@Fawad660660 @GadSaad Muslims haven't done physics since 1123 & then reverted to the 7th century which they continue to adhere to so obviously they don't
English
JJo
9.9K posts
JJo
@JJofoo
Complex Adaptive Systems=Decentralize=Adapt. OODA Otis Rush To all post modern Jacobins: "Had you stopped at Classical Liberalism, everything would be jake"
Katılım Eylül 2022
513 Takip Edilen224 Takipçiler
@ConceptualJames "What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?"
You split tens. You hang talking fish in your living room. You max out your credit for depreciable assets. You invade Gallipoli
English
@malumsuperate @DefiyantlyFree @TheRightMelissa The phrase Quantum Physics was invented yet either
Nonetheless Quantum Physics existed
Nonetheless the Constitution is, in significant part, based on "do not" Judaism which maximizes ordered liberty
On an "eye for an eye" commensurate justice Judaism; not turn the other cheek
English
We are a Judeo-Christian nation. All the same podcast bros who are saying we are not said the opposite before 2025.
I don’t care when the word Judeo-Christian started to be used politically.
The Old Testament (Jewish) and the New Testament (Christianity) make up the Bible. Hope I didn’t lose anyone yet.
According to political scientist Donald Lutz’s landmark study published in the American Political Science Review, the book of Deuteronomy was the single most frequently cited work in all of America’s founding-era political literature.
Followed by Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws.
Deuteronomy was referenced nearly TWICE as often as all of Locke’s writings, and the apostle Paul was mentioned about as frequently as Montesquieu and Blackstone.
The book the founders quoted most wasn’t Locke. It wasn’t Montesquieu. It was a 3,000 year old Hebrew text about a nation under God.
Deuteronomy 1:16-17 commands judges not to discriminate between the powerful and the poor “ye shall hear the small as well as the great.” Leviticus 19:15 echoes it: “Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty.” The founders produced: “All men are created equal.”
Deuteronomy 17:6 establishes that no person shall be convicted of a capital crime on the testimony of one witness alone. The Constitution’s treason clause mirrors it almost word for word: “No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act.”
Deuteronomy 24:6 prohibits punishing children for the sins of their fathers. The Constitution reflects this directly: “No attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood.”
The founders also found the separation of powers not just in Isaiah 33:22 but in Deuteronomy 16, 17, and 18, which lay out distinct offices with distinct functions a separation the founders saw as having divine sanction.
The founders saw a model of due process of law procedural fairness and equality of all persons before the law in the laws of Moses, especially Exodus 23, which for centuries has been called “the Ten Commandments of Due Process.” These principles are explicitly guaranteed in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
So yes, we are a Judeo-Christian nation FOUNDED on the Old Testament (Judaism) and the New Testament (Christianity).
Hope that clears things up.
English
@SholdonDaniels Europe & Britain are toast
American is the Alamo for Western Civilization
English
We need a more aggressive response to the Islamic invasion of America.
🇺🇸
English
@DefiyantlyFree Islamo Nazism is a problem of bot farms, mom basement dwelling children & barstool lawyers who throw peanut shells on the floor while wiping their hands on their wife-beaters
English
We totally don’t have a Jew hater problem. These people are all sane and not completely off the reservation.
Said literally no one ever.
Harrison H. Smith ✞@HarrisonHSmith
Israel must be destroyed. Destroyed like the Nazis were destroyed. Their leadership convicted and hung. Their ideology rooted out and eradicated. Brutalized to the point that ever trying it again becomes unthinkable. Burn it down and salt the earth.
English
@LouiseCulmer1 @NOTANIDLETHREAT @MrDanielBuck Can they read algebra? Would they been able, capable of reading Latin & Greek?
BTW reading Latin or Greek would make them MUCH better computer scientists or engineers
GIF
English
@JJofoo @NOTANIDLETHREAT @MrDanielBuck Reading Latin and Greek is fortunately no longer a prerequisite for a university education. I’m glad we’ve moved on since then. They would have been of little use to my sons for instance, whose respective degrees are in computer science and engineering.
English
Harvard circa 1700s:
"No student shall be admitted unless they can translate Greek and Latin authors such as Tully, Virgil, The New-Testament, & Xenophon."
Harvard circa 2026:
"We can't assign whole novels anymore."
English
@TechnomageDoge @DefiyantlyFree Jews, like Woke Right Christians, have the right to be grossly wrong
English
@JJofoo @DefiyantlyFree Tell that to the jews like Loomer.
English
@avspranc @DefiyantlyFree Ancient Judaism was a civic religion of "do nots" that therefore permits wide swaths of "do's"
Which is an excellent model for those wishing to establish a Constitutional Republic focused on ordered Liberty
Christianity is a religion of "do's" good for individuals bad for govt
English
@avspranc @DefiyantlyFree Yes that's precisely the point. One is for a legal system of commensurate & fair justice; the other for individual ethics
Which is why ancient Judaism served as (one) a model for the governance & law of the American Republic & the other served as the basis for individual mores
English
@TechnomageDoge @DefiyantlyFree Eye for an eye is a system of commensurate punishment, not retaliation
As such it's an advancement in human legal systems which also serves as the basis for English & American law
English
@Zigmanfreud You children are old enough to remember her
Every year on her birthday you should talk with you kids about her so they don't forget
English
My mother-in-law, Valerie Kallik, probably the toughest person I know, and who was loved more by my wife than any person has ever loved their mom, passed away today at the age of 86.
