J

9.8K posts

J banner
J

J

@Jnel03

Talentless golfer trying to swing above his weight class. Corgi watchman. I have pieces of paper that say I know a little bit about finance and economics

Cincinnati, OH Katılım Kasım 2011
592 Takip Edilen154 Takipçiler
Basil🧡
Basil🧡@LinkofSunshine·
The permanent vibecession is here to stay
Basil🧡 tweet media
English
598
161
3.5K
3.3M
J
J@Jnel03·
@BryanBryan716 @mnolangray All this would do would incentivize folks to further buy outside their means. "I have a $1M home on $100k annual income, but the only reason I still have it is because my RETs are so low" isn't a recipe for success.
English
0
0
0
33
Bryan
Bryan@BryanBryan716·
@mnolangray Limit the property tax bill to a % of income so property rich poor people aren’t priced out. Recoup the money with a property tax surcharge on high income property owners in the same jurisdiction. Call it “PIE” Property/Income Equalization.
English
6
0
0
391
M. Nolan Gray 🥑
M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray·
This meme is fascinsting, in that has the structure of a logical point, but it's just completely incoherent after even a moment of thought. "Why should you have to pay for cell service for a paid off phone?" "Why should you have to pay for car insurance for a paid off car?" Etc.
Johnny Cadillac@lippyent

Still boggles my mind!

English
209
77
1.6K
169K
J
J@Jnel03·
@J_in_AK No one disproportionately benefits, which means it's not problematic. It sucking fkr everyone is a good sign, just like how fair negotiations should feel like each side is losing a little.
English
0
0
0
73
J in AK
J in AK@J_in_AK·
No, the wealth of boomers in their retirement accounts empower and backstop our economy. They get that retirement because they earned and saved it, Social Security and Medicare because they paid into it, and a house because they bought and paid for it. Property taxes suck for everyone.
Billy Binion@billybinion

Terrible take. We’ve already constructed a system where younger, poorer people subsidize the lifestyles and asset appreciation of wealthier Boomers. We do not need to deepen that imbalance.

