Hitdah Floor

According to a new study, people who took last winter's flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to get influenza than the unvaccinated.

@drterrysimpson There is a 14 day window after being vaccinated, where you are classified as unvaccinated. This is an objectively falsified classification, and any results using this method is fraud.

Easy. If you assume 80% vaccinated in the population and a 10-fold lower hospitalization rate in the vaccinated, then you do not get 80% of hospitalizations in the vaccinated. The math is: vaccinated share of hospitalizations = (p × r) / [(p × r) + (1-p)] where p = vaccine coverage and r = vaccinated risk relative to unvaccinated. Put in your numbers: p = 0.8 r = 0.1 So: (0.8 × 0.1) / [(0.8 × 0.1) + 0.2] = 0.08 / 0.28 = 28.6% So no: with a true 10x reduction, you would expect about 29%, not 80%. The CDC’s own surveillance paper makes this exact point: the percentage vaccinated among cases or hospitalizations depends on both vaccine coverage and vaccine effectiveness, which is why raw percentages are hard to interpret and rate ratios are the better metric. Which means the real question is not “can Terry do math?” but whether your 10x assumption applies to that older VA cohort, that time period, that variant mix, waning, prior infection, and hospitalization definition. In Delta-era CDC surveillance, hospitalization rates were about 10.4-fold higher in the not-fully-vaccinated during late June–July 2021, but that was a different dataset and period. So the arithmetic is straightforward. If the hospitalized group is 80% vaccinated and the background is 80% vaccinated, then either: the protection in that cohort/time was far smaller than 10x, the comparison is badly confounded, or you’re comparing unlike denominators. What you cannot do is import a 10x Delta-era rate ratio and then pretend it automatically explains a different VA snapshot.

@DrNeilStone A correlation you have a preference for.

Must be a coincidence

@MauritzPreller @bosma2002 Dosing size, interval and duration are very important. Prophylactic usage in combination with other medicines too. None of those RCTs studied the ivermectin properly. Like testing the mRNA vaccine on hospitalized covid patients with a tiny dose. Wrong usage.

@bosma2002 Sorry to break it to you but if you don't find any clinical benefit in 6 different large RCT trials you can stand on your head and whistle as much as you like, Ivermectín would not work for covid. Two opposite things cannot be true at the same time.

The ivermectin narrative around COVID persists largely because grifters exploit scientific illiteracy. Large randomized controlled trials consistently show no clinically meaningful benefit. Continuing to promote it as a COVID treatment in 2026 is absurd.

@drterrysimpson No chance you are a dr... Actually doctors are mostly retarded so checks out.

The people who call obesity “laziness” often mistake genetic luck for moral superiority. GLP-1 therapies simply correct the biology of appetite they were lucky enough to inherit. Their metabolism isn’t the problem — their lack of empathy is.

4,551 studies later — still no apology from those who promoted "safe and effective" and silenced anyone who questioned it.

@DrSusanOliver1 You are the epitome of anti science dogma.

Malhotra started out by spreading misinformation about statins then when his father, who should have been on a statin but wasn't, died of a heart attack, he added spreading misinformation about vaccines. It's good to see the GMC is belatedly taking action against him.

BREAKING NEWS TELEGRAPH: ‘I blew the whistle on covid jabs 5 years ago. Now, I’m fighting for my medical license’ ‘You do not rebuild trust by shutting down debate. You rebuild it through transparency, humility and the courage to admit uncertainty’ telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/1…

Check out the new White House webpage on the COVID-19 origins. It says all the quiet parts (about the origin of the virus) out loud: whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-…

@KimDotcom The Institute for the Study of War assessments indicate Iran's capabilities degraded by over 90%, with thousands of Iranian casualties versus ~20 allied deaths.

Hold the line Iran You are winning

Science Has a Major Fraud Problem. For decades, scientists were above reproach. Not any more. @TheFP our Joe Nocera investigates the murky world of fraudulent research, and the sleuths exposing dishonest science. Must read. thefp.com/p/science-has-…

** HOT OFF THE PRESS ** ~The Persistence of Covid-19 Vaccine artifacts in BODILY FLUIDS & TISSUES: A systematic Review~ published: 02.10.2026

@DamienDraevon @DarkMatter2525 @EricLDaugh You are describing the incompetence of the Biden administration to get important things past the finish line. If it was that important to the Democrats, who had unified control of Congress, they could have made it happen.

@HitdahF @DarkMatter2525 @EricLDaugh Were you dropped on your head as a baby? Biden could not legally release the documents.

🚨 WOW. President Trump goes NUCLEAR on Rep. Thomas Massie "We gotta get rid of this loser! This guy is bad! He's disloyal to the Republican Party, he's disloyal to the people of Kentucky, and disloyal to the United States of America!"

@DarkMatter2525 @EricLDaugh pipe down lil bro, you didn't make a peep for the four years sleepy Joe failed to release the documents. Fake outrage. Go support the dictatorial theocracy. The fall off is astounding.

