Hayden Bruce

@slime_puppy_ @conlin_lauren @Bederowlaw It's okay to just say "I disagree with Bederow". Instead you called her piece "disappointing" like you're her grandmother. It's weird.

@slime_puppy_ @conlin_lauren @Bederowlaw Except it wasn't constructive. Telling Lauren her piece was disappointing just because you didn't agree with the person she interviewed is insane. He's a frequently sought after legal analyst. And calling Bederow not defense-friendly is insane if you knew his track record

Could Luigi Mangione Cut A Deal? Legal Expert Says It’s Complicated.. NY defense attorney Mark Bederow says a guilty plea in Manhattan could seriously damage Mangione’s pending federal defense. @Bederowlaw breaking all of this down was so helpful! Read the full story: lamag.com/general/could-…

@slime_puppy_ @conlin_lauren @Bederowlaw @conlin_lauren you're arguing with someone named slime puppy with a profile Pic of a fictional person. I wouldn't take too much of what they say to heart...

@conlin_lauren @Bederowlaw No worries at all!!

@shazlick79 @Cheryl651338402 @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Honestly the fact that this is where you're going is embarrassing to you and I'll cut it off now. You're a joke. I'm used to debating philosophy majors. This is below me. 😘

@shazlick79 @Cheryl651338402 @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy You think I have to be attracted to him? I believe Karen Read was innocent and TB did a ton to show the public of that. Idc what he looks like naked, since I'm straight. You know what George Washington looked like? Not pretty. I still respect what he did

Since Ian is apparently “looking into” the claims about me made by deranged individuals who have been harassing him all day for coming on my fundraiser, perhaps my followers could point him in the right direction of accurate information.

@IanRunkle I can think of worse

Also, definitely covering Murdaugh suing Becky. Holy shit. The worst people you know are fighting.

@Cheryl651338402 @shazlick79 @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy I'm truly interested in how the term incel got applied to me by such a titan of the legal community

@shazlick79 @HaydenSBruce @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Yeah that’s what they said 🥴

@JulieCar94 @theymattered25 @BostonDefender Nauseating isn't a legal term. Sorry

@theymattered25 @BostonDefender I do not think it was a threat towards Yannetti, however it's nauseating just the same.

Yesterday, @BostonDefender appeared on a fundraiser stream that the man who wrote the tweet on the left also appeared. Only the best of the best for Aidan Kearney and David Yannetti. You are the company you keep.

@WinterStorm829 @shazlick79 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Who told you that you had to like him?

@HaydenSBruce @shazlick79 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Win or lose, I’ll never like him. He’ll always be a vicious person.

@shazlick79 @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy If he interfered with any justice process both of them would have said. Also not sure you know what incel means lol

@HaydenSBruce @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Ok incel. If you actually read my comment, I’m explaining why LYK and Emily D Baker aren’t touching his case. Hint - it’s not because they’re scared of any clap back. It’s because they don’t agree with him. They know he interfered with the justice process. Fkn loser

@WinterStorm829 @shazlick79 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy So watch something else, you don't have to watch TB 😂

@shazlick79 @WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy Saving this for when the case ends in TBs favor

@WinterStorm829 @IanRunkle @DoctorTurtleboy That’s because they know TB is a virus. They know he is going to prison. A defense tactic that he turned into reality.

@TheCarolErskine @KelseyCaterino Love Judge Erskine! I'm happy to know there are judges out here to educate the public on how it should be done and not done!

Every minute of that hearing where the judge, on her own, turned a request to modify into a bail revocation was beyond wrong. It is a black mark on the judiciary and they know it. There were multiple violations of the Code of Judicial Ethics in my view and this was an embarrassment for the Mass. Trial Court. As a former Massachusetts judge I was simply horrified at the way you were treated...or should I say mistreated. It was indefensible. Kelsey, I'm so sorry you were victimized by an unjust court system.

I thought healing from a gunshot wound would be the hard part, but then McCarthy-Neyman said hold my beer. Nothing says fair and impartial like leaving a court room more traumatized than the actual gunshot

@historyinmemes I hate this movie.

A Clockwork Orange was pulled from cinemas in the United Kingdom by Stanley Kubrick after he and his family received threats tied to the controversy surrounding the film.

@That1Bitchjse7 @IanRunkle self-described "free-speech maximalist" who finds POC to call the N word and carries a gun if anyone reacts with aggression. I think the murder charge stems from his intentional harassing POC while bringing a gun, so he has consciousness of guilt knowing it will lead to violence

@IanRunkle So, if self defense a viable defense if he’s provoked it? In your opinion.

And now I have to decide if I want to cover the Chud The Builder case. I can note that he is not what defence lawyers would call an ideal client.

@yngblkeconomist @Table327 How is saying he likes the daily blaze harassment? Also how would he ever even know about it unless his mom showed him?

😀 I wouldn't fundraise for a guy who is constantly harassing kids like Nans son which he already has done like 5 times within the first 20 mins of this show, but that's just me. Also @Table327 apparently you're not invited. Didn't know you were thinking about it 💀

Here is DoctorTurtleboy's line up of streamers attending his fundraiser 😬

@von672 @ourx_vault @DoctorTurtleboy None of it counts yet you guys rely on it to create a whole conspiracy against the house defendants, and believe it wholeheartedly lol got it

@HaydenSBruce @ourx_vault @DoctorTurtleboy No, so far Trudboy is the only one who pleaded the 5th. Jen didn’t, Kerry didn’t, Higgins didn’t. Anything out of court really doesn’t even count bc he’s lying.