English
46
9
55
5.4K
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @JonesMarkLB @CarlHPetersonIV So he spells out the error in your logic, in plain words, and your response is to just brush him off? This is a prime example why folks don't take you serious. Don't waste your life arguing and defending ignorant beliefs. You've wasted so much time, when you could be learning.
English
0
0
0
15
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @deathmetalv10 @CarlHPetersonIV The. Bank. Doesn't. Own. The. Home. Ever. Whether there's a precise mortgage (lien) on the parcel is irrelevant to whether you pay/don't pay property taxes. You still own it regardless. Are you a foreign agent?
English
0
0
0
11
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @CarlHPetersonIV This assumes an average SPY return of 8.0% on invested cash savings, a $375k home w/ 9% down, and a rental rate of $1,800. There's a premium associated with home ownership now and it's no longer the optimal financial decision.
J tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
Radze
Radze@Radze11·
@Jnel03 @CarlHPetersonIV This makes no sense. Good luck with those rent payments the rest of your life. Guess I see why you're against me NOT paying taxes on something I own outright.
English
1
0
0
43
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @CarlHPetersonIV I pay for my rent, which includes RETs, and I don't complain like a whiney toddler? If I'm paying it, you're going to be paying it too. Otherwise, we take property taxes away, but we also take away you're undeserved social security dollars so you're no better off regardless?
English
1
0
1
52
Radze
Radze@Radze11·
@Jnel03 @CarlHPetersonIV And I hate whiny kids who live beyond their means and then complain they can't afford their lifestyle and want me to subsidize it. I paid for my house and everything in it, pay for your own. You don't get special treatment because you're illiterate.
English
14
0
0
414
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @deathmetalv10 @CarlHPetersonIV Screw it. Take away property taxes all together. You'll find something else to grip like a child about, because you're clearly ignorant to the basket of services/infrastructure RETs provide. State and munipalities will just tax everything else and get their funding anyways.
English
0
0
0
11
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @deathmetalv10 @CarlHPetersonIV The only thing that changes in that scenario is whether or not there's a lien-holder on your land parcel? Why are the property taxes contingent on there being a private lien to begin with, even though you're on the deed regardless?
English
1
0
0
20
Radze
Radze@Radze11·
@deathmetalv10 @Jnel03 @CarlHPetersonIV But you don't own the home outright. The bank still owns it until you've paid off the balance they loaned you. No special treatment, right?
English
2
0
0
49
Foundation Father | M.A. Franklin
Parents who refuse to spank are trading 5 seconds of controlled discipline for years of chaos down the road.
English
164
17
445
64.8K
J
J@Jnel03·
@Radze11 @CarlHPetersonIV And I hate old folks continuing to have their lives subsidized by everyone else. You don't get special treatment because you're old. Either participate in society, or go buy a parcel of land in the middle of nowhere, away from emergency services and modern-day infrastructure.
English
1
0
38
396
Radze
Radze@Radze11·
@CarlHPetersonIV Anyone who has lived in a house and paid it off after 30 years hates the thought of "renting" our paid for home from the government. You will too, someday.
English
17
0
9
1.8K
J
J@Jnel03·
@phibetakefka @Stormingurmom @Brien_Jackson All dependent on when you're able to purchase. Housing prices and rates are too high to justify the opportunity cost of a down payment + mortgage obligation relative to putting those funds in SPY. Equity growth, rather than taking on a liability.
English
0
0
0
18
phibetakefka
phibetakefka@phibetakefka·
@Jnel03 @Stormingurmom @Brien_Jackson But housing is, for Americans, their largest asset. If you can get a house young, you can easily trade up to better and access better lines of credit using the equity you put into it, versus losing 15-20 years of accrued equity to rent, which will be a $500k+ loss in that time.
English
1
0
0
8
J
J@Jnel03·
@ImNotOwned This is why we're doomed. There definitely is an educational component to this, but regardless, the vast majority of the public will never understand it and will never be happy until their suicidal preferences are achieved.
English
0
0
0
193
J
J@Jnel03·
@MrsCMFrancis This is why property taxes need to be retained. The problem is housing serves as private property AND a commodity (housing). Any other private good is regulated with pricing and supply maintenance, but when one of those is constrained, allocation becomes inefficient.
English
0
0
0
173
J
J@Jnel03·
@StatisticUrban @BarneyFlames It also appears to be inflation-dependent. I would bite on this since lower income folks get hit harder by inflation, but the discourse is instead "no, the economy is actually terrible and worse than 2008".
English
0
0
2
142
Hunter📈🌈📊
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban·
@BarneyFlames It only explains the last two months though. The sentiment-conditions divergence is way older than that.
English
3
1
181
2.6K
J
J@Jnel03·
@grapesmoker @fearthe_void That's where it's cruitial to compare comparable inflationary, unemployment, and fed-rate periods at the very least.
English
0
0
1
21
великий комбинатор
@Jnel03 @fearthe_void I think even 15 year comparisons are of pretty limited utility, not just because of psychological differences but because of the vastly different policy environments which also affect expectations
English
1
0
1
51
J
J@Jnel03·
@michaelevknight If folks weren't earning enough in their household, other folks in said household would start searching for jobs (as we've seen historically). This would cause the overall working population figure to increase, increasing unemployment if they weren't able to find a job.
English
0
0
0
58
J
J@Jnel03·
@michaelevknight If it were irrelevant, we'd be focusing somewhere else on the U-1/6 spectrum. If your statement were true, we'd see more folks needing to enter the workforce, which would drive unemployment up. Unemployment is where it is because folks have certain needs/wants currently met.
English
3
0
0
576
michael e. v. knight
michael e. v. knight@michaelevknight·
The unemployment rate is pretty much meaningless when nearly 44% of full-time workers in the U.S. do not earn enough to cover their family's basic needs.
English
41
969
7.3K
62.4K
J
J@Jnel03·
@Stormingurmom @Brien_Jackson This is where the "economy" is more than just housing. It's purchasing power, employment, real wages, income distribution, discretionary income, savings rates, etc. Housing is a large expense, but everyone's housing costs are different (rent vs own, paid-off vs mortgage, etc.)
English
1
0
0
14
J
J@Jnel03·
@Stormingurmom @Brien_Jackson You're right! Housing is only a portion of the economy. Key is *portion*. Median Real Wages have grown, but depending on how you interpret different splits, the effective purchasing power has hovered around neutral the previous few years, and positive if you include 2010-2020.
English
1
0
1
19