
Jeremy
3.1K posts

Jeremy
@Dangerous_Jezza
50+ Guitarist playing for 35+ years, The best way to describe my playing style would be I like all kinds of music and I play from the heart not the head.



Low cost - long term alternative climate action. ONE-PAGE PITCH 200-Year Climate Self-Regulation Test A Conservative, Low-Cost Experiment to Test Nature’s Thermostat The Theory Current warming of ~1.1 °C since pre-industrial times is largely a natural rebound from the Little Ice Age, amplified modestly by human CO₂. CO₂ is not a pollutant — it is plant food. When atmospheric CO₂ rises, global vegetation responds with a 20–50 year lag: plants grow faster, biomass expands, and natural carbon sinks increase. This self-regulating mechanism, working together with natural cycles, should eventually stabilise or reduce warming even if emissions remain steady. The mainstream narrative overstates the crisis while understating nature’s built-in thermostat. The Test A 200-year, falsifiable experiment: Years 1–100 (2025–2125): Modest, practical action to boost sinks and trim emissions slightly. Years 101–200 (2125–2225): Complete stasis — no new policies, emissions held steady (coal remains viable). Key Actions (conservative & realistic) 250 million hectares of high-productivity reforestation + natural regeneration + full deforestation halt by 2035. Nuclear ramps to 3,000 GW by 2075 (retrofits on existing coal sites). Solar reaches 2,000 GW. Coal/gas taper slowly to ~5–6 GtC/yr total emissions (CCS on 40–50 % of fleet). 90 % of light-duty vehicles electric by 2055 (30-year natural rollout). Total cost: $9–11 trillion over 100 years (~0.6–0.8 % of global GDP annually). Monitoring Fully transparent, low-cost protocol using existing NASA/ESA satellites (OCO-2, Copernicus, MODIS) and ground networks (NOAA, FLUXNET, ARGO). Annual public “200-Year Test Dashboard” with raw data, reviewed by an independent panel of mainstream and skeptical scientists. Clear, pre-published success criteria. Projected Outcomes if Theory Holds CO₂ peaks ~465–485 ppm by 2125 then falls to 370–430 ppm by 2225. Warming caps at 1.4–1.9 °C (possibly declining further as natural cycles align). Advantages & Conservative Benefits Extremely low cost compared with mainstream net-zero plans. Keeps coal viable for decades and uses proven, reliable energy. Relies on market-driven EV adoption and natural greening rather than mandates. Fully falsifiable — if sinks do not respond with the expected lag, the theory is disproven. Tests nature’s self-regulation without economic disruption or overstatement. This is not another alarmist proposal. It is a conservative, practical experiment that respects natural cycles, leverages real greening data, and lets the planet show us what it can do. Appendix.1 x.com/Dangerous_Jezz… Appendix.2 (grok link so table is readable) x.com/i/grok/share/b…



This chart chart often pops up on accounts like these. It's a recreation of a sketch of a local England (not global) temperature reading, missing the last 70 years of warming. Chris Hadfield goes into more detail about it here: youtube.com/watch?v=CY4Yec…

































