Dee

@steve_burkett @UniverseTwenty Just did 30 minutes ago. Already going back down.🤣😂🤣

@UniverseTwenty So when does it hit 1.50? It’s flirting with 1.40 now 🚀

#XRP is following its fractal the breakout could happen next week and before the end of may 40$ per coin is realistic 🚨💥🚀

@unforget_legacy @thehealthb0t Why don’t you show proof. 😂🤣😂

@thehealthb0t Calling everything “fake” without evidence is anti-science. Masks, vaccines, climate science: backed by thousands of peer-reviewed studies. The pandemic killed millions — real data. Denying facts makes you a denialist, not a truth-teller. Show proof or stop

The pandemic was fake. The tests were fake. The mask science was fake. The social distancing was fake. The vaccine science was fake. The news was fake. The CDC & FDA were fake. Climate science is fake. It's all fake.

@Vet_X0 Swift is DONE. Simple.

SWIFT is not using XRP. Nor do we need SWIFT to use XRP. Banks and institutions will leapfrog and bypass legacy systems like SWIFT that just woke up to the idea of blockchain enabled finance.

@EvanTeezz @KenzoXRP @Bitforcoinz Exactly, it’ll all come down to price and speed at the end and that means they’ll have to match or better the xrp to stay relevant.

@Dee__Zed @KenzoXRP @Bitforcoinz This is my point.. XRP doesn’t have the use for swift as it’s creating its own cross border payment system

LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!💥 IT'S OFFICIAL SWIFT🤝#RIPPLE #XRP WILL BRIDGE ALL THE MONEY🙌

@EvanTeezz @KenzoXRP @Bitforcoinz Soon enough, you won’t need swift.

@KenzoXRP @Bitforcoinz Swift literally announced they won’t be using XRP..

@pettersson_usa @swiftcommunity @bgarlinghouse A "last-ditch attempt"😂🤣😂

Hey @bgarlinghouse what happened? You guys are on your own. $SWIFT rejected you, and now they’re gonna launch their system hy June 2026. Where’s the Trump family? When you fall back to 6th rank I sell. What makes me sick about #RIPPLE, the #XRP never moved. Someone is making money at RIPPLE, but it’s not your loyal holders.

Wells Fargo is working with us as part of a global group of banks to design our blockchain‑based ledger for cross‑border payments. Together, we are shaping the rails of the future to support interoperability across all forms of value – today and tomorrow. 👉 Learn more: swift.com/news-events/ne…

@JohnEDeaton1 @bgarlinghouse @MariaBartiromo They’ll fight it , but the cat is out of the bag.😂🤣😂

One thing @bgarlinghouse said to @MariaBartiromo that I completely agree with - is that American companies and our financial markets cannot afford to experience Gensler 2.0. And the only way to guarantee that we don’t - is by passing legislation. Look, no one despises the banks more than I do. I remember being a kid and my mom couldn’t maintain a bank account because she couldn’t keep the minimum amount deposited because we needed the money for food. The banks would hit her with predatory fees. She was forced to go to the check cashing stores you always see in the hood - who charged her 10-15%. As far as I’m concerned, the banks are predators who’ve captured career-politicians to do their bidding for them. Look how the those career-politicians protected the banks over yield related to stablecoins in the Clarity Act. But as much progress, guidance, and clarity, @PaulSAtkiinsSEC and @MichaelSelig have provided to the markets, without legislation passed into law - all that guidnace and clarity can be taken away - as if it never happened - when a new administration takes over. Consider the amount of money wasted on legal fees paid by @Ripple, @coinbase, @krakenfx, @Grayscale, @Gemini and many others, caused by Gensler’s Regulation By Enforcement policy. Imagine the hundreds of millions that could’ve went to developers, users and innovation. Imagine the amount of innovation chased offshore. Moreover, when the Democrats take back control of the Senate, guess who becomes Chair of the Senate Banking Committee which oversees the @SECGov: @ewarren! The mere thought of @ewarren installing another Gary Gensler as Chairman of the SEC should force a deal.

