Timur Ercan 🌏

wake up babe building documenso part 3 just dropped and it’s about AES, QES, and the future of signing infrastructure documen.so/bdp3

@ultras_antifaa Hot take: Taxing the rich will never ever lead to the poor having more. Doesn't matter it you are pro or con.

Mark Ruffalo: ❝Tax the rich. They can handle it, trust me.❞

@peer_rich "It’s a level of condemnation he says he has never heard at an EU summit before." Is this a parody?

at this point throw hungary out they clearly dont want to a European Union member

Self-hosting is not a feature. It is the model. At Documenso, we treat self-hosting as a first class citizen. Not as an afterthought. Not as a limited export. Not as something you unlock after talking to sales. It is part of the framework. We do the work so you can actually run it. Realistically. In production. At scale. And importantly, we run the same code. The version we host is the version you can self-host. No hidden features. No separate editions. No “good stuff” locked away. No accounts required. No forced cloud dependency. No hidden coupling. Providers are interchangeable. Signing, email, authentication, storage. And in the worst case, you can replace every part of it yourself. Run your own signing stack. Your own mail transport. Your own auth layer. That is not theoretical. That is the design. We build this way because Documenso is infrastructure. And infrastructure should be owned. Even at the enterprise level, the goal is not just to buy. It is to build on top. Enterprise self-hosting is not about locking you into our system. It is about giving you a foundation you can extend, adapt, and integrate into your own stack. Upstream contributions are part of that model. The line between user and builder is intentionally thin. This also aligns with a broader shift. Across Europe, sovereignty is becoming a real topic again. Not just politically, but technically. Where your data lives. Who controls your infrastructure. What you depend on. Self-hosting is one answer to that. Open systems are another. Our model tries to combine both. A fully open community edition that can spread freely. Business and enterprise licenses that allow teams to run it seriously, at scale, without compromising sovereignty. This is good business. But more importantly, it is how you build ecosystems. Not by locking things down, but by creating a shared foundation that others can build on. Over time, that leads to better technology for everyone. A real open commons. That is what we are building toward. If you are thinking about owning your signing infrastructure instead of renting it, we should talk. documen.so/enterprise-sel…

@levie This is LOC all over again

Without getting into the specific numbers, this underlying concept and trend is going to be very real. For any worker who is able to wield AI agents effectively in an organization, their compute budgets are just going to monotonically go up over time. This will of course start in engineering, where we already know developers can run multiple agents in parallel, or have projects going over night. But this eventually hit the rest of knowledge work as well. Lawyers that can create and review more drafts, marketed that can build more campaigns and test more ideals in parallel, sales reps that can reach out to more customers and process more leads. Many of these activities will essentially be token-dependent in how much work a single person can do. These aren’t chatbot workflows answering a simple question, but agents that are running and processing through incredible amounts of data at scale, and generating all new forms of information. Companies will have to figure out how they budget for this, and it likely won’t be an IT budget item over time, but ultimately owned and allocated by the business. Maybe the CFO is ultimately the head of AI :-).

@jondelarroz @DEADLINE They get credit for trying at least. When was the last time a beloved niche Fandom was revives 25 ish years later by the OG cast just bc. Fans loved it?

@DEADLINE Except they hired woke writers. And it's not in development. No studio picked it up.

EXCLUSIVE: Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk are still riding on a high after announcing on Sunday that there’s a 'Firefly' animated series in advanced development. And with the explosion of stories and fan support that has emerged, likes and shares of their viral social campaign, could it possibly and finally be the right time for more 'Firefly'? The pair caught up with Deadline on Wednesday to explore the topic more in depth and to answer this and more of fans’ burning questions Read the full interview here: deadline.com/2026/03/nathan… (Photo: 20th Century Fox Film Corp.)

not sure what the fuss is about, clearly he wouldn't just day that if it weren't true

@peer_rich Best lies are based on truth

one the one hand his incentive is to sell tech that powers tokens on the other hand he is also right

@PiusSprenger tether is coming to btc, add x402 to the protocoll and we finally will have money for the interent

… and what money do AI agents choose to pay with?

@aliByteCode thats actually a very popular take

Hot take: Marketing your product is harder than building it. Change my mind.

@PabloPeniche is this from the night manager season 2? looks eerily familar

I can't believe this Getty mansion is still for sale. $5M in Berkeley.

Respect yourself, remove the Free plan.

Capitalism gives people a choice

@OldManHop @fandompulse its the next best thing after going back in time and not cancel imo

@fandompulse It takes place between the events of Firefly and Serenity - a narrative sweet spot where none of the characters have died yet. It's the only way to keep the franchise alive, really.

Nathan Fillion on whether Shepherd Book will return for the new Firefly animated series: "Absolutely, that’s the plan. Yeah, we’re bringing back Shepherd Book for certain. Ron Glass, unfortunately, is not available. Ron once joked that he didn’t get a part when they were looking for a Ron Glass-type, and here we are again. We’re looking for a Ron Glass-type, and it’s not going to be Ron Glass." Is this a good idea?

new phyton alternative dropped

> Strong engineers build C. > C builds the foundations. > Foundations create leverage. > Leverage creates comfort. > Comfort creates Python. > Python creates AI. > AI creates vibe coding. > Vibe coding creates weak engineers. > Weak engineers create collapse. > Collapse creates strong engineers.

Tough question.

@awaken_tom @pmddomingos I miss the times when war was conensus bad

@pmddomingos So, probably not a great idea to stir up war with China. ✅

TSMC is the Strait of Hormuz of AI.

@SirMikeaLot_ @fandompulse and I miss the early 20yo me watching firefly but they are not coming back

@fandompulse NOT animated. please. NOT animated. I miss the original crew. There is enough interest to do the real deal, with better sci fi, better script and all that. Please. NOT ANIMATED.

Nathan Fillion and Alan Tudyk say there is heavy interest from distributors for the Firefly animated series: Fillion said: "I don’t think we’re having any difficulty getting the appointment now. You know what I mean? Our foot in the door." Tudyk added: "Conversations are being had." Where do you want to watch it at?

@tkenerson_ @peer_rich time to learn how to cook :) it's my new favorite offline past-time

Feels like everything we’ve been accustomed to consuming is harmful in some way

ok wtf