Leering Observer

8.4K posts

Leering Observer banner
Leering Observer

Leering Observer

@LeeringObserver

Enjoying the Bacchanal 🍷 On a Bitcoin standard. Polymath in the Shadows.

The Gay Matrix Katılım Ekim 2021
97 Takip Edilen245 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
@hexumlite Dentist here. Palate expanders are only for people with abnormally small upper maxilla to widen and match the lower jaw, His bite is gonna be horrible. TMJ and bite alignment issues. Headaches, atrophy and more. This is really dumb.
English
26
3
486
25.4K
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
BIP-110 is a solution in search of a problem. It has almost zero miner support, risks a messy chain split, sets a terrible precedent for invalidating valid transactions, and won’t stop determined spammers anyway. Bitcoin works because of broad consensus and incentives, not by ramming through controversial rule changes via UASF when the hashrate says no.
English
0
0
0
26
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡@DudeJLebowski·
It's amazing how many Bitcoiners have moved to a country to become a paid government mouthpiece. Very strange behaviour.
English
4
1
47
1.3K
Victor
Victor@gvictor808·
@LoveIsBitcoin21 Wrong, but it's ok. You don't have enough yet to speak intelligently...sorry.
English
1
0
5
204
Leering Observer retweetledi
Love Is Bitcoin 🧡💊
Love Is Bitcoin 🧡💊@LoveIsBitcoin21·
Adam Back just destroyed BIP 110 with one question: "Could you stop spam by modifying TCP/IP?" No. Because TCP/IP is ungovernable. So is Bitcoin. The test is perfect. BIP 110 is dead. Fork off or get with the program.
English
67
24
250
9.4K
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
What will happen is this: It won't go through. They'll do a chain split. $BTCK will appear in everyones account. It'll be dumped like crazy. Then Bipcoiners/bad actors will publish as much CSAM and bs on bitcoin:native to attempt to ruin it and scare the public in order to pump $BTCK.
English
2
0
1
320
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
@AstrayaNthemoon @BitcoinJed1 The ones putting illegal content on a block with be sore loser Bipcoiners. They can only win by attempted sabotage. They are pretty much admitting it here.
English
0
0
0
15
dagz
dagz@AstrayaNthemoon·
IF someone puts child sex abuse material… say the full label so that you understand the gravity… on the Bitcoin blockchain, interpol will be IMMEDIATELY involved Furthermore, if bip110 activates and that material slips through on non-prunable storage then those that advocated for bip110 DESPITE MULTIPLE PUBLIC (some immutable and timestamped JSON events) warnings from technical individuals, then those that pushed through BIP110 should be considered complicit
English
8
0
8
894
₿randon BIP-110
₿randon BIP-110@BitcoinJed1·
I'm pretty sure BIP110 activiation is going to be a max pain scenario for all: It intially fails to get majority miner support and appears to be dead on arrival but still moves forward with getting a few blocks mined. It looks like it failed. Most people sell their BIP-110 coins when they eventually get listed on small exchanges. Months later someone actually puts illegal content in a block on the legacy chain or there is some other major issue b/c of SPAM on the chain. Hashpower switches immediately to BIP-110 and everyone then realizes holding legacy Bitcoin is doomed and it goes effectively to zero as we get closer to BIP-110 wiping out the legacy chain.
English
82
9
88
13.2K
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
The ones putting illegal content on a block with be sore loser Bipcoiners. They can only win by attempted sabotage. They are pretty much admitting it here.
₿randon BIP-110@BitcoinJed1

I'm pretty sure BIP110 activiation is going to be a max pain scenario for all: It intially fails to get majority miner support and appears to be dead on arrival but still moves forward with getting a few blocks mined. It looks like it failed. Most people sell their BIP-110 coins when they eventually get listed on small exchanges. Months later someone actually puts illegal content in a block on the legacy chain or there is some other major issue b/c of SPAM on the chain. Hashpower switches immediately to BIP-110 and everyone then realizes holding legacy Bitcoin is doomed and it goes effectively to zero as we get closer to BIP-110 wiping out the legacy chain.

English
0
0
0
23
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
@DavidFBailey Wait so are we actually getting airdropped coins when the fork happens? I don't want shitcoins
English
0
0
0
443
Muck Anick
Muck Anick@cornfedbtc·
I can really tell a lot about a person after I insinuate they may be okay with horrific crimes and then beg them to change the Bitcoin client they use
Muck Anick tweet media
English
6
0
43
1.5K
shaquille o'atmeal
shaquille o'atmeal@crypt0e·
Matt Karenatter has a message for mining pools: better pay attention.
English
25
11
104
3.8K
Bugle.News 📯
Bugle.News 📯@bitcoin_bugle·
JUST IN: Matthew Kratter files urgent complaints with the Better Business Bureau against top Bitcoin mining pools, citing @hodlonaut's "Capture" series as evidence of impropriety.
Bugle.News 📯 tweet media
English
3
5
68
3.1K
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
x.com/LeeringObserve…
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver

"You don't know what you're talking about" isn't an argument. BIP-110 currently has near-zero miner signalling. The default (status quo) rules continue without it. Not activating a proposed soft fork isn't a hard fork, that's basic protocol mechanics. If you have actual data showing sufficient miner support or why rejecting an under-supported UASF suddenly becomes a hard fork, share it. Otherwise it's just noise.

ZXX
0
0
0
8
Leering Observer retweetledi
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
What a god damn little pussy. Bro got wrecked by facts and logic (look at our thread) and needed to stay in his Bipcoiner echo chamber. Sad. A danger to the network. Fake catholic.
Leering Observer tweet media
English
2
1
2
71
Leering Observer
Leering Observer@LeeringObserver·
"You don't know what you're talking about" isn't an argument. BIP-110 currently has near-zero miner signalling. The default (status quo) rules continue without it. Not activating a proposed soft fork isn't a hard fork, that's basic protocol mechanics. If you have actual data showing sufficient miner support or why rejecting an under-supported UASF suddenly becomes a hard fork, share it. Otherwise it's just noise.
English
5
1
6
2K
SNEAKO
SNEAKO@sneako·
I will renounce my US citizenship if Elon Musk can properly explain in conversation why I am more harmful to America than him. One hour, one on one, poll decides winner. If I win he goes back to South Africa.
English
4.8K
2.1K
28.9K
2.1M

Keşfet

@DudeJLebowski @gvictor808 @LoveIsBitcoin21 @AstrayaNthemoon @BitcoinJed1 @DavidFBailey @wigger @cornfedbtc