
Davey Seiber
203 posts


@OcrazioCornPop We have open primaries. Democrats vote in Republican primaries here. We have @JoshKimbrellSC and friends to thank for that.
English

🚨 SOUTH CAROLINA: How does Lindsey Graham get BOOED for 6 minutes straight at a Trump rally and continue to win Primary AND General Elections...
The math doesn’t add up.
Is it machine politics, low turnout, fraud, or something weird about South Carolinians?
PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE IN AMERICA!
Who is voting for him?
English

Okay, without endorsing outright here’s a list:
Governor:
1) Most Conservative: Norman
2) Most Status Quo: Evette
3) Wildcard conservative: Mace
4) Wildcard: Reddy
AG:
1) Most conservative: Stumbo
2) Least baggage: Goldfinch
3) Wildcard: Pascoe
Com. Of Agriculture:
1) Most Conservative: Cody Simpson
2) Most Status Quo: Fred West
3) Wildcard: Danny Ford
All other positions are unopposed as far as I can tell.
Keyboard Warrior@DCecilWest
@SCVotersCo so as elections are headed here quickly, can you give us a setup of who’s running for state wide , and in your opinion deserves our vote?
English

@SCVotersCo Accurate post, in my humble opinion….
BTW Cody Simpson is a good bet
English

@SCVotersCo Will you please explain why you think Cody Simpson is the most conservative? This was not the results of my research. I would really appreciate anyone's input and reasoning on the agriculture race.
English

@fractal_friend The constitution was destroyed a century ago
English


@elonmusk France has looked this way since their revolution, where they rejected their God and king. France will never be right again until they submit to God and probably restore their king.
English

Anyone in SC agree with Grok about Ralph Norman?
Ralph Norman (U.S. Rep., SC-5)
Strongest conservative credentials: Longtime member of the House Freedom Caucus. Ranked among the most conservative members of Congress by GovTrack (often #1 in ideology score for the SC delegation and top nationally).abcnews4.com
Heritage Action scores: Near-perfect — 100% in recent sessions, 98% lifetime. Consistent "Yea" on key conservative priorities (spending cuts, border security, pro-life, 2nd Amendment).heritageaction.com
English

@MAGAMicki Me neither. I’m asking a lot of question on the two threads trying to understand
English

Who are you supporting?
Let’s hear your thoughts.

Sherri Unfiltered™@FFT1776
Trump endorses Pam Evette for Governor in SC! Two great candidates … Evette and Mace! Interesting? … why do you think Trump chose not to endorse Nancy Mace here?
English

@conserva_truth No. Still voting for the most conservative option- Ralph Norman.
English

@SCGovernorRace No, still voting for the most conservative- Ralph Norman.
English

@TheConfederate_ I just speak to them in German until they hang up on me.
English

@New_Christendom Totally real. Why is X putting that little label at the bottom???
English

@NRCC Try doing your job; then maybe you wouldn't have to beg for so much money.
English

Here are my own thoughts on the Tucker phenomenon as I have watched over these last couple of years. I genuinely don’t think Tucker Carlson is intentionally lying. That category is too easy and, frankly, lets the real issue slip by unnoticed.
What I see instead is a man who has trained himself to speak often and speak quickly, which means that he is rarely interested in speaking carefully. Over time, that kind of speech forms habits. So, what we see is his words coming out with force, sometimes even with insight, but without the discipline that preserves clarity and continuity.
He seems to be the kind of learner who does not labor to build stable categories. You can see this when he speaks of his Bible knowledge; consistency is not the driving concern for Tucker. There is a kind of elasticity to his thought, almost like an ability to adjust, to pivot, to develop politically in real time. And while that can give the appearance of freshness or boldness, it also means that what is said today may not sit comfortably with what was said yesterday.
So the issue is not first deception, but formation. Or, as I say, it's a matter of ritualizing speech. When a man is not committed to careful speech, he becomes difficult to follow. His rhetoric can stir people who are already angsty about the present. In other words, his use of uncareful language moves people to such and such conclusion, but it does not build them into a distinct interpretation of reality.
And that is where the concern rests, at least for me. Words are not neutral. They are a form of stewardship. If they are not governed or tethered to thoughtful, consistent categories, they may generate a lot of heat but will struggle to provide lasting light. And ultimately, that's where I think Tucker is today: heat, but little light.
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles@nosoup4knowles
Tucker claims the words "could this be the antichrist?" never left his lips. NYT shows a clip of him saying exactly that:
English

@redeemed_zoomer No, the church of England has been excommunicated.
English

The Vatican respecting Protestant jurisdiction more than 99% of Protestants and Catholics on this app
Like her or not, she IS the Archbishop of Canterbury and your problems with her do not justify leaving the Church of England
Matthew Joseph@matthew_sede
The Vatican Website has an entire main page entitled, "To Her Grace Sarah Mullally, Archbishop of Canterbury". You can't make this stuff up!
English









