Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Herbbug
3.5K posts
Herbbug
@Herb_bug
No skill, garbage gamer. Possible demon sympathizer. Hard 3rd impostor, always sus. Email: [email protected]
United States Katılım Mayıs 2014
514 Takip Edilen433 Takipçiler
Nerfs, buffs, bugs, feature tests; I've been playing Marathon pretty consistently since launch. The most recent patch 1.0.6.2 has introduced intermittent lock-ups starting at the sony logo splash screen, persisting into gameplay. Unplayable for now, hope next patch is fixes it.
GIF
English
@MarathonDevTeam I really enjoy this game but its completely unplayable since the latest patch for me, game is just intermittently locking up.
English
This issue is now resolved and the HUD is correctly displaying Runner eliminations.
Marathon Development Team@MarathonDevTeam
We're aware of and investigating an issue introduced in update 1.0.6.2 that is incorrectly displaying Runner eliminations on the HUD. We'll share an update when we have one available. Thank you for your reports!
English
@digitalN0mad49 @PlankReturns No personal risk sure, but that is not the same as no risk.
English
@Herb_bug @PlankReturns Red is literally the only no risk vote. The risk is purely imposed by and on blue votes
English
Lowest tier: if I press the red button I live
Midwit tier: I have to press the blue button because I cannot read
Above average tier: I will press red because that’s the smart thing to do
Smart tier: I will press the blue button because I understand the problem but I am also smart enough to realize not enough people understand the problem. By pressing the blue button and siding with the midwits, I can save them from their own stupidity.
Genius tier: I will press the red button. I will survive and hopefully all the morons will die.
English
@judgeshowgames @PlankReturns Blue majority doesn't negatively impact red voters.
It's the ideal outcome regardless of your individual vote.
Hypothetically vote however you like, there is no obligation.
English
@Herb_bug @PlankReturns Blue majority is safer for blue pressers.
Red is just plain safer for red pressers without any other qualification.
Press red.
English
@Syzler3 @PlankReturns "Have fun trying to empathically communicate to 4 billion people to choose blue." Pretty clear that you didnt understand the hypothetical, coordination isn't a variable. Your perception of risk/cost is nonexistent unless it's personal, then you dont understand risk/cost either.
English
@Herb_bug @PlankReturns The funniest thing is always when people say shit like "oh you need 100% red to save everyone" like thats an issue red considers. No lol. I only need 1 vote to save myself. Have fun trying to empathically communicate to 4 billion people to choose blue.
English
Herbbug retweetledi
English
@Herb_bug @PlankReturns Both red receiving 100% and blue receiving 50+% have a near 0 chance of happening.
English
@Zachary27636551 @VGBC_GimR It's not impossible, it's improbable. Words have meaning, try to use them correctly.
English
@Herb_bug @VGBC_GimR It’s impossible to get 100% red not harder it’s statistically impossible. Even taking away children at least one person would still slip and hit blue
English
Blues: come on guys, if we just get over 50% we can save everyone!
Reds: if you press blue, you’re just killing yourself. No one has made a single coherent argument as to why I should press it. If everyone just pressed it no one is in danger. And you know what!? Blues are actually the immoral ones because-
Blues: what about children? Many of them will select a button at random.
Reds:
GIF
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@SimoneSyed You haven't considered that some people have just enough faith that blue will be the majority result but not enough faith to risk their life on the uncertainty. Voting for the minority is unintuitive but is isn't impossible that some will reason that way.
English
"What radicalized you"
Realizing Red button pushers are willfully anti civilization
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@PlankReturns Lmfao just dont post or block me if you cant handle someone replying to you, weirdo
English
@PlankReturns Not really, you're attributing intelligence to hoping people would die without fronting the risk.
There is no altruism in wishing for the death of idiots, they are not devoid of value.
Vote red if you must and hope that more than 50% vote blue, blue majority is the ideal result
English
@Yatoplayz In every iteration of a blue majority scenario, the red votes become irrelevant so they feel justified in not fronting the cost/risk. The cost/risk is always blue voter lives. 100% red is highly unlikely without coordination so blue majority is ideal outcome for both parties.
English
Am I high why are people saying red when picking blue saves everyone
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@Prazkat The cost and risk is always blue voters lives.
Blue majority is the safest outcome, as 100% red is much harder to achieve.
Most "should" vote blue due to this conclusion but red votes aren't dangerous unless more than 50% of the population feel overwhelmed by uncertainty.
English
Estoy entendiendo mal la teoría de juegos aquí?
Porque no veo literalmente ningún incentivo para apretar el botón azul.
Si azul gana vive, pero si pierde muere.
Si rojo gana vive, y si pierde también vive. Rojo nunca está en riesgo. Presionas rojo.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
Español
@AdinitiumR @liminal_warmth I can't explain it more clearly to you. We agree that a blue majority is the best outcome. I'm just detailing that a red voter may not necessarily want the majority and doesn't intentionally "vote red to kill blue voters." Is that so hard to understand?
English
@Herb_bug @liminal_warmth There is no symetry in this case, which is what I think you were trying to imply, really hard to tell though. Reds winning imply a world of just reds left- just defectors - blue wins implies we wake up in the same world tommorow. One is objectivelly worse than the other.
English
I hope all the red button pushers will enjoy their new world without empathetic and prosocial people (and significantly fewer women).
Good luck with that
English
@AdinitiumR @liminal_warmth What are you arguing here? The blue majority scenario is already established you dont need to repeat it. No one suggested blue wants to be in the minority. Color perception is irrelevant. You might just be a moron though.
English
@Herb_bug @liminal_warmth Mate, the logic unfound in your sentence structure is equally unfound in your reasoning. Blue wins, all live, even the reds. In no world does Blue ever want to be the minority, Red on the other hand does. You might just be colorblind though.
English
@RaraSensei @WokeFDR Lmao I'm simply providing the alternative perspective, but there is something amusing about being called a coward and getting immediately blocked 🙃
English
@RaraSensei @WokeFDR You are inferring that from what you've understood from the hypothetical, but it isn't an absolute truth.
English
Yes but if you set the goal to “total survival” the red button automatically becomes the wrong choice given that some % WILL push blue.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
This sums up why the blue/red button thing has caused such a ruckus. Like the white-gold/black-blue dress, it can be viewed through two different lenses, with each lens making one button seem obvious and the other seem unfathomable.
English