Matteo M.

TBH this is such a pity - 12 months ago I would have bet everything on them. They are the only one of the BIG players who own Model + Infra + Reach/Adoption. They are the only ones who could take the Apple approach; design TPUs/Infra specific optimized for their hyperspecific usecase, and dominate the market... such a pity

I'm really glad people are finally waking up to the fact that google shouldn't be taken seriously. The labs that matter right now: - OpenAI - Anthropic - Cursor (and xAi) - All the Chinese labs (been more and more impressed with them over time) Google is a joke.

@F1 & @Hasbro Your newsletter signup for the F1 Monopoly Game release.. doesnt work? There is no button, no box to tick, no terms to review. Nothing. I dont care about F1 Financial News (oddly placed given this page is for a board game release). Also, "350 other subscribers" is hardcoded onto the page. Did yall vibecode it? LOL

@rankintweets I curious - what do you use?

Are people seriously still using pi and codex? lmao

@SorinBota_X @cheatyyyy care to elaborate

@MatteoMuscio @cheatyyyy Wow ... AI slop commentator responds to AI Slop poster. What a bright future.

Gemini 3.5 Flash pricing 🤡 $1.5/m input tokens $9/m output tokens a 3x increase over Gemini 3 Flash, it is truly over :')

@enviouky @cheatyyyy Always happy to provide

@MatteoMuscio @cheatyyyy hahahahahahahahaha oh my GOD this is a delusional take, thank you i needed that. good luck on 2.5 flash soldier 🫡

Usage resets are nice to have, but we need more stable connection and a "fast" mode that actually is "fast-er". Right now, there is no difference between the two, and keep getting constant reconnecting. What is happening? @thsottiaux

@emanueledpt You need to reasses the scope - what is even the purpose of remodex? Not trying to be a dick about it - genuinely wonder if this was a tiny passion project that turned into more (faster than you could answer the "why") or if it was meant from the getgo as a potential business

I'm finding really hard to stay positive recently Everytime I scroll on X I see another app similar to Remodex or DP Code And then I dig deep into what they do and what they have And surprise surprise most of them are vc backed, yc graduate and whatever I really don't want to sound too bitchy or whatever But how can I stay positive 100% when there are people doing what I'm doing, but with millions of dollars in the pockets? How can I remain competitive? Do I need to look for investors? Do I need to apply to YC? What's the end game here? Maybe I'm overthinking, or maybe I have a lot going on and I'm just crumbling I guess this journey is this part too, and probably I'm one of the few ones that shows this side I'm sorry if I sound too bitchy I don't want your pity, I don't want your sugarcoat I'd really love to know how the fuck I can make it out of here.

@thsottiaux ehm.. wut? Also on the $200 plan?

@theo The Codex App has completely replaced my terminal - especially for UI work. The only case where the terminal is still my goto choice is for adhoc usecases like remoting into a VPS etc.

Are you still using the CLI versions of your preferred agent instead of desktop apps like Codex App, Conductor, or T3 Code? Tell me why below. Genuinely curious.

@thsottiaux To get /goal working on the Codex App?

What is your /goal today?

(I dont remember exactly the current situation on the iOS App Store revenue split so dont quote me on this) Could it be that, on Mac, you login to chatgpt web, and then download the DMG to install Codex App. On iOS, they would need to release it on the app store, and they (I believe) cant ask users to sub from outside the app. This would mean that Apple would get 30% of the subscription value.

@thsottiaux hey man, since the last update, when I ask gpt 5.5 to spawn subagents, codex ends up using 120+gbs (M4 pro, 24gb ram). Had to a take a picture with my phone because the laptop was dead frozen. This was with 4 or 5 subagents running just exploration in a small codebase

Im confused - @cursor_ai was in talks to (maybe) be bought by @SpaceX (Cursor gets compute, Elon gets a home for Grok). But then they hand out compute to @AnthropicAI (money now-'ish' is better than money tomorrow-'ish'). So what is gonna happen with @cursor_ai ?

Only me or Fast is actually slower than Default for Medium thinking on GPT 5.5? @thsottiaux what's happening? Between all the "reconnecting" and overall poor performance, Standard is now faster than Fast.

Burned through 40% of the weekly quota in less than 2 days. Exta High + Fast is not sustainable with the current Pro Plan limits. Then again, I am surprised by how fast the non-fast mode can be at times, and how smart Medium is compared to Extra-High. EH still wins, but not by a lot

@rafaldarlak thats crazy if I was doing Extra High + Fast I'd burn through in 2-3 days lol

In Codex, I wish there was a model selector before you accept a plan. feels like planning with High/Extra High and implementing with Medium is pretty common

Re Claude being an unpleasant experience for average users due to the model selector - my dad (example user) has no clue of how much models actually cost. Already paying 20$ (for something he has for free for years with ChatGPT) means he expects "more intelligence". In Claude, that means selecting Opus, but that will kill his weekly limit in 2 prompts, make him cancel his Claude $20 p/month sub, and return to OAI. The problem is not Opus' pricing, but the option to select it to begin with.

C, but I also think that the average user of the ChatGPT app, and the average user of the Codex app, are 2 completely different users. One is only looking for answers to questions (no need for even things as simple as a model selector - IMO what causes the biggest issues with new Claude users), the other wants enough pro-features to have Codex become their superapp, but not too much customizability like PI would allow you.

“codex is for everyone, for any task done with a computer” but the name includes “Code,” and the app icon is a command line. very curious about the product / naming strategy here. can’t tell if it’s A) a deliberate separation of 2 products where the new one is for a different, more “pro” audience, AND where OpenAI specifically does not benefit from leveraging familiarity with ChatGPT’s brand. or B) there’s a desire to pull off a sneaky rename, where Codex also reaches mainstream adoption and replaces ChatGPT for everything (which would conveniently retire both the confusing “GPT” name and the “chat” anchoring, which might feel outdated in a more agentic world that goes beyond just chatting. or more realistically, C) codex started as an experiment, and then was just a more natural place for shipping these agentic features because it doesn’t simultaneously need to support 1B users, and it’s all just moving quickly, and shipping fast is what matters most. and the name just is what it is because it started as a coding tool. which is probably the most likely scenario.

@sachintwtss "Hey claude, make me $1M/month. Make no mistakes"

Just got Claude Code, now how do I make $1M/month?