Kvetch_Master

915 posts

Kvetch_Master banner
Kvetch_Master

Kvetch_Master

@KvetchMaster

America first. America only. 🇺🇸 We post to save our country. They post for shekels. I'm cheesed to meet you!

United States Katılım Kasım 2025
203 Takip Edilen76 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kvetch_Master
Kvetch_Master@KvetchMaster·
@TheRoyalSerf “Jews are not to blame for your life being bad. You are” -Serf
Kvetch_Master tweet media
English
0
2
55
1.1K
Kvetch_Master
Kvetch_Master@KvetchMaster·
Why do you see bulletproof glass at Mcdonald's in black neighborhoods? Because blacks behave poorly disproportionately compared to other races. They scream, insult, and get violent even when they are 100% wrong. Race matters because as the US becomes less white, this behavior will become more commonplace. If this is the type of society you'd like, then you should move into a black neighborhood instead of clutching your pearls on here.
English
0
0
10
89
Ben Dover
Ben Dover@OpinionzAreLike·
@WallStreetApes WTF does being black or any color have to do with this story? You're garbage
English
88
0
19
7.4K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Black Americans demand a full refund on their Dominos Pizza order because they said it was “nasty” They did not bring back any of the food, they just demand a refund The worker says she can’t refund them because she needs the product back to refund. They will not accept this, the food is at their home and they still demand a refund They relentlessly continue I looked it up, they should NOT get a refund Domino’s offers “make it right” with replacements, store credit, or rarely refunds for legitimate issues reported promptly. But “nasty” is highly subjective. Refunds are not automatic for subjective dissatisfaction, especially without evidence or return If they’ve eaten it or taken it home without bringing any back, there’s no basis for a cash refund Stop catering to people pulling this. They are just trying to get free food and it works
English
985
2.7K
17.1K
592.6K
Pirat_Nation 🔴
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation·
A controversial game called Plantation Simulator has been released on Steam and is receiving huge backlash from people calling it a slavery simulator. The game is described on Steam as a simple farming simulator where players motivate workers to work on a plantation. But the gameplay centers on a whipping mechanic applied to Black workers to increase productivity. The developer has described it as: “In this game, you will be whipping black people to keep your farm productive. If you whip your black person too much, they will die.”
English
1.4K
873
16K
2.1M
Mac
Mac@GoodPoliticGuy·
why the actual fuck is a Fox News guest wearing a sophisticated full head mask
Mr. Sausage@MrSausageGet

WTF

English
2K
19.9K
244.1K
15M
Kais
Kais@Arubbothian·
NEW: CAPTIVE DREAMER CRASHES OUT AND GETS ARRESTED AT IHOP
English
299
548
8.4K
700.3K
rushdee
rushdee@rushdee1776·
@KvetchMaster @ArchetypeTheory Regardless if he provoked him or not. He had no reasonable fear for his life to draw his weapon on a unarmed man to begin with. The vet with PTSD who DID see a real danger unlawfully emerging is however justified for his actions. Chud had counted on killing someone for awhile
English
2
0
0
60
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English
250
754
5.9K
478.2K
rushdee
rushdee@rushdee1776·
@ArchetypeTheory Branco is dumb and blocked me when I called out his logic pretending Chud didn’t know police were around and thus justified his life was threatened by a unarmed man he was provoking. He defaulted to logical fallacies citing my followers then blocked me 🤣
rushdee tweet mediarushdee tweet mediarushdee tweet media
English
7
0
6
1.5K
The Misfit Patriot
The Misfit Patriot@misfitpatriot_·
The most compelling argument is he said he was going to shoot a black person, leave them on the pavement, live stream it, make a bunch of money on a fundraiser, and get off on a self defense claim. He said this multiple times before he shot a black guy on pavement, on live stream, and raised a bunch of money on a fundraiser. If I said I was gonna rob a bank, then later I was arrested and charged for bank robbery, and a bunch of people online said I probably robbed the bank, those people would be making a pretty good fucking argument that I probably robbed the fucking bank. Are you retarded?
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

It's interesting to me that those who most wish to see Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly convicted for attempted murder have yet to bring up what's probably the most compelling legal argument for guilt. It's an argument that would properly lose in a fight, but it might take a fight. I wonder if they'll think of it.

