Herr Groucher von Schlesian

2.5K posts

Herr Groucher von Schlesian banner
Herr Groucher von Schlesian

Herr Groucher von Schlesian

@HerrGroucher

Der Mensch wird nie frei sein, bis der letzte König mit den Eingeweiden des letzten Priesters erwürgt wird.

A Violent American City Katılım Ocak 2021
1.5K Takip Edilen57 Takipçiler
Bill D'Alessandro
Bill D'Alessandro@BillDA·
I was quoted $10,000 to install two dehumidifiers in my crawlspace. I saved $7,500 by designing a DIY custom crawl space dehumidification system with Claude 🤑 I am not an HVAC professional. Here’s how I did it. Our story begins with the discovery that our new home needed a dehumidifier installed in the crawl space to prevent mold. The professionals told me it would cost $10k, since I’d need one unit on each end due to the size of the space, plus a second drain line installed. “Can’t we just use fans to move the humid air from one side toward the dehumidifier?” They wouldn’t do that. Enter Claude… I uploaded a floor plan of my crawl space and air volume dimensions, telling Claude what I was trying to do. It researched the best dehumidifier sized appropriately for my air volume (100 pints apparently). Found me the best price - $1,500. Now it was time for fans 💨 I had originally envisioned the single dehumidifier at one end of the space, with fans on the opposite end. Claude taught me that would just draw more moist outdoor air in through the vents on that side, creating a linear flow through the crawl space. Instead it modeled the air flow and suggested a circular vortex with 4 fans, one on each wall, in a circle. That sucks in minimal outdoor air, keeping cool dry air circulating. I told it to research appropriate fans. It found four 20” sealed bearing fans on Amazon (impervious to dust), with DC drive motors (more energy efficient than AC apparently). $120 each. 🔌 It told me to buy a smart plug for each fan and a few internet connected humidity sensors. Another $200. Claude mapped where to install everything in the crawl space. Here’s how it works - the humidity sensors monitor the crawl space air continuously. If it ever exceeds 60% humidity, the smart plugs switch on all 4 fans, circulating the air in the crawl space past the dehumidifier until the humidity is below 50% 🔃🔃🔃 Total cost ~$2,500 for everything and one Saturday of work for me. I saved $7,500 vs. the original quote because I didn’t need two dehumidifiers, and Claude tells me my version is nearly twice as energy efficient. Plus I learned a ton about my home and had fun. I didn’t know anything about dehumidifiers, fans, or air flow dynamics before starting. AI can do so much more than write code - the applications are endless.
Bill D'Alessandro tweet mediaBill D'Alessandro tweet media
English
96
57
1.2K
382.2K
Kostas Moros
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas·
Best headline I've read in a while. CA counts for a damn month, and magically, all the close races flip blue. That's bullshit and erodes confidence in our elections. Election DAY.
Kostas Moros tweet media
English
10
42
302
3.3K
Mark in California
Mark in California@Charles95684721·
@MorosKostas I don’t know how much fraud there is, but it certainly gives the impression of fraud. And we have an Election Day, not an election month. If you can’t get your ballot in by election day, tough luck.
English
2
0
6
93
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
Was it really a laundry fire that put a carrier out of action? Very big kill if it was the Iranians. And more proof that the A2/AD nightmare has come true.
Policy Tensor tweet media
Matthew Hoh@MatthewPHoh

The most expensive warship the US Navy has ever deployed, 1 of only 2 available for the largest US military campaign since Barack Obama’s escalation of the Afghan War 17 years ago…everyone remember how that went…is out of service for over a year because someone left too much lint in a dryer or because the crew would rather light a fire, on the same ship they are on, rather than continue taking part in the war…either explanation is a trumpet call of US military decline and superficiality. What’s startling as a former Marine, having been deployed on a Navy ship, is the question I don’t see being asked: How did that fire get out of control and burn so long? Damage control is one of the fundamental and existential tasks of any crew on any ship, let alone a warship. The ships are designed around damage control, damage control is a determinant of crew size, and a ship’s crew trains constantly for it. So, what happened on the Ford to allow burning pairs of skivies to take the $15 billion carrier out of the war and send her to the yards for at least a year? Of course, if the maintenance estimate is a year, double it, and triple the costs. I think two things are important here: -this fire and the inability to control it are another example, and there are multitudes of these examples, of poor design, construction, functionality and serviceability of American warships (same can be said of many aircraft and ground vehicles). I imagine the investigation will find that survivability and damage control were sacrificed for cost and space, while sexier, more expensive and unproven technologies were preferred over legacy design, construction and systems. The stories of the Ford’s maintenance problems on its first deployment, and this deployment, especially its overflowing heads (toilets), were widely reported. -Damage control, particularly fire fighting, is more about personnel than anything else. The extended deployment of the Ford, again 8 other carriers were unavailable, forcing the exhausted crew and ship to conduct these operations half a world away when the ship should have been heading home, may have led to command and crew dysfunction due to exhaustion, morale and complacency. It may also signal a Navy that fails to do the fundamental well, whether aboard individual ships, in fleets or out of training. This isn’t the first concern we’ve seen with naval leadership, command and crew performance. In the past decade, multiple ships have run aground or into other ships, and in 2020, the Bonhomme Richard, with a $5 billion replacement cost, burnt down to the water line after a sailor started a fire. She was subsequently decommissioned. The dangers here are greater than the risk the Iranians are going to start attacking our ships with catapults and barges full of flaming loads of laundry. This shows weakness across the board for the Navy with regards to ship design and construction, leadership and command, and manning and training. Issues of an under-resourced and over extended fleet are expressing themselves during war - exactly as should be expected. As this war continues, we’ll see more examples of these failures, accidents, and losses, and they won’t be limited to the Navy. One of several reasons the longer this war continues the more it goes in in Iran’s favor. Yet, there is likely a think tank conference or a congressional briefing this week in DC advocating war with China… 19fortyfive.com/2026/03/u-s-na…

