Charles

15.3K posts

Charles banner
Charles

Charles

@JiffjoffI

Research Scientist - FAANG; Film / culture / history / baseball / tech;

Katılım Temmuz 2020
1.1K Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@panickssery @thomashobohm I disagree with almost all of his views but can’t deny he’s a really good writer from the few essays i’ve read
English
0
0
0
67
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@razibkhan Dune is itself a historic blend - warring aristocratic houses on the desert outskirts of an Imperial periphery, explosion of Islam conquering post Roman fragmented empire, mixture of Arthur / Mohammad prophecies er
English
0
0
1
123
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@CrisisFront @aakashgupta Stupid comment - plenty of civilizations before and after had slave labor without achieving this level of engineering precision
English
0
0
13
149
Crisis Front 📡
Crisis Front 📡@CrisisFront·
@aakashgupta They had the luxury of double the water because half their population was enslaved and doing the actual work. It is easy to look like engineering geniuses when you have unlimited forced labor to build it.
English
35
1
19
10.1K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
That water clarity is an engineering decision, and the math behind it is wilder than the video. Roman aqueducts ran on gravity alone. No pumps, no pressure systems. Engineers carved channels with a gradient so shallow it borders on absurd. The Pont du Gard in southern France drops 2.5 centimeters over 275 meters. That's roughly the thickness of a coin over the length of three football fields. They surveyed that accuracy with plumb lines and wooden leveling instruments. The clarity you're seeing is a direct product of flow velocity. Too steep and the water erodes the channel walls, picks up sediment, turns brown. Too flat and it stagnates. Roman engineers targeted a slope of about 20 centimeters per kilometer, which kept the water moving fast enough to stay fresh but slow enough to stay clear. Before the water reached the city, it passed through multi-chamber settling tanks where velocity dropped near zero. Suspended particles sank. Clean water flowed out the top into the next chamber. Repeat three or four times. Pliny specified the minimum slope in writing. Vitruvius published the exact mortar ratio for hydraulic cement: one part lime to two parts volcanic ash for underwater work. The pozzolana from Pozzuoli reacted with water to form a calcium-aluminum-silicate compound that actually gets stronger the longer it sits submerged. Modern concrete degrades in water. Roman concrete bonds with it. Scale the whole system and it gets harder to process. Eleven aqueducts fed Rome at its peak. Combined output: roughly 1 million cubic meters of water per day. That works out to about 250 gallons per person for a city of one million. Modern New York delivers about 125 gallons per person per day. Ancient Rome had access to double the per capita water supply of the largest city in the United States, running entirely on slope and stone. The Trevi Fountain in Rome is still fed by one of them. Two thousand years, same source, same gravity, same water.
Ulises@UlisesDavid__

🚨| La claridad de un acueducto del imperio Romano, de hace 2000 años

English
752
11.5K
55.3K
2.8M
K J Gillenwater
K J Gillenwater@kjgillenwater·
She didn't say she'd never heard of it...clearly she had or she wouldn't have been able to quote some lines from it. She just had never read it so didn't know the source material intimately. I haven't either. Does that make me incapable of ever playing a part in a book I haven't completely read and digested? Why aren't we all wondering about all the rest of the actors and if they've read it? Sounds as if she is now familiar with the whole thing, which should make you very happy that she cared.
English
24
0
51
6.1K
GrumpyFucc
GrumpyFucc@GrumpyFucc·
@usr_bin_roygbiv I’m asking about acquiring a massive house with a 10pack of beer and a handshake.
English
1
0
0
4.5K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@CovfefeAnon @zuki_2024 @bronzeagemantis A woke more correct rendering would be eg trying to make odysseus unsympathetic bc he’s racist and sexist, where the left and right like it for different reasons but the anti-woke center is furious about the “inaccuracy”
English
0
0
2
41
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
Right - Woke more correct typically pattern matches against highlighting broad agreements between the left and right where the right interprets as “and that’s a good thing” - with the center under a delusion / myth Woke more correct here would be wokes saying the classical world was racist, sexist etc Or highlighting black dysfunction with victimhood, proportionality arguments and so on.
English
1
0
2
182
Zuki
Zuki@zuki_2024·
Emily Wilson’s translation of the Odyssey is a situation of “woke is more correct than the mainstream” or at least what was considered orthodox canon of the past. Are we ready to have that conversation tho @CovfefeAnon? @bronzeagemantis?
English
3
0
10
2.2K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
I’m not against non-white immigration, but the scale and speed should be slowed down and balanced against demographic, political and cultural preferences. Obviously exceptional people should be allowed in, but the scale of recent waves (especially wrt Indians) spiraled out of control
English
1
0
3
248
Diane Yap
Diane Yap@RealDianeYap·
If you're against non-white immigration, just be honest and say so. There's no need to make up reasons about personalities or traits or competition for your children. You don't like people who aren't white, and that's your prerogative. No need to lie about it.
i/o@avidseries