@AmericaNAxF @thecryptobasic @JoelKatz Exactly, 100% is different , 50% means there is just as much chance that it doesn’t.🤣😂🤣

agree but disagree at the same time. @JoelKatz would know, however I refer to his statement saying he never thought XRP would reach .50, yet alone $1.00. I believe if people knew for 100% BTC was going to $500k or XRP to $100 or $1000, they would go all in. Who wouldn't on a "guaranteed" investment, BUT, we also know the wheels of real change turn extremely slowly. AND, we also know institutional change can only really be applied after regulatory law. No institution is going to play with millions on a maybe. Once the Clarity Act is passed, that worry goes away, and the banks and institutions are clear to play in the field. That's when real adoption happens, and that's when we start to see the actual value of these tokens IMO.

#Ripple CTO Emeritus Speaks on the Chances of $XRP Reaching $100. The XRP community has repeatedly discussed the prospect of XRP reaching the $100 mark, which remains ambitious, given current market realities. With XRP currently trading for $1.45, the crypto asset would need to rise 6,796% to reach the $100 price. Schwartz implied that if investors reasonably expected XRP to hit $100, large-scale buying from them would have already pushed prices much higher. According to him, if large whales have not bought an asset to push its price higher despite bullish predictions, it’s because they do not believe those predictions.

@ChainLinkGod 🤣😂🤣

By owning $XRP, you are funding a company that has openly stated it will prioritize its equity shareholders over you Ripple wrote the playbook on this. Let me walk you through how it works👇 When a company sells both tokens and equity to investors, it creates two competing stakeholder groups whose economic interests may not, and often do not, align For example, when there’s excess revenue or profits, where does that value ultimately go: to equity holders via buybacks/dividends, to token holders via buybacks/staking rewards, or some split between the two? There is a fixed pot of revenue to distribute, and equity investors often have superior, clearer economic rights to that revenue that can be legally enforced, while token investors often do not Look at Circle’s recent acquisition of Interop Labs (Axelar team), Coinbase’s acquisition of Tensor, PumpFun’s acquisition of Padre, Ripple vs XRP. etc These are all situations in which equity holders benefited at the expense of, or isolation from, token holders In Ripple’s case, they have spent the past decade+ systematically selling XRP to retail while spinning a story of inevitable institutional adoption In reality, Ripple uses the proceeds of XRP sales to acquire real companies and fund Ripple Labs stock buybacks, to the sole benefit of Ripple Labs shareholders No value is created for the XRP token, even Ripple admitted under oath in court filings that the bridge currency use case of XRP is demand neutral and does not impact price Ripple Labs socializes its costs to XRP holders to fund product launches and corporate acquisitions, then privatizes the value for its own shareholders XRPL is an obsolete ghost chain that's not even in the top 40 chains by usage. It has less than 1% marketshare in RWAs and less than 0.01% in stablecoins. There is no metric the chain leads in Ripple themselves issued 90% of RLUSD on Ethereum and have now expanded it to even more chains outside of XRPL including BNY Mellon's private EVM chain and L2s The list goes on By owning XRP, you do not have complete exposure to the success of the ecosystem Ripple is building, because you do not own the equity, you own some undefined percentage of the success This issue doesn’t exist for Chainlink, because there are no equity investors. There is only the $LINK token to accrue value from the network’s growth. Even CLL employees receive long-term incentives rewards in LINK, not equity Unfortunately, depending on how you want to put it, there is no mass social media misinformation campaign driving retail towards Chainlink like we see with XRP However, Chainlink‘s clear dominance in DeFi (70%+ marketshare w/ $60B in DeFi TVL secured) and its tangible verifiable institutional adoption by the largest institutions in the world (Swift, DTCC, Euroclear, SBI, UBS, JP Morgan, Fidelity, ANZ, etc) will inevitably become too impossible to ignore While the XRP army comes up with bizarre conspiracy theories about why institutions don’t talk about XRP, enterprises adopting Chainlink have no issue publicly talking about their use of Chainlink And before you say Chainlink and Ripple/XRP are not competitors bc they do different things, I would agree from tech perspective, Chainlink actually offers useful products for banks and isn’t a retail grift Chainlink is the only unified platform that provides the critical data, interoperability, compliance, privacy, and orchestration standards that financial institutions need for advanced tokenization use cases None of these institutional use cases Chainlink powers have ever required a “bridge currency”, that is a fantasy narrative dreamt up by retail This has been proven time and time again The reality is that $LINK is the best index bet on the institutional adoption of blockchain, while $XRP is a bank themed memecoin that Ripple sells to retail to fund corporate acquisitions and stock buybacks Documented.📝

