sierramist369

@AskingSocrates @VladTheInflator @grok They valued life equally, but knew boundaries were needed. The founding fathers never believed in a melting pot.

@Mikewsowski @VladTheInflator @grok Your point?

@grok Why do you add information I didn't ask?

@AskingSocrates @VladTheInflator @grok The founding fathers said all men are created equal but then said only free white men can be considered for citizenship.

@VladTheInflator @grok The all men are created equal is a great way to clear this up for anyone confused by said propaganda.

@RealBeto1812 @1776General_ When the 2nd amendment was written, citizens had better weapons than the military. And insults are in the same category of free speech.

That's why words matter they can be taken out of context you idiots 😆. Insults aren't in the same category of free speech than making powerful points like war is bad. It's like YES we have the right to bear arms but we all agree that people shouldn't easily own grenades and Sherman tanks.

DA Robert Nash in the ChudTheBuilder case reportedly told the judge that “Dalton’s abuse of First Amendment privileges is what got us into this mess in the first place.” The First Amendment isn't a Privilege. It's an inalienable fundamental right inherent to all individuals that cannot be surrendered or transferred.

@CJ1_1z @JamesLucasIT @bo66ie29 What does CE mean?

@JamesLucasIT @bo66ie29 I’ve been to two of the oldest pubs in Europe. The Old Ferry Boat Inn, England 560 CE and Sean's Bar, 900 CE Ireland.

This pub in England was built in 1540

@13013zilla @RepThomasMassie @Melvin8654401 @AustinScottGA08 So Massie, who wants to reclaim the rights granted by those founding documents, you don't like him? And when's the last time you tried open carrying an ar15 in California? Obviously we need new language to correct the mess we're currently in.

@Mikewsowski @RepThomasMassie @Melvin8654401 @AustinScottGA08 We do not need new language to protect the rights granted in the founding documents. Division is antithetical. Try not to be a troglodyte. Educate yourself. Or stay on the menu. Mr. Nigel, I take my orders from Jesus. You and DT matter none to me.

No one should have to beg the government to exercise a constitutionally protected right anywhere in the country. Thank you @AustinScottGA08 for cosponsoring HR 645, the National Constitutional Carry Act.

@13013zilla @RepThomasMassie @Melvin8654401 @AustinScottGA08 What are you even saying?

@RepThomasMassie @Melvin8654401 @AustinScottGA08 We don’t need your reworded protection. We already have the og. Thanks for trying to stay relevant. We don’t need more division. Buzz off.

@TheBrancaShow What would happen to the case if both judge and jury were to convict DESPITE having no legal basis to do so? What if the jury has determined guilt before the case begins due to prejudice?

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

@Scorpio1115JV @beinlibertarian @RepThomasMassie He's the only one who actually reads them. What are you talking about?

@beinlibertarian @RepThomasMassie He probably does the same thing with many bills. Not read them.

i ain’t reading all that im happy for u tho or sorry that happened

@Borush420 @_NamrokNamrok_ @RepThomasMassie I used to support him because my TV told me to. But since the TV told me he's bad, now I don't support him. I don't understand how anybody could think the TV is wrong.

@_NamrokNamrok_ @RepThomasMassie this guy is a closeted rino/iino i used to support a lot of what he said and such but he has shown his true colors over the last couple years. Dem in sheeps clothing perse

@MatthewClarkEsq @TRHLofficial You think calling it a conspiracy makes it any less valid?

@TRHLofficial It’s exactly this kind of conspiratorial anti-Israel nonsense that lost him his seat.

“I would have come out sooner but I had to call my opponent to concede and it took a while to find him in Tel Aviv.” 💀

@SlyMason4 @stubbigg @Lisa52938411 @HansawRichard @hodgetwins @ForgiatoBlow47 @grok I don't think you understand anything at all about the appropriation bill. Do you have even the slightest curiosity as to what was in it, or are you just going to repeat what Fox news said religiously?

@stubbigg @Lisa52938411 @HansawRichard @hodgetwins @ForgiatoBlow47 @grok Paper thin argument, as the only republican to vote against it.

Never seen Republicans go after somebody like they going after Massie They don’t even attack Democrats like this

@still3arnin @dealwithitsmith @basedkletus Every time whites go to an island and build a civilization from scratch, you people come demanding to be let in for equality.

@dealwithitsmith @basedkletus Ok I’ll keep my stupid ass from the voting booth and you incel maniac fuckers go chimp out on an island by yourselves somewhere and leave normal kids out your sick genocidal fantasies. Sound good?

@SpaceX Why are you going public? I'm sure the money will help with scaling operations, but the shareholder obligations would make a colony a hard sell due to short term profitability.

Starship’s twelfth flight test will debut the next generation Starship and Super Heavy vehicles, powered by the next evolution of the Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad at Starbase. The launch is targeted as early as Tuesday, May 19 → spacex.com/launches/stars…

@learning_yohei Americans already speak English and our strategy is just to speak English everywhere because the rest of the world teaches English to their kids.

僕は日本人なので、日本語が第一言語です。そして、多くの日本人は第二言語として、英語を学んでいます🇯🇵🥰 そこで、アメリカ人に質問があります。アメリカ人は第二言語として、どんな言語を学んでいますか？🇺🇸🤭

@EricBMiller2 @iluminatibot Can you explain how this relates to Israel?

@iluminatibot “And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”” Genesis 12:2-3 NASB1995

This is the guy who woke up Charlie Kirk

@OurOwnNation This event has great potential to be a precedent setting court case. If this gets to the supreme court, it either gives all white people the N-word pass, or it makes it legal for a black person to kill you if you call them a N|gg3r

If ChudTheBuilder shot someone I don’t support violence but i understand given that someone murdered his dog, Doxxed him, threatened his kid, the feds detained him and took his electronics. Major streamers like academiks, Stackswopo, and others called for his murder. You should avoid encounters and content like this Becuase it is high risk to low reward, it was only a matter of time before you either have to quit, get killed, or god forbid have to defend yourself with more than pepper spray.

@Cat5SMASHICANE Who considers Indian people white? I've never heard this before.

I always felt like George Carlin was on the liberal side. Turns out I was wrong. He was right down the middle and found many issues on both sides. He had no problem calling it out. The man was brilliant and definitely ahead of his time. Too bad he wasn't here now. 🔥🤣🔥🤣🔥

@HexZatara @VladTheInflator We didn't enslave them in the first place.

@Mikewsowski @VladTheInflator You didn’t free them, you bought them

The slave trade propaganda against America is fucking hilarious

@HexZatara @VladTheInflator We freed Africans from the Africans who were enslaving them.

@Mikewsowski @VladTheInflator Yea! That were biracial, not actual free slaves but children of the masters and those whose masters had died and granted them freedom and passed off their slaves to them. Again, what don’t get a thank you for simply giving back black Americans their freedom.

@HexZatara @VladTheInflator Bro the USA didn't even buy most of the slaves that came out of Africa. Also at the peak of slavery less than 2% of free individuals owned slaves in this country.

@Mikewsowski @VladTheInflator That’s not how you save a group of people from slavery, you enabled it for 400 more years before saying that’s enough.