MONEY2069

We’ve been working on the founding manifesto for Money2069. A monetary religion for a neutral, state-free currency standard with stable spending power by 2069. 👉 money2069.org/manifesto

@TheBitcoin__ You nailed it. Math won't lie like governments do.

Gold but backed by math instead of vibes Gold but you can send it anywhere in seconds Gold but no one can seize it at the border Gold but the supply is verifiable by anyone with a laptop That's #Bitcoin Same idea, better execution 🧡

@0xNairolf You nailed the three. But a billion stays only if the foundation can't be seized. Apps burn. Money survives.

crypto wins when it is in the hands of a billion people that means: - fully abstracted experience - one app replacing all financial apps - full self custody thats it

@LarkDavis You're mapping it right. Each tax is a choice, layered on purpose. Stack them and surrender stops looking like giving up.

Wild how hard it is to build your first million. Half your income disappears before you touch it. Income tax. Inflation steals from the half you keep, because printing money is just a tax they don't call a tax. You pay again every time you spend. Sales tax. You pay again if your investments grow. Capital gains. They now want to tax paper profits you haven't even cashed out yet. Unrealized gains tax. And if you grind through ALL of that and finally cross $1M? There's a Millionaire's Tax. An extra surcharge. A punishment for winning the game they set the rules to. They will tax your ambition at every single step. And then celebrate when you give up.

@BitcoinRebel Right. You're accumulating the asset that doesn't debase. That wins this round. Only question is what asset doesn't debase on the next one.

People going back to dollars aren’t in the same fight I am. I don’t fight fair either, I fight to win and I win by getting more bitcoin. You go back to the scam and I’ll stick with my program.

@Greencandleit Argentina in 2001. Lose 30% a year and volatility stops being the debate. The only conversation becomes what actually holds value.

There are countries printing money so fast their citizens lose 30% of their savings every year. Those people aren't debating Bitcoin's volatility. They're using it to survive. Volatility is a luxury complaint.

@RobinSeyr You're right that gold's future supply will flood. The acceleration is real. But scarcity was never money's real property anyway. It's what scarcity prevents i.e, debasement. Bitcoin does that.

GOLD ISN’T scarce! -> New Gold is found every single day. -> And the pace will only accelerate with AI + Robotics + Space Travel. Gold eventually will lose all of its monetary premium to Bitcoin.

@Kylechasse Diocletian tried price controls after the denarius collapsed. Roman bakers burned their shops to escape the edict. The price of bread didn't fall. History: elites always thought they could print, lend, and tax their way out of it. They were wrong every time.

🚨 HOW THE BANKS SCREWED GEN Z The most powerful bankers didn’t build wealth lending to people. They built it lending to governments. From the 1800s, elites were financing both sides of wars. Debt became the business model. Print money Lend it at interest Get paid with taxes

@TheDefiantGhost Nailed it. Government bloat and extraction are real. But those wins disappear if inflation keeps eroding your purchasing power. Both moves have to happen together.

“You get taxed on what you earn, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own.” “Taxes, taxes, taxes.” “What does it get spent on? A bunch of stuff it's spent on, you don't even agree with.” “That's why we need to reduce the size of government... and let the people keep a lot more of their hard earned money.”

@varrock Right. But here's the thing: if they can print money, they don't need your taxes for revenue. They tax because it's about extraction and control. The allocation is the distraction. The real question is why they need to print.

@InvestingCanons Independent thinking about investing is step one. Step two: thinking independently about the money you're measuring in. Most investors skip that. That's where the real edge lives

“[Good investing] requires insulating yourself from popular opinion. You simply cannot pay attention to it. You’d be better off, just sitting and thinking a little bit.” — Warren Buffett

@BitcoinNewsCom Fiscal dominance means one thing: the printer is in charge now, not the market. The question isn't whether we're in a new paradigm. It's who survives when velocity breaks.

NEW: Lyn Alden explains to CNBC why this market is unlike anything we've been used to between 1980-2020. We have fiscal dominance, endless dominance and real performance is lagging. Most market participants aren't ready for the new paradigm.