English
41
234
1.3K
102.6K
Daniel
Daniel@dbweinger·
@mattyglesias Why are you assuming Trump is chickening out? Do you have evidence for the notion that whatever talks are going on won’t get trump what he wants? Or that the bombing of energy infrastructure (the only thing effected by this “pause”) won’t continue absent something acceptable?
English
5
0
1
2K
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
Congratulations to everyone who kept their heads, ignored the physical fundamentals, and just counted on TACO to maintain market equilibrium.
Matthew Yglesias tweet mediaMatthew Yglesias tweet media
English
25
22
413
54.1K
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
Indeed, so far, nothing fundamental has changed. Israel continues striking in Iran, the U.S. is likely involved, and Iran continues its own attacks. What also hasn’t changed is that Iran hasn’t backed down — and there’s little indication it will. It still controls the Strait of Hormuz and is not prepared to compromise on its core demands in any negotiation. What has changed is Trump’s apparent recognition of the limits of force. He issued an ultimatum and threatened action but ultimately stepped back without securing anything from Iran. Messages may have been exchanged, but there’s little evidence of real Iranian flexibility. Tehran is clearly not willing to reopen the Strait on Washington’s terms. Trump now faces a stark choice: escalate with significant force to reopen the Strait, a move that could widen the conflict, deepen its global economic impact, and still fail — or move toward a deal that requires concessions to Iran, even if framed domestically as a win. That’s where things stand. The real test of Trump’s flexibility is still ahead, and this episode may have underscored, perhaps for the first time for him, that Iran is not Venezuela. #iran
Babak Vahdad@BabakVahdad

Positive sign but a bit of skepticism here. Iranians remember what happened during the two previous rounds of negotiations with the Americans. Trust is at an all-time low. #Iran #IranWar

English
20
151
416
68.3K
Herr Groucher von Schlesian
@Gruntpa @Wehrschach_109 It should upset everyone that the US President is manipulating markets by lying. But alas, about a third of the US has TDS. Trump says jump, they jump. Trump says kneel, they kneel. It's a shame.
English
1
0
0
23
The Reagan Caucus
The Reagan Caucus@NewReaganCaucus·
@WHE_Reborn Yeah, we're not losing. We're well on our way to achieving 3 of our objectives. The only real open question is whether Israel's efforts to facilitate an uprising will succeed. It's either a highly successful lawnmowing operation or a real permanent change.
English
10
3
38
2.2K
The Reagan Caucus
The Reagan Caucus@NewReaganCaucus·
Stopping the Iranian regime now is far more important than midterms. Those who know, know.
English
99
173
1.3K
129.4K
Christian Beyzad
Christian Beyzad@marginletter·
@JavierBlas @MarketBlondes That tells us that there isn’t a real energy crisis and once a settlement will be achieved things will rip again. I pity the panicas
English
1
0
1
467
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
BREAKING: Trump postpones attacks on Iranian electricity network for five days; says that Tehran and Washington are having “good and productive” discussions about a “complete and total resolution of our hostilities.” Oil and natural gas prices fall sharply.
Javier Blas tweet media
English
226
262
862
335.7K
Patrick De Haan
Patrick De Haan@GasBuddyGuy·
@Tomdickanarry and if there's dialogue happening, risk calculations improve, that's why the market is reacting. if it turns out to be meh, markets will again react based on the infomation
English
2
0
2
202
Mohamed A. El-Erian
Mohamed A. El-Erian@elerianm·
Market prices performed a massive U-turn just minutes after the post below as President Trump announced that the U.S. has held "very productive and constructive conversations" with Iran, resulting in a five-day postponement of "any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure." The question now is not only the outcome of these "ongoing meetings and discussions," but also how the three warring parties—the U.S., Israel, and Iran—will react in the interim. #economy #markets #middleeastwar
Mohamed A. El-Erian@elerianm

Current pre-market price action—marked by a broad-based decline in asset prices, including 6% and 8% drops in gold and silver—reflects a persistent flight to cash. At this stage, cash has emerged as the only reliable (nominal) safe haven. #markets #economy #investing #investors

