Nick

@tintinhaddock47 @EricLDaugh Like the second amendment and guns. When the constitution was written no one assumed there would be guns that could fire hundreds of rounds a minute and be readily available. So if this is your argument for 14, you have to allow it for 2. Can’t have it both ways.

@EricLDaugh If the Iranian father entered legally, then the child wouldn’t automatically be an Iranian citizen?

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Justice Sam Alito just sounded the alarm that unlimited birthright citizenship means a Chinese, Iranian or Russian foreigner can have a child in America, and that US citizen owes MILITARY ALLEGIANCE to a foreign adversary "They have the duty of military service. It seems that makes them subject to a FOREIGN POWER!" 🔥 Gosh he is so good. "Not subject to any foreign power is pretty straightforward. So let me give you these examples. A boy is born here to an Iranian father who has entered the country illegally." "That boy is automatically an Iranian national at birth and he has a duty to provide military service to the Iranian government, is he not subject to any foreign power?" "What I said about a boy born to an Iranian father is true of children born here to parents who were nationals of other countries. It's true to a child who's born here to Russian parents." The framers of 14A did not intend for this!

@ClayTravis “Be more like China” - the new slogan for America. Interesting choice.

An American citizen’s baby can’t become a Chinese citizen by being born on the soil of China. Can anyone explain why a Chinese citizen’s baby should be able to become an American citizen by being born on the soil here? It’s absolute insanity.

@XJR_0980 @RedWavePress No one is ignoring race. Race plays an integral part in an analysis of any individual or society as a whole. Racism on the other hand, is illogical. Once again proven wrong. You are bad at this. You can’t even ragebait well.

@Nick_Leye @RedWavePress no, racism is actually the most logical thing there is. Ignoring race is illogical.

Chief Justice John Roberts on Birthright Citizenship: “You obviously put a lot of weight on 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof. But the examples you give to support that strike me as very quirky. You know, children of ambassadors, children of enemies during a hostile invasion, children on warships…” “And then you expand it to a whole class of, illegal aliens are here in the country. I'm not quite sure how you can get to that big group from such tiny and sort of idiosyncratic examples.” What a disgrace!

@slingshot681 @RedWavePress Precedence can be made off of one or two specific examples that speak to the broad nature of the class, but if the examples are not representative of the larger class they would not form the basis of a precedent.

@RedWavePress Ironically precedence is often based off of one or two examples, ya know, the way the whole legal system is structured. He just doesn’t have the guts to do this job.

@XJR_0980 @RedWavePress Racism is illogical, as a result I find your name to be illegitimate. Invalidates all of your arguments.

@RedWavePress Our constitution was written at a time when the framers did not understand jewish lawyers would parse the plain meaning and original intent out of the text so as to make the constitution itself meaningless.

@XJR_0980 @RedWavePress Someone’s racism doesn’t let them know what co-equal means.

@RedWavePress Stop pretending SCOTUS has legitimate veto power over the elected branches of government.

@BasedMikeLee Page 12 line 22 says that state governments shall make a process, but that process does not guarantee the right to vote upon submission of the attestation. That determination is still at the discretion of the state official. There also isn’t a process for disputing the result.

1. This is a lie 2. Read the damn bill 3. The text beginning on page 12, line 22 makes abundantly clear that what you’re saying isn’t true 4. Why can’t Senate Democrats argue against this bill without lying?

@hollhypeman He just named a bunch of guys most of the fanbase wants gone due to the level of their play, why aren’t we reading into that?

Laughts not mentioning Auston, Willy, or JT here is very telling

thinking about where this team and org was at in 2017 and I'm CRASHING TF OUT MAN

@tavkniesnythews I can’t help but think they are going to let us down. I’m hoping they won’t, but I feel like they won’t make enough trades to make a difference.

It’s trade deadline day. Hopefully the leafs have some more moves coming… #LeafsForever

@WannabeFunnyMan @joeyferg Because accountants are logical and often make decisions based on evidence. I’d take cold hard data over whatever metric Treliving has been using these past years.

