Heddhurtz

@paulJpitt1967 @WilloWispish Is this in a video game or real life? It may have a bearing on the answer.

@MatthewStadlen Says the laughing stock of a commentator. 🙄

Reform is fast becoming a laughing stock of a party.

@JohnCrookes7 You must be talking about a different Keir Starmer. The one I know of is absolutely useless

The fact that Sir Keir Starmer's opponents want him gone shows how much they fear his ongoing success will deny them the opportunity of being elected to government. His honesty and decency is a breath of fresh air and we are lucky to have him in charge.

@WallaseyWayne @owenjonesjourno People choose their own medium by which to communicate their views. I don't draw caricatures, experimental or otherwise, because my drawing is rubbish.

@Heddhurtz @owenjonesjourno Experiment, try it .. make your own characture of a leading Israeli, say you're in the green party, post it online see what happens.

An obvious antisemitic caricature of Zack Polanski in The Times. But there will be no media or political outrage, which tells you all you need to know.

@TheBaylorHomer @KYVAMIguy @xtards @Paul_provalone @MattWalshBlog Not just you. Unfortunately, some either can't see the obvious or choose not to because it doesn't fit their narrative.

@KYVAMIguy @xtards @Paul_provalone @MattWalshBlog I’m assuming it’s because the White house is more secure than a hotel. That’s just me though

Just to be clear, the theory that leftists are running with is that the Trump Administration somehow convinced a registered Democrat to volunteer to go to prison for the rest of his life so that they could use him as a patsy for a third staged assassination attempt -- one that, they apparently believe, was concocted mostly to justify building a White House ballroom that's already being built anyway. That's their theory of the case here.

@KYVAMIguy @xtards @Paul_provalone @MattWalshBlog You really did double down on being stupid. Basically, by the WH having it's own ballroom it's easier to bring security in house and have it designed in, unlike a hotel not designed with the same attention to security and where anyone can book in. The advantages are obvious.

@xtards @Paul_provalone @MattWalshBlog Yes, you’re good at it

@SeraphimDec6 @crockpics Ageist!

@crockpics She was too old to be showing all that.

A great 1986 backstage portrait featuring Mark Knopfler, Tina Turner, and Eric Clapton. They were all performing at Wembley Arena for the tenth anniversary of the Prince's Trust charity event.

@lynne_colton @crockpics Don't you dare make juvenile comments. Only I can remark on Tina Turner being sexy and her breasts being visible, because you lot are juvenile but I'm not. 🤪

@crockpics The juvenile responses on here are truly pathetic. Tina Turner is a sex symbol and had a sexy woman's body. She's not showing anything naked in this photo and she looks terrific. Don't you agree? So you can see her breasts through her dress? She still looks awesome. Deal with it.

@ZackPolanski If you talk stupid shit expect to be called out on it, irrespective of your religion.

Yesterday in Hastings, in the wake of antisemitic attacks in Golders Green, I faced Nazi salutes. Today the Prime Minister uses his office to attack the only Jewish party leader to score political points.

@BladeoftheS It isn't.

The Times need to apologise for this disgraceful antisemitic picture they published today.

@KarlTurnerMP Why would he not know if he had a niece? I don't think you have thought this through. Odd.

I’m sick to death of the right wing press to be honest. I suspect that Keir didn’t even know he had a niece and this wouldn’t have crossed his desk. Why is he getting the blame for selections that he has absolutely no involvement with whatsoever? 🤷🏼‍♂️

@ChrisWrightson6 Joanne Lumley may well be intending to vote for Reform UK. As for Joanna Lumley, I have no idea, but I don't think a mocked up picture will persuade anyone.

@JackDunc1 Nothing to do with what he is. Everything to do with the rubbish he spouts and the political company he keeps

This is the leader Britain needs. The far right are so angry he's Jewish and gay, as they can't use their usual attack lines.

@Indiegirl28 Not smeared. Just called out for the idiotic stuff he says.

Zack Polanski being smeared a week just before the elections was predictable. They did the same with Corbyn. I really hope Greens do very well the next week. It's sickening to see how people in power work together to bring down a politician who is bringing a message of hope.

@zarahsultana Not a political attack; a defence of his officers. Sir Mark Rowley makes a valid point. Maybe you'd care to share your expertise and experience in arresting people. 🙄

For more than 25 years, the Metropolitan Police has been repeatedly found by independent investigations to be institutionally racist, misogynistic and homophobic. The brass neck is staggering. As Commissioner, Mark Rowley’s job is to serve the public, not to make political attacks. Shame on him.

@bottomley50 No thanks.

Please everyone get out and vote for Labour,a big turnout,they have to be able to continue the work.Councillors work hard and we must keep them in there councils.

@The_Dark_Horse @emmakennytv @ZackPolanski He certainly talks a lot of bollocks.

@emmakennytv @ZackPolanski It is a mystery why people anyone thinks he is the bee's bollocks

@Anna_Soubry An honest & decent man running scared of the Privileges committee. An honest & decent man not prepared to hold himself to the standards he expected of others. Mind you, you betrayed your own party and electorate. Of course you think he's an honest & decent man.

FWIW: sensible #Labour MPs may well be disappointed (given recent events) in #KeirStarmer but he’s fundamentally an honest & decent man. Opposition parties are playing politics ahead of elections. I hope Labour back benchers get behind Starmer & vote the motion down

@DanielJHannan It's a shame that 'procedure' failed to conform with Simon Case's advice. It was sound advice, especially given Mandelson's history. As far as I care, what came after is moot. He could have avoided the whole debacle. Clearly not as cautious as you suggest.

This is going to be unpopular, but here goes. I believe Sir Keir Starmer. I don’t think he would be so foolish, or so careless, as to lie to Parliament. He is an ultra-cautious man, a creature of procedure. When he says that he did not discover until this month that Peter Mandelson had been denied security clearance as a potential ambassador, I think he is telling the truth. But here’s the thing. He never allowed the slightest leeway to others in similar circumstances. As leader of the Opposition, he always assumed the worst, always levelled accusations of lying, always demanded resignations. Boris Johnson was, in my view, also telling the truth as he understood it when he said that he had been “assured that no Covid rules were broken”. He plainly took the word “party” to mean a festive congregation of invited guests, not a break for tea among keyworkers. The only actual party in Number 10 was organised by officials while Boris was 40 miles away. Yet Starmer insisted that this was “industrial-scale law-breaking,” and that Boris must “do the decent thing and resign.” Having set those standards for everyone else, he can hardly now expect an opt out himself.

@Glinner @hashjenni In fairness they don't regularly vote for that in Gaza, but that's because once Hamas got into power elections stopped happening.

@hashjenni And we don't regularly vote for terrorists who use us as human shields. So that's two differences.