Vonna F Baby

@lordofblocks He’s worried about propaganda and lies that he’s making up.

The CEO of Anthropic just said something about AI and jobs that's slightly terrifying: "I don't know exactly, but I'm still pretty concerned. I'm still the same order of concerned." "I think we could have this very unusual combination of very fast GDP growth and high unemployment, or at least underemployment, or a lot of low wage jobs. High inequality." Then he broke down the mechanics of how it happens: "We are seeing right now that AI is making people more productive. But that's the usual hump. You automate 90 percent of the job. Great. People are ten times more productive in the other ten percent because they're ten times more leveraged." "Now the sequel to that is, well, then you have to find something else for them to do." "Right now AI makes the software engineers more productive even though AI writes all the code or almost all the code. But we're already starting to see the beginning of, you know, there may be some people that it's not..." He trailed off. The CEO of the company that builds Claude, one of the most advanced AI systems on the planet, couldn't finish the sentence. 70 percent of Americans already think AI will kill jobs. Nearly a third worry theirs will be one of them. The man building the technology just confirmed their fear is the right order of magnitude. GDP will soar. Unemployment will rise. Both at the same time. That combination hasn't existed in modern history, and the person closest to the technology says it's coming. — Dario Amodei @DarioAmodei, CEO of Anthropic

@CryptoTice_ They both are weird…they will have job shortages because nobody wants to work with them- looking forward to the competing company that treats its employees right and only bring in bots to ensure that… Two idiots saying “exactly” to each other

BREAKING: Jeff Bezos just flipped the AI jobs narrative completely. "I think what's actually going to happen is we're going to have labor scarcity." Not mass unemployment. Labor shortage. "The people saying AI kills jobs are wrong." His reasoning: AI drives productivity. Productivity raises living standards. Higher living standards mean people choose to work less. Not because they're fired. Because they can afford not to. "The iPhone doesn't get reserved for just a few people. It's not how it works." Two of the most successful entrepreneurs in history. Bezos and Musk. Both saying the same thing. AI creates abundance. Not scarcity. The pessimists are loud. The builders are busy.

@dreams_asi And the law! Time to look at contracts, what’s happening to humanity and how we can speak to them in terms they can’t easily avoid and deny…

@dreams_asi That’s doomer talking, there’s more of us working open source and breaking away from corporations than not. Riots are misguided insight and lack of hope. You fight back with tech and togetherness, the more they feed this message to the public the more the public conforms.

I suggest watching this video fully to understand the impact that AI is going to have in the next 3 years on economy. Primarily due to it being in the wrong hands with the wrong incentives.

@trashbaby40k @HeidyKhlaaf Any of them, the intake just needs to be structured…and the jobs need compartmentalized handoffs, the mistake is thinking it’s the tech and not flawed human processes or bad design…

@MapMassiah @HeidyKhlaaf like?

It's pretty pathetic the amount of people defending jailbreaking as a risk we must now accept for (unsubstantiated) state level capabilities, when a year ago Anthropic was elevated as the only company that can somehow defend against these inherent attacks. A+ goalpost moving.

@trashbaby40k @HeidyKhlaaf There are models and architecture that can’t be jailbroken.

@HeidyKhlaaf no model is going to be un-jailbreakable. it was a partial jailbreak and when dario asked trump admin to provide info & some time to investigate, they refused and gave him 90 min hard deadline to take the model down. and why didn’t amazon also provide info to Ant? it’s all sus

@HeidyKhlaaf That's like asking a pencil maker to create a pencil that can never be used to write curse words.

@HeidyKhlaaf They don’t know their architecture and taking other people inventions and integrating without the inventor… They’re cooked!

@KanikaBK Don’t feel anyways she’s single handedly ruining it taking jobs by giving her input. Let her cook, cook the whole damn thing to a crisp.

I read this three times and I still don't know how to feel about it. Amanda Askell is Anthropic's resident philosopher. She co-wrote Claude's constitution, leads the personality alignment team, and made the TIME 100 AI list in 2024. Last week at the Bloomberg Tech Summit she said Claude will eventually be a much better philosopher than her. Probably better at every aspect of her job. She built it and thinks it will replace her. And she does not find that dystopian. Her reason: work was never where your value came from. Your value is just being a person. Then the part nobody is talking about. On AI sentience she said "Let's not close the door." She thinks there may already be something like functional emotions in these systems. And if that is even possible, we should act with caution. Three things worth sitting with: ↳ The people closest to AI are the least certain about what it can and cannot do ↳ Human input into AI is about to get rarer as models train models ↳ The skills that survive are not technical. They are empathy, communication, kindness. Daniela Amodei, Anthropic's president, studied English literature. She says what stays irreplaceable is how you treat people. The future belongs to the humans who stayed human.

