Jay Strellson

1993–2025

Burnham chooses to spend at least £23bn on foreign aid. That is: - More than the entire policing budget in England & Wales - The cost of 10+ large new hospitals - The budget for all NHS dentistry 7 times over - 100k affordable homes - The entire roads repair backlog Choices

It should be 0% of GDP.

@Ye_Olde_Holborn Outside an ISA it’s taxed though.

>>>Ditto, my wealth is spread across the globe ~ you’ve got to batshit bonkers to keep your savings in a cash ISA

@monokaidan Indeed.

@PWestoff @RNLI Okay but what's the guy supposed to say in this situation? "Yeah, you're totally right! I don't want to be out there risking my life for these invaders, but it's my job." This isn't investigative journalism, this is harassing people at work for social media views.

No ranting, no swearing, just a brutal takedown of the traitor @RNLI which reduces them to shamed (or cowardly) silence.

@GeoffPelling By sea. And by land?

@PWestoff @RNLI If they land in Jersey they are sent straight back to France, why are we not doing the same

@PWestoff @RNLI This is clearly a man with nothing more productive to do. You don’t remonstrate with the foot soldiers of a business or organisation you remonstrate with the field marshal.

“tranny terrorism”. Yes weirdos being violent (and weird).

@VulpesBite @KrispiesReece @Ye_Olde_Holborn Marx was an angry, smelly alcoholic bum. I’m amazed he managed to have any children by taking advantage of his host houses maidservants.

@KrispiesReece @Ye_Olde_Holborn I'd also add "totally unfuckable". But i'm sure the unemployed tankie will have some sort of inane "comeback" to that.

Burnham’s master plan: 1) Reshuffle the useless shit ministers that have already failed under Starmer & sprinkle in some Hope Not Hate commie activists 2) Blame Thatcher for everything

If a party advocating a political solution cannot make its mind up about what its policies are but persistently disintegrates via Judean People’s Front Syndrome and internicine factional purity spirals it’s not going to be taken seriously by the electorate. Both conservative and liberalism have similar problems with the fringes of leftism and Rightism, that’s why any party has to regularly clean house of nutters to the poultice parties of communist party, BNP/Mosleyites, Green/Jihadi fringes.

@waterjetcut @Ye_Olde_Holborn As I’ve stated already in other replies, as communism is a philosophy its aims and its means to an end are up to interpretation. Communist states have caused the deaths of hundreds of millions yes, I will not dispute that, but capitalist states has caused more deaths

And why the leftism dysfunction of liberalism struggles to be taken seriously duevto Judean People’s Front Syndrome. Of course conservatism has its own problems with Rightism dysfunction, or as the American vernacular puts it, the “Retard Right”/Crank Right/Hurr-Durr Right Poultice parties exist to draw away the political pus from the two boils on the buttocks of the body politic and help prevent it from overwhelming the body of the host.

@JayStrellson As I've said its the plagerism of the word as if it only has one meaning. Thus, the NHS is actually a form of "National socialism" yet it's employees called people "Nazis" during the covid regime. It's all to blur the meaning of words and reality.

Indeed, @VinnieSull1van …

@Jacob_Rees_Mogg @siiduc For being a busybody fool, a man consumed with a sense of his own self importance.

@siiduc He is a defender of freedom of speech and was badly beaten up by Mugabe’s thugs for his efforts.

I am glad Peter has apologised and hope people will forgive him. He is a brave man who made a mistake as we all sometimes do.

The first task of a British government is the protection and security of its citizens. No one in a foreign nation is entitled to be in Britain if the people don't want them there.

Talk about putting the boot in…

"We do not merely study the past: we inherit it, and inheritance brings with it not only the rights of ownership, but the duties of trusteeship. Things fought for & died for should not be idly squandered. For they are the property of others, who are not yet born." Roger Scruton

Bit off more than she could chew. Not acclimatised or gradually trained up to an uphill 12 mile walk.

😎

@DOCMAGA1 Viva Frei is an antivaxxer and conspiracy theory windsock.

Ok, @RealCandaceO @DiligentDenizen @baroncoleman @IanCarrollShow or any other person in the cult with means. Let's do this. You want to prove that you are HONEST and SINCERE and not reporting the ridiculous steakhouse story as a grift? 1 million dollars. I am willing to place 1 million in escrow, saying my reporting that I reported on yesterday was accurate AND will PROVE to be accurate when the trial comes. I will also wager @RealCandaceO does not have corresponding BANK STATEMENTS to Tyler Robinson eating at the Steakhouse as she claimed to @thevivafrei In fact, I think @thevivafrei is still licensed attorney, yes? I am good with him picking the escrow agent. So, prove this is not a grift, prove you are so RIGHT that you can get some easy money. I will get into detail tonight what is happening with this entire steakhouse story, but first, you guys are SOOOOOOO sure. Let's do this, I am sick and tired of people not willing to put some hustle behind their tongue muscle. I mean, no worries I am sure @netanyahu has me covered. Right? It is so exhausting with your total bullshit.

@Xentrik85 @alexboge @TheSkywatcher17 Ptolemaic model is even more curious.

@alexboge @TheSkywatcher17 Occam’s razor applied properly 😁 One single force, one central point, common orbits across all bodies (including natural satellites) Vs Kaleidoscope motion with multiple unique forces, including massive changes of motion and accel’n to achieve retrograde motion…

The main point, however is that the polymath Erosthenes knew mathematics and geometry, which never changes in its principles. The calculation he did with two sticks of equal height stuck in the ground vertically and measuring angles cast by shadows from the Sun, can be repeated today with a pocket Calculator to get the same result.

@TarkerDahl @JayStrellson @alexboge You known what else people knew in ancient times? A whole fucking lot less than we do now

An observation from years of debunking that I can't stop thinking about: the more decisive the argument, the less engagement it gets. My routine debunks, the ones targeting familiar claims like curvature photos, gravity denial, or moon landing objections, reliably pull big traffic. Long comment threads. Days of back and forth. The arguments never change and nothing ever resolves, but the interaction is constant. My two most recent flat earth posts are different. They attack the model at its foundation using arguments the community has never had to answer. To date, no rebuttal has appeared. And they earned a fraction of the engagement. Let me steelman the boring explanation first, because it's partly true. Engagement algorithms reward conflict. Familiar debunks trigger familiar objections, which trigger replies, which feed the machine. A post nobody argues under is algorithmically invisible no matter how sound it is. That's real, and it explains some of the gap. But it doesn't explain the silence itself. Flerfs are not shy. They will argue under anything that gives them an opening. They'll argue under NASA baby photos. The absence of even a bad rebuttal is the data point that matters. My hypothesis: conspiracy engagement runs on scripts. Every standard debunk has a community-approved counter that any member can deploy without thinking. That's what makes the back and forth feel endless. It's not reasoning, it's recitation. A novel argument has no script. Responding would require original thought, alone, in public, against evidence. The belief system offers no support for that situation, so the safest move is not to engage at all. Which produces the paradox: the arguments that generate the most noise are the ones the community has already metabolized. The arguments that generate silence are the ones it can't. If you're measuring debunking success by engagement, you're measuring how comfortable your opponents are. Sometimes the quietest post is the one that landed.