
Albertina McNeill
92.5K posts

Albertina McNeill
@GreenfordBlog
The struggle to see the good side of a west London suburb #hyperlocal https://t.co/PyBiCMtA18





We investigated 'London's most dangerous cycleway' and saw dozens of near-misses metro.co.uk/video/we-inves… via @MetroUK


So glad this is finally public so I can comment on it openly. I have seen a fair number of HR investigations over the years. In my experience, whistleblowers are often formally investigated before they are pushed out, or as a way of “teaching a lesson” to anyone who challenges the status quo. This is actually one of the most competent internal investigation reports I have seen. What surprised me most was the outcome. Usually, management plays an active role in managing out people who raise concerns - such as Lucy, who was clearly DATIXing poor standards and practices within the neonatal unit. Dr Brearey and Dr Jayaram were in management positions at the time and therefore carried responsibility for patient safety and culture within the department. So that would have been a pretty major motivator to want her out if she was shining the spotlight on their managerial/leadership failures. Lucy Letby was never going to be safe returning to a workplace where she was clearly being bullied by a group of colleagues (most of whom were consultants and thus in a position of power over her) unless individual accountability followed. At the very least, that should have meant formal warnings, apologies to Lucy, and mediated discussions. Management could have supported her with a temporary redeployment to another clinical unit so she could continue practising while matters were resolved. Clinical work was clearly what Lucy wanted to continue doing. Some people in these situations , where redeployment is necessary during HR investigations, choose to remain in management or leadership roles instead, but that wasn't what Lucy wanted. So in essence the hospital made a strong start with doing a competent HR investigation - but by failing to follow through properly, the situation escalated to the point where consultants went to the police. What nobody seems willing to ask is this: if the consultants genuinely believed Lucy was murdering babies, why did they only go to the police after they were found to have bullied her? If you truly believed a nurse was a serial killer, is it reasonable to accept that a consultant would really think that internal Trust procedures were an appropriate way to deal with it? UK trained consultants are NOT politically naïve. Consultant appointments are highly political positions, and consultants understand very well how NHS systems actually work. It stretches credibility, and that's a generous description, to claim the consultants genuinely believed reporting concerns over a serial killer internally was what they thought was the right thing to do. If they truly thought Letby was such a prolific killer, were they not concerned she might harm children outside work as well? This entire case is a national disgrace, and I suspect it will remain in history as one of the most consequential modern witch hunts in British healthcare. Witch hunts within the NHS are unfortunately, however, very common - often carried out through internal employment procedures or GMC processes. But turning that common dynamic (whose root cause is toxic leadership practices) into the conviction of a serial killer is something else entirely. An extraordinary outcome, enabled by a broken medical "expert" system and sealed by an inadequate police investigation and criminal justice system. What a world we live in. I hope everyone involved in this MoJ - or anyone who knew what was happening and could have helped but chose not to - gets what they deserve. @LucyLetbyTrials @drphilhammond @PrivateEyeNews @NadineDorries @ClarkeMicah @peter__duffy @MartynPitman @willcpowell @DavidDavisMP @DavidRoseUK @PeterElston1 @Michelehal7344 @Voice4theDead @reasonoverfear @Oversig58651516 @Seagreen2707 @RexvsLucyLetby



Trump envoy dismisses criticism: “The opposition comes more from Europe than from Greenland” The United States’ special envoy, Jeff Landry, downplayed the negative reactions to his visit to Nuuk and pointed to European resistance. Amid intense media attention, Donald Trump’s special envoy, Jeff Landry, arrived Tuesday at Katuaq, where the Future Greenland business conference was taking place. As he entered, he moved through the crowd wearing a dark grey suit, leather boots, and a steel-and-gold Rolex watch, while participants watched him closely. KNR caught up with him for an extended interview about his stay. KNR asked Jeff Landry whether the goal is still to take control of Greenland, something both he and U.S. President Donald Trump have previously expressed interest in. “The person best suited to answer that question is the President of the United States. But I think, first and foremost, what the President of the United States wants is to ensure that the Western Hemisphere is secure and that the countries of the Western Hemisphere share in all the opportunities that the United States — the world’s largest economy — has to offer,” said Jeff Landry, who is visiting Greenland for the first time. According to Jeff Landry, the meeting with Greenland’s government leadership went extremely well. He says he left the meeting with the feeling that no one had really cared about Greenland before Donald Trump started talking about the country — neither from the American nor the European side. “He (Premier of Greenland, ed.) said that we (Greenland, ed.) had been knocking on the door, but the door was never opened. And I said: ‘Listen, that’s why I’m here.’” “I’m here to say: hey, the door is open. Let’s build a relationship,” Trump’s special envoy explained. After the meeting, the Premier of Greenland stated that there were people on the American side of the table who lacked knowledge about Greenland. Whether Jens-Frederik Nielsen was referring to Jeff Landry or Ken Howery remains unclear. Q: Do you believe Greenland is “a badly managed piece of ice,” as President Donald Trump has described it? “I can tell you that what I will take back and report to the President is that we previously had an opportunity that presidents before him squandered. Trump is not a failure like they were. He loves to win. He loves making deals,” he said, continuing: “He recognizes that Greenland is extremely important for national security — not only for the United States, but also for the Western Hemisphere, and of course for Greenland’s own security.” Q: What do you think about the fear and anger that your visit and the President’s rhetoric have sparked among Greenlanders? “There was this huge backlash, which honestly sounded like it came more from Europe than from Greenland. Remember, I was invited to a dog sled race,” he said, referring to an invitation he received in January that was later withdrawn by the organizers. According to the special envoy, it appears that Europe is trying to close the door between Greenland and the United States. “I think this could become a great opportunity for coexistence between Europe, Greenland, and the United States, with the United States in the lead. This is not foreign territory, because the United States led the reconstruction of Europe after the Second World War. It’s not as though Europe alone built the Europe we see today.” Q: There is a high-level working group, and then there is you — Trump’s special envoy. What is your role, and where do you fit into the broader situation between Greenland and the United States? “I see my mission as being about economic opportunities — naturally, as Governor of Louisiana,” Jeff Landry said, continuing: “It is economic opportunity — not government welfare — that lifts people from dependency to independence.” —KNR (Foto © : Christian Klindt Sølbeck/Ritzau Scanpix)




















Name a better engineer than a London beaver. We’ll wait. 🦫 These incredible creatures were reintroduced to the city and have already stepped up to stop flooding at a Tube station and restore local habitats. Nature is healing (and civil engineering). npr.org/2026/05/21/nx-…






