左脸.ip🔔

2K posts

左脸.ip🔔 banner
左脸.ip🔔

左脸.ip🔔

@Leftface_

空投搬运工 ✈️ | 项目试毒员 ⚡ | 偶尔梭哈,常常躺平 | 一切尽在链上 🐬TermMax

Hongkong Katılım Mart 2012
1.9K Takip Edilen384 Takipçiler
心怡 🌧️🌈☀️
心怡 🌧️🌈☀️@xiaoayi1997·
爱咋咋地吧 跑了跑了 拒绝谈恋爱从我做起 亏大了!!!!
心怡 🌧️🌈☀️ tweet media
中文
6
0
7
5.4K
陈小萌
陈小萌@MengLayer·
顶流 megaeth 在2026年开启了一个 需要KYC的奥德赛~ 复古!伟大!无需多言! 我 733分 现在rank 70 😅 Rank 1 是 @Cbb0fe 对了,忘了说参加这个奥德赛需要 KYC 🤣
陈小萌 tweet media
中文
10
1
25
13.5K
George.TON
George.TON@Showy005·
这个应该是国内目前最前沿的微信社群了,都是聊 AI 应用,出海创业,海外增长… 牛逼🐂🍺
George.TON tweet media
中文
258
9
124
135.6K
火星甘
火星甘@gumpbing·
建了个 QQ撸毛群,要进的私信我 对微信彻底失望了 熊市没地方聊天,憋着也挺难受 一起过冬,等待牛市。
中文
548
0
101
52.4K
Titan
Titan@Titan_Exchange·
Route with 🎯 soon.
Titan tweet media
English
49
18
245
11.3K
左脸.ip🔔
左脸.ip🔔@Leftface_·
Ferra In-Depth Exploration | Sui Liquidity Layer + Three Major "Fee Printer" Models 🧵 While most DEXs are still focused on liquidity competition, Ferra's Sui layer is more like building a "liquidity efficiency layer." 1️⃣ Why Sui? Sui's parallel execution and low latency enable high-frequency trading and complex market-making strategies. 👉 This directly determines that a DEX is not just a matching tool, but a strategy infrastructure. 2️⃣ Analysis of Three "Fee Printer" Models 🔹 DLMM (Discrete Liquidity Market Maker) • Market making within a discrete price range • Similar to an upgraded version of centralized liquidity • Advantages: High capital efficiency, suitable for volatile markets • Essence: An alpha tool for active LPs 🔹 CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity MM) • Classic Uniswap v3 model • Liquidity is concentrated within a price range • Advantages: Improved capital utilization • Disadvantages: Requires frequent portfolio rebalancing (high user requirements) 🔹 DAMM (Dynamic AMM) • Dynamically adjusts parameters (fees/curve) • Adapts to market changes (volatility/liquidity) • Advantages: A more "intelligent" passive market making experience • Essence: Algorithms replace some manual strategies 3️⃣ Key Differences of Ferra It doesn't just choose one model, but may integrate multiple liquidity mechanisms: 👉 DLMM → Provides space for active strategies 👉 CLMM → Provides basic liquidity depth 👉 DAMM → Provides automation and adaptability = Building a "multi-layered liquidity engine" 4️⃣ Strategic Significance On a high-performance chain like Sui: The competition is no longer just about TVL, but rather— • Liquidity utilization • Fee capture capability • Richness of market-making strategies Whoever can enable LPs to earn more fees will win in the long run. 5️⃣ Conclusion If Ferra can integrate DLMM + DAMM + CLMM into a unified experience, it is essentially creating: 👉 A "liquidity operating system," not just an ordinary DEX (It is recommended to experience the product yourself before creating content; the conversion rate and interaction will be significantly higher.) @ferra_protocol #Ferra #DEXonSui
左脸.ip🔔 tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
左脸.ip🔔
左脸.ip🔔@Leftface_·
From a mechanism design perspective, Ferra is building a content-driven growth flywheel through "Yap Score," rather than simply relying on traditional airdrop incentives. 1️⃣ Project Overview Ferra is a DEX built on Sui, with its core competitive advantages lying in performance (low latency/high throughput) and optimized user experience. Compared to traditional on-chain trading platforms, it is more suitable for high-frequency trading and new asset liquidity scenarios. 2️⃣ The Essence of the Yapping Mechanism Yapping ≠ Simple Posting Essentially, it's a comprehensive evaluation system of "content quality + dissemination efficiency": • Content Supply Side: User output of knowledge, tutorials, reviews • Distribution Side: Reliance on social dissemination through X (interaction rate) • Feedback Side: Quantifying influence through Yap Score 👉 This is similar to converting "attention" into on-chain incentives 3️⃣ How to Improve Yap Score (Strategy Layer) • Originality and Depth Priority: Mechanism Deconstruction / Transaction Experience Review / Data Analysis • Information Density: Avoiding low-value repetitive content (anti-Sycophantic logic) • Interaction Design: Proposing viewpoints and creating discussion, rather than one-way output • Sustainability: Weekly snapshots indicate long-term activity > short-term boosting 4️⃣ Ranking Logic (Speculation) Yap Score ≈ f(Content Quality × Interaction Rate × Sustained Activity) This means: • High quality but no dissemination ≠ High score • High reach but low quality ≠ Sustainable • The optimal strategy is "high signal-to-noise ratio + stable output" 5️⃣ Key Conclusions Ferra is attempting to replace part of the incentive model of traditional liquidity mining with a content marketplace, incorporating "cognitive producers" into the value distribution system. If this mechanism works, it could significantly reduce customer acquisition costs and enhance community stickiness in the long run. @ferra_protocol #Ferra #DEXonSui
左脸.ip🔔 tweet media
English
0
0
1
20
左脸.ip🔔 retweetledi
Ferra
Ferra@ferra_protocol·
Geopolitics moving fast. Perps in progress. $OIL $XAU $XAG #forex
Ferra tweet media
English
4K
3K
1.6K
48.8K
左脸.ip🔔
左脸.ip🔔@Leftface_·
I've just registered for the xPoints rewards program and unlocked a permanent 20% points boost. Join me @xStocksFi
English
0
0
0
9
Ferra
Ferra@ferra_protocol·
Every generation finds a way to break free from the Matrix. Forget doctors or engineers. Fortune favors traders. Your escape route: Ferra Terminal → ferra.ag
English
3.3K
3K
1.8K
23.6K