beyond exceptional.
English
523
1.7K
26.6K
331.7K
It’sjustme
It’sjustme@ItsjustmeandJC·
🚨CANDACE OWENS STAFF QUITTING🚨 Several Candace Owens staff have recently quit including a TOP PRODUCER and her MANAGER! 😲 Ben just spilled the tea. “There is no national media coverage if a top Candace Owens producer and her manager quit…” “ these are all things that actually happened by the way..”
English
975
650
5.7K
584.7K
Dana-mite🎱25
Dana-mite🎱25@Danamite25·
@NoFilterSkin If I hadn't ruined my eyebrows in the 90s over tweezing I could see myself doing it. Maybe I should look into permanent eyebrows.
English
0
0
0
2
No filter Skin
No filter Skin@NoFilterSkin·
Are there women here who leave the house with zero makeup on? Like not even a little bit. I want to hear from you—what’s that like?
English
2K
101
3.7K
490.4K
Dana-mite🎱25 retweetledi
MatrixMysteries
MatrixMysteries@MatrixMysteries·
“We have to have sympathy. We need to at least let them engage in some stock trading so they can continue to take care of their family.” Americans are tired of watching corruption dressed up as virtue.
English
3K
5K
20.5K
1.9M
Woke Societies
Woke Societies@wokesocieties·
@Villgecrazylady lmao go fuck yourself, nobody believes this bullshit. Dear God, the grift is over already.
English
35
0
104
13.3K
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
The reason Candace had to retype the email is because of a security feature embedded in the email called FontCode. FontCode works by weaving tiny, imperceptible perturbations into the font of a text. These perturbations serve as a kind of fingerprint on the email in the chance that it leaks, it’s easy to trace back to the source. This has nothing to do with simple redactions of email addresses.
Mel tweet media
English
111
233
2K
616.2K
Dana-mite🎱25
Dana-mite🎱25@Danamite25·
@MsJaneDoeUKnow She has already lied too much. One has to take anything "Honest Erika" claims now with a grain of salt.
English
0
0
1
15
JaneDoeUKnow
JaneDoeUKnow@MsJaneDoeUKnow·
“Erika Kirk was not at or near Fort Huachuca on September 8, 2025 or September 9, 2025. Neither Mrs. Kirk nor Andrew Kolvet was in Utah on September 10, 2025 until after the assassination took place.” Erika WAS NOT at Fort Hauchuca 9/8, 9/9 or 9/10! Source: Collin Campbell cease and desist letter from Erika’s attorney.
JaneDoeUKnow tweet media
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman

Nobody has ever (to my knowledge) alleged she was at Ft Huachuca on the 9th, so good job nailing that down. The question was whether she was there the evening of the 8th.

English
72
30
255
42.3K