Gilbert Tuplin

Furious Spanish Health Minister Monica Garcia has told Donald Trump to stop sticking his nose in Spain’s business over the US-ordered probe into the euthanasia of gang-rape victim Noelia Castillo. The 25-year-old was paralysed after jumping from a fifth-floor window following a brutal nightclub gang-rape, then spent years in agony begging to die “beautiful” in her prettiest dress. She was euthanised last week despite family splits and claims she showed hesitancy in her final hours. Trump’s team slammed Spain for failing to prosecute repeated sexual assaults against her while in state care and questioned the euthanasia law for psychiatric cases. Garcia raged: “Spain is a serious country… Trump should stop fuelling the international far-right agenda.” Thoughts?

A failed asylum seeker was captured on CCTV leaving a fake stick of dynamite outside the headquarters of MI5, a court heard Watch the moment in full ⤵️ telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/0…

Everything about Net Zero is fake. Temperature record - fake. Climate emergency - fake. Emissions reductions - fake. Cheap renewables - fake. Green jobs - fake.

BREAKING: Britain has fewer than 50 Storm Shadow cruise missiles left. The stockpile that once exceeded 200 was drained over two years of transfers to Ukraine to help Kyiv strike Russian targets deep behind the front line. The missiles worked. They hit command posts and ammunition depots and naval headquarters across occupied Ukraine and Crimea. They helped Ukraine survive. And now Britain has almost none left for itself, during a war being launched from its own airfields against a country that just hit a British oil facility with drones. Brimstone anti-armour missiles sit at 25 to 35 percent of pre-war stocks. Paveway IV precision-guided bombs, the same weapon the RAF used over Libya and Syria, are at 30 to 40 percent. The National Audit Office estimates that Britain can sustain high-intensity combat operations for three to six weeks before requiring American resupply. Three to six weeks. The Iran war is already in its fifth week. If Britain were fighting it rather than hosting it, the cupboard would already be empty. The Army is 10,000 soldiers below target. Type 45 destroyers suffer chronic propulsion failures requiring six to twelve months of repair. The F-35 and Typhoon fleet operates at 60 to 70 percent availability. The industrial base that would replenish stocks runs on rare-earth magnets manufactured in China, the same China that controls 90 percent of the permanent magnets in every guided missile Britain would need to fire and is currently being asked to broker the peace. Any direct involvement beyond basing would require 8 to 15 billion pounds in emergency supplemental spending. National debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP. There is no majority in Parliament for funding a war the Prime Minister says is not Britain’s, fought with weapons Britain does not have, replenished by supply chains controlled by a country Britain needs to broker the ceasefire. This is why Starmer says “not our war.” Not because of principle. Not because of legality, although his own advisors have told him the strikes are legally questionable. Not because of Iraq, although the ghost of Blair hangs over every press conference. Because of arithmetic. Britain gave its missiles to Ukraine. It gave its bases to America. It gave its diplomatic capital to a 35-nation meeting about reopening Hormuz “after the fighting stops.” And it has nothing left to give except words, which cost nothing and accomplish less. Trump knows this. He mocked the Royal Navy in the Telegraph interview. He dismissed Starmer’s windmills. He called NATO a “paper tiger” because the paper is literal: Britain’s defence capability exists on paper. On the tarmac and in the magazines and in the recruitment offices, the numbers tell a different story. The story says that one of the six largest economies on earth, the country that once ruled a quarter of the planet, cannot sustain a shooting war for longer than six weeks without calling Washington for resupply. The bases are full. The aircraft are American. The missiles are gone. The debt is real. And the Prime Minister stands at the podium and says this is not our war while the war takes off from our runways carrying weapons we could not replace if we tried. Britain is not refusing to fight. Britain cannot fight. The doctrine is not a choice. It is an inventory report. And the inventory says zero. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

Craig. Philip Hyland a Lawyer, Lois Bayliss a Lawyer, myself a retired Police Constable and an attending journalist, supplied the evidence in person, to The Metropolitan Police at Hammersmith Police Station on the 27th of January 2022 all of this damning evidence re the HCQ trials. It’s on record, they ignored it. This was under the crime number we obtained on the 20th December 2021 reporting serious crimes against regulators and government re vaccines and covid. 6029679/21. They shut it all down on the 21st of February 2022. They stated they couldn’t find any crimes. 😳 Video of us at the police station submitting statements and evidence to A/Inspector Sheehan, 27/01/22. Operation Talla has since been uncovered whereby there was a national order given U.K wide to all police not to accept any reports or evidence of crimes relating to Covid vaccines and government. This order came from the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) It is highly likely Australia will have had a similar nationwide order. Evidence has been posted on my page and also by; @EthicalApproach @pjhlaw It is their own evidence obtained from FOI replies, public statements and personal interactions and its all damning.

Here is my new paper for the Great British Business Council on the importance of oil, gas and coal to the UK economy. The UK’s industrial decline is not inevitable, but the result of decades of deliberate policy choices that have undermined domestic energy production and driven manufacturing offshore. Lowering UK employment and tax revenues, while increasing the UK trade deficit. The paper also includes a plan to reverse this. gbbc.uk/uk-deindustria…

Excellent question...

I read how a failed Pakistani 'asylum seeker' who repeatedly abused and raped an eight year old girl has been jailed for 15 years. He abused her in her own home and bedroom. She was told that if she told anyone, she would die. I wouldn't deport him. Under a Restore Britain Government, with the British people's approval, the death penalty would be reintroduced for such evil and undeniable crimes. He would be put to death. If you rape a young child, you do not deserve to live. It's that simple.

