Isla Mac

5.4K posts

Isla Mac banner
Isla Mac

Isla Mac

@Isla_macy

Rtd Principal University Lecturer. Nursing and Public Health. Ex Chair of School Governors. Here to challenge the ‘Gender Identity’ crime scene.

UK Katılım Aralık 2020
1.6K Takip Edilen9.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
'Tackling 'Gender Ideology' in Your Child's School' For Parents. Following the celebration of a parent who managed to eradicate 'Gender Ideology' in his child's school, I have been asked to give some general tips for my advice to parents. There are 'Gender Critical' professional organisations that offer comprehensive resources (listed below). Please retweet so more parents can find their way through the maze. 🙏 1/22 A thread 🧵You can do this!
English
27
522
1.3K
105.4K
Carolyn Brown
Carolyn Brown@cbbroony·
For at least the last 6 years or more, Scottish Education has been set up to indoctrinate children with gender identity ideology & it refuses to discuss it. This is a national scandal @Rachael2Win @VoteEwing @MspMeghan64838 @jackiebmsp @AnasSarwar @SharonDowey_ @Isla_macy
ScotPAG@ScotPAG

What has gone wrong with Scottish Education? Quite a lot!! @HeadWarriorTWM @Transgendertrd @ProtectTeach @scotgov @ForWomenScot @WRNScotland @WingsScotland @TessWhite4NE @Rachael2Win @ScotUnionEd scotpag.com/post/scottish-…

English
2
18
30
780
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
Why are the children of Scotland not important enough to save from the pernicious indoctrination of gender ideology? Why are parliamentary representatives not utilising our legal gains to step in? Why is it acceptable for the parents to be hog tied by the scandalous ‘trans child’ school policy? I agree, and add, this is a national child abuse scandal. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
English
0
0
1
40
Isla Mac retweetledi
Bayswater Support
Bayswater Support@BayswaterSG·
The Department for Education UK is consulting on changes to "Keeping Children Safe in Education" (KCSIE) Deadline: Wednesday April 22 Have your say: consult.education.gov.uk/independent-ed… Key concerns: Social transition has "significant effects on [the child's] psychological functioning and longer-term outcomes", including potential medical implications. Consequently, no education professional has the expertise to assess a child's "best interests" on this matter as suggested by the draft guidance (e.g. para 254, 256 etc.) Encouraging an assessment of "best interests" in cases of gender-related distress contravenes KCSIE's own stipulation in para. 45 "Only appropriately trained professionals should attempt to make a diagnosis of a mental health problem." Teachers do not acquire the necessary expertise to assess "best interests" when a child enters puberty (paras. 258, 259, 264, 265). The draft guidance puts children at risk by encouraging teachers to stray beyond their professional expertise, handing them a highly consequential decision that they are not qualified to make. This is true even if parents consent to social transition. Parents are not always well-informed about the consequences this may have for a child, so while parental consent is important, teachers must not be given the impression that there is a green light to proceed as long as parents approve. Teachers cannot determine whether this is in the child's "best interests" (257) even if the parents might think so. The draft guidance fails to define social transition and thus confuses personal expression (which is uncontroversial as long as a child complies with uniform regulations) with teachers treating a child as if they were the opposite sex (which has profound consequences for the child and their peers). The guidance must articulate more clearly that social transition in the context of a school involves harnessing the child's peers and teachers as a form of 'therapeutic community' to affirm the child as the opposite sex (or non-binary or other identity). The guidance is not clear that safeguarding considerations take priority over a child's individual agency and their equality/human rights e.g. if an equality claim puts a child at risk of harm. The guidance mentions 'harm' (para. 261) but does not explain what this means for a cross-sex or non-binary identified child e.g. breast binding, tucking, DIY hormones, heightened dysphoria, online exploitation, misinformation about suicide. Para 263 promises confidentiality if a child reveals a cross-sex identity to a teacher but does not demand social transition. This means parents are uninformed about something that could indicate underlying mental health issues, trauma, neurodevelopmental issues. This secrecy undermines safeguarding for these children. Para 252 opens up the possibility of schools drafting their own policies on 'social transition'. This creates a loophole for unevidenced and unsafe policymaking by education professionals, who are not qualified to make decisions relating to mental health. Para 262 must be reworded to be clear that if a school considers a parent to be such a risk that their child's cross-sex identity should be concealed from them, this would warrant immediate referral to social services (not merely a consultation with the DSL). Otherwise schools will continue to use this as a loophole to exclude parents from decision-making. Note: The main question to respond to is Question 33 of the consultation. Further information may be added in response to Question 34 on single-sex toilets, changing rooms etc., and Question 35 on single-sex sport.
English
2
43
77
5K
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
Hey, have you got 10 minutes this weekend to help out kids being indoctrinated into ideological madness? Please, and I am slightly begging, would you help us out? TT have done a great job and we desperately need assistance to stop this high speed train 🙏 This is a critical area of schools policy that we need to turn around. Thanks.
TransgenderTrend@Transgendertrd