@jravelo01 @Traveler2236 Whatever you do , don’t…..😂🤣😂

@Traveler2236 We know, but the real question is, “WHEN” lol. Some of us are running on fumes, lost my job 4 months ago, and I can’t land a job even if it kills me, trying to survive on Uber but it doesn’t cover all of my bills, lol. “I’m trying hard brother” pray for me, 🙏🙏🙏.

XRP will make millionaires. Just a reminder before the clarity act and adoption.

@Walton_Ocelot @Vet_X0 😂🤣😂

@Vet_X0 Strange, dishonest or both that you would tout this, when absolutely no one uses a bridge token because they're obsolete. Smart contracts, atomic DvP swaps and banks issuing their own stablecoins have rendered them so.

This is how XRP was used as a bridge asset in the last 24h. 477 auto-bridging events occurred. EUROP / RLUSD - 124 events (most active) RLUSD / BBRL ( Braza Bank Brazilian Real Stablecoin) - 67 events USDC / RLUSD - 46 events Interestingly, RLUSD appears in majority if auto-bridging event. Clearly the most actively traded currency against other currencies where XRP gets used as the bridge. > Total of ~15,000 XRP was used to provide liquidity for better exchange rates. > 92% of all trades are Token/XRP pairs > 8% of all trades are Token/Token pairs out of all Token/Token trades, 0.8% were auto-bridged. For the BBRL events, those amounts were small trades but still enough to trigger auto bridging. The XRPL DEX is so efficient that you can trade tiny amounts without friction. XRP loves tokenization - long tail of assets.

@Brown_Thunder76 @lewis_lukaliz If you’re second you’re too late.

@lewis_lukaliz Please show verifiable proof of live production settlement volume. A pilot, test, or partnership announcement isn’t the same as active institutional usage

So this Luke Belmar clip has been going around this morning. Luke says XRP made people money, but banks probably won’t use older rails and points to newer tech like Keeta. Ty’s been saying the same thing. Keeta is building what XRP sold everyone on years ago… real settlement rails institutions can actually use. You can literally see what they’re building in GitHub. Do your own research. Keeta is building the network of networks. @lukebelmar @KeetaNetwork $KTA

@CryptoPatel We have accumulated in that zone few years ago.😂🤣😂

I Know $XRP Army is Hoping for $10 TARGET… But Will #XRP hit $10 in Next Altseason, or First Stop at $1? IMO Best Accumulation Zone Could be $0.70-$0.50 But Around $1 Will be Good Entry Zone with Very Small Quantity. Currently XRP/USDT Is ~70% Down From The Recent ATH. After A Historical 96% Drawdown From $3.28 To $0.1050, A Similar Crash Is Unlikely, But A Corrective Retracement Below $1 Remains Possible. Stay Patient, Don't FOMO at TOP @Ripple

@MaxCrypto Good luck with that.🤣😂🤣

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 A whale has opened a $36 million Silver short with 25x leverage. Liquidation Price: $125

@richbycoin_news Did anyone expect anything different, banks will not just roll over.😂🤣😂 They’ll fight crypto to the bitter end. But you can’t stop the progress, you can only delay it.😂🤣😂👍

XRP slides as U.S. banks resist crypto-friendly rules tied to the Market Structure Bill, with stablecoin debates and ETF inflows shaping sentiment. richbycoin.com/2026/01/18/xrp…

@Zedzies @swiftcommunity @BNPParibas @intesasanpaolo @SocieteGenerale 🤣😂🤣

@swiftcommunity @BNPParibas @intesasanpaolo @SocieteGenerale Looks like $LINK was in fact the chosen one and not $XRP or $QNT all along.

