De Nile
2.9K posts

De Nile
@De____Nile
Inquirer of the Catholic Christian faith 🇻🇦 Banana cake enjoyer 🍌🍞
Earth Katılım Ocak 2026
224 Takip Edilen138 Takipçiler

@BishopJaxi @bodymechanic37 Have you ever been to one?
English

Read your Bible and do exactly what it says, do not skip church (because the Bible tells you not to skip church). Find a good church (like non denominational churches of Christ).
Bishop@BishopJaxi
Protestantism has no mechanism to stop this, because private interpretation is the system. The logical end of Protestantism is DIY Christianity where isolated narcissists with a study Bible, accountable to no authority beyond their own opinions, appoint themselves as the final authority on Christianity.
English

@biohackingstyle @GeoffKlein3 It's horrible what reprobates in the Church are trying to do. Lord have mercy.
English

@De____Nile @GeoffKlein3 Apparently that nigga died of aids too idk if that’s true tho.
@grok is that true my goat?
English

@GeoffKlein3 Pretty sure it was this one so called "Catholic" scholar pushing for the homosexual aspect of it.

English

@HHS3239 The Church has always honored them as holy martyrs. The attempt to sexualize them says far more about the people doing it than about the saints.
English

@PopeDefendersX Discussing any of the Apostolic Churches, heck, discussing Christianity itself with Ryan is wild and so so dumb. Dr. Wood should know better.
English


@lefebvrists Yes, thank you, I did it a few minutes after I posted this actually.
English

@SquareCircle01 I did actually. A few minutes after posting this, I got a post showing how to block access.
English

@De____Nile Those sites can be scammy and can make you follow crypto accounts, I'd remove access if I were you
English

@BibleInContext1 Patrick you don't even teach the gospel. Literally all you do is go on an endless tirade of slop arguments ONLY against Catholicism, not even against the EO, OO, ACOE or even magisterial Protestants, all of whom would largely disagree with your own so-called "biblical gospel".
English


ChatGPT pro summary of the encyclical:
According to the encyclical itself, Pope Leo XIV’s Magnifica Humanitas is fundamentally a theological and anthropological reflection on the future of humanity in the age of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, transhumanism, and rapid technological change. The central question running through the document is:
“Quo vadis, humanitas?” — “Where are you going, humanity?”
The encyclical argues that modern technological development is not merely technical or economic, but deeply spiritual and anthropological. Leo XIV repeatedly insists that the real issue is not simply what humanity can do technologically, but what humanity is and what humanity is for.
The document is strongly rooted in the tradition of the Second Vatican Council, especially Gaudium et Spes, and presents itself as a continuation of Catholic social teaching in response to a “new industrial revolution” centered on AI.
Some of the main themes of the encyclical are:
1. Human dignity cannot be reduced to technology
Leo XIV warns against visions of humanity that treat persons as programmable, improvable, or replaceable systems. He critiques both transhumanism and posthumanism for trying to overcome human limits through technological self-creation.
The encyclical rejects the idea that humanity can “create itself” apart from God or human nature. It argues that the human person is fundamentally a gift, not a self-manufactured project. Human identity is therefore both:
something received,
and something responsibly lived out.
2. AI and technological progress require moral direction
Leo XIV acknowledges the extraordinary power of modern science and technology, but says technological progress without moral development becomes dangerous.
The document repeatedly emphasizes that humanity now possesses powers capable of radically reshaping society and even human identity itself. The Pope warns that these developments expose humanity to “risks never before imagined.”
3. The crisis is anthropological and spiritual
The encyclical argues that modern society increasingly produces a “person without a vocation” — someone detached from meaning, transcendence, gratitude, and responsibility.
Against this, Leo XIV presents the Christian understanding of vocation:
life is not random,
identity is relational,
and fulfillment comes through communion with God and self-giving to others.
4. Christianity offers “true humanism”
The conclusion of the document presents Christianity not as anti-technology, but as the safeguard of authentic humanity. The Pope argues that Christ reveals the fullness of human nature and protects humanity from reduction into purely economic, technological, or biological categories.
The encyclical therefore proposes what it calls:
“integral human development,”
“situated anthropocentrism,”
and ultimately “the gift of divinisation as true humanisation.”
5. A call for interdisciplinary cooperation
Leo XIV calls for theologians, scientists, educators, politicians, artists, and cultural institutions to work together in shaping the future ethically. He argues that the challenges posed by AI and biotechnology cannot be solved by technical expertise alone.
Overall, the encyclical’s central thesis is that:
humanity must not lose its soul in the pursuit of technological power,
technological progress must remain subordinate to human dignity and moral truth, and the future of civilization depends on preserving a truly human understanding of the person.
The official Vatican presentation describes the encyclical specifically as being “on safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial intelligence.”
You can read the official Vatican publication here:
vatican.va/content/leo-xi…

English

guys begging in the replies
SHES INDIAN
flidina 🇻🇦@flid1na
coincidentally so did I only issue was that she was 25 or 26...
English

@RonaldM71579792 @Ron172892111531 @Carolyn26591696 @YeFutureSaint They are in Heaven actually, what are you even talking about?
English

@De____Nile @Ron172892111531 @Carolyn26591696 @YeFutureSaint They are not in heaven yet. Revelation shows the 3rd heaven age after the white throne judgment to those that resurrected. That's in our future and they are not there yet to hear your prayers. Jesus is the ONLY one that's been resurrected to date in our time.
English

2007: Baptist ✝️
2008: Baptist ✝️
2009: Baptist ✝️
2010: Baptist ✝️
2011: Baptist ✝️
2012: Baptist ✝️
2013: Baptist ✝️
2014: Baptist ✝️
2015: Baptist ✝️
2016: Baptist ✝️
2017: Baptist ✝️
2018: Baptist ✝️
2019: Baptist ✝️
2020: Baptist ✝️
2021: Baptist ✝️
2022: Baptist ✝️
2023: Baptist ✝️
2024: Baptist ✝️
2025: Baptist ✝️
2026: Baptist ✝️
So we are no longer to be children, tossed back and forth by waves and carried about by every wind of teaching by the trickery of people who craftily carry out their deceitful schemes.
Ephesians 4:14
The Other Other Paul 🇺🇸✝️@PaulKM32
2015: Baptist ✝️ 2016: Baptist ✝️ 2017: Baptist ✝️ 2018: Baptist ✝️ 2019: Baptist ✝️ 2020: Baptist ✝️ 2021: Baptist ✝️ 2022: Baptist ✝️ 2023: Baptist ✝️ 2024: Baptist ✝️ 2025: Episcopalian 🇺🇸 2026: Episcopalian 🇺🇸
HT

@CatholicMic @MJKelleyII Is Mary Mediatrix in a subordinate, secondary sense?
Română

Saying Jesus is God is to deny that he is the Son of God.
END OF DISCUSSION!!!
Michael Yaw Antwi@mikeautoplug
BREAKING: JESUS CHRIST IS GOD. END OF DISCUSSION!!!
English