@EricLDaugh Because he has fought so hard to release and unredact the Epstein files. Same reason MTG got excommunicated. You're all pedo defenders.

@DesireeAmerica4 Do you think this type of shift just happens at random? Modern feminists deployed a full out war on men. They literally define masculinity as toxic. Enodrine disruptors are riddled throughout our food supply and products. Testosterones is plummeting in men. There are consequences

AN ENTIRE GENERATION OF BOYS HAS LOST THE PLOT ​If your first instinct as a young man is to go full MMA on a female classmate instead of de-escalating or walking away, you failed the most basic test of masculinity. The bar is in hell. The most embarrassing part isn't even him. It’s the room full of other "boys" sitting silently at their desks instead of standing up and putting this nerd back in his chair. ​Has Gen Z completely forgotten how to act like men.

@TheMemeticist If you look at the graph, the steep decline in life expectancy only began on the year of the vaccine roll out. Oopsies

"don't worry about covid bro, it's only a 10% reduction in life expectancy" do normies hear themselves?

@PokerPolitics Maybe going from near zero to billions of doses overnight had manufacturing quality concerns... Highly automated processes across many distinct production plants on such a large and quick scale would almost certainly have anomalies. Why are you so against batch analysis?

COVID lot numbers are a deep cut conspiracy theory where anti-vaxxers try to figure out which COVID vaccine shipments were full of the death jab and which shipments were intercepted by White Hats and filled with saline/placebos.

Post-Pandemic Week 49 2025 Update The Bad News: Excess Cancer Mortality has accelerated beyond even its old elevated trend. Elevated at 10.1% over baseline. PFE here is only 1.1-pts of this excess (11%). Perhaps this is why we have observed elevated cancer treatment expenditures, diagnoses, drug allocations, and new patient social chatter — all inflecting in relation to the very same strike point (Week 14 of 2021). This is not good news, and overshadows all the other good or encouraging news about US Mortality trends. The signal is clear. TES was right to have raised the alarm over this signal 5 years ago. 😑

@theBrianaMills Democrat mayors decided to send infected people to elderly homes. Almost as if their goal was to increase deaths to maximize fear mongering potential.

It's so maddening that when the pandemic hit, instead of deciding to clean the air in all indoor spaces, wear respirators in healthcare settings, and understand more about spreading airborne disease, everyone decided to just get infected over and over again.

@drterrysimpson "briefly produce the spike protein" "rapidly broken down" 🤡 "established limits for residual DNA" "fragments are degraded quickly" LNPs have entered the chat.

There has been a lot of noise lately about “SV40,” DNA fragments, and claims that mRNA vaccines might integrate into our genome or cause cancer. For people who are worried, here is what the science actually says. First, the COVID mRNA vaccines do not alter your DNA. The vaccine contains a piece of messenger RNA, which is simply an instruction your cells use to briefly produce the spike protein so your immune system can recognize it. mRNA stays in the cytoplasm of the cell, where proteins are made. It does not enter the nucleus, where your DNA resides, and it is rapidly broken down by normal cellular processes. Second, the “SV40” claim is widely misunderstood. What people are referring to is a small promoter sequence used in plasmids during the manufacturing process to produce the mRNA. A promoter is not a virus and not a gene. It is simply a regulatory sequence used in laboratory vectors. It cannot replicate, infect cells, or produce proteins. Like many biologic products, extremely small fragments of DNA from the manufacturing process can remain. Regulatory agencies have established limits for residual DNA for decades, and the amounts allowed are measured in nanograms—trillionths of a gram. These fragments are degraded quickly and have no demonstrated biological effect. Third, claims that vaccine RNA or DNA integrates into the human genome are theoretical arguments, not evidence. Integration requires a very specific set of molecular machinery—reverse transcription, nuclear transport, and specialized integration enzymes. Human cells do not randomly take stray RNA or DNA and stitch it into chromosomes. If they did, every bacterial infection, every meal, and every interaction with our microbiome would permanently alter our genome. Most importantly, after billions of doses administered worldwide, there is no evidence that mRNA vaccines integrate into DNA or increase cancer risk. If such an effect existed, it would already be visible in cancer registries and population studies across countries with high vaccination rates. It is not. What we do know is this: COVID-19 itself was deadly. Before vaccines were available, hospitals filled, intensive care units overflowed, and millions of people died worldwide. The mRNA vaccines dramatically reduced severe disease, hospitalization, and death. They remain one of the most effective medical technologies deployed during the pandemic. Scientific progress always invites theoretical concerns—that is part of how science works. But science ultimately rests on evidence, not speculation. After billions of doses, the evidence is clear: the risk of these hypothetical scenarios is extraordinarily remote—closer to being bitten by a shark while being struck by lightning than to a real, observed medical risk. The technology that helped end the deadliest phase of the pandemic is not something to fear. It is something to recognize for what it is: a remarkable achievement of modern biomedical science.