After decades of health issues, the end was sudden, but peaceful. She will be greatly missed.🥲
English
@Ixenal @DefiyantlyFree Aw...the poor child did a comment & block
If this were an issue of American governance using Judeo principles I would block him back...eye for an eye
But, given the weakness of his cheek slap..meh. Don't even need to turn it
English
JJo retweetledi
Did you know the United Nations has a roadmap to transform the entire organization into Sharia-compliant funding and projects across every single UN agency and body?
These are not individual agency initiatives. This comes from the very top of the organization as a global initiative. And because donations are not enough, they also want to tap into people’s accumulated wealth and property after they die as a source of “funding.”
In 2022, a roadmap document detailing how to transition the entire United Nations into Sharia-compliant programs and funding sources was presented. One of the goals is to “accumulate” wealth for the UN and its Sharia programs, including its Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and “the public good.”
The UN aims to tap into an estimated pool of money worth more than half a trillion per year, along with an estimated one trillion in already accumulated real estate, wealth, and assets. The goal is to accumulate and manage all that wealth under the principles of “the Holy Quran,” because, according to the document, there is a “paradigm with capitalism.”
Currently, four UN agencies (UNRWA, UNICEF, UNHCR, IOM) officially have Sharia-compliant frameworks and programs. A few other agencies, such as UNICEF, WFP, UN Women, UNDP, and others, are in the pilot stage. WHO is apparently in the initial stages of planning.
These Sharia-compliant programs inherently discriminate against non-Muslims. In addition, the UN has formed partnerships and MOUs with organizations tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, which makes it even more problematic.
I repeat, I can trace this entire initiative back to at least 2015, when it was first presented to the UN General Assembly Fourth Committee (Decolonization). For ten years, the UN has been planning and building these mechanisms in the open, with member states receiving all the details about it, both in writing and in some cases as open debates, sessions, and meetings, but nobody in our government thought this was outrageous and unacceptable?
Our taxes are being used to build a global communist sharia-compliant organization.
What is the next step? If you are not an Islamic country, we will have no vote & be mandated to pay jizya "contribution"?
The United Nations cannot be reformed.
@AmbUNReform @USAmbUN @michaelgwaltz @UNWatch @NGOmonitor @HillelNeuer @LauraLoomer @EFischberger @AmyMek @RAIRFoundation @HouseGOP @SenateGOP @StateDept @SecRubio @LeoTerrellDOJ @BillAckman @realDonaldTrump
Leslie Kajomovitz@kikas6652
🧵The UN’s International Organization for Migration (IOM) launched the "Islamic Philanthropy Fund (IPF)," embedding doctrines into its operations. Backed by partners tied to Muslim Brotherhood networks, the fund integrates Zakat and Sadaqah, compliance with sharia law and fatwas into aid. All while IOM, funded largely by Western taxpayers, supports an agency facilitating illegal migration into the very countries funding the agency.
English
JJo@JJofoo
@DefiyantlyFree Ancient Judaism was a civic religion of "do nots" that therefore permits wide swaths of "do's" Which is an excellent model for those wishing to establish a Constitutional Republic focused on ordered Liberty Christianity is a religion of "do's" good for individuals bad for govt
QME
@JJofoo @DefiyantlyFree I think that is a gross oversimplification.
Jesus wasn't saying "organize your society around the legal principle of turning the other cheek". He was preaching about the kingdom of heaven and not of this world. No society has ever based its legal principles thus.
English
@Ixenal @DefiyantlyFree "No society has ever based its legal principles thus"
There are hosts of posters claiming the opposite
While ancient Judaism WAS claiming to organize your legal principles around an eye for an eye
And English & Americans took note
English
@malumsuperate @DefiyantlyFree @TheRightMelissa That's great
However the American government & Constitution - though in part founded on Judeo Christian principles- were not founded for the purpose of salvation but to allow you to find salvation as you see fit
English
The term Judeo-Christian is not biblical. Both the Old Testament & the Law precede the tribe of Juda. The covenant begins with Abraham (Genesis 12), way before Judah is even born. The Law is given through Moses at Sinai (Exodus 19–24) before Israel is divided into tribes in any meaningful national sense. Judah is just one of the 12 sons of Jacob also Israel, not the origin of the covenant. Bottomline there is not a “Jewish path” & a “Christian path” to salvation. There is one covenant fulfillment which is Christ. The promises are fulfilled in Christ alone, not in an ongoing dual system
“For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him.” (Romans 10:12, NKJV)
English
@JJofoo @DefiyantlyFree Neither. American law was mostly based in English law. And the government was not organized or modelled along biblical writings at all.
?
English
@DefiyantlyFree Ancient Judaism was a civic religion of "do nots" that therefore permits wide swaths of "do's"
Which is an excellent model for those wishing to establish a Constitutional Republic focused on ordered Liberty
Christianity is a religion of "do's" good for individuals bad for govt
English
@DefiyantlyFree “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’
But I tell you...turn to them the other cheek also"
For all the Judeo deniers
American law & government is founded, written & adjudicated based on which principle:
Eye for an Eye or Turn the other cheek?
English