Zhishen 🇦🇺🚫💉☠️

@rationalaussie Depending on who is in control of the government, subjugation has always been the plan of the Fabian socialists and Banks

It's hard to tell whether these are the last few years where accruing a shitload of money as fast as possible matters, or whether AI will catalyse so much change that money really does not matter much anymore. If the government is going to steal it all during the Fourth Turning anyway, and shortly after AGI + robotics renders all goods and services abundant and cheap, what is actually worth competing for? Human status hierarchies form based on comparative difference. The last half century has been fairly anomalous historically because people have been able to win based on effort alone. Historically you were either born into wealth or you were poor, with few exceptions... In some sense we are returning to this historical reality but with a weird tech overlay on-top whereby the definition of 'poor' will be: a team of humanoids built you a house for 'free' 2 hours from the CBD, but maybe your equally poor friends live in that neighbourhood too and it's not so bad because none of you need to work anymore to survive. You spend all day playing sports, games, participating in new 'religions' etc. You're not rich compared to the 'old money' that lives by the coast, but you also don't really care because you are healthier and happier than pre-AGI. It's techno feudalism, except the floor for being poor is now what rich people today experience, for the most part. And the rich people of tomorrow will still have access to a new level of rich you don't, because that is what will keep the status hierarchies stable: their new level might be they travel to different planets regularly whereas you, dear pleb, only get to travel to Euro Summer annually, subsidised by your UBI tokens. We are heading for very weird times, but you can still reason about strong possible futures through first principled thinking about human psychology.

@Helios_Movement 20 year olds are being psyoped into thinking being NEET makes you an independent person; it's the complete opposite

I know that some of you who are 20-year-old retards think that this is funny but i once knew a guy like that. He killed himself at 31. Life is not easy for a useless man. Lock in. You're not a kid anymore.

@InTheAssembly @ERROLFLYNN1969 The real product is retail, not the etf

Cathie Wood might be the most expensive lesson retail investors have ever paid for. Her flagship ARK Innovation ETF is down 23% in the last 5 years. The S&P 500 is up 77% over the same period. She has underperformed the index by 100 percentage points. And she has done it while collecting BILLIONS in management fees. A quick reminder of the highlight reel: – She predicted Tesla would hit $3,000 per share by 2025. It is currently $432. – She predicted Tesla revenue would hit $234 to $367 billion in 2025. The actual number came in under $100 billion. – She made Teladoc her single largest position around $80 per share. It trades at $7 today. – She loaded up on Zoom near $300. It trades at $110. – She dumped almost her entire Nvidia position in January 2023 around $20 per share. Nvidia is now at $220, which means she sold the single greatest stock of this generation right before it 10x’d. Morningstar officially labeled the ARK family of funds a “value destroyer,” noting that her funds lost roughly $14 billion in shareholder value from 2014 to 2024. But here’s the part nobody talks about: ARK Investment Management has been one of the most profitable asset managers of the last decade. Wood has personally made tens of millions in fees while her investors have collectively lost real money. This is the part of Wall Street most retail investors do not understand. You’re not paying for performance, you’re paying for marketing. The people who win are the ones running the fund, not the ones holding it. This Friday, May 15, every fund managing over $100 million is legally required to disclose their Q1 2026 trades to the SEC. We will be breaking down EVERY major filing right here the moment they drop. Follow us with notifications before it’s too late. If you don’t follow us, you might regret it.

@TheLaurenChen Blue vs red button

If your kid is invited to another kid's birthday party, YOU GO. I don't care. Drag your kid. Bribe them if you have to.

@JustnThePhotog I can't tell if this is a joke

Japan - “How much will it cost us to run a pilot to tokenize our bond market on your blockchain” Abalaba - “actually we will pay you” J - “oh wow okay. But what about the announcement? Surely you want to be named in the headline” A - nah just burry our name on the last page of the pdf J - fair enough, but what if we go forward and want to do it for real? How much then? A - like… $20 a month?

@rahowaii Kids can't give consent regardless, if you have a problem with that you should voice your concerns to your workplace, spouse, friends and family. Do it constantly do you ensure they know your position on the matter

Ruined life forever cos this retard desired 12 year olds as an 18 year old Fyi the adult woman who told people about his pedohebephilia only revealed it, cos he broke up with her, ofc He got exposed by a fat ginger ashkenazi j 🇮🇱, compare the phenos

@DBCrypt0 @avax coded

This is what happens when you stop paying people to use your chain Yes, you heard me right PAYING people to use a chain The KaiChing (KaiKaiNow) contract ended with NEAR and they drove the majority of users and TPS NEAR paid an undisclosed but likely 8-9 figure sum to KaiKaiNow just so they would integrate and use the chain KaiKaiNow covered the gas fees for all user txs from the amount paid boosting users and TPS over 10x Until the money ran out… Then they peaced out and took over 90% of the numbers away Just like when the Hedera subsidies ended and Atma stopped doing thousands of TPS Remember when Hedera was doing 2k-4k consistent TPS? Yeah, they paid for all that and then some and now their TPS is less than 5 TLDR: It’s all fake and we have to pay people to use this tech currently This is not NEAR or Hedera FUD just a wake up call for many in the industry

@el33th4xor Who? Lol

Come see our John Wu outline the next steps ahead for genuine crypto adoption.

