Jack Ormrod

6.1K posts

Jack Ormrod banner
Jack Ormrod

Jack Ormrod

@JW1996BAE

Chemist, WBA, Raiders, Nets

Warrington, England Katılım Temmuz 2020
395 Takip Edilen171 Takipçiler
Navy Lookout
Navy Lookout@NavyLookout·
Disappointing news for @Babcockplc Sweden has selected the 🇫🇷Naval Group FDI frigate for the Luleå class frigate programme.
Navy Lookout tweet media
English
40
47
380
82K
Per Burström
Per Burström@perburstrom·
I'm Swedish, and this very much makes sense... we need a ship that is already in production, which can be delivered in time. First delivery in 2030. Swedish version will have RBS15 anti-ship missile, TP47 torpedo, Giraffe1X radar, Trackfire RWS, Bofors 57 mm main gun and Bofors 40 mm secondary gun.
English
3
0
46
2.9K
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
@NavyLookout I do think theyll go with FDI, but some great options there for them!
English
2
0
7
2.4K
Navy Lookout
Navy Lookout@NavyLookout·
🇸🇪Sweden is due to announce its decision on which of the 3 options it has selected for the 4-ship Luleå class frigate programme this morning. 🇬🇧Babcock Arrowhead 120 🇫🇷Naval Group FDI 🇪🇸Navantia Alfa 4000 See also navylookout.com/babcock-pitche…
Navy Lookout tweet mediaNavy Lookout tweet mediaNavy Lookout tweet media
English
14
55
470
37K
Large Horchata
Large Horchata@LARGE_horchata·
@stillhereamI @CoreyWriting If China invades Taiwan militarily are you going to advocate for a war with China? A nuclear power? We couldn’t stop it from happening and if we tried it would be a disaster.
English
2
0
0
42
Jim LaPorta
Jim LaPorta@JimLaPorta·
Navy never publishes the location of its submarines unless there’s a strategic reason to do so. This morning, @CBSNews was made aware that a U.S. Navy ballistic missile submarine arrived in Gibraltar on May, 10, 2026. This seems to be strategic signaling to U.S. adversaries, particularly Iran. c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/New…
English
64
262
642
217.9K
molly
molly@BLEACHERSMOL·
If a black player wins the World Cup for England I don’t want reform voters to celebrate xox
English
316
92
2K
377.6K
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
@afneil They are being transparent, they're literally plotting where the RN and RFA ships are. How are they conveying anything other than that?
English
0
0
2
1.2K
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
I’m sure they are good people. But they’d be even better if they were more transparent about the truth. I’m sure like me they’re in despair over the state of the Royal Navy By the way — Swear again in a tweet to me and you’ll be blocked. Thank you for your attention to this vital matter AFN.
Stephen@ArtfulDodjar

@afneil Hey show some fucking respect, that account is ran by good people who dont get paid to do it.

English
14
25
442
83.3K
Ken Brisbane
Ken Brisbane@Gadzooooooks·
@afneil Is that account "official"? Just looks like someone keeping records of where our ships are.
English
2
0
2
368
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
This is a quite pathetic attempt to make our naval deployment far bigger than it is. To give it even this modest scale you have to include patrol vessels, a landing ship, a tanker and a fast boat squadron. But we can see only one frigate, two destroyers and one submarine (you say two but that includes our one Vanguard nuclear deterrent at sea). The only vessels with real firepower. That’s it. For the whole globe. Pathetic. You fudge the Prince of Wales position. It is still in Scottish waters. Not yet deployed. This map is pure misleading propaganda.
UK Forces Tracker@UKForcesTracker

Royal Navy Fleet Tracker - 5th of May 2026 Seven Royal Navy ships, two submarines, six patrol boats and two Royal Fleet Auxiliaries on deployment.

English
31
167
700
59.6K
UK Forces Tracker
UK Forces Tracker@UKForcesTracker·
Royal Navy Fleet Tracker - 5th of May 2026 Seven Royal Navy ships, two submarines, six patrol boats and two Royal Fleet Auxiliaries on deployment.
UK Forces Tracker tweet media
English
18
18
123
75.3K
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
@afneil Its literally just a forces tracker, why wouldn't it track OPV's and the RFA? How on earth is that "Propaganda"? Poor.
English
0
0
9
263
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
Sometimes Andrew just nails it you know
Andrew Neil@afneil

