Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")

WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH CENSORSHIP IS FREE SPEECH (Updated version of *1984*, aka 2023 on Twitter)

@AlexFinn OMG, Clare, you really believe this? Well I guess I'm a "douche"...

European Charging Stations. Tesla received €150 million in subsidies in 2023: tinyurl.com/mu52syjk. €30 million more than the "fine". Will not go viral on X. @NickHudsonCT @jengleruk @ClareCraigPath @jpkiekens

@SenadIBM @NickHudsonCT @mdvex22 @MikeBenzCyber 2/2 Covert censorship is not free speech.

@SenadIBM @NickHudsonCT @mdvex22 @MikeBenzCyber 1/ And, in any case, you have proved your general point. How on earth is the below supposed to be compatible with Benz’s fairy tale about X bravely resisting EU censorship? It’s just that X, unlike Twitter, does not *tell us* what “misinfo” is being punished/suppressed.

Putin didn’t impose $140 million of fines on X to impose censorship on Americans. If you’re more authoritarian than Putin, maybe you should meditate on that.

@DrJBhattacharya @X It’s not at all ironic. It makes sense because X does censor. See👇. To not call this censorship is shameful. You know that I was talking about the threat of EU censorship before anyone, and you also know that I’ve been made invisible on X, so you don’t have to respond.

Oh the irony of the European censors, sanctioned for pressuring American tech platforms to censor speech under force of law, complaining about the sanction uncensored on @x, the very platform they most sought to censor. Sanctioning the censors is not censorship.

@DrJBhattacharya @pmcdunnough @freddiesayers Yes, the GDI is an important part of the network. But is it really British, as I believe Sayers says. So what is this then? The EU apparently thinks its German and funds GDI: cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101…. (This is just one grant.) Whatever happened to Robert Kogon, btw?

Watch this April 2024 video by the great @freddiesayers, who documents one node in the global censorship apparatus, the orwellian Global Disinformation Index. x.com/freddiesayers/…

Modern censors work in the shadows, so victims never know who squelches their speech. They use NGOs and universities, with euphemisms like "prebunk", to launder their censorship. This is the beating heart of the EU's & UKs silicon curtain. youtube.com/watch?v=QNq8pt…

@SecKennedy Corporate influence was definitely not the problem in the Covid "response". It was all government(s). When has RFKjr *ever* mentioned BioNTech and its state sponsor, Germany? AFAIK, never. He knows but he's covering it up. I don't know why. But he is covering it up.

This is a screenshot from American Academy of Pediatrics’ webpage, thanking the organization’s top corporate donors. These four companies make virtually every vaccine on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule. AAP is angry that CDC has eliminated corporate influence in decisions over vaccine recommendations and returned CDC to gold-standard science and evidence-based medicine laser-focused on children’s health. AAP today released its own list of corporate-friendly vaccine recommendations. The Trump Administration believes in free speech and AAP has a right to make its case to the American people. But AAP should follow the lead of HHS and disclose conflicts of interest, including its corporate entanglements and those of its journal—Pediatrics—so that Americans may ask whether the AAP’s recommendations reflect public health interest, or are, perhaps, just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP’s Big Pharma benefactors. AAP should also be candid with doctors and hospitals that recommendations that diverge from the CDC’s official list are not shielded from liability under the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act.

@gadboit @stevenemassey As always it's as if the German presence in the Wuhan virology scene doesn't even exist for these people. It was a direct PRESENCE in Wuhan, involving massive German funding. Drosten himself was directing GoF research on MERS. Again, for DRASTIC, crickets. tinyurl.com/mu28x82c

New paper and thread with more details about the 🔥💣 discovery that @stevenemassey and others reported on a couple of years ago of engineered coronaviruses contaminating some rice reads in Wuhan. Neither of those viruses was SARS-CoV-2 but what was that research all about...

@jjcouey They're not even "Pfizer" contracts. They're contracts with a consortium of Pfizer and the German owner of the "vaccine" and marketing authorization holder BioNTech. The German MEP Anderson knows this perfectly well. This is all just a show.

Seriously, you cannot see the DNC?

@DrJBhattacharya @elonmusk @X So, Jay, you really believe that there is no censorship on X? "Blacklists" and many other "visibility filters" are built right into the algorithm. The fine had nothing to do with X's "content moderation" and is a pittance compared to, say, the 3 BILLION the EU fined Google.

It's the height of irony that the European Commission fined @elonmusk's @x for not being transparent. The old Twitter handed out blue checks to cronies with no transparency whatsoever. The purpose of the old Twitter blue check system was to suppress dissidents and censor speech.

@KnowledgeAcqui1 @emilyakopp @ClareCraigPath And they didn’t even pull the (yearly!) recommendation much less the jab for 18+, which is also peak myocarditis per the CDC’s own, now memory-holed, data. This is not a victory, it’s defeat packaged as victory. Cc: @jengleruk

@EdV1694 @emilyakopp @ClareCraigPath I believe they capped the analysis at age 16, which is the age where peak-myocarditis is just beginning. There are perhaps 100 more reports of deaths in this age group no part of the analysis, and thousands more for all ages. The probability is that there are far more than 10.

Another alarming update from FDA: The recent analysis by FDA career staff finding 10 children died after the COVID vaccine followed an earlier analysis conducted 3-4 years ago but never publicized. Hoeg: "It does highlight the need ... to actually use the information we're gathering so that we're more transparent to the public."

@ClareCraigPath @emilyakopp Don't have time or even motivation to look into this more closely. But not sure I believe this narrative. Remember the CDC's 2022 myocarditis study? It showed enormous harm and admitted underreporting. The current leadership cites LESS alarming numbers. x.com/EdV1694/status…

@EdV1694 @emilyakopp No - I do not think that was the full extent of the harm. The reason I shared it is because there was an investigation that was then not published - presumably because they didn't like what they found.