Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽

5.2K posts

Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽 banner
Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽

Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽

@JonathanBesler

INTP*ISTJ Hereditary Chieftain of the Beßler Nation: Salic primogeniture to 1712. 👦👦👦 And yet, here I stan.

Western Canada Katılım Ekim 2013
282 Takip Edilen144 Takipçiler
Tradvocate
Tradvocate@TradAdvocate·
If you send your 18-year-old daughter away to a secular university, the statistical default is four years of casual sex, binge drinking, and relationships that end in heartbreak at 22. She will return to you with $60k of debt and a new worldview that does not include becoming a young mother. This is not a paranoid prediction. Why would you take that risk?
Tradvocate tweet media
English
48
188
890
11.4K
Kaiser von Lohengramm
Kaiser von Lohengramm@KaiserLoengramm·
My favorite thing about Orangutans is that around the 18th century, they were understood to be a sub race of humans in West Africa which lived in tribes that would go out and raid villages, specifically seeking out their women in order to propagate themselves as they found Africans to be more beautiful than there own, which Thomas Jefferson used to illustrate the superior beauty of White women over all other races. Here’s the quote from Notes on the state of Virginia where he outlines this: “Are not the fine mixtures of red and white, the expressions of every passion by greater or less suffusions of colour in the one, preferable to that eternal monotony, which reigns in the countenances, that immovable veil of black which covers all the emotions of the other race? Add to these, flowing hair, a more elegant symmetry of form, their own judgment in favour of the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the preference of the Orangutan for the black women over those of his own species. The circumstance of superior beauty, is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?” - Thomas Jefferson
Kaiser von Lohengramm tweet media
English
43
90
1.8K
67.8K
Tanya
Tanya@Tanyaelisabeth·
Some Christian just accused me of being flesh focused because I asked my husband how tall he was before we met. The same type of people that will tell you attraction doesn’t matter. Ok go marry a troglodyte and then get back to me.
English
44
4
221
16.3K
kt🧝🏻‍♀️
kt🧝🏻‍♀️@amishescapee·
Showing this to women will fix the fertility rate crisis
kt🧝🏻‍♀️ tweet media
English
174
1K
18K
315.2K
Kat Kanada 🏴
Kat Kanada 🏴@KatKanada_TM·
I had a miscarriage today… I’ve never had one before. This is the most devastating loss I’ve ever experienced in my life… If you are a praying person, would you say a prayer, please. 💔✝️
English
8.5K
1.9K
48K
765.6K
Nc NaKamoto
Nc NaKamoto@NcNaKamoto·
@jimcramer bro just go MEGA BULLISH - i'm sick of this melt up already
Nc NaKamoto tweet media
English
1
0
53
7.2K
Jim Cramer
Jim Cramer@jimcramer·
Tonight, the really bad things just didn't happen. An explanation of the rally...
English
182
60
1.1K
343.1K
Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽
@_wej01 Depends who you listen to For me it was similar, like you're still young you're still young you're still young You're 28, what's wrong with you? Why aren't you married yet? But I never really believed it. I was raised for a 1980 world, but grew up in a 2015 world, unfortunately:
Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽 tweet media
Calgary, Alberta 🇨🇦 English
0
0
0
75
ꪝe
ꪝe@_wej01·
Being a woman is like: Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant Aren’t you too young? Get an abortion Don’t get pregnant Don’t get pregnant QUICK GET PREGNANT! GET PREGNANT, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! Aren’t you too old to be pregnant???
English
309
6.9K
84.8K
2.5M
UrbnLit
UrbnLit@UrbanLiterature·
@Cocoaisadog @Ne_pas_couvrir You’d have to be a direct descendant of Neanderthals to believe that having sex with children and animals is left wing ideology!!
GIF
English
2
0
0
38
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost@Ne_pas_couvrir·
Here’s Ben Stein in 1979 describing television as an engine of cultural demoralization. He argues that a small clique of producers and writers pushed a left-coded inversion of reality onto the public. They despised traditional power centers and hated figures like Buckley. They propagandized the nation into accepting a fake world where businessmen are villains, criminals are the good-guys, small towns are sinister, military officers are proto-fascists, and work barely exists.
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost@Ne_pas_couvrir

In the 1970s Ben Stein interviewed major TV producers/writers to ask why their portrayal of US culture was so distorted. Businessmen were evil. Real life crime was always depicted inaccurately, favoring instead the Marxist narratives on race, class, and culture of the new left.