English
446
42
610
52.3K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@criticlthinkr The number of physicians is limited by medical school / residency slots and licensing, so medicine is one area where there’s a clear zero sum aspect wrt who we give slots to
Charles tweet media
English
0
0
0
45
Critical Thinker
Critical Thinker@criticlthinkr·
The chud fantasy is that they could practice medicine despite not passing the MCAT, so we don't need immigrant physicians.
English
3
2
12
1.3K
shako
shako@shakoistsLog·
@JiffjoffI anyone who claims to be chudless is morally bankrupt and lost all noblesse oblige. you are responsible for your chuds.
English
1
0
10
357
shako
shako@shakoistsLog·
the correct benchmark for the bottom 20% it a country isn’t the elite, it’s the bottom 20% of other countries. by that metric the american lower class is actually remarkable. i immigrated here at age 4, and i could never bring myself to look down on them like this.
SWAMPIST@swamp_ist

Imagine feeling safe to post like this in America.

English
37
50
1.4K
127.5K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@MostlyMonkey That’s pretty high for tOSU , much more overlap than i would’ve guessed
English
0
0
5
656
Taste of Cinema
Taste of Cinema@davidcinema·
The 100 Best Existential Movies of All Time
Taste of Cinema tweet mediaTaste of Cinema tweet mediaTaste of Cinema tweet mediaTaste of Cinema tweet media
English
15
125
1.2K
74.9K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
@Jason @Geiger_Capital We do not need 1m+ every year, people who will actually make a difference (top entrepreneurs, ai / medical researchers etc) is like 50k a year at the most
English
0
1
21
306
@jason
@jason@Jason·
The best interest of America today is very simple: 1. SKIM THE CREAM: Recruit the smartest and most driven 1-3m people on the planet every year; < 1% of our population. They create companies and jobs, while taking that economic growth away from our rivals. 2. POWER THROUGH SHORTAGES: Allow for a modest amount of workers based on our acute needs and the immigrants willingness to assimilate (as seen in say learning to speak English before arriving). This is probably 100-500k a year on average… healthcare, agriculture etc. 3. STRATEGIC IMMIGRANTS: Allow dissidents and refugees when politically advantageous (ie from rivals) And of course cut off all illegal immigration to accomplish this
English
142
12
226
85.6K
Geiger Capital
Geiger Capital@Geiger_Capital·
Before Hart-Celler in 1965 our nation's immigration system was severely restrictive with varying national quotas. Immigrants from many countries were outright banned. It was almost exclusively Europeans because the men before us wanted to preserve our own ethnic homogeneity, demographics, culture and social cohesion. They prioritized our nation and the economic interests of American workers instead of the feelings of weak men and cheap foreign labor. The last few decades of third-world mass immigration has not been in our nation's interest.
@jason@Jason

Politicians make immigration decisions on what gets them elected — not what is in the best interest of the nation.

English
38
269
1.7K
164.2K
Charles
Charles@JiffjoffI·
Part of me is sad that i’ll probably never recapture that youthful wonder and spark of the imagination from reading Michael crichton / lotr / great experiences with books in middle and high school I’ve heard great things about the series - seems obvious that more films should be made
English
1
0
1
92
Moses Kagan
Moses Kagan@moseskagan·
@JiffjoffI I've read the entire series 3x (approximately once per decade since I first read them in highschool)
English
3
0
2
532
Moses Kagan
Moses Kagan@moseskagan·
Apropos of nothing: Four novels I love
Moses Kagan tweet mediaMoses Kagan tweet mediaMoses Kagan tweet mediaMoses Kagan tweet media
English
40
10
338
60.3K