@joeyferg Pridham is basically the team accountant. Why does everyone want to put him in charge?

- Fire Treliving and let Pridham manage the trade deadline - Keep Berube until the off-season to try and maximize your chance of a top 5 pick - Shut knies and Matthews down - Work on trading every other player not named William Nylander Flowbuds for President of Hockey ops

@Steve_Dangle They definitely read your tweet. I think he had one shift after this tweet.

The second Carlo is back I never want to see Reilly-Myers again. Actually, no, just start now.

@Steve_Dangle They heard you …

That's textbook. Can't write it better. Leafs finally dominate a period, allow a goal from a guy who hasn't scored since there was snow on the ground with two minutes left.

@Gregpboh23 @ldl716 I yelled that and why barger/Bo were pulled for most of extras. We had no pop in the lineup after like the 8th inning.

@ldl716 I just about broke my TV when they took him out after 8 pitches. Imagine if he goes 2 more innings. You don’t even get to Little in the pen.

Someone explain to me why the hell Chris Bassitt only pitches 1 inning every time he goes out. Seems like he has way more in him, he’s a Starter…

@IAmClintMurphy @SteveKooner Ahh yes, you do drugs you lose charter rights. Bold arguments. What else robs you of your charter rights, just want to make sure I get the complete list first.

SHOCKING: NDP MLA Stephanie Higginson says she won’t support the Drug Use Prevention Education in Schools Act because she finds “explicitly discouraging drug use” to be “deeply concerning”. I find it deeply concerning that this government can’t put their radical ideology aside for a single second to protect BC school kids from life-destroying drugs.

@18_manning @ldl716 @lukefoxjukebox I’d take it. I think he’s a fine guy I just don’t think he fits with the team.

@ldl716 @lukefoxjukebox Be lucky to get a large French vanilla back for domi

Knies–Matthews–Domi outscored 1-0, outshot 6-2, and out-chanced 9-1 by Devils through two periods. Toronto still searching for a first-line fit.

@WatchMyReview @KPapetti Roy, Lorentz and Laughton made sense to me in the roles I assumed (3C, 4W, 4C and all on PK). Joshua doesn’t make sense to me. Also don’t let Domi off the hook in this group. I don’t think he does anything more than Robertson this year but he hasnt sat a game.

@KPapetti Why have Roy, Lorentz, Joshua and Laughton on the same team?

The Leafs have too many ~$3M ish forwards who don't provide that much more than the $1M guys

@AdamWylde @Frisbob I think you give them too much credit. For some of them I agree, but for others I just don’t think they have been put into a position to succeed and no amount of trying harder will solve that.

@Frisbob Don’t let them off the hook. This is straight up a details and desire issue.

I guess the Seattle game (the hockey and the baseball) was not enough to inspire this team to play to its ability And don’t let them off the hook, they have the talent.

@AverageBearFish @AdamWylde Can’t agree more. Too many similar skill sets, not enough balance. Domi, maccielli, Jarnkrok, Robertson feel like they e should only have two of them. Also what is a Dakota Joshua and why did we trade for him?

@WynterythTX @Watkinvasion56 There isn’t any assessment 1.5 trillion in pork in S.2882, so I find your initial statement to be false. Extending ACA subsidies would cost roughly 350 billion over ten years, are unaffordable when the house/senate used those funds to enshrine trump tax cuts permenantly

Hey Andrew. What part of what I stated is false? Before answering, you should make sure to familiarize yourself with S.2882. That's the Democrat CR that was introduced with 1.5T in pork in it. Then feel free to put together a cogent rebuttal in regards to the ACA subsidy sunset that was a part of the 2023 American Rescue Plan and in regards to the ACA itself.

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just openly bragged about consolidating power during the shutdown he and his allies orchestrated. “After your pivotal changes to the Senate rules last month… we’ve confirmed more than 175 Trump nominees in just a few weeks.” He’s not hiding it anymore — he used the shutdown to fast-track loyalists and choke off oversight.