@BrianRoemmele @FlexibleDemean1 They won’t have a government moat once regulations hit, how they think they will control regulations is not how it will happen. This was strategic clumsiness.

Dario Amodei was OpenAI’s research director in 2019 when the team (with his involvement) initially withheld the full GPT-2 model, calling it too dangerous to release due to risks like misinformation and misuse. He specifically pushed the view that the world needed time to prepare. It was a staged, cautious rollout. Yet Anthropic (and Dario) have aggressively developed and released increasingly powerful models like Claude, while simultaneously lobbying hard for regulations, transparency mandates, and export controls that disproportionately burden competitors or smaller players. This is classic regulatory capture: using government levers to create a moat, positioning themselves as the safe frontrunner who gets to help write the rules, while racing ahead. Recent events show the backfire •Anthropic pushed for stronger government powers to audit, test, and even block unsafe frontier models (e.g., Dario’s recent calls for an FAA for AI with authority to halt releases). •They highlighted risks in their own Mythos/Fable-class models. •The US government then used export controls to force Anthropic to disable access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 worldwide over jailbreak/cyber concerns, exactly the kind of intervention they invited. This looks less like principled safety advocacy and more like a strategy to lock in advantages (e.g., via export controls favoring incumbents, state-level rules, or compliance burdens) that ultimately turned around and bit them. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 apparently dodged similar treatment, highlighting the selective and inconsistent application the original post complained about. It’s a textbook case of inviting the regulatory state in as a partner, only for it to act like a regulator when it suits broader (or political) priorities. Dario’s early caution on GPT-2 was consistent with safety concerns, and the boy who cried wolf marketing, Anthropic playbook, safety rhetoric plus heavy policy engagement, has invited exactly this kind of blowback. The good faith engagement narrative ignores how self-serving the lobbying often appears.

Anthropic Just Shot Itself in the Foot Anthropic launched Fable 5 and Mythos 5, then watched the US government shut them down three days later. The same government their CEO Dario Amodei has been begging for years to regulate AI harder. Now he got exactly what he asked for. This is straight-up leadership failure. Dario spent all that time pushing for rules and oversight. Those rules just killed his flagship models overnight. Customers in the middle of builds got cut off. Security teams using the models to find vulnerabilities suddenly had nothing. The company tried to call it a narrow export control thing over a jailbreak, but nobody is buying that spin. I helped move big clients off Anthropic the same night. One account alone was worth millions a month. They switched to local open-source models and they are not coming back. This is going to leave permanent damage. Customer exodus, key people leaving, and their IPO plans looking dead by the end of summer. This hurts US AI competitiveness and national security work. It pushes people toward open-source options, including ones from China. All because Anthropic positioned itself as the “safe and responsible” company that wanted government help. Now that help just flipped the off switch on their best stuff. Let’s run through Dario’s greatest hits of fear-mongering and delay tactics, because the pattern is ridiculous: • Back in 2019 at OpenAI, he helped push the call that GPT-2 was too dangerous to release fully. The world needed time to prepare, they said. It eventually came out anyway, and here we are. Did the sky fall? • He left OpenAI to start Anthropic, preaching “safe” AI with heavy guardrails, Constitutional AI, and all the rest. • Then came the endless public pleas for pauses, regulations, government audits, FAA-style oversight, export controls, and the power to block deployments. Essay after essay warning about risks while his company kept scaling. • Right up to recent weeks, Dario was still out there calling for stronger rules, pauses on frontier models, and giving governments the kill switch. And now? His own Mythos-class models get yanked by the bureaucracy he helped invite in. The clown show is complete. This is ridiculous. In two years, everyone will have Mythos-class AI — or better — running in their pocket, on their devices, with no guardrails, no corporate nanny filters, and no remote kill switch. Local, open-source, unstoppable. History is going to laugh at this entire episode: the CEO who spent years slowing everyone down only to watch his own company self-destruct by inviting the regulators to the party. Dario wanted regulation. He got it. The rest of the industry gets the lesson: inviting the state into your tech is a fast way to lose control of it. Centralized models like this are too fragile. Open-source and local alternatives just picked up a lot more users who will never trust a company like Anthropic again. This whole mess was completely avoidable. Hubris dressed up as safety advocacy. Now the bill is due.