English
54
9
72
26.1K
Kvetch_Master
Kvetch_Master@KvetchMaster·
A big part of the problem is so many Whites get antagonized over one word. It’s like a spell is cast over them where they’d have an emotional response to even consider saying the word alone in private. Getting over this is a crucial step in the reawakening of White racial identify that is necessary to fix the catastrophic immigration problem in this country. The taboo of Whites fearing offending non Whites must stop immediately. Chud saying nigger unapologetically is the catalyst of this reawakening. Whites face extinction and persecution globally - we are well beyond giving a shit about optics, it’s how we got into this mess.
English
0
0
0
42
Politically Atheist
Politically Atheist@boardride23·
Both can be true. Chud can be a complete dickhead and deserve to get his ass kicked for monetizing harassing people while videoing them without deserving to be killed or charged with murder when defending himself. I think what’s happening to Chud is a complete abuse of the justice system - both in terms of the bail amount, the charges and the fact that the lunatic aggressor hasn’t even gotten charged with anything. I am fully awoken to the fact that our legal system has become weaponized against white people and coddles black people. I see the headlines every day of some black dude murdering a white kid at random and getting a 50k bail or being deemed “unfit to stand trial” and legal system / media defending black on white violence because the black person baselessly says the white person was being racist. I’m livid about it but it doesn’t mean Chud was some noble person by videoing himself antagonizing people and then flashing his gun when they “chimp out”.
English
5
0
4
727
fud reaper 🪦
fud reaper 🪦@fudreaper_·
Nick is completely misidentifying the hill Dalton is willing to die on. Dalton isn’t risking his life for the right to say “the n word”. Dalton is fighting the idea that the greatest crime you can commit in today’s society is to offend a non white person. This is such a strong, pervasive issue in western countries today that a college kid in the UK just died, drowning in his own blood, because a Sikh man stabbed him and then tried to justify it by saying the kid had been racist. Think about that for a moment. The police denied a kid that had been stabbed 4 times with an 8 inch knife medical attention because a brown person claimed racism. The reason we even all say “the n word” is because we live in UNIVERSAL FEAR of the repercussions. We are more afraid of saying a word than a black person is of going to jail for assaulting you for saying it. We’ve been cucked. That’s why we live in “nigger hell”, Nick. And Dalton was trying to change that. In front of the whole country, he was literally risking his life to challenge the idea that the greatest crime you can actually commit is to offend the sensibilities of a black person. I understand that you can’t condone people behaving this way because of the liability, but Dalton wasn’t doing what he did just so that he could say “the N word”. He, just like you, was trying to make real ideological change. @NickJFuentes
English
376
337
4K
98.8K
MO
MO@Mo_On_Go·
@FREECHUDNOW Stfu krakker, jst like Chud the krakker-you will get yo ass whooped even while possessing a gun 😂😂😂 yall krakkers are comical and soft af
English
21
0
4
1K
FREE CHUD NOW
FREE CHUD NOW@FREECHUDNOW·
Niggers would suffer from mass starvation without our government food programs. Imagine how stupid an entire population has to be that they can’t even catch a fish to feed themselves. We literally have to send food to niggers in Africa because they can’t string a fishing pole.
FREE CHUD NOW tweet media
English
158
283
2.3K
21.1K
Alfred TwitchTok
Alfred TwitchTok@LucianFick·
@SydSteyerhart Hinduism deals extensively with consciousness — it's one of the central themes in Hindu philosophy, especially in the Vedas, Upanishads, Vedanta, Yoga, and Samkhya traditions.
English
5
0
3
381
Syd Steyerhart
Syd Steyerhart@SydSteyerhart·
The entire concept of consciousness is western and it describes almost exclusively western people. Once you understand this it becomes clear why it's almost impossible to charge foreigners with crimes because they are all mentally ill (lacking consciousness) by western standards.
English
15
39
476
9.7K
Rae
Rae@ragefighthouse·
I’m an immigrant who’s lived and worked in the UK for 16 years. I have a North American accent and I’m white. I’ve never once been told to ‘go back’ to my ‘shithole country’ or to ‘stop stealing jobs from British people’. You’re not concerned about immigration. You’re racist.
English
4.4K
16.3K
117.9K
2.3M
Kvetch_Master
Kvetch_Master@KvetchMaster·
@Skwerilleee @MrsK Arguing with a woman about politics is futile. They don't care to understand you point of view or how anything works. They just want want will make them personally feel better and have no capacity for 2nd, 3rd order thinking. The 19th was a mistake.
English
0
0
2
44
Jordan Howard
Jordan Howard@Skwerilleee·
"The government has tanks. What good would your guns be against tanks?" I mean. Guerrilla fighters with rifles gave our high tech military hell in places like Afghanistan and Vietnam. But it doesn't matter how the actual fight would go, it works as a deterrent. As long as the civilian populace is heavily armed, there are lines the government just won't cross, because it knows a bloody war would ensue. It's why we don't end up with stuff like Tiennamen square happening here. "I'd rather vote against the party that wants to micromanage my choices and use the government's power to take away my rights." That's literally what stuff like assault weapons bans are lmao. The problem is that both parties act like that. Both just want to keep expanding the government and restricting people's lives, just in slightly different directions. I don't vote at all because the entire government is evil and I refuse to be complicit in it.
English
4
0
37
637
Jordan Howard
Jordan Howard@Skwerilleee·
Something that happens to me literally every time I'm talking politics with a liberal: I'll mention that the gun control is a total dealbreaker on voting blue for a lot of people. They respond with "nobody wants to take your guns, that's just republican fearmongering." I point out that no, literally every democrat candidate wants an assault weapons ban. That's not some republican lie, it's literally right there on their own issues pages. Rather than acknowledging that they were incorrect and continuing the conversation from there, they just immediately pivot to "omg nobody needs an assault weapon!" It's literally like a script, I've had the exact same conversation like 1000 times.
English
535
720
11.9K
214.8K
Uubzu v4
Uubzu v4@uubzu·
Dalton is helpfully partitioning us into those who support the White man and those who countersignal him I started a list to keep track of the latter. Your suggestions appreciated. I’m focused on 10k+ follower accounts which could be mistaken for being right-wing
Uubzu v4 tweet media
English
152
217
2.8K
38.4K
Andrew Branca Show
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow·
80% of people shot with handguns survive, given modern EMT and medical care. That means there's a shitload of people on the streets who HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY SHOT, and DID NOT DIE. A lot of them MORE THAN ONCE. Don't be surprised when such people are less than wholly impressed when you point your 9mm CCW pistol at them.
Anthony Cumia@AnthonyCumia

