左脸.ip🔔
2K posts

左脸.ip🔔
@Leftface_
空投搬运工 ✈️ | 项目试毒员 ⚡ | 偶尔梭哈,常常躺平 | 一切尽在链上 🐬TermMax
Hongkong Katılım Mart 2012
1.9K Takip Edilen384 Takipçiler

300 Strands claimed.
Real-world yield is coming to Solana with @SplyceFi
Feels good to be early.
Your turn: solana.splyce.finance/rewards?ref=cb…

English

$6.5 → ~$90
Solstice 第6档认领麻了
在140万钱包中仅有约1.5万钱包注册 ,仍有约1380万 SLX 未被认领
如果重新分配,每个钱包将获得约920 SLX,按1亿美元 FDV 计算价值约$90
鑫浩Ⓜ️@JerryHu611841
即便我是第6档,还是花6u去空投注册 就博很多人不来注册 在PM上,500M的FDV是92%,1000M的FDV是64% 公售价格是130M,打新的又赚麻了。 还有最后5小时 @solsticefi
中文

Joining the @TermMaxFi Puzzle Challenge — collecting all 4 pieces to unlock the Master Badge #TermMaxPuzzleChallenge
English
左脸.ip🔔 retweetledi
左脸.ip🔔 retweetledi

Yapping feature just got upgraded.
Campaign-based, cross-social yaps & Yapper Leaderboard.
Yap now: ferra.ag/feeds?tab=yapp…

Ferra@ferra_protocol
English

Ferra In-Depth Exploration | Sui Liquidity Layer + Three Major "Fee Printer" Models 🧵
While most DEXs are still focused on liquidity competition, Ferra's Sui layer is more like building a "liquidity efficiency layer."
1️⃣ Why Sui?
Sui's parallel execution and low latency enable high-frequency trading and complex market-making strategies.
👉 This directly determines that a DEX is not just a matching tool, but a strategy infrastructure.
2️⃣ Analysis of Three "Fee Printer" Models
🔹 DLMM (Discrete Liquidity Market Maker)
• Market making within a discrete price range
• Similar to an upgraded version of centralized liquidity
• Advantages: High capital efficiency, suitable for volatile markets
• Essence: An alpha tool for active LPs
🔹 CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity MM)
• Classic Uniswap v3 model
• Liquidity is concentrated within a price range
• Advantages: Improved capital utilization
• Disadvantages: Requires frequent portfolio rebalancing (high user requirements)
🔹 DAMM (Dynamic AMM)
• Dynamically adjusts parameters (fees/curve)
• Adapts to market changes (volatility/liquidity)
• Advantages: A more "intelligent" passive market making experience
• Essence: Algorithms replace some manual strategies
3️⃣ Key Differences of Ferra
It doesn't just choose one model, but may integrate multiple liquidity mechanisms:
👉 DLMM → Provides space for active strategies
👉 CLMM → Provides basic liquidity depth
👉 DAMM → Provides automation and adaptability
= Building a "multi-layered liquidity engine"
4️⃣ Strategic Significance
On a high-performance chain like Sui:
The competition is no longer just about TVL, but rather—
• Liquidity utilization
• Fee capture capability
• Richness of market-making strategies
Whoever can enable LPs to earn more fees will win in the long run.
5️⃣ Conclusion
If Ferra can integrate DLMM + DAMM + CLMM into a unified experience, it is essentially creating:
👉 A "liquidity operating system," not just an ordinary DEX
(It is recommended to experience the product yourself before creating content; the conversion rate and interaction will be significantly higher.)
@ferra_protocol #Ferra #DEXonSui

English

From a mechanism design perspective, Ferra is building a content-driven growth flywheel through "Yap Score," rather than simply relying on traditional airdrop incentives.
1️⃣ Project Overview
Ferra is a DEX built on Sui, with its core competitive advantages lying in performance (low latency/high throughput) and optimized user experience. Compared to traditional on-chain trading platforms, it is more suitable for high-frequency trading and new asset liquidity scenarios.
2️⃣ The Essence of the Yapping Mechanism
Yapping ≠ Simple Posting
Essentially, it's a comprehensive evaluation system of "content quality + dissemination efficiency":
• Content Supply Side: User output of knowledge, tutorials, reviews
• Distribution Side: Reliance on social dissemination through X (interaction rate)
• Feedback Side: Quantifying influence through Yap Score
👉 This is similar to converting "attention" into on-chain incentives
3️⃣ How to Improve Yap Score (Strategy Layer)
• Originality and Depth Priority: Mechanism Deconstruction / Transaction Experience Review / Data Analysis
• Information Density: Avoiding low-value repetitive content (anti-Sycophantic logic)
• Interaction Design: Proposing viewpoints and creating discussion, rather than one-way output
• Sustainability: Weekly snapshots indicate long-term activity > short-term boosting
4️⃣ Ranking Logic (Speculation)
Yap Score ≈ f(Content Quality × Interaction Rate × Sustained Activity)
This means:
• High quality but no dissemination ≠ High score
• High reach but low quality ≠ Sustainable
• The optimal strategy is "high signal-to-noise ratio + stable output"
5️⃣ Key Conclusions
Ferra is attempting to replace part of the incentive model of traditional liquidity mining with a content marketplace, incorporating "cognitive producers" into the value distribution system.
If this mechanism works, it could significantly reduce customer acquisition costs and enhance community stickiness in the long run.
@ferra_protocol #Ferra #DEXonSui

English
左脸.ip🔔 retweetledi

I've just registered for the xPoints rewards program and unlocked a permanent 20% points boost. Join me @xStocksFi
English









