Not Josh Blackman

171.2K posts

Not Josh Blackman

Not Josh Blackman

@NotJoshBlackman

Just YEETing and YOLOing my way through ConLaw and Statutory Interpretation. Parody

Some opium den, apparently Katılım Nisan 2014
1.8K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Not Josh Blackman
Not Josh Blackman@NotJoshBlackman·
""Are there no boundaries on what you can say, when you can say it, who you can say it to?" Ardis asked." No, you censorious douche.
English
11
15
94
0
Katya Sedgwick
Katya Sedgwick@KatyaSedgwick·
@Olivia_Reingold @TheFP She’s not a private person, she’s a political cartoonist. And regardless, it says something about Mamdani that he calls this woman “the love of my life”. How can you love somebody like that?
English
16
0
36
2.9K
Olivia Reingold
Olivia Reingold@Olivia_Reingold·
Rama Duwaji wants the spotlight, just not the scrutiny. My latest for @TheFP
English
783
591
3.9K
940.9K
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
Meet Larry Lang. He’s the Vice Mayor of Los Altos, California. He posted “8647” which is known to signify kiIIing Trump. This is an elected official being paid by our tax dollars. Absolutely unacceptable. He must RESIGN! You can contact him here:
Libs of TikTok tweet media
English
1.1K
13.5K
24.6K
567.4K
Jay Town
Jay Town@JayTownAlabama·
🚨LET ME BE CLEAR!🚨 No person in this moment can claim that they are unaware that “the Comey post” could reasonably be considered a threat to President Trump. It matters not what the Oxford Dictionary or a waitress explains to @NBCNews what “86” means. Taken together with “47”, “the Comey post” has a direct stochastic meaning. A federal grand jury has determined that reasonable people could view “the Comey post” as a call to harm the President. @TheJusticeDept has determined that “the Comey post” is a threat to the President. Therefore, people who now put up a post identical to “the Comey post” are consciously disregarding that such a post could be reasonably seen as incitement or violence against the President. Thats the law!⚖️ That’s a true threat!☢️ That’s a federal crime!🚔 Proceed at your own risk.🇺🇸 - Career Prosecutor - Former U.S. Attorney @dbongino @NEWSMAX @sonnyjoynelson @DAGToddBlanche @FBIDirectorKash
NBC News@NBCNews

"86 it": Restaurant workers say the term at the center of James Comey's indictment is "everyday lingo." nbcnews.com/politics/justi…

English
235
38
115
95.4K
Not Josh Blackman
Not Josh Blackman@NotJoshBlackman·
@JayTownAlabama @NBCNews You're a feckless whore. You know you're lying, and you do it anyways. Does your mother know she raised a son who can't feel shame?
English
0
0
0
52
The Chris Salcedo Show
The Chris Salcedo Show@CSalcedoShow·
HEY DOUGH BOY, THIS YOU? Leave it to you leftists to try & force an illegal election under illegal maps! REJECTED! "The 19th JDC just rejected an attempt by the @marceelias Law Group to force Louisiana to hold elections under the now-unconstitutional map. The court heard argument on a motion for a TRO this afternoon and ruled in favor of the State. 💪" x.com/AGLizMurrill/s…
Marc E. Elias@marceelias

🚨BREAKING: On behalf of the National Council of Jewish Women and voters, my law firm has sued Governor Jeff Landry (R) and Secretary of State Nancy Landry (R), challenging the state’s decision to suspend the 2026 congressional primary elections. democracydocket.com/cases/louisian…

English
3
12
35
1.4K
Not Josh Blackman
Not Josh Blackman@NotJoshBlackman·
@Andy_Bloch @JayTownAlabama @NBCNews Also, I'm absolutely certain that the grand jury was lied to, either about the facts (like they were told only that it was a threat), or about the law ("if there is another explanation he can raise it at trial").
English
0
0
4
38
Andy Bloch
Andy Bloch@Andy_Bloch·
Quit making shit up like "direct stochastic meaning" and that 86 ever literally means kill. You also grossly misrepresent what the indictment says about what the grand jury found. This is WRONG: 'A federal grand jury has determined that reasonable people could view “the Comey post” as a call to harm the President.'
English
4
0
23
620
Not Josh Blackman retweetledi
Not Josh Blackman retweetledi
Mike Norton
Mike Norton@NortonMpls·
It took police over an hour from when they arrived to go inside Melissa Hortman’s home, even though they witnessed her husband Mark get shot. The article even quotes a law enforcement official who said officers should have gone into the house. This is just so fucking cowardly.
Mike Norton tweet mediaMike Norton tweet mediaMike Norton tweet media
Ryan Faircloth@RyanFaircloth

Breaking: Newly released records detail police response to Minnesota lawmaker attacks. They show how police knew a woman was lying motionless on the top of the stairs inside Melissa and Mark Hortman's home but waited 30 minutes to physically check on her. startribune.com/newly-released…

English
77
757
3.1K
92.1K
Not Josh Blackman retweetledi
Ryan Faircloth
Ryan Faircloth@RyanFaircloth·
Breaking: Newly released records detail police response to Minnesota lawmaker attacks. They show how police knew a woman was lying motionless on the top of the stairs inside Melissa and Mark Hortman's home but waited 30 minutes to physically check on her. startribune.com/newly-released…
English
3
127
539
149.5K
Corey Bennett (BadgerNews)
Corey Bennett (BadgerNews)@BadgerNewsNet·
I get that you're running PR here, but a pre-publication denial letter does almost no work on actual malice against a public figure. As long as the Atlantic has sources it reasonably credited, the fact that Patel denied it in advance doesn't move the needle. Sullivan 101. You know this, obviously. Doing my part to ensure you don't gaslight the public.
English
11
7
335
9.4K
Jesse R. Binnall
Jesse R. Binnall@jbinnall·
This is the letter we sent to The Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick BEFORE they published their hit piece on FBI Director @FBIDirectorKash. They were on notice that the claims were categorically false and defamatory. They published anyway. See you in court.
Jesse R. Binnall tweet mediaJesse R. Binnall tweet mediaJesse R. Binnall tweet media
English
3.1K
8.1K
28K
2M
dcc0928
dcc0928@dcc0928·
@CraigCastleber1 Understood. The point I was trying to make is: wasn't this a waste of the court's time? The amount of money the judge makes in 15 minutes probably exceeds the fine.
English
2
0
0
34