𝙃𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙎𝙩𝙚𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙧

Oh, one account.

Today I learned that white men's founded complaints of discrimination may not be heard because it's not as bad as black slaves had it.

@ArtemisConsort You mean bad faith actors seized on a detail to derail legitimate arguments? We’re never going to convince the people that depend on not understanding. Don’t try. Mock them, expose them for what they are.

This is so annoying. We have a winning argument about anti-White discrimination and (potentially) genocidal anti-White ideology pushed by major institutions. It exists, it’s pervasive, it’s bad, and it’s unpopular. But some weirdos made the absolutely indefensible claim that White men in America are the most oppressed group in history, and now we’re all talking about that instead. I am begging you all to be serious. Communicate in a way that’s likely to achieve your goals. Build coalitions. Do something other than jerking yourself off with how contrarian you’re willing to be. Mass deportations are happening. Repealing Hart-Celler is in the Overton window. Crushing major institutions for anti-White discrimination is in the Overton window. That will get all of us at least 90% of what we want if we can maintain the momentum to see it through. Focus on that.

@christopherrufo @jeremykauffman I think what you guys are missing is that what is happening to white people is much more insidious and for that reason it almost makes it worse because most people don’t even think we have the moral right to fight back.

@BlueBoxDave Oh, Dearest, please explain how discrimination against white people today is obviously not as harmful? I beg to differ. Nay, I claim your belief false. Come to California, my Boo, and apply for a job. Any job.

@BlueBoxDave "obviously not as harmful" I beg to differ. Discrimination against White men in America could potentially lead to civilizational collapse when you consider the scale of it, which would be more harmful a than any past discrimination.

@christopherrufo Bitch x.com/i/status/20355…

@christopherrufo Better ask Paul Singer first. Don't want to get your funding cut

@christopherrufo Pornographer also could be added

The AAMD (now AAIDD) revised its 1973 manual: IQ cutoff dropped from ~85 (1 SD below mean, + "borderline" category labeling ~15-16% of population) back to ~70 (2 SD, ~2%). Official rationale: reduce overdiagnosis/stigmatization of mildly low scorers who weren't functionally impaired; emphasize adaptive behavior deficits alongside IQ. Secondary sources note it responded to civil rights concerns over disproportionate labeling of minority students (mainly Black Americans, whose group mean IQ is ~85) in special ed. This sharply cut eligibility for services.

@AFpost @Mark___Taylor

In 200 years people will see videos like these and it will be like watching videos of Ancient Rome

He’s on fire 🔥 today

@Noahpinion I see non-boomers are now doing the "if it isn't happening directly to me, then it isn't happening" thing. We are trying to connect the dots for you but you have to look at them Best of luck in the coming years with assuming the worst will not happen

@bonchieredstate @SoothingDave why would you spend the time arguing with other white men that you agree have been disenfranchised?

@tedcruz OMG YAWN

Communism is the most evil, twisted, depraved ideology that mankind has ever produced. Defeating communism is incredibly important.

@bonchieredstate The fact that your knee-jerk reaction is to say "You pathetic people are better off than chattel!" is disingenuous and disgusting rhetoric. Utterly shameful.

@bonchieredstate Had blacks not been oppressed by slavery, they would have continued living in huts in Africa. Had whites not been oppressed in America, we would be living on the moon

@bonchieredstate I don't care how hysterical whites act until the problem is fixed and neither should you. What's the point of this post? Are officials fixing the discrimination so quickly you feel the need to temper it? You're signalling and it's cringe.