JETAlone01

549 posts

JETAlone01 banner
JETAlone01

JETAlone01

@JAlone01

He/him. Horny containment account.

Katılım Şubat 2022
435 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
Born to mosey Forced to git along
English
0
0
0
2
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@Crossboner2200 @kineyDE @An_Aria_Blooms Bro thinks spending the better part of a decade as a journeyman learning engineering and mathematics alongside their craftsmanship isn’t a “formal education” 💀💀💀
English
1
1
14
173
James McKinney
James McKinney@_jamesmck·
That’s not the point though. Using AI (they are weirdly allowed to use Gemini) would 5x their output. Gemini is decent but Claude and ChatGPT are likely better for their use cases. They need to hire someone to implement systems, and then check the output. I promise it would improve their work and their results in the midterms.
English
3
0
3
457
Jacob Freeman
Jacob Freeman@GeForce_JacobF·
Haha, def not pretending. 🙂🙂 I could point out the various areas. Start with second set, RT off missing reflections, most notable Hugh/Diana. Papers on floor are completely missing any shadows. Left hand side is cube map (or screen space) reflections. No shadow under chest on left with better defined character shadow based on object/shadow proximity w/ RT on. Yellow bag center of screen gets proper reflection on back wall and floor. Blue cube left hand side shows reflections. There are more smaller details but those are a few. Here is an easy way to compare nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/…
English
11
0
3
3K
Jacob Freeman
Jacob Freeman@GeForce_JacobF·
Path Tracing off vs on in PRAGMATA, makes a big difference in the research station with accurate reflections, shadows and more 👍
English
174
40
866
1M
RJ Palmer
RJ Palmer@arvalis·
@GeForce_JacobF Why do you think it looks better when it looks worse in every way? This is a genuine question
English
1
8
3.4K
48.1K
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@SaintSFGil I’d mostly be confused. Me? Pretty? Need your eyes checked, pardner?
English
0
0
3
250
Saint “Super Freak” Gil
Do people even call others “prettyboy” as an insult anymore. I feel like if you called a dude a prettyboy theres like a solid chance they’d just get a boner
English
131
4.2K
58.9K
584K
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@trocchio33 @alittleyareli The pain of watching a game with a promising Early Access collapse due to a flood of negative reviews from people who don’t understand they paid to participate in a closed beta
English
0
0
2
70
yareli
yareli@alittleyareli·
yeah the average gamer just doesn't know how to talk about video games compared to how they talk about literally any other medium. this has been a problem for years. from the opening passage of "Introduction to Game Analysis" by Clara Fernández-Vara:
yareli tweet media
English
57
999
8.4K
238.8K
The Political HQ
The Political HQ@ThePoliticalHQ·
@SenTomczyk How’s it confusing to rank candidates based on preference? Do you think voters can’t understand that? 💀
English
4
3
370
2.9K
Senator Cory Tomczyk
Senator Cory Tomczyk@SenTomczyk·
Legislative Democrats want to replace "one person, one vote" with a confusing multi-round system. Wisconsin deserves better.
English
61
23
58
49.1K
Imperial Citizen
Imperial Citizen@imperialpeasant·
@esjesjesj I don't think Tim is an objectivist, mostly because I don't think he knows what objectivism is.
English
1
0
15
1.3K
AGIHound
AGIHound@TrueAIHound·
No surprise here. I and others have been saying for a long time that, deep down, every LLM is dumb as a rock. Yes, cheating can make a machine sound smart but it's still dumb as a rock. If you know how LLMs work, this truth is obvious. No one needs to read a paper to know that LLMs are massive cheating machines with zero intelligence. I, for one, am not amused. 😠
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy

🚨Everyone thinks GPT can do math they're wrong new paper called SenseMath just proved LLMs don't have number sense at all this changes everything about how we should use them:

English
21
169
1.5K
43.4K
Derek Fine Allen🛑
Derek Fine Allen🛑@DFine2002·
Did you open the second link? It has a full detailed explanation of what happened. First there were some prompts about starting up a VM and defining the desired exploit, then the 0 day was made autonomously, all by an existing AI It also leads to this report from FreeBSD that credits the exploit to Nicholas Carlini using Claude, Anthropic freebsd.org/security/advis…
English
1
0
1
101
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@etscrivner This is the kinda guy they'd drag in front of Congress to explain why a dam failed and he'd have to talk about thousands of people dying because he thought he was too smart for basic safety regulations.
English
0
0
1
43
Eric Scrivner
Eric Scrivner@etscrivner·
> the mass code review. the line-by-line gatekeeping. the "craftsmanship" that was really just slow iteration disguised as rigor - that era is over. You really see how these guys are lashing out at their own mental phantoms.
Elvis@elvissun

this thread is what mass cope from legacy devs looks like. i talked to @FastCompany about why @garrytan's "AI slop" is actually the future of software engineering. the mass code review. the line-by-line gatekeeping. the "craftsmanship" that was really just slow iteration disguised as rigor - that era is over. and the engineers who built their entire identity around it are panicking. @gregorein brags about burning 3 billion tokens last year while dunking on garry for flexing lines of code. i've burned 6.6 billion in the past three months on codex alone. by his own logic, i'm 8x as credible. see how silly that sounds? yes, he found real issues. yes, they got fixed. that's exactly the point. karpathy's autoresearch proved this already - AI agents can solve very complex problems just by operating inside feedback loops, iterating to optimize a loss function. this is what software engineering is now - gradient descent. ship, measure, self-correct, repeat. all by the agent itself. this is the new startup playbook. your job isn't to review every line before deploy. your job is to build systems where agents observe outcomes - mrr, analytics, error rates, user behavior - and self-improve. the engineer's role shifts from gatekeeper to building the machine that builds the machine. you could run this level of audit (using AI) on any production site and find the same issues - most just don't have a billionaire CEO attached for virality. mocking the people who adapted is easier than adapting. but the craft is evolving whether you like it or not.

English
33
37
952
65.9K
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@yuigiyams @G0ffThew Bro turned off replies because he doesn't want to admit Nen's "complexity" is all potential and no payoff 💀
English
0
0
0
5
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@yuigiyams @G0ffThew Nen is exactly as "shallow" as Stands but with infinitely more pretension and window-dressing. Its supposed nuance and complexity never matters to the actual story.
English
2
0
0
27
JETAlone01
JETAlone01@JAlone01·
@biznuz_nunya @G0ffThew Exactly. I don't care how well-thought-out and nuanced your power system allegedly is in theory if it never affects the actual story.
English
0
0
0
71
Ya Boy Mart
Ya Boy Mart@biznuz_nunya·
@JAlone01 @G0ffThew As an actual power system, Nen is much more thought out, organized and interesting. In terms of how the powers actually work in fights, Stands almost always are better.
English
1
0
2
102