English
46
59
254
105.4K
Hamid Riahi
Hamid Riahi@HamidRiahi10·
@citrinowicz @BabakVahdad Without an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire, Iran’s leadership may not even have the logistical capacity to regroup and make coherent decisions—let alone any incentive to pursue an end to the conflict at this stage.
English
2
4
4
1.7K
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
Trump blinked first — out of a clear understanding that striking Iran’s energy infrastructure would trigger a direct and significant retaliation. As for negotiations, messages were clearly exchanged, but there’s strong reason to doubt that Iran actually conceded. This regime is unlikely to reopen the Strait without meaningful concessions from the U.S. From Tehran’s perspective, this is a notable achievement: they didn’t fold, didn’t back down, and may have forced Washington to recalibrate its objectives. For Trump, the goal now appears to have shifted — no longer regime change, but reopening the Strait. Bottom line is - the conflict isn’t over. It’s still unfolding, but a potential path to de-escalation has emerged. Still, one key question remains — if in five days Iran hasn’t reopened the Strait, it’s unlikely that threats alone will change that. Pressure without incentives rarely works. #IranWar
Barak Ravid@BarakRavid

🚨🚨Trump on Truth Social: I AM PLEASE TO REPORT THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, HAVE HAD, OVER THE LAST TWO DAYS, VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS REGARDING A COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION OF OUR HOSTILITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST. BASED ON THE TENOR AND TONE OF THESE IN DEPTH, DETAILED, AND CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS, WITCH WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK, I HAVE INSTRUCTED THE DEPARTMENT OF WAR TO POSTPONE ANY AND ALL MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST IRANIAN POWER PLANTS AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A FIVE DAY PERIOD, SUBJECT TO THE SUCCESS OF THE ONGOING MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

English
99
425
1.3K
400.4K
OSINTWarfare
OSINTWarfare@OSINTWarfare·
The Israeli Air Force (IAF) carried out airstrikes on targets in Tehran, which may have included energy infrastructure.
English
16
53
312
18.7K
Nikunj
Nikunj@VakilNikunj·
@citrinowicz Or the US should leave it to European and Asian countries to arrive at an understanding with the Iranians regarding Hormuz.
English
2
1
5
2K
Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش
Another statement that, beyond reflecting frustration, reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of Iran (and no — it’s not Venezuela). A. Iran will not reopen the Strait of Hormuz. That’s not going to happen. In the coming days, we can expect Tehran to threaten to “set the Gulf on fire,” especially if the U.S. strikes critical infrastructure. B. At the same time, such a strike would likely accelerate the Houthis’ entry into the conflict — a player that will find it difficult to remain on the sidelines. C. It’s hard to reconcile how a president who emphasizes concern for the Iranian people can simultaneously threaten Iran’s destruction. He may believe deterrence through threats is sufficient — it isn’t. Such rhetoric will not shift Iran’s position; instead, it forces the president to choose: escalate and follow through, risking broader war, or back down and further erode U.S. deterrence. D. Above all, this kind of messaging highlights how inadequate the strategic preparation for this scenario has been — particularly the failure to fully account for Iran’s leverage over the Strait of Hormuz. E. It is also plausible that Iran’s leadership will “send a message” during any ultimatum period by striking infrastructure in one of the Gulf states, signaling both capability and intent. At the same time, Gulf countries would likely accelerate efforts to de-escalate the conflict, as they would be the primary targets and bear the immediate costs of any escalation. F. If the U.S. wants the strait reopened, it will have to either use force or pursue regime change. There is no third option. #IranWar
Nicholas Kristof@NickKristof

1.) President Trump appears to be threatening a war crime; 2.) This will go over badly with other Gulf countries, for Iran will then attack their power plants and perhaps desalination; 3.) Iran won't reopen the Strait, because closure is what gives it leverage.

English
34
150
480
121.2K
Herr Groucher von Schlesian
@JetSetGent @AlexBerenson Iran is much larger than Serbia and has a decentralized power grid (largest power station only generates <5% if national power). Iran has been preparing for this war for almost 50 years.
English
1
0
0
47
JetSetGent
JetSetGent@JetSetGent·
@AlexBerenson Wrong. Collapsing Iran’s electric grid will make it much harder for them to both conduct military operations AND control their population. This worked in Serbia, so why not here?
English
2
2
9
409
Dmitri Alperovitch
Dmitri Alperovitch@DAlperovitch·
@AdamSternthal As even POTUS is saying now, nearly all the original objectives are nearing completion now. Let’s see what happens this week
English
14
0
21
11K
Thomas Keith
Thomas Keith@iwasnevrhere_·
Hebrew media reporting that the U.S.-supplied THAAD system missed the same class of missile across Arad, Dimona, and earlier at Beit Shemesh. Same profile, multiple penetrations. Two direct impacts landed within an hour, leaving dozens wounded. The IOF is now acknowledging what it usually avoids, the defense is not hermetic. The cause is being framed as either human error or a technical issue, but the pattern is clear. A system meant to anchor the upper layer alongside Arrow didn’t hold under repeated engagement.
Thomas Keith tweet mediaThomas Keith tweet media
English
9
278
1K
45.1K