MisTKy

@intelFromBrian @WarMonitorINTL 10m people ? World power ? STOP SNIFFING GLUE

@WarMonitorINTL Are you guys this dumb? WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO FIGHT TWO WORLD POWERS AT ONCE? Focus on America first. I swear, you idiots just think it’s a video game 😂😂

Iran is attacking everyone -except one country... Strange, isn't it?

It seems I was mistaken,Polymarket didn’t introduce new withdraw fees out of the blue. They simply stopped subsidizing the swapping fees.

The main issue is the lack of clear communication with users. While this won’t drive me away , since I make money on Poly. I can easily imagine how frustrating and off-putting it is for new users to suddenly face unexpected costs they weren’t informed about.This isn’t the first time changes have been made without proper notice. A simple pop-up notification whenever something important is updated would go a long way toward improving the user experience.

@MiSTkyGo we don't make any money on deposit and withdrawals, it's fun.xyz fees for swapping/bridging. We were subsidizing it before. I'm working with them to lower it.

Polymarket has introduced withdrawal fees (0.07%). I’m not a fan of the change, but to be fair, it’s not an outrageous amount. They also claim you can still withdraw for free on Polygon (I’ll need to verify that).The real issue is how they handled it. They advertised free withdrawals for a long time, then quietly changed the policy without any announcement or warning. This is the 218,423,085th time they’ve pulled something like this. At this point, it doesn’t even feel like it’s about the money , it just feels like pure incompetence. It genuinely makes me sad. Polymarket used to be excellent, largely thanks to its huge selection of markets. But between the poor communication, bad management, and the constant bugs and errors popping up every week, it feels like they’re starting to lose their way.

Maybe Parity is the edge you were looking for

@choice_markets Ah, this brings back memories of my first few months on Polymarket, back when Car scammed me out of $1k...

Has anyone here been scammed by this person? Pls DM me

‼️Choice.Markets Official Statement: We were scammed by the KOL @CarOnPolymarket Here‘s the proof：

@C1995851282425 @0xDinoCrypto i came back 😅😂

@MiSTkyGo @0xDinoCrypto If Polymarket can’t provide clear rules, it’ll die. Most people lose, and if you lose because the outcome is open to interpretation, you’re definitely not coming back. I’ve noticed a lot of events that can’t be verified against real data or that stay open to interpretation.

Two fundamentally similar Polymarket markets. Same date. Same Iran–US agreement context. Different outcomes. Market 1 had serious volume, attracted whales, was disputed multiple times, and the YES side was effectively blocked through UMA voting: polymarket.com/en/event/us-an… Market 2 had smaller volume, little whale interest, and the outcome was obvious: polymarket.com/en/event/us-an… This is exactly the problem. When the facts are similar but the result changes depending on who has money, who controls votes, and who can afford endless disputes, that is not a fair prediction market. In the event chat, a large holder allegedly said before the vote that YES could not win and that everything had already been decided — while debates were still ongoing. Prediction markets should resolve facts, not reward the side with deeper pockets. This is not just one bad market. It is a structural failure. @Polymarket

@denizz_poly ?

@MiSTkyGo forgot a relevant clause there

“The U.S. further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.”Do you think this is enough for the market to go yes? In my opinion, it’s not, because it’s contingent on a future event. I’d love to hear your opinion on this. #dqrlJ0m" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/what-ira…

@llamaonthebrink What MSTR has to do with this market ? The announced and signed before 15th ?

To be clear though, I think the spirit of the market calls for a YES resolution. the problem is that Poly literally just resolved the “MSTR sells BTC in May” market to NO because the 8-K from the week of the sale came after the expiry in the same way that the peace deal is expected to come on June 19th, and in this case, because the rules don’t seem consistent with a YES outcome either.

@cgyang1627 Some people just know how to read...

地缘政治不得不品的一环：规则争议 YES的持有者里面聪明钱扎堆，这些地址的盈利加起来都快20M了 这还有反转么😆

@bryantheden That's how UMA system works.

polymarket's us-iran peace deal market just pulled the most sus move was expecting final review in 30 mins. now it's 3 days out with disputed outcomes stacking up is polymarket just extending these geopolitical markets when the outcome doesn't land where they want it to 🤔 or is this just how contested markets work either way kinda sus for a platform that's supposed to be the truth machine

@buckyandlucky @Polymarket You should stop giving advice....di even trade this ?

美伊永久和平协议市场，已被提交yes，这科是微策略卖币 2.0 版本，不知 @polymarket 能否妥善处理 虽美伊双方都已经宣布协议达成，但按微策略 2.0 逻辑，需要以一致性文本公开时间为准 这个盘我认为最终会No，No有文本一致+解读+公开时间三种角度 是一个6 倍机会，我本金少经不起亏损，水深不敢参与

@0xPaarth @0xDinoCrypto Also i agree that polymarket handled the case poorly. But again he choose to deposit and gamble on something he didn't fully understand. Nobody pushed the button for him.

@MiSTkyGo @0xDinoCrypto There needs to be some basis on why it resolved as no So you are saying one should put money on poly only if they can lose it and expect poly to resolve it in the wrong way?

Some people say I am not doing this for the benefit of everyone. Let me be clear: This is not just about me. Behind the $3.8 million lost in this disputed market, there are real people. There are fathers who worked for years to save that money. There are students who trusted the written rules. There are mothers, workers, farmers, small investors, and ordinary users who believed that a market should be settled by its own terms. To some people, this may look like just another crypto bet. To us, it is rent. It is tuition. It is savings. It is months or years of work. It is trust that was broken. I may be one voice, but I am not speaking for myself alone. I am speaking for every user who believed the rules mattered. @Polymarket @shayne_coplan #StopPolyScam

@0xPaarth @0xDinoCrypto There is a basis, that the information got out after the market end date. All the regular players were on NO because they knew that...i just traded the market, yes had a strong case. But complaning that you put money on a trade that you didn't study it is only your fault.

@Atlantislq You should have shared were you got this alpha :P

I can make $32,843 if the US and Iran reach a deal and the agreement includes any mention nuclear > According to the market rules, any reference to nuclear commitments would count toward a nuclear deal resolution > There's a 99% chance Iran puts something like "Iran renounces nuclear weapons" in the agreement because they've always included language like that and have never had an issue with it

@MadRyeguy @Impij25 Lol , you don't follow the new do you...there is a big chance they sign tomrrow

@Impij25 @MiSTkyGo What if just nothing signed at all though in the next two weeks?

I'll drop some alpha (a lot of Polymarket OGs are probably gonna hate me for this). On the US-Iran nuclear deal market: If the US and Iran sign an MOU that states Iran agrees not to develop nuclear weapons, it should resolve to Yes , even if both sides are still saying there haven’t been any formal nuclear discussions yet. #WDHrohO" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/us-iran-…

@wumpafroot I don t judge, new people don't understand the low bar of polymarket rules

@MiSTkyGo Apparently reading market rules is considered alpha now