Mitchell Traver

17.4K posts

Mitchell Traver banner
Mitchell Traver

Mitchell Traver

@Mitchell_Traver

Husband of 1 and Dad of 3. Sports Chaplain @TCUFCA. MDiv Student @RTS_Dallas. Pastoral Intern (PCA).

Fort Worth, TX Katılım Temmuz 2009
252 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Mitchell Traver
Mitchell Traver@Mitchell_Traver·
@gavinortlund Disappointing. Grateful for your ministry, Gavin. For both your scholarly rigor and especially the way you engage online. It stands out in a way which encourages me very much. Gal 6:9
English
0
1
4
441
Gavin Ortlund
Gavin Ortlund@gavinortlund·
So last night @JoshuaTCharles used my reference to Emperors “presiding” over ecumenical councils to paint me as an “online troll” with “first semester graduate level” scholarship. He also questioned my sincerity and honesty. In reality, what I said about emperors is standard (see below). This is a tactic I have noticed on the internet: pivoting from disagreement about what you are saying to try to discredit you *as a person.* I attempted an olive branch of terminological concession, since “preside” is an ambiguous term. But this amplified Josh’s efforts. His response claimed I was not acting in good faith. So, let’s talk about emperors and councils. According to Francis Dvornik, “the emperors or their assistants PRESIDED at synods, directed the debates at meetings....” (Francis Dvnornik, “Emperors, Popes, and General Councils,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 6 [1951], 3). Noting that Emperor Constantine established a precedent that subsequent emperors would follow, he shows from extensive quotes of Constantine’s personal correspondence his own self-perception: “he represented the Divinity and was given by God supreme power in things material and spiritual” (Dvnornik, “Emperors, Popes, and General Councils,” 7). He notes that council proceeding at Nicaea were modeled after Roman senatorial procedure: “The emperor convoked the bishops as he convoked the senators, PRESIDED at sessions of the council as he PRESIDED at the senate, and after making relatio, called upon the members to state their point of view (sententi rogare)” (Dvnornik, “Emperors, Popes, and General Councils,” 9). He notes this became the model for subsequent councils and works through them, giving examples and documentation. Even at Chalcedon, where Pope Leo had such a significant role, “the leading of the debates remained imperial prerogatives” (18). Dvornik’s comments are standard. According to Philip Schaff, emperors “HELD THE PRESIDENCY” at ecumenical councils. They or their deputies “PRESIDED in conjunction with the patriarchs, conducted the entire course of the transactions, preserved order and security, closed the council, and signed the acts either at the head or at the foot of the signatures of the bishops.” I am citing some of the older scholarship here. I could add much more. But hopefully you can see the point already. What I said is standard. Now, it is absolutely true that the nature of this “presiding” varied – hence my offer of a terminological concession (“oversaw” as a more general term). At some councils, the emperor delegated his authority, worked through representatives, etc. Totally fine to debate the terminology. But Josh seizing upon this standard language in order to discredit my competence or sincerity is a move away from substantive disagreement and into something else entirely. I’ll leave it there.
Joshua Charles🇻🇦@JoshuaTCharles