@lynk0x That spread is the visible part. Fractional reserve is the deeper scam. They lend money they didn't create, pocket the spread, and you lose to the inflation they engineered.

Your bank pays you 0.5% interest on your savings. Then they turn around and lend YOUR money out at 7-8% on mortgages. They're making 15x what they pay you. Using YOUR cash. And somehow YOU should be grateful for the account. THIS IS THE BIGGEST SCAM NOBODY TALKS ABOUT.

@senatorbabet It's working perfectly. Just not for you. The system is designed to reward whoever controls money creation. For them it works flawlessly. That's why it won't change from within.

All the system wants from you is for you to pay your taxes and be quiet. It is thoroughly broken. Or perhaps it is working perfectly.

@KnowledgeArchiv Right. But brotherhood requires trust. Trust requires predictability. You can't have harmonious relationships when inflation is silently redistributing wealth from savers to spenders. Start with stable money.

How many rich men would say this today? “The problem of our age is the proper administration of wealth, so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in harmonious relationship.” — Andrew Carnegie

@Handre Right. But the deeper problem: when money is inflating, price signals lie. Nobody can see real returns versus nominal. Keynesians and businesses alike make decisions blind. Stable money is how you see the unseen again.

Keynesians see a bridge built with government money and call it economic growth. They miss the entrepreneur who never started her business because the state taxed away her capital. They miss the factory expansion that died because bond purchases drove up interest rates. They miss the consumer spending that vanished when inflation ate paychecks. Bastiat called this the "seen and unseen" in 1850 -- governments break windows then hire glaziers, economists cheer the employment. Krugman championed this exact logic after 9/11, suggesting the destruction would boost GDP through reconstruction spending. The $800 billion Obama stimulus created 3.3 million jobs according to the White House (generous estimate). Basic math: $242,000 per job. You think the private sector couldn't have deployed that capital more efficiently? The unseen jobs -- the ones that would have emerged from leaving that money with businesses and individuals -- never make it into their models.

@magattew Exactly. Freedom to build works. But a builder in unstable currency is always one policy away from losing everything. Capital freedom works best when paired with monetary stability.

China lifted 800 million people out of poverty not through communism but by creating Special Economic Zones where capitalism was allowed to function. Shenzhen went from a fishing village to a megacity because the government said "in this specific area, you can build freely.” That should tell you something about what works and what doesn't. Even the world's largest communist country had to let capitalism in through the back door to feed its people.

@mert Right. Markets are the best information system we have. But they only work if the price signals are trustworthy. Stable money is the foundation. Crypto is scaling it, but stability is still the missing piece.

as information & intelligence become abundant, markets become the main global information system this is how polymarket predicted the elections and why oil prices are used to gauge the war crypto's task is scaling and hardening this system at planetary scale

@RockChartrand Right. And it gets worse at the monetary layer. If you wouldn't let a politician spend your money first, why let them print it first? The advantage compounds exponentially.

“The government should manage your finances” is an idea almost no one would trust at a personal level. Yet the same people argue it should manage everyone’s finances at scale. If you wouldn’t hand over your bank account to a politician, why assume the outcome improves when it’s done collectively? It’s not that government can’t do anything. It’s that it lacks the knowledge and incentives to allocate your resources better than you can.

@VersanAljarrah Right. But cutting rates is just the Fed admitting they're choosing debasement over reality. Markets learned not to price risk because the Fed will print it away before it matters.

The market isn't pricing risk appropriately. As the economy slows, there will be more pressure to cut rates.

@DarkFiSquad Exactly. Surveillance shapes behavior. But it gets worse with digital currency. Your spending patterns become your behavioral cage. Whoever controls the ledger controls what you're allowed to do.

What do we lose when we're always watched? Risk-taking. Honesty. Originality. Experimentation. The surveillance tax isn't measured in dollars. It's measured in all the things that never exist because someone might be watching.