My monologue from today’s The Times at One with Andrew Neil: As often happens with President Trump, it’s not long before you end up in fantasyland.  Yesterday, in a long and at times incoherent social media post, he suddenly announced the US would start ‘guiding’ — his word —  commercial ships out of the Strait of Hormuz, where they have been stranded by his War on Iran.  On the face of it — at last an effort to unblock this vital supply route for the global economy.  Of course, it turned out to be no such thing. There will be no US Navy escort for stranded ships to go through the Strait in convoy. Or the navies of any other countries for that matter.  Just a so-called ‘co-ordination cell’ involving countries, insurance companies and shipping lines sharing data. Trump has dubbed it ‘Project Freedom’. But there will be precious few ships freed by this latest wheeze.  The UK’s Maritime Trade Operations agency, which works in tandem with the Royal Navy, said this morning the security threat level in the Strait remained ‘critical’. As long as that’s the case ships won’t risk the passage without Iran’s approval.  And that was before we had Iran claiming this morning to have hit a US frigate. America is categorical that none of its ships has been hit.  At first Tehran didn’t deign to respond to Trump’s latest initiative. But this morning Iran warned it would attack any commercial ships or US warships that tried to transit the Strait without its permission, reminding everyone it was in control of the Strait, which, of course, it wasn’t before Trump began his attacks on Iran.  Over 1,600 ships are now trapped on either side of the Strait. Only those of whom Iran approves and prepared to stump up $2m per ship to Tehran are allowed through. The truth is Trump has no idea how to reopen the Strait — or how to bring his war to an acceptable end.  He’s just rejected Iran’s latest peace proposals, which were full of unacceptable nonsense — suggesting the tyrants of Tehran are still in no rush for peace. But what happens next is anybody’s guess.  Mine is that Trump will simply play for time, as he has in Gaza. Last year, to much fanfare, he announced peace had broken out in the strip and reconstruction would begin.  Since when, there’s been very little peace and no reconstruction. But our attention has moved on. Gaza makes few headlines these days, even though it’s still grim on the ground.  Trump will be hoping for the same attention deficit towards Iran. Both sides have stopped raining down missiles, bombs and drones on each other. Not much else is happening. Nothing to see here. Let’s move along.  However, there is one mighty difference with Gaza: the Strait of Hormuz. The longer that stays closed the more the global economy is likely to be crippled. That’s already happening in Asia, where shortages are spreading and economies grinding to a halt.  The same fate is heading our way, slowly but surely. We are heading for shortages and massive price rises in all manner of materials — not just oil and gas — but jet fuel, helium, naphtha, fertilisers  — about which we know little but which are, in fact, vital to normal life.  No jet fuel, no flying.  No helium, no microchips, no microchips, no cars or household appliances, never mind the AI developments currently keeping the US stock market afloat.  No fertilisers, no food.  No naphtha, no building blocks for everything from textiles to rubber to car parts.  If, come June, the Strait is still closed then we will be entering a summer of misery thanks to Trump’s War. The chances grow by the day.  It has dawned on Tehran that controlling the Strait is a far more powerful weapon than a nuclear bomb. Though it’s not giving up on that either.  As the rest of us suffer, Trump will be declaring a fantasy victory. Which makes you wonder: if this is victory, what would defeat look like?

English
0
0
0
32
Not Stacey Abrams
Not Stacey Abrams@chris3840624·
@BDHerzinger Do you think it’s more likely we don’t want to place them on German soil after he said we were embarrassed in Iran, or that we are running low?
English
1
0
0
208
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
@MightBeUrDaddy8 @shashj Argentina has no way to occupy or take the islands, if you think the UK armed forces are in a state, you should really look closer at Argentinas...
English
1
0
20
265
Shay
Shay@MightBeUrDaddy8·
I will never understand why European nations with no real naval power, feel entitled to maintaining their colonial holdings on the other side of the ocean…at America’s expense in the case of Greenland. All because they gave some (mostly symbolic) lukewarm support during the GWOT. 🙄 Argentina and the UK are both US allies. We will let you settle this amongst yourselves… with no support for either side. Which probably won’t go Britain’s way considering the state of their Navy and the fact that the Falkland Islands are on the other side of the planet…just off the coast of Argentina…
English
6
1
11
2K
Jack Ormrod
Jack Ormrod@JW1996BAE·
@BO3673 He's gonna have to bite the bullet sooner rather than later. He's going to look foolish and weak one way or another.
English
0
0
1
43
JoseonOne
JoseonOne@JoseonOne·
@bennn435 @Ziron331 @fharris2011 @NavyLookout We saw the Soviets use this strategy with their massive cruisers and they were ridiculously expensive to maintain, like the Zumwalt class. We have aircraft carriers and LHD's serving as command ships. It's a vanity project.
English
1
0
2
45
Navy Lookout
Navy Lookout@NavyLookout·
🇺🇸US Navy will ask Congress for $17 billion to fund the first Trump-class battleship in 2028. Expects to spend $43.5 billion in on the battleship project over next 5 years. news.usni.org/2026/04/21/nav…
Navy Lookout tweet media
English
151
218
1.7K
419.8K
damien
damien@bennn435·
@JoseonOne @Ziron331 @fharris2011 @NavyLookout Tonnage meaning bigger able to carry more they exspected it to be around 140 + Plus hypersonic wepons lazor wepons and electronic anti drone .. burk isnt able to add the defence it needs against drones of the future. Its maxed where they can qulity of quantity.
English
3
0
0
106