denizz

@Euanker @LovejoyActual Would make you an aristocrat in the Middle Ages

@LovejoyActual The concept of £39.5k after tax being an obscenely large salary in 2026

still think £50k is an obscenely large salary, i’d be living like royalty even in this economy

@EFischberger Works for you too!

The metamorphosis of Nick Kristof

@mbkline @LydiaMoynihan it's pure speculation and has like 0 chance of being true.

@denizz_poly @LydiaMoynihan Why?

I just explained to a non-media person that Nick Kristof claimed the IDF is training dogs to rape Palestinians... in the NYT... in the opinion section... based on Hamas sources... And timed it to front-run a report today about Hamas using sexual violence as a deliberate tactic

@wokbonds @estherzelda0514 @KennyDeanT Doesn't prove your point

@denizz_poly @estherzelda0514 @KennyDeanT Wrong bozo x.com/IsraelMFA/stat…

Does anyone else find it remarkably suspicious that the NYT publishes an incredible account, badly sourced, in the opinion section, of the systemic rape of Palestinian prisoners the day before Israel releases an extremely well sourced and investigated report of the sexual atrocities perpetuated on October 7 and upon the Israeli hostages? Is Nicholas Kristof just lucky or did he coordinate the timing of his story with those who have a vested interest in discrediting the years of hard, painful work that The Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes did? Someone needs to ask these questions.

@wokbonds @estherzelda0514 @KennyDeanT It has absolutely not been proven that Kristof timed the article release and there's like 0.01% chance that it happened.

@denizz_poly @estherzelda0514 @KennyDeanT It's proven to have happened lmfao

@estherzelda0514 @wokbonds @KennyDeanT You should cultivate that part of you because you absolutely should not believe this.

@wokbonds @KennyDeanT A part of me really, really, really does not want to believe this. The level of antisemitism needed for such coordination is too much to fathom.

@NordlundMatthew @Eve_Barlow At least the article only describes an attempt.

@Eve_Barlow Genuine question: Do you believe that Klaus Barbie, notorious SS torturer, used dogs to rape women as reported by victims at his trial? Would you look these women in the face and call them liars? jta.org/archive/six-wi…

For the 1000th time. There is no scientific or behavioral evidence that dogs can be trained to commit sexual assault. Experts and dog behaviorists point to several biological and cognitive barriers that make this impossible. But go on with your desperate myths.

@michael_galant @Eve_Barlow Unfortunately the question would be whether the testimony goes into the details.

@Eve_Barlow I personally know someone who was sexually assaulted using dogs while being tortured as a prisoner of the Pinochet dictatorship. Do you deny her personal testimony of this horrific abuse, which she has made publicly?

@Megankstack Of course it can be true that there's a notable rate of sexual assault in Israeli jails, and that @NickKristof 's article made uncritical use of multiple problematic sources and anecdotes, and is largely retractable.

14 people telling a journalist they were raped is, imo, too many to dismiss. Especially in a society where shame/stigma around sexual assault is even greater than in the US. Incredible how many people just will. not. consider that their pre-existing view might be flawed.

@FHustede I'm not sure you convince anyone on the fence with such comparisons.

Man muss es ganz deutlich sagen, was die New York Times da veröffentlicht hat, ist Stürmer-Level antisemitischer Lügenpropaganda. Ohne wenn & aber. Das ist ein so eklatanter Verstoß gegen jegliche journalistischen Prinzipien, für welche der Autor auf der Stelle gefeuert gehört.

@CarOnPolymarket @holy_moses7 Trump is very restrained so we should have no problem there

@denizz_poly @holy_moses7 We need to stop them asap them, for our bags

Just bought this following Trump's rejection of the Iranian response. 6 cents seemed like a very decent buy, I'll probably sell if it goes higher.

@HenMazzig You should be more careful. There were more than those 2 sources in the article, flawed as it was.

I cannot believe we have to do this. The New York Times, the paper of record, just published an op-ed accusing the State of Israel of systematic sexual violence against Palestinian detainees, including the claim that Israel is training dogs to rape prisoners. One of their sources is a man who left his job after multiple people, including minors, accused him of sending them threatening and sexual messages. The other is Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, a group whose chairman was sanctioned by Israel as a Hamas operative and who publicly called the testimonies of Israeli women raped on October 7th “fabricated lies.” The Times is using the words of a man credibly accused of sexually harassing children, and an organization led by a man who denies the rape of Jewish women, to build a case that Israelis are sexual predators. This is the most serious accusation you can level at a country. It demands the most serious sourcing. The Times decided the opinion section was good enough. It is not good enough. And spare me the crocodile tears. The same people who spent two years calling the rape victims of October 7th liars, who told us “believe women” had an asterisk when the women were Jewish, are about to share this op-ed with tears in their eyes. They never cared about sexual violence. They cared about who they could pin it on. I do not want to spend my day writing about this. But when the largest newspaper in the world launders this against my people, silence is complicity. @nytimes owes our community, and its readers, an apology.

@CarOnPolymarket @holy_moses7 It's certainly physically possible

@holy_moses7 Its physically impossible bro

@laurnorman Sounds like they were OK with some exportation to Russia as long as it could "snap back".

Diluting to 20% is frankly worthless. Barely a concession at all.

@Jokeisonmehah @laurnorman For the record, Iran certainly did/does want to maintain the option of building nukes, even if only as a perpetual blackmail item to immunize its foreign policy including terrorist proxy sponsorship.

@laurnorman What do want from us man? Nuke us so we don't have nukes? What kinda sick demented people try to rationalize something that was obviously not real (iran wanting to have nuclear weapons) to get to the objective of destroying a country of 92 million. And Remember I'm one of them.

@BrettErickson28 @RZimmt Current US and Israeli governments are not terribly exercised by global economic fallout from this.

@denizz_poly @RZimmt And what about the world?

There is serious doubt whether a military strike on its own — however painful — would persuade Iran to soften its position. If a military option is pursued again, it would be preferable for it to be one capable of depriving Iran of one of its key leverage cards: its control over the Strait of Hormuz or its highly enriched uranium. However, there are at least three problems with this: a. Any such military move, which would require boots on the ground, is highly risky. b. It is not certain that it would lead to the desired outcome. c. While for the U.S. the top priority is reopening the Strait of Hormuz (which appears more complex to achieve through military action), for Israel the priority is addressing the fissile material. In any case, if a military operation is undertaken whose sole purpose is to inflict further damage on Iran, one must assume that afterward we may well find ourselves back in the same stalemate.

@RZimmt The point of the blockade is to damage Iran, so a punitive campaign on top of it is arguably an enhanced version.

@BrettErickson28 @RZimmt Bear in mind these military engagements are an order of magnitude worse for Iran than they are for the US or Israel.

@RZimmt No. We would not find ourselves in the “same” stalemate, we would be weeks further into the closure of SoH, have even less trust at the negotiating table, and will have seen retaliatory strikes further degrade the Middle East’s energy infrastructure.

@thsgolfnut @edghirnour Not sure but I think he is discussing the delay to the current weekend.

@edghirnour End of week = sunday? Instead of friday deadline? Or u saying next week? Can u clarify

إعادة قواعد الاشتباك حتى في المفاوضات،و قد تؤخر طهران ردها إلى نهاية الأسبوع بدل توقيت واشنطن، فهي و بحسب الأجواء العامة لا تريد 1-الخضوع للتوقيتات الأمريكية 2-ولا تريد لسوق الطاقة أن يكون أسيرا للمواقف الأمريكية