**Schools guidance consultation** Parents, please respond to the government consultation on the updated KCSIE draft guidance! Deadline 22 April. You only need respond to 3 questions on the new gender questioning children section. Here's our quick guide: transgendertrend.com/kcsie-draft-gu…

English
0
44
62
2.6K
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
The level of government led, child abusing indoctrination via policy, is terrifying in Scottish schools. I’m moving back home to Scotland shortly and I’m looking forward to working with all the 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿awesome women and groups, including @ScotPAG ⬇️ Scottish parents and their children are desperate for help.
ScotPAG@ScotPAG

´..the concept of gender identity is based on a lie and for a lie to persist, everyone needs to play along with the lie and reinforce the lie. This is dangerous authoritarian territory.’ @WingsScotland @Jebadoo2 @Transgendertrd @WRNScotland @ProtectTeach @HeadWarriorTWM @SexMattersOrg scotpag.com/post/a-tale-of…

English
8
24
87
1.6K
Isla Mac retweetledi
For Women Scotland
For Women Scotland@ForWomenScot·
"The Supreme Court has confirmed women’s rights. Then the High Court confirmed them again. So why are working women still waiting, trade unions still silent, and a litigation company earning thousands still raising money after the judge told them to sit down?" labourheartlands.com/good-law-proje… via @Labourheartland
English
16
460
1.6K
15.7K
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
I agree with a lot that @soniasodha says, but certainly not with this. This is the unwise liberal-left feminist position, propagated by @SexMattersOrg and Co, that has cost women, children and British society so much in lost time to fight the damage of gender ideology. We really must discuss this point right from first principles. WHY do ‘trans people’ ‘deserve same protections against discrimination as other groups’ as a matter of course? ‘Trans people’ is not even a meaningfully defined category of people in law or medicine - and we are all now well aware that it includes men with fetishes and personality disorders and a huge cohort of very confused young girls. This is a topic to do with illness, perversion and vulnerability, not workers’ rights! And what does ‘protections against discrimnation’ actually mean in that case? We cannot keep relying on this ill thought out, undefined gesture of kindness and inclusion based on rotten Fabian equality laws, when in reality it is producing horrendous safeguarding risks, abuses and mismedication. In these cases we actively need to employ discrimination to make good decisions concerning safer recruitment and for the sake of a civil society. There are no such things as ‘trans people’ - there are simply people with delusions and compulsions about their sex and sexuality, who engage in cross sex impersonation, which is a behaviour not an innate characteristic - and this behaviour is sometimes extremely antisocial. If this cohort warrant protections at all it would be best that it is under disability, because they are often suffering from a mental health problem and a lack of boundaries, that they should be protected from to avoid mutilating surgery. That would be true compassion. I beg the liberal-left feminists to debate this issue properly… to explain why they think the nonsense Protected Characteristic of Gender Reassignment should exist at all - especially when it has been designed to apply to children - a tool ripe for paedophilic abuse?
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha

Trans people of course deserve same protections against discrimination as other groups, but we must be clear that doesn't extend to the right to self-identify into services & spaces reserved for those of the opposite sex. Boundaries are kind and appropriate for everyone here.

