John Hammond

777 posts

John Hammond banner
John Hammond

John Hammond

@JohnHammond33

New York City Katılım Temmuz 2009
526 Takip Edilen725 Takipçiler
Jon Matzner
Jon Matzner@MatznerJon·
2026: Live shot of staffing markup agencies
Jon Matzner tweet media
English
1
0
16
2.8K
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@MatznerJon I do not see anything on your website about how Sagan makes money. I’m not trying to be lazy or a dick, im just curious
English
1
0
0
36
Robert Sterling
Robert Sterling@RobertMSterling·
Nobody: Absolutely no one: My boomer neighbor Gary at 6:30 AM today:
Robert Sterling tweet mediaRobert Sterling tweet mediaRobert Sterling tweet mediaRobert Sterling tweet media
English
151
24
995
67.8K
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp·
I asked Jensen, why don't you just become a hyperscaler yourself (rather than funding different neoclouds)?
English
119
102
2.7K
239.5K
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@JamesonCamp I mean respectfully you are insinuating what I said does not make sense when it clearly does. But agreed this is probably the dumbest exchange I’ve had in a while lol
English
0
0
0
19
James Camp 🛠,🛠
James Camp 🛠,🛠@JamesonCamp·
@JohnHammond33 I think maybe we are just having a big miscommunication brother haha Hope your well. No mal intent here
English
1
0
0
30
James Camp 🛠,🛠
James Camp 🛠,🛠@JamesonCamp·
I turned down OpenAI at $30B in 2023 it just closed at $852B last month. Q4 IPO targeting $1T one of the biggest mistakes of my life my mom knows what Claude Code is now. thats how you know were at peak AI hype trillion dollar IPOs. every company becoming an AI company. nobody blown away by AI video anymore saw this script with the internet in 2000. crypto in 2021. the tech always changes the world - it just does it QUIETLY after the peak breaks robotics is next Figure at $39B. Skild at $14B. $13.8B in robotics funding last year - more than the 2021 peak the mind-blown moment comes when humanoid robots start walking around homes and offices. weird factor hits. hype peaks the real money will be in the dark factories behind the scenes not gonna miss this one...
James Camp 🛠,🛠 tweet mediaJames Camp 🛠,🛠 tweet media
English
10
0
36
7K
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@JamesonCamp …damn dude ok. You said what I said didn’t make sense. I said it did. You said it didn’t bc the pic wouldn’t be there to “prove I did invest”. But I wasn’t saying the pic was to prove you did invest it was to prove you had an opportunity. …so it does make sense. End
English
0
0
0
12
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@JamesonCamp “telling your friend you had the OPPORTUNITY to invest”
English
1
0
0
18
James Camp 🛠,🛠
James Camp 🛠,🛠@JamesonCamp·
@JohnHammond33 Not really sure how, because the tweet said that I didn't invest and I missed it, so the picture wouldn't be there to prove I did invest. It'd be the opposite.
English
1
0
0
19
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@anothercohen It’s insane what companies charge for BAA. Twilio is $24k/year for the baa alone
English
2
0
2
88
Alex Cohen
Alex Cohen@anothercohen·
I'm tempted to finally churn off Slack. We're paying ~$6k/year for 40 people and they just quoted me $21k/year for the business version that includes a BAA (and all the shitty AI features). Incredibly overrated software
English
519
37
3.8K
503.5K
Jonas
Jonas@jonaswillett1·
Hosting a poker night tonight. West Village penthouse. Founders only. Have a special guest coming. @thecollectiv3e
Jonas tweet media
English
41
4
199
74.9K
𓁹‿𓁹
𓁹‿𓁹@kitvolta·
Have we considered that no sane hot competent 27-33yo woman wants to marry a 46yo
Blaine Anderson@datingbyblaine

Why is matchmaking expensive? To illustrate, here’s how I’ll lose money on a client’s $49,000 package. Client is 46, 6’2, exited tech founder. He’s looking for a woman 27-33, very specific criteria around match personality, appearance, and profession. Without diving into specifics, she: • Isn’t easily searchable online... • Isn’t likely to reply when we find her… • Isn’t likely to be single… • Often has a deal-breaker trait we can’t screen for without a phone call… • Isn’t necessarily interested in my client… I was expecting this to be a difficult search, so I quoted $49,000. I wasn’t expecting ~100 hours of labor to find each match, not including communication with the client! To date I’ve spent $45,000 on salaries for the women staffed on his search, plus $2,750 on styling and photos, and we still owe the client 2 matches... Before considering overhead (let alone opportunity cost) this will be a huge L financially. Things balance out though. Most engagements are profitable. Some engagements are quite profitable. For example, a new client in NYC paid $30,000 and paused after his first match, because he’s 99% sure we found his wife. That's still a new relationship, and engagements last 9 months (6 months of active matching + up to 3 months of pause), so we could be on the hook for more work in coming months. But you get the point 🙏

English
332
984
27K
1.4M
Shaan Puri
Shaan Puri@ShaanVP·
@SahilBloom Everytime I post on social media I feel like I’m still doing things for the approval of others
English
14
1
131
14K
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
I wish I could tell my younger self how much better life gets when you stop living for the approval of others. You realize you were living at 10% of full power and suddenly unlocked that other 90%. The gray dullness of constantly editing who you are is replaced by full color.
English
170
87
991
45.5K
simp 4 satoshi
simp 4 satoshi@iamgingertrash·
Rabois is an Old Pervert, Well past his prime That is desperate to be correct, when he’s simply retarded and wrong The Aging Old Man Who clings to any wisps of life left As his own slips him by; May delivery is $101
simp 4 satoshi tweet mediasimp 4 satoshi tweet media
English
7
4
415
42.5K
John Hammond
John Hammond@JohnHammond33·
@Rachi__01 Haha yeah you just respond to comments saying the same thing the commenter said. Almost like a bot 😂😂😂
English
0
0
1
105