What sets experts apart from novices when viewing surveillance footage? New work by Peng, Burling, Todorova, Neary, Pollick, and Lu uses eye-tracking and machine-learning analyses to take a closer look. Post by @hannah_mech#psynomPBRbit.ly/3y3S76i
I'll be giving a talk at Pint of Science Glasgow on the 14th of May. Here scientists present their work in a relax and entertaining way to the public, always a good laugh and a fun night out. If you wanna see me (or other presenters) tickets are below :)
pintofscience.co.uk/event/roborevo…
One more day to register - Developing a Framework for Human Interactions with CyberPhysical Systems: The Dynamics of Risk and Trust. Enjoy a multidisciplinary day! See attached for details @DigitalTwinCon@DigitalTwinHub@uofgmvlsengage@UofGMVLS
Deadline extended to 4 March! Human Interactions with cyber-physical systems. We have a keynote by Jonathon Hill, Global Lead for Virtual Marketing at Rolls Royce. We also have a multidisciplinary field of speakers from Law, Psychology, Marketing, Robotics and Engineering.
A few more days til the submission deadline for our workshop on 16 April sponsored by WTW. Happy to announce our keynote by Jonathon Hill, Global lead for Virtual Manufacturing at Rolls Royce. @UofGPsychNeuro@UofGSciEng@UofGI@UofGMVLS
Excited to be sharing the first experiment of my PhD, Social Intelligence Towards Human-AI Teambuilding at #AAAI23@RealAAAI. The work is coauthored by @FrankPollick and recieved support from @QumodoAI. Naturally I had to bring the unofficial @Social__AI ambassador!
Supporting research in @GlasgowCS today: Wearing eye tracker for my commute, taking part in @SABrewster study on how cyclists communicate non-verbally with other road users.
Happy to share the good news that our cybersickness paper is selected as the feature article on the topic Sensor Informatics in the latest issue of IEEE J-BHI. Please check out here: embs.org/jbhi/articles/…
@HenryMusto Even back in the day you were an undergrad there was a preference for participants, but "subjects" is not strictly wrong and some fields/people still use it, while some outlets effectively forbid it. Probably you can see the change reflected in APA writing guidance.
So I have encountered a few comments on my writing saying that it is not really the done thing anymore to call volunteers on a study, 'subjects' and we should instead be calling them 'participants'. Can anyone explain to me why this shift in terminology occurred?