English
20
28
80
5.6K
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
We cannot move forward effectively without complete dissection of non sensical terminology. Paraphilic men do not ‘deserve the same legal protections’. That’s why we are now in a stale mate whereby eg. Parents, cannot challenge schools effectively. There is no homogeneous group of TP. Kids are not ‘trans’ yet are being bombarded with indoctrination because of this compromise. It’s frankly infuriating that this is the level of capitulation some are willing to stoop too.
English
0
11
42
677
Isla Mac retweetledi
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
Well done @SpeechUnion, @toadmeister Such an important success. This is also a crucial factor for maintaining impartial and transparent schooling, because parents have been vulnerable to counter attack with accusations of hate speech if they raise their head above the parapet to make a formal complaint. When I raised a complaint to my school about TQ+ indoctrination and that our RSE provider had links to the adult sex industry, I was accused of being an anti LGBT harasser. The external RSE provider also suggested I might be part of a parent group issuing online hate towards them. The Head Teacher suggested to the academy Trust I be banned from contacting the school, and the lesson my child received was kept secret in part because the RSE provider implied I might troll them. Luckily for me, I didn’t have any public social media accounts at the time, so their false claims were easily debunked and the governors discounted them in my complaint hearing. But had I been a bit mouthy online, this could easily have been weaponised against me as hate speech, ruining my opportunity to make a valid formal complaint about a serious safeguarding matter. Other parents have since found police sent to their door by their school, with accusations of hate speech. And parents generally have been cowed into silence from making necessary complaints to their school by the fear of being identified as some kind of bigot, backed with weaponised action using hate speech laws. Suitably free thought and speech is essential in schooling and the academy to maintain safeguarding, liberty and a successful civilisation. Thanks to the @SpeechUnion for supporting it.
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion

Non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) have had a chilling effect on free speech since their introduction in 2014. We estimate that around 250,000 NCHIs have been recorded against individuals — an average of 65 a day. Perhaps the two most pernicious aspects of NCHIs are that they can appear in enhanced DBS checks, potentially preventing you from getting a job, and that you may not even know one has been recorded against your name, as the police are under no obligation to inform you. Rather than policing our streets, forces have focused on our tweets. They have even recorded NCHIs against schoolchildren for hurty words said in the playground. Police forces across England and Wales alone have spent at least 60,000 hours a year investigating and recording NCHIs. It is clear they have been a waste of police time and taxpayers’ money. NCHIs will now be folded into the anti-social behaviour regime, with a higher threshold for recording. At the same time, they will continue to be recorded in Scotland and Northern Ireland. While the Free Speech Union welcomes this move, the fight to protect free speech from overzealous policing continues. Watch Lord Young of Acton, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, on @GBNews 👇

English
1
6
26
762
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
@MegaSausageHead That’s devastating and I’m really sorry for your loss. It sounds like he was really let down by the system. Sending my condolences to you.
English
0
0
11
682
KPSS Woman who said NO
KPSS Woman who said NO@MegaSausageHead·
My eldest brother died today. He had untreatable lung cancer and was, until yesterday when he tripped over, living independently on a care plan for 'end of life'. It took 6 hours for an ambulance to arrive and gain access via his neighbour. During that time his phone had died and he seriously injured his arm trying to get up. The hospital called us at 2am and my sister began the 5 hour journey at daylight. He was unconscious when she arrived and dead by 1pm. They said he died of pneumonia. But they had withdrawn all of his COPD breathing medication on admittance and put a DNR on his file. Before any family arrived. I was obviously expecting him to die imminently. Just not this way. I don't know how to feel.
English
350
189
2.5K
120.1K
Isla Mac retweetledi
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
And actually, the two things of Islamism and trans indoctrination in schools are deeply connected… As a result of the Birmingham schools Trojan Horse scandal (plus fears of the local backlash), Conservatives invented the SMSC and Equality Act in Schools Advice as the solution, hoping to teach kids to respect each others ‘protected characteristics’ and play nicely in a moderate, multicultural way, according to a fuzzy sense of ‘British Values’. This programme was promptly hi jacked by the Queer Marxist faction of the NEU teaching unions, which pushed TQ+ indoctrination nationwide under the guise an anti LGBT bullying, funded with millions. Spielman failed to stop that grotesque programme after the Tories were too chicken to stand their ground against Islamist schools outright. It’s a godawful mess that needs a public inquiry and a complete rewrite of education policy - preferably after sacking the whole of the DfE!
English
2
20
46
868
Isla Mac retweetledi
Kellie-Jay Keen
Kellie-Jay Keen@ThePosieParker·
Amanda was in charge of Ofsted and ignored so many horrific practices in schools. She’s now a darling of the free speechers and has a seat in the Lords.
Lewis.B.Rendell Official@Lewisrendell1

