privatize social security

54.2K posts

privatize social security banner
privatize social security

privatize social security

@MakeUSAVAT

20% VAT. Privatize Social Security like Australia. Borjas is wrong. Create a universal child benefit.

The moon Katılım Aralık 2024
1.7K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
privatize social security
@CoopTory Hong Kong isn't exactly a free market paradise but unlike some of their east asian neighbours they did grow without as much statist industrial policy.
English
1
0
1
37
privatize social security retweetledi
Eli Miller
Eli Miller@ghostrunnerblog·
My latest on how Mamdani and Menin managed to fix the budget crisis and freeze the status quo in amber.
Eli Miller tweet media
English
3
9
52
22.9K
Cler
Cler@The_Clermontian·
All this guy does is dunk on me and then snap me saying which microcelebrities found it funny
Cler tweet media
English
4
0
27
732
ツナ
ツナ@motikiro2·
それぞれの寝方
ツナ tweet mediaツナ tweet mediaツナ tweet media
日本語
2
65
845
9.2K
Cler
Cler@The_Clermontian·
@punished_casa Thats called being open, not moderate
English
1
0
1
23
casa 🇺🇸🪽
casa 🇺🇸🪽@punished_casa·
2015: apolitical 2016: apolitical 2017: apolitical 2018: apolitical 2019: apolitical 2020: woke ish lolbert 2021: lolbert 2022: moderate conservative 2023: moderate conservative 2024: moderate conservative 2025: moderate conservative 2026: moderate conservative
Buckeye Politics@BuckeyePolitic1

2015: apolitical 2016: apolitical (supported Trump) 2017: apolitical 2018: center left environmentalist 2019: Moderate Republican 2020: Moderate Republican 2021: Right Libertarian 2022: RW Populist 2023: RW Populist 2024: RW Populist 2025: RW Populist 2026: RW Populist

Română
5
0
29
3.9K
privatize social security retweetledi
dylan matthews 🔸
dylan matthews 🔸@dylanmatt·
Very excited to launch a project I've been helping out with the last couple months.* The Center for Shared AI Prosperity is an attempt by an, other than me, very impressive team (so far including @davidshor, @katz_morris, @StefFeldman, @maidinoff, Lindsay Lamont, Jesse Stinebring, @joshhendler, @goldman, and Lilah Penner Brown) to force DC policy elites to take the impending economic impacts of advanced AI more seriously. We do not think this is a normal economic shock, though we are deeply uncertain about what kind of economic shock it will be. We could be left with a world of extreme power and wealth concentration, increasing political instability arising from that growing inequality, and deep questions about how to fund governments that have for a century-plus relied on income and payroll taxes. Our main purpose as an organization is to surface tractable ideas to reform and grow the safety net to meet the moment; to restructure the labor market so workers are still valued and fairly paid; to remake the tax code so that the gains from AI are shared widely; and to experiment with ways of giving average Americans concrete shares in the AI surplus. To that end, we're running a Request for Ideas, and we're offering $3,000 for the best proposals. Top ideas will get rigorous polling from Blue Rose Research to see how Americans feel about them. We are trying to solicit submissions from a wide pool, and purposefully don't want to just ask the usual think tanks, economists, academics, etc. (Though we want them too!) If you have ideas that you think could be useful, please don't hesitate to apply. Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions about the program. Read more here: csaip.org *Obligatory disclaimer: I'm doing this on my personal time, not in my capacity at Coefficient Giving. Nothing I or CSAIP say necessarily reflects CG's views.
dylan matthews 🔸 tweet media
English
38
135
809
204K
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham’s slogan for the Makerfield by-election will be "For Us"
Politics UK tweet media
English
441
154
2.1K
197K
Noba
Noba@Mental339631·
@MakeUSAVAT Would you also try to limit pornography?
English
1
0
1
34
privatize social security retweetledi
privatize social security
privatize social security@MakeUSAVAT·
Most of Reagan's increase in the debt was from higher interest rates (and lower inflation). The below photo shows three counter factuals: lower interest rates, lower inflation, and both combined.
privatize social security tweet mediaprivatize social security tweet media
ShitpostGateway@ShitpostGate

English
3
2
12
869
Jerome Sneed Democrat
Jerome Sneed Democrat@avrilbradley23·
Critical thinking is when you think the median voter prioritizes woke casting choices over inflation.
Critical Thinker@PredictitD

@mattyglesias @dilanesper You can make all the intellectual arguments you want, but the average person and median voter thinks it’s dumb to have a 100 pound trans actor playing a Greek warrior and a bald black lady playing a Greek beauty. Sorry.

English
2
0
11
548
talmon joseph smith
talmon joseph smith@talmonsmith·
@MaxJerneck interest payment increases matter for sure as did the recession decrease in tax receipts but i imagine tax cuts while ramping up other spending play a heavy role. not that deficits are inherently bad. + the appetite for that eras bonds was incredible
English
2
0
4
125
talmon joseph smith
talmon joseph smith@talmonsmith·
still learning but i rly struggle to believe this line that actually the EMTRs on the rich werent that high in 1950-1980 if thats the case why did the rich and corporations work so hard for tax cuts in the 70s and 80s and why did deficits blowout afterward (as revenues fell off)
Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦@JessicaBRiedl

As other economists have shown, Gabriel Zucman's tax and inequality data is wildly misleading. He turns seemingly every methodological dial to claim that inequality has soared and high-earner taxes have collapsed. In his own data, virtually the ENTIRE drop in high-income taxes come from Zucman's highly unorthodox assumptions about the incidence of the corporate tax - which he claims cost the top 1% of earners 29% (!) of their income in 1951, and yet now costs them 6%. And this questionable data accounts for his ENTIRE claimed "drop" in higher-earner taxes. You see - on the income tax side - Zucman's own data shows that the average individual income tax paid by the rich has RISEN - not fallen - since the 1950s. See gabriel-zucman.eu/usdina/ then click on "Table 2: Distributional series," and navigate to tab TG2b, column T for income taxes (and column U for corporate taxes) As much as Zucman builds up 1950s income tax rates, almost no one actually paid 91% tax rates - or even touched a tax bracket over 50%. And that's why actual income tax revenues - including income tax rates paid by the rich - were *lower* in the 1950s than today. Zucman's rhetoric is peddling a "tax the rich" utopia of the 1940s-1960s that his own data shows did not exist.

English
11
7
58
15.1K
Auctor
Auctor@n30n5223434·
Americans' Views of Japan (1989-2021)
Auctor tweet media
English
3
6
69
5.7K