Protestors seemed to have spray painted a wall in St Asaph against King Charles #stasaph

One of the reasons I decided to go into politics isn’t something I talk about enough. Back in 2022, serving on HMS Dasher with Coastal Forces Squadron, we were tasked with assisting Illegal Channel crossings. I had to board these boats and rig them for recovery into Dover. What I found stuck with me… Abandoned IDs. Cash. Phone chargers. Tools. I even pulled a wallet from the water. Discarded like it meant nothing. why would someone throw away their identity? 👉Because they don’t want to be identified. 👉Because they know the system is broken. I’ve seen it first-hand. Britain has lost control of its borders. We’ve lost our standards. We’ve lost accountability. It’s time to restore British values. 🇬🇧 That means strong borders. That means proper enforcement. That means mass deportations for those here illegally. ‼️This operation cost the government £29,433,762. No more pretending. No more weakness. Roll on a @RestoreBritain_ Government !

Every time a British government attempts to control immigration, deport a terror suspect or enforce a border, the left reaches for the same instrument. The European Court of Human Rights. The supreme guardian of minority rights. The ultimate check on any state that attempts to act in its own national interest. The institution whose rulings Labour and every progressive human rights lawyer in Britain treats as sacred and untouchable. However, in 2014 the ECHR ruled that banning the burqa is lawful. The case was brought by a 24 year old French Muslim woman who argued that the ban violated her right to private and family life, her freedom of thought and religion and her freedom from discrimination. She had the best human rights lawyers in Europe making her case. The court dismissed it. It ruled that preserving the conditions for living together in society was a legitimate objective that justified the restriction. The left's own favourite weapon, deployed against the left's own objection, found against the left's own position. The ECHR decided this question twelve years ago. Britain has spent twelve years pretending it did not happen. France banned the burqa in 2011. The arguments made then are identical to the arguments being made now by the Conservatives. Supporters called it a tool of sexist repression, a threat to public safety and a barrier to integration. Critics called it Islamophobic and a violation of individual freedom. After a year of debate the bill passed. Fifteen years later it remains law. It has survived every legal challenge. And of the five million Muslims living in France at the time, approximately two thousand women wore the burqa. The ban affected two thousand people and was opposed by the entire progressive establishment as though it threatened five million. Then consider Trappes in 2013. A police officer attempted to conduct an identity check on a woman wearing a niqab. Her husband reacted violently. The following day an angry mob stormed the police station, setting fires and throwing rocks, demanding his release. That is not a community responding to oppression. That is a community asserting that the state has no authority to enforce its own laws when those laws conflict with communal preference. The state attempted to enforce a law on its own territory. It was met with a riot. Britain took note and concluded that the correct response was to do nothing. Kemi Badenoch has herself identified sharia courts, first cousin marriage and sectarianism as more insidious integration threats than the burqa. She is right. The deeper failures, parallel legal systems, communal bloc voting, educational environments teaching loyalty to the Ummah rather than to Britain, these are the structural problems a burqa ban alone will not solve. But a ban would establish something more important than a dress code. It would establish the principle that the state's authority in shared civic space is not negotiable and that the conditions for living together require a single visible standard of civic participation. The opposition will invoke human rights. The ECHR has answered that objection. The opposition will invoke religious freedom. The ECHR has answered that too. The UN Human Rights Committee disagreed but has no power to enforce its rulings. France ignored it. Its ban remains in place. The question is not whether a burqa ban is compatible with human rights law. The ECHR settled that in 2014. The question is whether Britain has the political will to act on what it already knows. The answer so far has been no. And every year that answer remains no, the conditions for living together that the ECHR itself identified as the legitimate objective deteriorate a little further. "Trappes in 2013. A police officer attempted to conduct an identity check on a woman wearing a niqab. Her husband reacted violently. The following day an angry mob stormed the police station, setting fires and throwing rocks, demanding his release."

That's total rubbish 1. The cap level is only down £79 since the General Election 2. This has been achieved by moving about 75% of the Renewables Obligation from bills to taxation 3. This is adding £7-8 billion to the tax burden You're not lowering energy costs, you're just changing who pays for them PLUS the price cap was a major factor in the failure of HALF of suppliers in 2021-22 which cost consumers £2.8 billion (c£100 per household) This was predictable: the exact same thing jaooe in California when it introduced a retail price cap in the 2000s Research shows that price caps lead to tariff concentration... Everyone prices to the cap. They also inhibit competition... Consumers see no reason to switch since the regulator is already ensuring they have the "best price" So the cap is a bad thing and consumers would be better off without it

🇺🇸 Meanwhile on a beach in Florida “Look at the trajectory - same as a ballistic missile huh? NASA - going nowhere since 1959.” People on a Floridian Beach observe Artemis II blastoff - just one problem - nobody trust NASA anymore‼️

The reason for depopulation at home is also taxation: inheritance tax keeps families poor. It also saves on pension payouts, so the state can redistribute money to its cronies like Palantir instead of paying out pensions.

The Climate Minister wants to "re-make the case" for Net Zero while families struggle. 🚨 Banning our own gas and oil makes us more vulnerable to dictators, not less. We don't need "chickpea korma" lectures - we need reliable fossil fuels and energy freedom. The insanity must end! Link below for more👇

What do you think ? Yes or no ? Should every politician with ties to the World Economic Forum be arrested on suspicion of High Treason ?

The most unpopular PM in history. Keir Starmer is not for the British.

Britains swarm Keir Starmer screaming “PEDO PROTECTOR” and “TRAITOR” right in his terrified face. This grooming-gang-enabling Asshole sold out British children and flooded Britain with rapists…now the people fucking hate him. Starmer’s finished.

Rachel Reeves opens rift with Miliband by backing North Sea drilling The chancellor said she was ‘very happy’ to back exploration at Rosebank oilfield and Jackdaw gasfield thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…