This is Amanda Spielman, Ofsted’s Chief Inspector, stating the facts without apology. At Al-Hijrah School in Birmingham, a state-funded “community” school, bankrolled by British taxpayers, inspectors discovered library books teaching that a husband can beat his wife (provided he doesn’t leave marks, naturally) and that a wife has no right whatsoever to refuse sex to her husband. These weren’t hidden pamphlets; they were presented as legitimate religious guidance, normalising domestic violence and marital rape for children to read and absorb. The school enforced strict gender segregation from age nine, boys and girls in separate classrooms, corridors, playgrounds, even lunchtimes, ruled unlawful sex discrimination by the Court of Appeal. Ofsted placed it in special measures for being inadequate and unsafe, the government took it over, and it closed in 2019. The problem? This is no outlier. It’s part of a recurring pattern in taxpayer-supported Islamic schools: Trojan Horse echoes, where imported ideologies erode British norms under the banner of faith and multiculturalism. Boys are taught entitlement and dominance; girls submission and obedience. All while the establishment pretends it’s just “cultural diversity” and shies away from calling it what it is, indoctrination that clashes head-on with equality, consent, and basic human dignity. too many are “afraid” to confront these issues when they stem from religious or cultural beliefs. But fear doesn’t make the facts disappear. We fund schools that prepare children for modern Britain, not for a parallel world where women are property and violence is sanctioned correction. England isn’t a laboratory for foreign doctrines that degrade our women and undermine our values. We owe nothing to ideologies that treat half the population as lesser. Our schools exist for English children, for native British futures not for sectarian enclaves that groom the next generation against everything we stand for. These texts weren’t contraband; they were stocked openly, framed as proper Islamic guidance, drilling into young minds that domestic violence is permissible correction and marital rape is a wife’s duty. But don’t mistake closure for victory. The pattern repeats across these taxpayer-backed Islamic setups: rigid segregation breeding entitlement in boys and submission in girls; materials normalising violence against women under religious cover; all while the system pretends it’s harmless “faith schooling” in “multicultural Britain”. Similar issues surface time and again, books advocating wife-beating as discipline, obedience as non-negotiable, women as property. It’s not education; it’s grooming for a worldview that treats half the population as lesser, clashes violently with British equality and consent, and prepares children for a parallel society, not ours. We don’t owe imported doctrines that degrade women a single inch of ground. England was forged for the English, for our traditions of fairness, mutual respect, rule of law that protects every native daughter and son equally. Not for enclaves that import attitudes straight from the dark ages and call it heritage. From everything we stand for, our sovereignty, our women’s dignity, our children’s right to grow up free of foreign-imposed hierarchies. we carry on without apology. No more pretending tolerance means tolerating intolerance.

English
12
187
601
12K
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
Thank you to @WomensRightsNet @SexMattersOrg @AllianceLGB and the many organisers, @roseveniceallan et al for a highly successful day in Westminster. Great to meet up with friends and talk to my MP. My lobbying points today: We need the door closed on the private supply of drugs to children. A safeguarding first approach which doesn’t expose even one child to iatrogenic harm. No trial or one more kid harmed. The upcoming debate to be fully attended by parliamentarians. It is not too late - please write to your MP about the ‘puberty blocker’ issue.
Isla Mac tweet media
English
0
13
52
1.4K
Isla Mac
Isla Mac@Isla_macy·
It is imperative that the pressure does not let up and parliamentarians are urged to attend the debate on 23rd March and write to @wesstreeting. We must close the door to private providers and save the many children that may be held in a holding pattern on puberty blockers for many years. This is not over by any stretch. I look forward to seeing many at Westminster tomorrow.
English
0
2
26
314
Bayswater Support
Bayswater Support@BayswaterSG·
Families have paid a heavy price for years of inaction on cross-sex hormones. Reports about the lack of evidence and potential harms go back many years and were confirmed by the 2020 NICE systematic evidence reviews that informed Cass. The NHS's decision raises more questions than answers: * What action will the government now take on private providers and unregulated sources? * What provision is the NHS making for the children harmed by these interventions? * What does the withdrawal of cross-sex-hormones mean for the puberty blocker trial, which will generate a new cohort of patients for a treatment now confirmed to lack an evidence base? * Where is the evidence that CSH become safe and effective at 18+? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
7
100
275
15.8K