English
1.1K
11.8K
43.6K
22.6M
Iran News 24
Iran News 24@IRanMediaco·
The US did not come to negotiate but to dictate.
English
1.5K
3.9K
19.1K
279.3K
Jonatan Pallesen
Jonatan Pallesen@jonatanpallesen·
The rates of female genital mutilation in Somalia is close to 100%. People don't understand how horrible this mutilation is. Here is a detailed description below. If a single White person did this to their daughter, this would be a huge story, and that person would be renowned throughout the world as an insane monster. But it's not White people who do this. Instead its Somalis — many of whom we allow to immigrate into our countries. We should not have mass immigration of such people into our countries.
Jonatan Pallesen tweet media
English
313
1.4K
5.6K
146.8K
hoe_math = PsychoMath
hoe_math = PsychoMath@ItIsHoeMath·
I can see a lot of people are going to ask about the sex gun. You guys do not know what's going on in the cities. That part of what the tranny said did not stick out to me because I am accustomed to city people speaking openly of their numerous and deep perversions. Using a gun for sex increases arousal in a disappointingly large number of women because if you point it at them, they feel like you could kill them in the blink of an eye and they enjoy that level of control. Presumably homos do it too but I don't know about that
English
23
18
655
19.8K
hoe_math = PsychoMath
hoe_math = PsychoMath@ItIsHoeMath·
Leftrats really be like "I spend a lot of time in the bedrooms of men I consider losers" and they think they did something Here's xer/xem's unfuckable tranny pig face by the way. This is the face of anti-gun and pro-somalian whore emotions If things like this are surviving to adulthood we've become too weak
hoe_math = PsychoMath tweet media
English
30
72
1.8K
43.3K
Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽
@realfemsapien Perhaps as you say, a function of exposure >I've known a few men to crash out after a new child. I don't know what their cognitive load is like >I've even known one man to take his life after having a child Perhaps overwhelm from neurodivergence plays a part
Calgary, Alberta 🇨🇦 English
0
0
0
16
Jonathan Besler 🇩🇪🇦🇹/🇺🇦 🇨🇦/🇲🇽 retweetledi
Aly Dee
Aly Dee@realfemsapien·
I don't know why men get Postpartum Depression. I don't know if it's hormonal, environmental, psychological, or all three variety of factors. All I know is, they can get it these days, and I've known a few men to crash out after having a new child. I don't know what their cognitive load is like, and I have even known one man to take his life after having a child. I only know that it is happening. Maybe some find the diagnostic verbiage too feminine. Maybe it's better to call it Male Postnatal Depression. For now, medicine calls it Postpartum Depression, and it's real. We don’t expect a first-time postpartum woman to "just get it" the first time. Why do we expect fathers to?
English
7
2
22
2K
༺𝔤𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔢༻
༺𝔤𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔢༻@0rangebl0ss0m_·
@JonathanBesler @BlobbyTables88 @WhiteBabyFac I have a very happy family mind you, but if not wanting crusty dusty incel piece of shit pedophiles like the one in the picture below to have absolutely any access to children like my sweet daughter, happens to make me anti-family that’s what the fuck I’ll very well be.
༺𝔤𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔢༻ tweet media
English
2
0
0
27
White Baby Factory
White Baby Factory@WhiteBabyFac·
It's medically riskier to have a baby at 37 than to have a baby at 17.
White Baby Factory tweet media
English
22
47
627
6K
Abby Libby
Abby Libby@abbythelibb_·
@GiffLasta "Why are you thinking about sex? We're just cuddling. Kinda seems like you're thinking about sex, but if you say so." *more foreplay, but remind her she's not horny, totally definitely not. Tell her to focus on the TV show. Ask her why she's not focusing on the TV show.* ETC.
English
28
2
1.2K
136.7K
Giff Lasta
Giff Lasta@GiffLasta·
I cringe because I’ve been there. Fellas, what’s a better response to an unsolicited, “no, not tonight”?
Giff Lasta tweet media
English
1K
142
14.6K
1.5M
Sweet N Savory 🇨🇦💙
Sweet N Savory 🇨🇦💙@seastar898·
@KILLTOPARTY He's probably dating too young. If he's 28, he's dating 23 to 25 year olds who dont have a marriage mindset yet. Wait until you're 35, save money, and find a 28-30 year old who is ready to settle down.
