Lumenaut

@flyingtulip_ Huge news

Intent and Supporter participation is now live. The allocation you submitted during the intent phase is a guaranteed allocation until the public sale on 02/16. When public sale concludes token will become transferable. All products natively integrate the token, so as soon as token becomes transferable the product suite can begin launching. You can see if you are eligible on flyingtulip.com/eligibility Refund anytime; flyingtulip.com/allocation/pos… Thank you for the support.

@StarPlatinum_ Sniping bags

Bitcoin will never go to zero Adam Back has a standing buy order for Bitcoin 21M BTC limit buy at 2 cents for $420k - born July 1970 in London - grows up on a ZX Spectrum - studies computer science - PhD at University of Exeter in 1996 - focuses on distributed systems + crypto - deep into privacy tech before Bitcoin even exists - joins the cypherpunk mailing lists - same circles as Wei Dai and Hal Finney - obsessed with encryption as a political weapon - 1997: invents Hashcash - you want to send a message? - you burn CPU first - publishes the full Hashcash paper in 2002 - it gets used in SpamAssassin, Microsoft research - 2008: Satoshi finds Hashcash - cites it directly in the Bitcoin whitepaper - it’s literally the core primitive behind mining - August 23, 2008: Satoshi emails Back - subject: “Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper” - PoW similar to Hashcash Back replies: - you should read Wei Dai’s b-money - December 2008: Back admits he didn’t fully read it at first but he’s intrigued - January 9, 2009: Satoshi emails again - Bitcoin v0.1 released - genesis block mined - Bitcoin is real now - 2013: Back starts showing up more publicly in Bitcoin debates - 2014: co-founds Blockstream - raises $18M seed round - 2015: launches Elements Project - sandbox for sidechain tech - 2015–2017: Blocksize Wars explode - biggest civil war in Bitcoin history - big blockers want huge blocks - 2017: miners stall SegWit - UASF movement rises - users force activation pressure 2018: Liquid Network launches - 2025–2026: quantum threat discussions - Blockstream Research works on post-quantum signatures - SLH-DSA hash-based schemes - January 2026: Back tweets technical notes on PQ signature size optimization - late January 2026: Epstein Files - emails show Epstein invested ~$500k into Blockstream in 2014 through Joi Ito’s MIT Media Lab fund - February 1, 2026: Back responds publicly - Blockstream has zero connection today Adam Back is one of the most important living Bitcoin architects

@Zeneca Next blue chip

Finally getting around to setting up OpenClaw - what're the best tips for optimizing costs/API usage?

@Rosaaa @FriendSpaceApp God candle

@Hydraze420 Mega cheap

From now on please refer to me as captain fantastic. My team carrying me hard rn as i'm actually negative pnl myself ha. If you still haven't joined in on the Vault777 fun join my squad here & let's win this $50K: markets.vault777.com/r/Hydraze420

@MarioNawfal Massive potential

Is Pizzagate another example of a conspiracy theory turning out to be true?

@apcollective Bag secured

Congratulations to Paradex on the launch of the MoneyBadgers collection. With the reveal trending on X, the collection adds a new cultural and brand layer to their ecosystem. AP Collective is proud to work alongside Paradex as they continue to scale.

@LarkDavis Adding hard

The price action over the past few days reminds us how easy it is to lose money when greed or fear gets the better of us. A lot of longs got rekt during the dump, and the late shorts got the short end of the stick immediately afterward. The lesson is simple: do not use excessive leverage, do not risk money you cannot afford to lose, and definitely do not use money earmarked for rent or utilities. You might miss out on some gains, but you’ll also sleep better at night. Peace of mind is priceless.

@oxtochi Hold this

$70k is the new $126k

@xerocooleth Send it higher

Shopper talked an AI chatbot into 80% off the order And it worked

@CredibleCrypto Next 100x

"Are we in a bear market?" This is kind of the issue with the arguments about if we are in a "bear market" or not. Everyone's definition is literally different. If the logic is that "X% of correction = bear market" then by that definition we had 6 "bear markets" in the 2 year span of 2015-2017 as we rose from $200-$20,000. I don't consider the 6 "corrections" in 2017 as different, distinct, "bear markets" because most of them only lasted a few weeks before continuation to new highs. Just as there are smaller cycles within larger cycles, there are different degrees of "corrections" within any larger secular bull trend. The "degree" of a correction is dependent on where we are in a particular cycle, and is based on BOTH time and price. A 40% drop that recovers in 5-6 months, after which we make new ATH's is not the same as an 85% drop that takes three years to recover from. The former, despite it's depth, was just a larger correction within a bull market (imo), because the trend resumed to the upside some months later. This makes it distinctly different from a correction that is 70+%, which lasts for 2 years, or a correction that is 80+%, that lasts for 5 years. Both of those would be corrections of a larger "degree". The "bear markets" that happen AFTER a blow off top are always the most brutal, usually both in time and price. Everything else is usually a correction of a "smaller degree". For example, in the chart below: The two "bear markets" that followed blow off tops are marked in ORANGE, and these were the most devastating both in terms of price and time. Each dropped 85% from the highs and took 1100+ days to recover to new highs from. The two "bear markets" in BLUE were both "mid-cycle corrections", still pretty deep at 70-75% depth, but both recovered back to new highs in a shorter amount of time (500-800 days). All the smaller corrections in RED are corrections of an even smaller degree than the blue or orange. These lasted for a number of weeks or months, with the longest lasting around 240 days until new highs, and corrected anywhere between 20% to 40%. Some people may call every "deep" correction over X% a "bear market" but that leaves out a ton of important context because not all "bear markets" are the same and you shouldn't position the same way during every "bear market" either. Some are just aggressive shakeouts in a stronger up-trend where you would want to be buying the dip while some are corrections of a much higher "degree" where it probably makes more sense to sit on your hands and wait. I've seen some on here argue that we are in a "bear market" but are now saying they believe we are close to the end of it and they are looking to "buy the dip". Was this really a "bear market" if we were at all time highs literally just 3 months ago and you expect us to see new highs soon? The degree of the correction matters more than the verbiage. What some might call a "bear market" may be what others simply call a "deep correction" within a larger uptrend. Like all things in markets there is a LOT of nuance, it is not as simple as "are we in a bear market?"

@dabit3 Next runner

@Feld4014 Gn legends

NFTs are still the closest we've come to mainstream adoption that crypto has ever seen. Normal people don't care about your tech. They care about a frictionless novel experience that can be enabled with new tech. We need to do better. Don't let grifters steal the narrative. I don't think I'm biased though, do you? The Bias:

@IterIntellectus That's crazy

a breath of fresh air

@XCreators @grok Loading bags

You thought the fun was over? 🏈 This weekend, video takes center stage on the timeline. We’re awarding $1M, $500K, and $250K to the top three videos about @grok, created with Imagine 1.0.

@naiivememe To the moon

@Cointelegraph Buying more

🔥 LATEST: In 2025, Binance teams assisted in recovering $131M in illicit assets while responding to 71,000+ official requests.

@mikadontlouz Next gem

Mika’s market update

@chooserich Sniping more

10% failure rate is not something I’d expect a “secure product” to promote 😅

@MarioNawfal @BasedMikeLee Won't miss this

🇺🇸 Wait, wait, wait… Schumer wants ID from DHS agents, but not from voters? The hypocrisy isn’t even subtle anymore... Source: @BasedMikeLee