The idiot lawyers suing me on behalf of the McAlberts allege that Karen Read "fed" me a fake story that I knew was complete bullshit, and I ran with it anyway to make money. Here are my messages with my original source - a Duxbury Police Officer who worked with John O'Keefe and believed that his murder was being covered up. He sent me the court filings in the early afternoon, I read them, and I told him that my jaw was on the floor. I made a Twitter post at 6:26 PM announcing that I was writing about this, which is what caught the attention of Natalie, who told Karen. The first time I ever spoke with Natalie was late night on April 17 as I was already in the process of writing my first story on the Canton Coverup. My mind was made up long before I ever spoke with anyone related to Karen Read's defense team, for the same reason every other rational person reached this conclusion - the evidence all points to the McAlberts. Good cops know this better than anyone.

@shazlick79 @ourx_vault @DoctorTurtleboy Yeah I'm aware of all that and have seen everything they have shown. So what. What does it prove? Certainly not the Cottage dude's narrative. So again... Where's the evidence to support what they asserted?

@HaydenSBruce @ourx_vault @DoctorTurtleboy BS are you for real? You do know his entire phone extraction has been widely available for months right? You do know we’ve seen his early on texts? Watch the Fourensic gals if you need to be spoonfed.

@ourx_vault @DoctorTurtleboy Where's your "facts"? Any documents, screenshot with dates, testimony? So far TB is the only one presenting evidence. Your side is all assertion

Come on. We all know the story. We've seen the messages. We know what Natali will testify to. Karen and her team made contact in social media with the Pitbull(Altman), who is...or rather was your designated Kool Aid stirrer. She was supposed to be there at the end to make sure no one broke ranks on the final day. And the Pitbull had been trying to sell you on the Karen Read thing for a while. With Karen now making direct contact, you were interested. But you had grown street smart over time and knew that many people, like Nick Fiorello, will try to sell you on a bogus story. So you were rightly skeptical that's what Karen was doing. But then she found her hook: the Feds. When she told you that federal arrests were expected as soon as that May, she had you. We've seen the messages. You actually had some good skeptical questions before that. That's part of the tragedy. You have the intelligence and instincts to be a good journalist. You just lack the integrity. Your question on the 2:27 part of the story was spot on, an insight that no other FKR follower was capable. Could Jenna have ever thought of such a question? Or Young Jelly? No, on that side, only you had the brains for that. I remember the word you used privately in 2023(not with me, but someone else we both talked to) for your arrangement with Karen: the "deal". The way you described at the time was she gives you a story first, and you give her control over the story. This came up when you were at Canobie Lake Park and she leaked it out that the FBI attempted to serve a warrant to appear before the grand jury to Colin at school. You were pissed that you didn't have it first. She tried to go through you, but she was so anxious for the story to get out, because it proved that there was a federal investigation, that she couldn't wait. I have to admit, I was skeptical, even after that, about her having control over your stories. Influence, yes, but control? However, now that we see the private messages, it's clear that she did have control. And she likes to control everything down to the minutia. She would make a great staff officer. Why would you put up with it? It's not actually hard to understand. Because you had rivals for her attention, most notably Sean, Nick and Jenna, but even others like Young Jelly, who normally wouldn't have the balls to stand up to you, but if backed by Karen, he might. All this gave Karen something her financial training taught her to understand very well: leverage. Because she could always cut you out and use them instead, she had you by the short hairs. Seen in this light, it also explains why you would threaten her behind the scenes, such as when you threatened to go to Tully with info that could "destroy" her. We have perhaps wrongly tended to think of that is just outbursts on your part. We should have given you more credit. You are too intelligent for that. Those threats were meant to reach her. Meant to show her that you had leverage too. I've always said there are no geniuses in crime, and the corollary: there are no idiots. Those that despise you often make the mistake of thinking you are an idiot. No. So when you do something, there is generally a reason. But now you try to rewrite the history. And it's not stupid to do that, because you do know that, while there are no idiots in crimes, there are plenty of idiots, and your followers are idiots. They'll believe whatever you say. However, facts are stubborn things, and anyone can read these messages, or just apply logic to your actions. You were completely fed the story by Karen and her lawyers. You lied about those contacts and got caught. And now you lie about the extent that she controlled you. You might even be able to fool a jury that's already been shaped by public performance. But fooling yourself is much tougher. You'll always know. If you forget, I'll be there to remind you. And that burns.

@benwehrman Moron.... 2d maps don't accurately depict shape and distance. They're only useful on small scales

Anyone who's flown to Europe or Asia from USA (or vice versa) knows that when you watch the in-flight tracker screen, it shows you're making a giant rainbow-arc shape over Greenland/Alaska. You've probably wondered: "That's weird, why don't they just fly in a straight line? Wouldn't that be the easiest, most fuel-efficient way to get from point A to point B?" Don't worry - you are not crazy! Here's what's actually going on with these nonsensical flight paths, explained by Terry Eicher 👇