“A Roman emperor…presided over EVERY one of the first seven ecumenical councils” (around 27 minutes). This is just one of numerous completely false statements made in this video, as in so many others. Anyone in the sources would find such a claim ridiculous. Yet he makes it with conviction. Gavin seems to interact overwhelmingly with secondary assessments of the sources, rather than the sources themselves (which is tragically common among academics). As a friend of mine who converted from protestantism and obtained theological degrees from some of their finest institutions (Wheaton, etc.) observed: “Gavin presents as the nice Baptist guy next door when he’s actually the online Baptist troll we’ve seen a million times already. His scholarship is first semester graduate level, and because that is above 70% of the Christian population’s education level, he’s able to build a little “hedge of protection” around half-informed Protestants who would have otherwise already become Catholic.” Gavin also misses the framework everywhere present in Church history for working through the various issues he claims somehow disprove the Catholic Church: namely, the Church is governed by the successors of the Apostles, the bishops. Period. This is unanimous. This is how Christ governs His Church on earth. It is by their solemn judgments (“binding and loosing”) that He guides the Church into all truth, through the power of the Holy Spirit (which is spoken about quite often by many Church Fathers), precisely in order to address new issues throughout Church history. It has happened countless times. That is WHY, for example, the authority of the Church to “bind and loose” with the authority of God exists—the very authority Gavin denies. This is why the “Nicene” creed we say today is actually primarily from the Council of Constantinople I in 381, and includes additional details the original creed in 325 did not—because new issues, new heresies, new upstarts had popped up contradicting the Catholic Faith of the Catholic Church, and they needed to be addressed—by the visible successors of the Apostles who had the authority to “bind and loose.” Yet Gavin denies the monarchical episcopate everywhere appealed to is even apostolic. So essentially all Christians, all Fathers, everywhere, are wrong, if Gavin is right. But don’t worry, he says near the end that “you can trust in the Gospel and the Holy Spirit will SEAL this on your heart,” appealing not to the universal consensus of anything (the testimony of our ancient ancestors, saints, and martyrs), not to a history of ANYTHING, not to a Scripture citation of ANYTHING, but to a purely individual and subjective claim of being “sealed” by the Holy Spirit (who can’t make this claim?). He claims he is being “honest” about Church history, but what he’s actually doing is doubting God’s providential guidance of His Church into all truth, which Christ promised. That self-evidently didn’t happen if Gavin is correct. This is why protestantism is the seedbed of much of modern skepticism. There’s ALWAYS some other reassessment some individual or sect can claim to be making, under the guise of being “honest” about history, and “faithful” to Scripture (again, who can’t claim this?). It’s a never ending and fruitful source of chaos, uncertainty, and ensuring no issue is ever finally and dogmatically resolved, forever. But it relies on denying the ancient, everywhere affirmed, everywhere obvious reality that the Church ALWAYS understood itself as governed by the successors of the Apostles who possessed the authority to “bind and loose” from Christ Himself. (Conclusion below)

English
54
27
515
68.3K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Chauncey Franks
Chauncey Franks@chaunceyfranks·
Week 1 of our TCU FCA “Tough Questions” Apologetics Series was powerful. Mitchell kicked off the series with a question many students (and adults) wrestle with at some point: “Aren’t we better off without religion?” We addressed 3 common criticisms that are often aimed at Christianity and faith in general: 1.Religion is harmful 2.Religion is divisive 3.Religion is irrelevant What I love about this series is that it creates a space where students don’t have to hide their doubts, questions, or real life experiences. Instead, they can bring those questions into the light, think critically, and have honest conversations in a community that genuinely cares about them. Grateful for what God is doing through TCU FCA, and excited to see how God continues to use our team to impact students on this campus. 💜🐸 #TCUFCA #FCA #Apologetics #ToughQuestions
Chauncey Franks tweet media
English
0
4
17
711
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Chauncey Franks
Chauncey Franks@chaunceyfranks·
We’re back! Excited to kick off TCU FCA tonight 7 PM in the courtside club! With our Spring Tough Questions Series. Sometimes one of the biggest barriers between us and experiencing God fully is a question. A tough question. And often those questions come from our finite minds trying to make sense of real life experiences—disappointment, hurt, pain, and unmet expectations. In those moments, we wrestle with things like: Can I truly trust God? Is God real? Is He reliable? This semester, I’m excited to see our team dive into these conversations as we aim to unpack tough questions that can often become barriers between us and God. Our prayer is that as we ask honest questions, we’ll gain a healthier view of the heart, character, and faithfulness of God—and learn how to walk with Him through every season of life. Let’s grow together. #TCUFCA #FCA #TCU #Faith #Leadership #ToughQuestions
Chauncey Franks tweet media
English
1
5
23
690
Mitchell Traver
Mitchell Traver@Mitchell_Traver·
@JasonRomano It’s beautiful. Hoping for more of the same in the second half…🧀
English
0
0
0
47
Jason Romano
Jason Romano@JasonRomano·
Bears look putrid.
English
2
0
2
1.4K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
James R. Wood
James R. Wood@jamesrwoodtheo·
Ws
James R. Wood tweet media
0
1
30
1.1K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Tony Reinke
Tony Reinke@TonyReinke·
Tim Keller (2007): “The world embraces Christmas in a way it has never embraced Good Friday and Easter. I think the world sees Christmas as being rather affirming — it’s all about peace and goodwill. Isn’t that nice? Actually, the message of Christmas is incredibly confrontational. It says the reason for Christmas is the world’s wisdom has failed.”
English
3
121
793
38.6K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Danny Morgan
Danny Morgan@DannyMorgan0·
“For whatever reason God chose to make man as he is— limited and suffering and subject to sorrows and death—He had the honesty and the courage to take His own medicine. Whatever game He is playing with His creation, He has kept His own rules and played fair. He can exact nothing from man that He has not exacted from Himself. He has Himself gone through the whole of human experience, from the trivial irritations of family life and the cramping restrictions of hard work and lack of money to the worst horrors of pain and humiliation, defeat, despair and death. When He was a man, He played the man. He was born in poverty and died in disgrace and thought it well worthwhile.” - Dorothy Sayers
English
1
1
7
373
Mitchell Traver
Mitchell Traver@Mitchell_Traver·
Sobering. And yet, really and truly hopeful. I’m blown away - both by the gravity of the news and by Ben’s response. This man knows the hope of the gospel, and is clinging to the good news amidst the darkest season of his life. Read this, and pray for Ben and his family, please.
Ben Sasse@BenSasse

