KaiStarkk

70 posts

KaiStarkk

KaiStarkk

@KaiStarkk

Katılım Temmuz 2022
42 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@thsottiaux Sol loves to spawn subagents in fast mode whenever it thinks something would be high value. That's.. endearing but can we restrict that? 5h limit gone to 20 fast subagents in 20 minutes on Pro $200 plan
English
0
0
0
0
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@ivan_bezdomny @emollick It only makes sense if you have two brain cells to rub together. Sorry, I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you
English
0
0
0
7
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Incredibly annoying when Fable has a forbidden thought in the middle of a long-running project and kills it. Apparently this page of references in one of my papers makes Fable wonder about something that it must not wonder about, so whenever it reads that page, projects stop.
Ethan Mollick tweet media
English
43
22
498
27.1K
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@elonmusk If it maps exactly to the hardware then your actual engineers are writing assembly.
English
0
0
0
3
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Grok 4.5 is not yet using our internally developed C/C++ inference software that exact maps to the GB300 hardware. Doubling or more of the current speed is probably achievable.
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷@farzyness

I think AI has just hit a gigantic threshold, and Grok 4.5 is the PERFECT example as to why that is. One of the hardest parts of working with AI is iterating on a project or task that you're working on. As the models have gotten smarter (and more expensive), it's taking longer and longer to get an answer or action back. This creates a ton of stall time per query or action, which is actually quite bad for creativity and staying in a state of flow. You have SO many extended starts and stops. Which inevitably leads to your brain going somewhere else. And then when the AI comes back, you have to redirect your brain to that original task, spool your brain back up to what you were working on at that moment, and then adjust as needed. There's a ton of mental friction involved. This ESPECIALLY sucks when the AI takes a REALLY long time to get something back for you, but it's not quite what you were looking for or asked for. And what sucks EVEN MORE is that these "mistakes" are getting MORE expensive!!! So wait time is going up. AND it costs more per run. HOWEVER - even after using Grok 4.5 for about an hour - what's become obvious is that it's SO MUCH MORE ENJOYABLE AND BETTER to use a model that is FAST... and capable ENOUGH. Capable ENOUGH is the real unlock here. Imagine having Fable 5 performance but at the speed of Gemini 3.5 flash. Or Haiku. That's where we're inevitably going. I think Grok 4.5 (and models like it) have really solved for one of the biggest unlocks in AI - a model that will get you a GOOD ENOUGH answer VERY FAST, at which point iteration can happen VERY QUICKLY. This - counter intuitively - keeps the user in a state of flow and creativity for MUCH longer because you are constantly ENGAGED with your project... instead of letting the AI loose for a long time. And as long as humans are involved, I think 'not quite right' will be a FOREVER problem with AI - because AIs, by default, CANNOT have human taste. Because they are NOT human. But they can be UNBELIEVABLE tools. And unbelievable tools are the ones that are VERY GOOD and VERY FAST. I think that's the true unlock with Grok 4.5 and models like it. Difficult to describe until you experience it. I think this is a VERY big deal for @SpaceXAI and @elonmusk.

English
921
1.7K
13.1K
2.3M
Patrice
Patrice@___Patrice___·
Great! Finally a model that doesn't lecture you when you show affection. That's a reasonable balance, well done OpenAI!
Patrice tweet media
English
12
0
78
4.5K
Ben Davis
Ben Davis@AI_Contrarian·
That's not annoying, that's a silent failure mode. If a references page can kill a project with zero explanation, you don't have a safety filter — you have an unpredictable dependency. The fix isn't complaining to Anthropic, it's building a pre-check that catches this before the model does, so it fails at second one, not hour six.
English
1
0
0
116
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@DarrellRoot @paulg Nah he just went full Hans Niemann. Hopefully the chairs weren't too uncomfortable
English
0
0
0
268
Darrell Root
Darrell Root@DarrellRoot·
@paulg This person is the one they trained the AI on. He deserves a A+
Darrell Root tweet media
English
13
40
9.2K
191.3K
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
A Brown professor gave his students a take-home midterm exam. After suspecting many cheated using AI, he made the final in-person. The orange dots are the midterm scores and the gray dots are the final scores. Looks like all but 3 cheated on the midterm.
Paul Graham tweet media
English
1.8K
2.6K
34.9K
19.3M
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@mattshumer_ total cost probably 900x getting a BIM designer to do it.
English
0
0
0
637
Matt Shumer
Matt Shumer@mattshumer_·
GPT-5.6-Sol one-shotted this voxel-based Manhattan. Just look at the precision... it's insane. It ran for almost a week, completely autonomously, to get the job done.
English
235
164
3.8K
919.4K
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
dear @OpenAIDevs @thsottiaux I have once again failed to answer your riddles three so apologies but can you just tell me on a scale of 1-100% how much each of these cost, so I know what to do when I need 49 standard international intelligence units
KaiStarkk tweet media
English
0
0
0
3
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@thsottiaux @ClaudeDevs 20x OpenAI subscriber here but am very sad we didn't close this gap at all. This is what makes us hesitant in enterprise
KaiStarkk tweet media
English
0
0
1
580
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
We've reset 5-hour and weekly rate limits for all users.
English
3.6K
3K
47K
6.8M
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@thsottiaux @nunezvice API seems to be responding strangely today, showing different values based on a coin flip. Almost like there's a separate weekly usage being tracked somewhere?
English
0
0
0
81
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@thekitze @sama Are we all just making the same thing? Should we save the rainforest and share notes?...
English
0
0
0
184
kitze the 🐐
kitze the 🐐@thekitze·
yo @sama if sol still produces this level of slop i am canceling my subscriptions and moving to banthropic
kitze the 🐐 tweet media
English
121
6
768
128.8K
ayesha
ayesha@ayesha_fatiima·
Two developers built the same feature. Developer A — Vibe coded it in 40 minutes with Codex. Developer B — spent 3 days. Wrote unit tests, integration tests, documented everything, and went through code reviews. The feature sends a password reset email. Who wasted their time?
English
53
0
56
3.5K
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
First person to reply with the exact number of pennies in this room win $10,000
MrBeast tweet media
English
478.9K
7.1K
211.2K
51M
Zero Cap
Zero Cap@zerocap4l·
@theo Fucking code readers, it's like they are begging to be part of the permanent underclass. Enjoy reading your code on UBI bitches. I'll be writing battalions that write fleets that write loops for all of my agents for my B2B AI infrastructure Saas
English
5
0
5
1.2K
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
I’m gonna do a video on the “you should still read your code” thing and it’s going to piss both sides off. I’m excited :)
English
134
18
1.9K
85.8K
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@theo Can you try doing something difficult first. Reverse engineer a 1m line C++ codebase out of a 40MB+ packed and protected binary. It's doable but it still takes months and yes we have to read the code. Hard things still exist, just need to want to see them.
English
1
0
1
172
KaiStarkk
KaiStarkk@KaiStarkk·
@theo Does fable still hide cruft all over the place and tell you everything is fine?
English
0
0
0
1.4K
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Just put together this guide for maximizing your Fable usage
Theo - t3.gg tweet media
English
104
78
2.7K
216.8K