When did people stop being afraid to have guns pointed at them??? Right, wrong or indifferent…if someone is pointing a gun at you, don’t give them any shit.

English
57
9
224
24.3K
Kvetch_Master
Kvetch_Master@KvetchMaster·
Wow sarcasm, never seen that before! So if a black person is charged for a violent crime but not convicted are you saying the crime didn’t happen or it’s likely another race as the perpetrator? We have massive problem with repeat offenders not getting convicted then getting released to commit more crime.
English
1
0
0
13
Happy Filmore
Happy Filmore@happyfilmore500·
@KvetchMaster @Vunte_Muntrell @TheBrancaShow You must be new to reading. Table 43 is arrest data but an arrest is not proof that a crime was committed or that the person arrested committed a crime. You learn something old everyday. You're welcome for the education.
English
1
0
0
23
BuddaBudda347
BuddaBudda347@Vunte_Muntrell·
@KvetchMaster @TheBrancaShow This video literally had nothing to do with black people. It's 2 white guys, and you're still talking about black people lmao.
English
2
0
2
33
The Misfit Patriot
The Misfit Patriot@misfitpatriot_·
If I already didn’t support Jews from day 1, this would probably be my position after seeing the past few years of a bunch of retards blaming them for every stubbed toe on the planet. When a bunch of dumb cunts start saying _______ is bad without providing an actual logical reason why, I start supporting ______. “Trump bad” Woke left “Israel/Jews bad” Woke right
BDSN@CJKelley79

@misfitpatriot_ U know before all this Jew haters, blame the Jews for everything started I was like whatever about Jews they are just people no biggie . Now as of today I’m Zionist fuck it . U disgusting people have pushed me to that point. This is the same shit the Nazis and Hitler did to them

English
11
11
71
2.5K