
privatize social security
54.2K posts

privatize social security
@MakeUSAVAT
20% VAT. Privatize Social Security like Australia. Borjas is wrong. Create a universal child benefit.



The virgin Metrolinx pimping out their air rights above their rail lines vs. the chad MTR Corporation who just develops it themselves


2015: apolitical 2016: apolitical (supported Trump) 2017: apolitical 2018: center left environmentalist 2019: Moderate Republican 2020: Moderate Republican 2021: Right Libertarian 2022: RW Populist 2023: RW Populist 2024: RW Populist 2025: RW Populist 2026: RW Populist


🗳️NEW | Burnham narrowly leads in Makerfield 🔴 Lab: 45% (-) ➡️ Ref: 42% (+10) Source: @Survation estimate, 15 May 2026 --- +/- vs 2024 general election




Im curious. What is your most unpopular polical position?

My new book (matching my nail polish) on how to structure relationships (capital-labour, public-private, civil society-state) with common good principles from the start instead of correcting afterwards is out June UK, July Netherlands/Germany, September USA/Spain, October Italy…





@mattyglesias @dilanesper You can make all the intellectual arguments you want, but the average person and median voter thinks it’s dumb to have a 100 pound trans actor playing a Greek warrior and a bald black lady playing a Greek beauty. Sorry.





As other economists have shown, Gabriel Zucman's tax and inequality data is wildly misleading. He turns seemingly every methodological dial to claim that inequality has soared and high-earner taxes have collapsed. In his own data, virtually the ENTIRE drop in high-income taxes come from Zucman's highly unorthodox assumptions about the incidence of the corporate tax - which he claims cost the top 1% of earners 29% (!) of their income in 1951, and yet now costs them 6%. And this questionable data accounts for his ENTIRE claimed "drop" in higher-earner taxes. You see - on the income tax side - Zucman's own data shows that the average individual income tax paid by the rich has RISEN - not fallen - since the 1950s. See gabriel-zucman.eu/usdina/ then click on "Table 2: Distributional series," and navigate to tab TG2b, column T for income taxes (and column U for corporate taxes) As much as Zucman builds up 1950s income tax rates, almost no one actually paid 91% tax rates - or even touched a tax bracket over 50%. And that's why actual income tax revenues - including income tax rates paid by the rich - were *lower* in the 1950s than today. Zucman's rhetoric is peddling a "tax the rich" utopia of the 1940s-1960s that his own data shows did not exist.




