Friends- This is a tough note to write, but since a bunch of you have started to suspect something, I’ll cut to the chase: Last week I was diagnosed with metastasized, stage-four pancreatic cancer, and am gonna die. Advanced pancreatic is nasty stuff; it’s a death sentence. But I already had a death sentence before last week too — we all do. I’m blessed with amazing siblings and half-a-dozen buddies that are genuinely brothers. As one of them put it, “Sure, you’re on the clock, but we’re all on the clock.” Death is a wicked thief, and the bastard pursues us all. Still, I’ve got less time than I’d prefer. This is hard for someone wired to work and build, but harder still as a husband and a dad. I can’t begin to describe how great my people are. During the past year, as we’d temporarily stepped back from public life and built new family rhythms, Melissa and I have grown even closer — and that on top of three decades of the best friend a man could ever have. Seven months ago, Corrie was commissioned into the Air Force and she’s off at instrument and multi-engine rounds of flight school. Last week, Alex kicked butt graduating from college a semester early even while teaching gen chem, organic, and physics (she’s a freak). This summer, 14-year-old Breck started learning to drive. (Okay, we’ve been driving off-book for six years — but now we’ve got paper to make it street-legal.) I couldn’t be more grateful to constantly get to bear-hug this motley crew of sinners and saints. There’s not a good time to tell your peeps you’re now marching to the beat of a faster drummer — but the season of advent isn’t the worst. As a Christian, the weeks running up to Christmas are a time to orient our hearts toward the hope of what’s to come. Not an abstract hope in fanciful human goodness; not hope in vague hallmark-sappy spirituality; not a bootstrapped hope in our own strength (what foolishness is the evaporating-muscle I once prided myself in). Nope — often we lazily say “hope” when what we mean is “optimism.” To be clear, optimism is great, and it’s absolutely necessary, but it’s insufficient. It’s not the kinda thing that holds up when you tell your daughters you’re not going to walk them down the aisle. Nor telling your mom and pops they’re gonna bury their son. A well-lived life demands more reality — stiffer stuff. That’s why, during advent, even while still walking in darkness, we shout our hope — often properly with a gravelly voice soldiering through tears. Such is the calling of the pilgrim. Those who know ourselves to need a Physician should dang well look forward to enduring beauty and eventual fulfillment. That is, we hope in a real Deliverer — a rescuing God, born at a real time, in a real place. But the eternal city — with foundations and without cancer — is not yet. Remembering Isaiah’s prophecies of what’s to come doesn’t dull the pain of current sufferings. But it does put it in eternity’s perspective: “When we've been there 10,000 years…We've no less days to sing God's praise.” I’ll have more to say. I’m not going down without a fight. One sub-part of God’s grace is found in the jawdropping advances science has made the past few years in immunotherapy and more. Death and dying aren’t the same — the process of dying is still something to be lived. We’re zealously embracing a lot of gallows humor in our house, and I’ve pledged to do my part to run through the irreverent tape. But for now, as our family faces the reality of treatments, but more importantly as we celebrate Christmas, we wish you peace: “The people walking in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of deep darkness a light has dawned….For to us a son is given” (Isaiah 9). With great gratitude, and with gravelly-but-hopeful voices, Ben — and the Sasses

