
No Caparison 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇻🇦
707 posts




"roughly 90 percent of politically relevant social science articles leaned left 1960–2024" 1. The lack of viewpoint diversity affects the questions that are being asked. Conservatives who are scholars sometimes ask different questions than progressives who are scholars! 2. The lack of viewpoint diversity obviously affects the answers that are given to a given question. 3. There is no conspiracy: Human beings naturally give less scrutiny to answers that conform to their prior views. This natural human tendency reinforces (at least on the margin) the dominance of progressive views in peer-reviewed journals. 4. This is such an obvious and major problem that is of first-order relevance to the central mission of universities. It is astonishing to me that the dominant view of faculty at elite universities is that the absence of scholars with conservative views is either desirable or not a big deal.


This is a preposterous and defamatory characterization of the actual postliberals I’m familiar with (@PatrickDeneen, @ccpecknold, @Vermeullarmine, @gjpappin, @SohrabAhmari, @yhazony, @philippilk, @johnmilbank3, @AdrianPabst1, D. C. Schindler, et al., not to mention myself). “Postliberal” is now starting to be used the way “neocon” eventually was, as a lazily-flung epithet with little connection to the ideas the label was originally used to denote.



Tennessee GOP advances bill that would create public list of trans residents thepinknews.com/2026/03/19/ten…




















Being broke in Italy still beats being rich anywhere else



@whooith That's factually incorrect....sex broadly speaking cannot change...you're changing secondary sexual characteristics which is not strictly speaking the same thing scientifically.




