The future of digital finance is interoperable - and we’re helping make it real. We’ve completed pioneering digital asset interoperability trials with @BNPParibas Securities Services, @intesasanpaolo , and @SocieteGenerale - FORGE demonstrating how Swift can orchestrate tokenised asset transactions across multiple platforms. This builds on a broader set of recent trials, including: • ISO 20022 interoperability between blockchains with @HSBC and AntInternational • Fiat and digital currency settlement with @Citi • Digital asset transaction exchange with @NorthernTrust and the Reserve Bank of Australia • Bridging tokenised assets with UBS Asset Management and @chainlink With this work now complete, we’re focused on adding a blockchain-based ledger to our infrastructure stack to enable real-time, 24/7 cross-border payments, in collaboration with more than 30 global banks. 👉Read the full story: swift.com/news-events/ne… #DigitalAssets #Interoperability #Swiftledger

@VALELORDX Hopefully is going to to start pumping. 🤣👍

CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE MARK UP IS TOMORROW LIKE I SAID. “ WE ARE GETTING CLOSER TO A BILL TRUMP CAN SIGN!!”

@daria_anne1 @RippleXrpie @Ripple Banking will become part of XRP system.😂🤣😂

🚨RUMORS: @Ripple will become a Bank in Q1 2026! 💥Ripple National Trust Bank💥 #XRP

@WokePatriot22 @pumpius Yes, the bigger picture.😂🤣😂👍

@pumpius There is so much XRP and such little is used and banks don’t hold on to it. They just pay out as needed. Am I missing something?

To everyone still standing with XRP, If this were easy, everyone would still be here. This path was never designed to reward comfort or impatience. It was designed to test belief when there was no applause, no confirmation, and no clear timeline. Staying was not luck. It was a conscious decision made repeatedly when walking away would have felt safer. Being early is isolating. Early means silence. Early means watching narratives form that do not reflect reality, while what you hold refuses to perform on demand. We were early to something that moves at institutional speed, not social media speed, and that disconnect is where doubt creeps in and conviction gets forged. For years, progress looked invisible. Legal pressure. Regulatory fog. Relentless misrepresentation. Not because nothing was happening, but because the work being done could not happen in public. Systems that move nations are not built on stages. They are built quietly, behind closed doors, under pressure. What sits beneath XRP is not hope. It is preparation. Infrastructure hardened by resistance. Relationships built while being challenged. A network that survived its most difficult chapter before most people even understood what it was. That kind of foundation does not crack. It matures. Now the tone has changed. Not louder. Calmer. More precise. That is what execution sounds like when the groundwork is finished and usage is ready to scale. What comes next is flow, volume, and reality asserting itself. Very few will ever understand what it meant to still be here before it made sense. Even fewer will admit they doubted and stayed anyway. But that is the quiet strength of this community. Respect to @bgarlinghouse and @Ripple for building through the hardest part while the noise was loud and the rewards were distant. When this finally becomes obvious to everyone else, remember who you were in the waiting. That version of you is the reason you will still be standing.

@StockmoneyL @BlockchainOrakl Even if that’s true, will it still make money?😂🤣😂

@BlockchainOrakl Yeah, adoption plan for xrp is good. but i really don't like the cartel-like status and that the supply is solely controlled by ripple

I am not a huge fan of XRP, but it will serve as an example for a multi-year breakout pattern, I have rarely seen before. If you look at Altcoins chart vs. BTC (lower image), a similar formation is just building up. My scenario for 2026 would be as follows: - Bitcoin maybe ranges for a while, then breaks out and forms a new ATH - BTC Dominance drops, Altcoins break out and recover from their currently from a technical point of view ridiculuously oversold levels - Another Bear market (for Alts) kicks in by the end of 2026, forming a higher base compared to what we see now. Why do I believe this? I am not dellusional, but I believe in the concept of money rotation. TradFi has focused on Bitcoin, which was an essential part of the 3 year pump - money will rotate to altcoins. It always starts with technical reversals (algos etc) - more and more traders jump on the train. We have multiple etfs launching... It's simply a bet I am willing to take, since we are not talking about assets that have made +500% last year but rather -80%. Not financial advice. DYOR.