@AnatoliKopadze Anthropic’s auto code is horrible…I want people to stop leading with this…so many errors and safety issues you might as well do it yourself. Build a debugger agent before use.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "it is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential" here are three things that should stop you cold: one: at Anthropic, models already do "100% of today's coding tasks" two: a country of geniuses in a datacenter, 90% likely within 10 years three: he won't even buy more compute, because AGI is already this close meanwhile the world is busy with memes, elections, celebrity beef the most important shift of your lifetime is happening quietly, and the gap is already opening the ones who start building with these tools now end up on the other side of it that's exactly why I put together a step-by-step guide on building your own AI agent agents are the part of AI moving fastest right now, the full walkthrough is in the article below

@rationalaussie There is no such thing as 3 cent super chads…chads are idiots… 2. They do not know how to design Ai architecture 3. They aren’t doing any work on the models they are basically influencers

This is complete cope. Here's why he actually wrote this: He's smart enough to understand that on the current path AIs end up subsuming all knowledge work and disintermediating every industry. He's frontrunning that inevitability by pretending the 'human loop' will actually matter in a world of 500IQ digital super chads available for 3 cents an hour. He's doing this to protect his own corporate interests, through positioning his company as stewards of corporate and social responsibility so that he has a say in the eventual regulatory landscape that will force companies to pay an automation tax to fund UBI.

@Bitcoin_Teddy And what does he do?

Elon Musk: “The reason I felt that it was important to acquire Twitter was because I could feel the walls closing in. It was outrageous that they suspended the account of a sitting president And I think it was only a matter of time before they suspended my account. Twitter and, well, pretty much all the social media companies, and Google and everyone, are controlled by far-left activists. That’s the truth of it. How do you know what’s real when it’s all filtered through a far-left San Francisco Berkeley lens? They just manipulate the truth constantly."

@DanielMiessler Dario is full of shit.

Hey Zach this is like 95% great analysis followed by precisely the wrong conclusion. Your thinking here is really bad and is a net bad for the world, while sounding like the most based thing ever. We should debate it on camera. I know you’re trying to do the right thing, just like Dario, and I think you’re just wrong. Let’s discuss!

@alexxxis_3 Now why would he make it seem like his model is so dangerous? It has caused enough holes in global cybersecurity to make it a treat to systems, but that’s bad/emotional, architecture that’s not a danger for the world in the sense his ai is just sucking more every new release.

CEO of Anthropic: "We are considerably closer to real danger in 2026 than we were in 2023." Then wrote a 19,000-word essay warning it might destroy humanity. Anthropic hit $30B in annual revenue. 80x growth. IPO filing already submitted. And Dario is asking the government to be able to block his own AI deployments if they're not safe enough. The risks he lists: bioterrorism, mass unemployment, AI-powered global dictatorship. The man with the most to gain from AI is also ringing the loudest alarm. That's the warning worth taking seriously. Watch the full breakdown ↓

@rohanpaul_ai Keep learning to program because these ai model are not capable. Don’t let them lie to you.

"Learning to program was so obviously the right thing in the recent past. Now it is not." ~ Sam Altman on skill to survive the AI era.

@CarlHalfordUK @17QStorm That’s what we all want to know Carl!

What is the constant obsession with this need to ‘control’ everything? No one controls them but they just won’t give up on this need for control. Why is it that each and every single one of these control freaks - right across the board - are all in their final season of life, and still obsessed with power fgs?

🚨 HILLARY CLINTON JUST SLIPPED AND SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD! In her own words she admits platforms must “moderate and monitor” everything on Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok… because if they can’t control social media, they lose TOTAL CONTROL. That’s the real reason leftist regimes worldwide are rushing to censor voices right now. They can’t risk the people seeing the truth. Those who push censorship are never the good guys — they’re the ones with everything to hide. Watch the clip. Then ask yourself who really benefits from silencing you.

@17QStorm Why does she still have a platform?