English
3
0
1
780
“Bad” Billy Pratt
“Bad” Billy Pratt@KILLTOPARTY·
When women seek husband material, they’re using a subconscious algorithm that has a built-in disgust threshold— exceed this threshold and you get bounced
“Bad” Billy Pratt tweet media
English
32
13
627
32.1K
Brian DeVries
Brian DeVries@cplan_logician·
My baseball bat and constructive advice, in that order. "These women are not blameless," then you spend the rest of your post blaming men for not approaching. "I'm sorry if this sounds insensitive to men's struggles" is HR-speek for "I don't give a shit about men's struggles." (Think: "I'm sorry you feel that way. Now do what I want.") Speak plainly. If you want to be demure, then advocate for repealing the 19th Amendment first. "I have to wonder why Christian men don't believe the prize outweighs the risks" then you describe the prize as strictly sex, which is dirt cheap in our current environment. "[a] highly religious, patriarchal community" is clearly not your current environment. Thus, it is illogical to complain that your current environment does not produce the results of a completely foreign one (and one I'd argue does not exist in any meaningful way in the West, particularly the United States). In such a patriarchal environment, your only concern would be to prepare the young women under your charge to be proper helpmeets for when the men finally retake their rightful ruling role and burn down the longhouse that is the modern church. Put another way, it is not your purview to dictate terms to men, and women's Genesis 3 desire to rule --- having been left completely unchecked for 50+ years --- has bequeathed the current hellscape. Train your women to accept the headship of their husbands' righteous rule (for example, being able to explain why "yes sir" is the only appropriate answer to the "red dress question" that made the rounds a couple months ago). Men will tend to training other men to ensure that rule is just, because we're the only ones who can. Here is the reality, and the constructive advice. Remember: women gatekeep sex, men gatekeep the relationship. Right now women are giving the sex away for free (both IRL and especially online), so if you're thinking the men's only choices are "die a virgin or marry one of my wonderful young women" then I have some bad news for you. Most men will choose to escape that false dichotomy entirely --- for those that are able, to the night club hookups or secular LTR dating; for those that aren't, to PornHub and OnlyFans. The few that choose neither are not the men you want approaching your wonderful young women because they completely lack agency over their own lives and are unfit to lead. This is the reality that Pat is addressing in his posts, and one you still seem to feel in control of. You aren't, you never were, and the more that women have been allowed to pretend, the worse things have gotten. One more time: it's not for you to demand, or even expect, that men "do" anything, at least in this "meta" context. Your task is to prepare your wonderful women for when their future husbands "do." Furthermore, this means that your women MUST bring something else to the table besides sex. Your post is maintaining "but I am the table!"-tier delusional thinking, as @ItIsHoeMath likes to say. Sorry, women's liberation inflated the comparative value of sex to "worthless." Adapt your mating strategy accordingly. Next, understand that social media has played a direct role in the decline in cold approaches, which it sounds like you're expecting. "The worst she can say is no" is no longer true when you can become an involuntary viral sensation for all the wrong reasons. Hell, you can look on this very site and find posts from women describing how "mortified" they were that they were cold-approached at church. On that note, I'd also urge you to properly educate your women on the dangers of social media: it has weapons-grade refined "comparison is the thief of joy" into a tactical nuke aimed directly at them. I have long held that social media is more dangerous and damaging to women than porn has ever been to men; before you object, consider we've had porn for a LOT longer without staring down the barrel of collapsing birth rates. As an added