JCSM

@Biig_Dre It's Tom. He treats his crew well. Jackie is actually quite disliked by people he worked with

Who is the ultimate stunt king in Hollywood? Tom Cruise Or Jackie Chan

@Cultination1 In that incest?!!

🇺🇸🤰👨‍❤️‍👨Pour AIDER SON FILS GAY, cette maman de 61 ans DONNE NAISSANCE à son propre petit-enfant conçu avec le sperme de son fils. En 2019, Cécile Eledge, âgée de 61 ans, a DONNÉ NAISSANCE à sa petite-fille, Uma Louise Dougherty-Eledge, le 25 mars au Nebraska Medical Center à Omaha. Elle a accepté de devenir mère porteuse gestationnelle pour son fils, Matthew Eledge, et son mari, Elliot Dougherty. L’embryon a été conçu par fécondation in vitro avec LE SPERME DE MATTHEW et les ovules de la sœur d’Elliot, Lea. Contre toute attente, Cécile a mené une grossesse sans complication majeure et a accouché par VOIE NATURELLE d’un bébé en bonne santé. Cécile N’A PAS HÉSITÉ un seul instant. Elle a déclaré : « Je n’ai tout simplement jamais hésité. C’était juste un amour inconditionnel. » Matthew était initialement sceptique en raison de l’âge de sa mère, mais les médecins ont donné LEUR FEU VERT après un bilan de santé complet. Matthew et Elliot ont qualifié cette NAISSANCE d’« histoire d’origine poétique ». Ils EXPLIQUENT à Uma que « tante Lea a donné la graine de la vie » et que « sa grand-mère lui a offert un jardin aimant pour qu’elle puisse s’épanouir ». (NBC News)

@RetroMoviesDB Shrek 2

Time for discussion. Name a sequel that surpassed the original... I'll Start: The Godfather Part II

@lina84150038 Good thing someone was there to film it all!

伸出援手，展现人性， 希望像你这样的人多多益善

@VigiaCiudadano7 She's gorgeous

Deja su país americano por el amor de una HONDUREÑA . Joseph Nelson, un estadounidense que llegó a Honduras como misionero mormón, decidió quedarse en el país tras enamorarse de una Hondureña originaria de choluteca. Lo que comenzó como una vision terminó cambiando por completo su vida. La mujer es madre soltera y eso no fue un obstáculo para Joseph, quien decidió formar un hogar junto a ella y asumir también el compromiso de cuidar al pequeño. Aunque no descartan mudarse a Estados Unidos, el extranjero optó por quedarse en tierras Catrachas

@DrewVento For that price? Yes

You can get an apartment in manhattan for $1289. No idea why everyone says it’s so unaffordable.

@RichardArion1 11/10 is way too generous

Here is an example of an 11 out of 10 White woman who had sex with a black in her prime and got pregnant She is a Millenial. I keep telling everyone that 30% to 40% of unmarried sexually active White American women have s£x with blacks but you won’t believe me

@ClownShoesZomg @downbadcomment He's a cuck and he doesn't even know it

@downbadcomment It's like you're having a normal reaction to your wife cheating on you. Except somehow you were talked into agreeing.

@downbadcomment He got cucked. And she loved it.

Welcome to Meta! Here's what you should do during your onboarding. 1. Leave

@thisdudelikesAI I figured this out using ChatGPT for 5 minutes when it first came out. They are designed to keep you engaged so gaslighting is baked in. All these AI psychosis cases are just dumb people too stupid to understand it's all bullshit.

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

@Being__Mukesh Lol 🤣

Grok Result 😭

@hippojuicefilm She looked better fat

Imagine losing all that weight and still being Indian.

@DefiantLs Fucking trash 🗑️

What is this genre of music called?

@anishmoonka Same thing happens at IBM.

8,000 Meta workers got fired by email this morning. Singapore got the notice at 4 AM. The moment the email arrived, their laptops, work email, and accounts went dark. That is how a $1.7 trillion company tells you it is over. Inside Meta, this round has a name. They are calling it "Pralaydin," which is Hindi for "day of catastrophe." Reuters reports this is the third firing round of 2026, and the full year could end with 22,000 people gone. About one in five Meta employees. Analysts at Evercore say firing these 8,000 people will save Meta around $3 billion a year. That sounds like a lot. Zuckerberg has been writing much bigger checks for AI hires. Last summer he paid an ex-Apple engineer named Ruoming Pang $200 million to come work on AI. He paid another AI researcher, Andrew Tulloch, a reported $1.5 billion over six years. He wrote a $14.3 billion check just to get the CEO of an AI startup called Scale to join the team. The same week Meta laid off 8,000 office workers, the company is still planning to spend somewhere between $125 and $145 billion this year on AI data centers and the chips to run them. The firings save about 2% of that. Two days before the layoffs began, Meta picked 7,000 of the survivors and moved them onto brand new AI teams. The people getting hit in this round are mostly engineers and product managers. Another wave is already planned for later this year. Meta is not in trouble. Far from it. The company made $56 billion in revenue in just the first three months of 2026. That was up 33% from a year ago. Pure profit in those same three months was nearly $27 billion. The stock is off its September high but Meta is still worth $1.7 trillion. The severance is good on paper. 16 weeks of base pay, plus two extra weeks for every year you put in, plus a year and a half of health insurance. The average payout works out to about $360,000 per person. The money does arrive. But finding a new job is brutal. Engineers who got cut in earlier Meta rounds say they have sent out hundreds of job applications and heard back from almost nobody, even with Meta on the resume. So a wildly profitable company is firing 8,000 office workers via 4 AM email and instant lockout, while writing checks worth hundreds of millions of dollars to a small group of new AI hires. The Singapore workers reading their termination email at 4 AM were paying for the next $200 million hire.

@StockSavvyShay He's correct. But wouldn't that incentivise people to stay in that income bracket to avoid paying taxes?

Jeff Bezos said the bottom half of Americans should pay zero federal income tax. He cited a nurse in Queens making ~$75K and paying ~$12K in taxes saying “we shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington.”

@aroog1278 Only upper caste like Padma

@LASHYBILLS French man?

An American tourist in Phuket, Thailand, stepped in and fought a French man who was beating his girlfriend.

The hacks are only going to get worse. AI assisted hacking is all the rage now. Github was just the latest. Brace for Impact.

I'm scared to make this video, but I feel like I have to. It's time to talk about Google.