English
0
0
1
264
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Matt Schneidman
Matt Schneidman@mattschneidman·
Warren Brinson’s facemask penalty Romeo Doubs botching the onside Blown coverage on the regulation TD Botched fourth-down snap in OT Just a comedy of errors for the Packers, who now might have to cling to the No. 7 seed.
English
195
245
2.9K
230.1K
Mitchell Traver
Mitchell Traver@Mitchell_Traver·
@dandarling Go Pack! 🧀 Going to be tough sledding without Micah and Jacobs, though…
English
0
0
1
175
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
@markdtooley
@markdtooley@markdtooley·
Conspiracism, the assumption that the world is controlled by dark invisible forces, outside divine sovereignty, is a malevolent spiritual force always at odds with Christianity.
Brandon Tatum@TheOfficerTatum

🚨#BREAKING: Erika Kirk just erupted on Fox News. ... and rightly so. After people accuse her family and the TPUSA team of being “involved” in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Her message is simple: STOP. Her team watched her husband get murdered. They’re getting death threats, kidnapping threats… and being forced to relive the trauma daily. It’s a mind virus and it needs to end. Enough. Video credit: @FoxNews

English
0
4
13
1.1K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
BYU Blue
BYU Blue@BYUbluThru·
ESPN owns all broadcasting rights to the CFP. All CFP money is paid by ESPN ESPN owns all SEC broadcasting rights. ESPN owns all ACC broadcasting rights. ESPN isn’t the primary owner of B1G or Big 12 rights anymore. ESPN doesn’t own primary Notre Dame broadcast rights. Is anyone surprised ESPN managed to invest $20 million in its main product and found away to shun a more deserving Big 12 program and/or Notre Dame to invest $4 million in its ACC product instead? Only $16 million to B1G and Big 12 where ESPN has minimal broadcasting rights compared to $32 million paid to ESPN owned conference rights. Follow the money and it all makes sense.
Front Office Sports@FOS

The College Football Playoff bracket is set. Each selected team receives $4 million for making the playoff. Here’s the breakdown by conference: 💰5 SEC Teams - $20M 💰3 Big Ten Teams - $12M 💰1 Big 12 Team - $4M 💰1 ACC Team - $4M 💰1 American - $4M 💰1 Sun Belt - $4M

English
509
1.8K
12.3K
1.8M
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Green Bay Packers
Green Bay Packers@packers·
ELECTRIC
Green Bay Packers tweet media
Català
292
2.8K
12.6K
285.9K
Mitchell Traver retweetledi
Robert Griffin III
Robert Griffin III@RGIII·
The way the College Football season shaped up, the CFP Committee had an opportunity to do the most right thing with the smallest backlash. Alabama and BYU getting blown out in their conference championship games opened the door to put both Notre Dame and Miami in. Instead they dropped the ball and punished BYU for losing, didn’t punish Alabama for losing and then flipped Notre Dame and Miami despite neither of them playing a game. None of it makes sense. They did the thing that would give them the most backlash just to have 5 SEC teams in the playoff. That makes everyone question the integrity of the process and rightfully so.
English
673
1.6K
12.9K
569.7K