bonus, AI is also going to turn it into a security risk, so your women should keep that in mind the next time they post pictures of themselves or (much worse) their kids. "I'm not on any social media" is approaching "I'm a virgin" in terms of sexual market value at this point. Finally, I'll highlight two posts by Devon Eriksen, who has hit this nail on the head multiple times from multiple angles. You (and your husband, I presume) should carefully read through his entire posting history like you're on a directed mission from God if you're serious about solving these problems. First up: x.com/Devon_Eriksen_… If your women think they're traddie baddies who can cop this attitude (a not-insignificant amount of which I see in your posts here), they should begin their Cat Mom arc as soon as humanly possible because they will make their future husbands' lives hell, "patriarchal" or not. Start or redouble efforts to deprogram the "don't let a man boss you around" attitude, because being able to demonstrate that to a man early on is one of those things they can bring to the table. The less deprogramming he needs to do, the sooner he can conclude the vetting process with a proposal. (As to how to ensure that it's genuine and not a mask just to get to the proposal before reverting to boss-babe priors? I leave that in your hands. But please make sure it's there, for the sake of God and country.) Second, and more importantly: x.com/Devon_Eriksen_… You should read the whole thing aloud repeatedly until it sticks, but I'll summarize: stop expecting men to cold approach. It was a very sub-optimal approach when it was normalized, it's become crushingly counter-productive in the modern age, and the expectation that this is what's supposed to happen is one of the reasons you and your wonderful women are feeling frustrated. Instead, teach your women the old ways of flirting: i.e., being the initiator in a plausibly-deniable way. You've got the old classics like "tuck the hair behind the ear" and "catch his eye, then look away and smile," but those are just the ones I know anything about as a guy who was never educated in such things. This is why you, as a woman, are charged with training women --- you have an intuitive understanding of these things I will never have. I can only say that modern problems might require modern solutions, so get creative with it. Sure, she loaded that box into her car all by herself, but maybe she "needs" help unloading it. Maybe she "needs" him to "settle a bet" between her and a friend. You get the idea. Past that, how does she play to her strengths to maintain his interest? Can she hold a conversation about deep topics without becoming offended? Can she cook a meal that gives him a spark of joy in his day? At a minimum, can she bring peace to his life, such that he feels safer in her presence than her absence? Here's the bonus: if you can get a couple of them paired off, you can maybe start to rebuild the peer-to-peer vetting networks that functional societies have enjoyed, which is how my wife and I got together. And I'll agree, men need to be taught to see those signals in the first place (I certainly never was), correctly interpret if they're aimed at them, and then properly vet the women for marriageability. Leave that to people like Pat. But understand this: the "worst she can say is no" era is clearly in its death throes, the "men should stay celibate till their 30s" expectation is hopefully being butchered as quickly as possible, and the "my vagina is the one and only prize" attitude has been dead for decades. No amount of exclaiming how things "should" be will change any of those realities. Remember, men gatekeep the relationship that your women want. They can practice abstinence from providing the relationship with a near-zero loss of sexual gratification in the current environment, and regardless of how suboptimal or even harmful it is for him, it's clearly infinitely worse for your wonderful women. Teach your women how to look at a man, decide whether she'd let him fuck her, catch his attention, and then demonstrate her high marriage quality as quickly as possible so they can both get what they want and start building a union together. To maximize the odds of success, suggest she do so while wearing a properly-fitted "Repeal the 19th" T-shirt.
English
1
0
2
120