Joseph Alexander

California AB 2047 was GUTTED of any safe harbor, amended 33 times in 4 days, and BROKEN. If enacted into law, EVERY 3d printer sold in California would be in violation. youtu.be/EGvvEuIPJxA

A new VPN leak that allows any app to leak traffic outside the VPN tunnel has recently been discovered by @cybaqkebm Read more here: mullvad.net/blog/any-app-o…

@Lilkniv @Ev1ILLLL @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ We just have different views on how to handle the situation. I’m fully aware that no one can escape the consequences, no matter the reason, but violence isn’t the only option.

@Just01000101 @Ev1ILLLL @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Apology not accepted dick head.

Kick streamer gets into a heated argument with three black guys on the street. He threatens them “We got 18 rounds for you.” Then drops the hard R “Don’t follow me to my truck NGGER” Pure chaos.

@Lilkniv @Ev1ILLLL @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ The harasser expends his physical and mental energy to maintain the attack. If the target refuses to engage in the cycle of violence, the harasser eventually runs out of fuel. I must apologize for thinking differently using my "room temp IQ". I only know causality exist😔

@Just01000101 @Ev1ILLLL @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Again, dude is literally throwing racial slurs, harassing and threatening folks and you’re dumbing it down to a “simply hurt ego” shows your room temp iq.

“Only criminals care about privacy” is one of the dumbest takes to come out of the internet age. Banks care about privacy. Governments care about privacy. Military systems care about privacy. Critical infrastructure cares about privacy. Every Fortune 500 company on Earth cares about privacy. But somehow you think the average citizen shouldn’t? You lock your doors. You use passwords. You expect doctor-patient confidentiality. You expect your bank account to stay private. You don’t livestream your house keys and social security number online. Why? Because privacy is a normal human boundary, not a criminal act. The funniest part is that attackers, data brokers, advertisers, scammers, and hostile actors absolutely LOVE people with your mentality because you voluntarily normalize centralized mass data collection without understanding the consequences. You traded autonomy for convenience and called it intelligence. Also there was a data breach of the social security administration and the hackers let everyones SSN out in the open, but thats why im in business to fix your privacy settings 😆.

@alexxx11b @c47769 @Clip_Station_ Excuses are unnecessary when oneself recognises their own vulnerabilities because the next thing you need to do is simply to strive to improve and carry on. Try to be content with oneself once in a while.

You are right, & in most cases yes you should do just that. But this guy going around being highly disrespectful & telling people to do something about it, I mean he’s pretty much inviting them into a fight. Can’t be surprised when someone finally says fuck it I’ll risk an assault charge.

@windscribecom Vatican

Now that Bill C-22 is threatening our business, where should Windscribe move to?

@CSKBennettp3x6 @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ I quite agree with you, because it is essentially optional to take the words seriously to some extent, bearing in mind that it is not necessary to take them personally as a whole.

@Just01000101 @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ I mean the constitution is just words.. should we not take those seriously either?

@c47769 @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Still, the fundamentals doesn't change much. it is absolutely okay to argues back against him or perhaps you can just ignores him and also respond back unseriously because he can't spouting off non-stop for 24 hours — he'll just wear himself out.

@Just01000101 @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Nah bro it’s not even about this word he is literally harassing them

@Ev1ILLLL @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Everyone has the right to be angry and it is okay to argue back, but that doesn't mean it's fine to resort to violence simply because your ego has been hurt. Just because a fisherman casts a bait into the water doesn't mean the fish have to take the bait.

@Just01000101 @alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ “words” and its racial slurs and threats 😭😭 white people man. professional victims. thank god this dude will be rotting in prison

Captured the "Four Seasons" vibes of Qinchuan in this new piece. #wherewindsmeet #WWMQinChuan

@alexxx11b @Clip_Station_ Just don't take words seriously. Taking someone's words personally will make lives worse. It just shows that oneself is weak against mere words; that's how fragile ego works. If someone simply letting me know that he/she threatening my life then I just need to prepare accordingly

@Clip_Station_ So if they don’t do anything they pussy, if they do they violent? What a joke

Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They're convincing a growing number of services to adopt it. Google's Play Integrity API and Apple's App Attest API are very similar. Apple brought it to the web via Privacy Pass, which Google intends on doing too. Google's Play Integrity API requires hardware attestation for the strong integrity level and is gradually phasing in requiring it for the more commonly used device integrity level. Apple already has it as a requirement. Over the long term, this will increasingly lock out hardware and OS competition. The purpose of these systems is disallowing people from using hardware and software not approved by Apple or Google. This is wrongly presented as being a security feature. Banks and government services are the main ones adopting it but Apple and Google are encouraging every service to use it. Apple's Privacy Pass brought hardware attestation to the web to help with passing captchas on their own hardware. Many people saw that as harmless since few sites would be willing to lock out non-Apple-hardware users. Apple and Google are both likely to bring broader hardware attestation to the web. Google's reCAPTCHA is planning an approach where they use Privacy Pass on Apple hardware, their own approach on Google Mobile Services Android devices and a QR code scanning system to require an iOS or Google certified Android device for Windows and other systems: support.google.com/recaptcha/answ… Banking and government services increasingly require using a mobile app where they can use attestation to force using an Apple or Google approved device and OS. Apple's privacy pass, Google's 'cancelled' Web Environment Integrity and now reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification are bringing this to the web. Current media coverage for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification misunderstands it and the impact of it. They're bringing a hardware attestation requirement to Windows, desktop Linux, OpenBSD, etc. by requiring a QR scan from a certified smartphone to pass reCAPTCHA in some cases. They could expand it more. Control over reCAPTCHA puts Google in a position where they can require having either iOS or a certified Android device to use an enormous amount of the web. Google defines certification requirements for Android which includes forcing bundling Google Chrome, etc. It's enormously anti-competitive. Google's Play Integrity API bans using GrapheneOS despite it being far more secure than anything they permit. It also bans using any other alternative. This isn't somehow specific to an AOSP-based OS. You can't avoid this by using a mobile OS based on FreeBSD instead. You'll just be more locked out. Google's Play Integrity API permits devices with no security patches for 10 years. The device integrity level can be bypassed via spoofing but they can detect it quite well and block it once it starts being done at scale. The strong integrity level requires leaked keys from TEEs/SEs to bypass it. It doesn't provide a useful security feature, but it does lock out competition very well. Services requiring Apple App Attest or Google Play Integrity are primarily helping to lock in Apple and Google having a duopoly for mobile devices. Play Integrity is more relevant due to AOSP being open source. Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them. Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they're directly participating in locking out competition via their own services. Requiring people to have an Apple device or Google-certified Android device is anti-competition, not security. reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that. This isn't about security or any missing functionality. GrapheneOS can be verified via hardware attestation. Google bans using GrapheneOS for Play Integrity because we don't license Google Mobile Services and conform to anti-competitive rules already found to be illegal in South Korea and elsewhere. Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.

‼️🚨 ALARMING: Google now treats privacy as suspicious behavior by default. Users of GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, /e/OS, and other deGoogled Android phones are being locked out of millions of websites unless they install the exact Google Play Services software they deliberately removed. GrapheneOS is recommended by the EFF and used by journalists, lawyers, and activists in high-risk environments. The audience most likely to read Google's data practices and refuse its terms is now flagged as fraudulent for that exact decision. What happened?: ▪️ Google announced "Cloud Fraud Defense" at Cloud Next on April 22-23, 2026, branding it "the next evolution of reCAPTCHA." Existing reCAPTCHA customers were auto-migrated. ▪️ When the system flags traffic as suspicious, the old click-the-bus puzzle is gone. Users get a QR code instead. ▪️ Scanning the QR code requires Google Play Services running on the device. Internet Archive snapshots show this requirement has been live since at least October 2025, silently rolled out for 7 months before anyone noticed. ▪️ No Play Services = no QR scan = locked out. The bigger picture: ▪️ Google already tried this in 2023. It was called Web Environment Integrity (WEI), and it would have let Google decide which devices were "real enough" to access the web. Standards bodies and the public pushed back hard, and Google killed it. Three years later, the same idea is back, just hidden behind a QR code instead of a browser feature. ▪️ reCAPTCHA runs on millions of websites. Every developer who keeps using it is now, by default, telling deGoogled Android users they're not welcome...

@CR1337 "This will allow YouTube to locate the best content." YouTube was much better 10 years ago than it is now. What a bullshit.

YouTube (Premium) is now blocking Mullvad IPs: "To continue, turn off your VPN / proxy. This will alow YouTube to locate the best content."

Creating quantum entanglement inside a solid material is tricky in the lab – but crystals buried in the earth could be growing it naturally. Now one scientist says he has proof he’s found them #Echobox=1778001340" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/252343…

@LundukeJournal "Uncertainty is the only certainty there is, and knowing how to live with insecurity is the only security." There will always be risks, no matter what.

@LundukeJournal Let's just normalize criminalizing the behaviour that are already proven rather than the materials. The use of any materials with the known risks should be issued with a warning, not to be suppressed. the risk of freedom is a part of freedom itself.

And, right on cue, a flood of people have arrived to defend pornographic, cartoon, sexualized depictions of small children. One of their main arguments is "It's not a picture of a *real* kid, so it's ok!" Look. Wether it's pictures of real children, or cartoon depictions... It's all evil. Are some things more evil than others? Absolutely. But evil is evil. And this sort of sick, perverted, pornographic material, depicting little kids, is evil. Without question. This is not up for debate.

@nym Digital Oppressive Verification.

Age verification is backdoor mass surveillance.

many new ways to make your browser feel "just right" dropped in helium today: - centered address bar - minimal address bar - new dynamic layout - improvements to vertical layout - and experimental zen/frameless mode (flagged, bit buggy, but cool!) helium.computer