@Nazo_ku Why stake 💩v💩x when you can just short it

Manifold, a quantitative trading firm, has been continuously offloading $154.55M in AVAX over the past year on Bybit: - 4 mins ago: Dumped 85k $AVAX ($814.3k) - 23 hrs ago: Dumped 22k $AVAX ($208.8k) - Past year: Dumped a total of $154.55M in AVAX This explains why AVAX has been moving sideways for months; even with Bitcoin’s massive rally over the last few days, AVAX has shown very slow growth and has been unable to pump. If you're interested, here is the address of the quantitative trading firm, Manifold: intel.arkm.com/explorer/addre…

@DrCameronMurray The gender pay gap is an ideological issue not an economic one

I wonder what the gender pay gap discourse will look like when the gap reverses, as it has for full-time workers under age 30.

@jackNichol90667 @Breaking911 People exposed to this story will remember this for the rest of their lives

BREAKING: Tanner Horner, the FedEx driver who kidnapped and murdered 7-year-old Athena Strand in Texas, has been sentenced to death.

@TommyFalkowski You're allowed to use their API keys in other harnesses

Anthropic: You are forbidden to use anything other than our shitty client if you want to use the Claude Code subscription. We don't want any of your third party harnesses touching our precious Claude. OpenAI: You can use whatever you want. But know that all your third party harnesses are gonna be obsolete soon anyways, since we're gonna steamroll you. So you might as well just use our tools from the get go. I don't like either one of those...

@RealKahall Charles = new world order scum

Charles III just taught more about American Constitutional history in 2 minutes than law schools teach in 3 years. (Watch the judge’s reaction, it's all the proof you need.) -If you want to understand why courts today claim the authority to rewrite the Constitution through case law… Why people believe courts issue “rulings” instead of what they actually issue, opinions… -It’s because we no longer teach Constitutional history. We don’t teach that the Framers acted with deliberate purpose in every word they wrote and ratified. We don’t teach that their understanding was built on over 700 years of legal history. We don’t teach that every Article, Section, and Clause was debated, defined, and explained. -And because of that ignorance, a dangerous myth has taken root: That the Constitution needs to be “interpreted.” It does not. -There is no power delegated for courts to rewrite or redefine the Constitution, through interpretation. That idea was created to justify expanding authority; turning a limited government into a centralized, controlling force, and reducing the people to subjects of political power. -I teach the actual history of the Constitution: clearly, simply, and truthfully. If you’re ready to learn, you have three options: 1. Watch online: LibertyFirstSociety.com 2. Join in person: riveruniversity.org/river-school-o… 3. Bring me to your group: krisannehall.com 250 years of Liberty MUST be celebrated and learned

@Nazo_ku In case it wasn't obvious to anyone at this point, AVAX is going to be a Trainwreck

Over the past 17h, whale 0xb36 has dumped over 250K $AVAX (~$1.02M) on Coinbase. The latest transaction was 7h ago, and more selling may follow. These tokens came from 0xe1e. This whale currently holds 2.2M $AVAX (~$20M) and is distributing across multiple wallets. Over the past 3mo, AVAX has been ranging between $8.2 and $10.4, with $8.2 acting as a key support level. 0xb36 intel.arkm.com/explorer/addre… 0xe1e: intel.arkm.com/explorer/addre…

@cryptoreine @avax Any project betting on their own token as the base layer asset is going to fail next cyclr. Avax token in particular is an operational cost to be minimized not a store of value that institutions want

After hundreds of meetings with tokenization teams, a pattern: the projects that win institutional capital on @avax vs the ones that stall out are separable on a handful of questions. Here’s a list of questions I use to evaluate new companies in the space: 1) Is the underlying asset something institutions actually want to hold? Real yield-bearing exposure (MMFs, private credit, T-bills) from a regulated issuer wins. Speculative wrappers from an unknown SPV don’t clear diligence. 2) is the legal structure defensible? Jurisdiction, vehicle (Reg D, Reg S, BVI SPC, Luxembourg SICAV), and whether the token is the security of record or a mirror asset, all determine whether an allocator can hold it. Bankruptcy remoteness has to be a one-sentence answer. 3) Who actually buys this? The single biggest predictor of success. Named fintech, neobank, and allocator partners with concrete integration paths beat “we’re in conversations with XYZ” every time. B2B2C consistently beats direct-to-retail. 4) Can the token do work on-chain? Use as collateral, in lending markets, in payments, in looping strategies, this is what creates demand beyond the initial buyer. An asset that can’t move or be posted as collateral is just a worse PDF. 5) Can holders actually get paid and get out? Yield mechanics (rebase, accumulating NAV, distribution) and redemption paths (T+0/T+1, gated windows, behavior under stress) decide whether this is a real product or a one-way trade. Tax treatment matters too; rebase tokens can be nightmares for US taxable accounts. 6) Is the tech a real commitment or a press release? One chain with audits, compliance hooks (ERC-3643), and clear admin key policy beats deployment across ten chains. 7) Do the economics work for distribution? Minimums shape who can buy. Fee structure and yield pass-through determine whether partners can actually build on top. 8) Does the team have both sides? Tradfi credibility on issuer/legal, crypto-native execution on eng. Most failures are missing one. 9) What’s the actual moat? GP relationship, regulatory lane, distribution channel, unique collateral? If the answer is “better tech,” pass. 10) Are the ops there? NAV, transfer agent, tax (1099/K-1), audit. The boring stuff is what kills deals 6 months in. 11) Red flags: no redemption path, decks with no named LPs, reliance on one regulatory interpretation that could flip, etc.

@peterrhague Reds are people with no souls

Sociopath doesn’t understand mentally healthy people have a different payoff matrix, assumes they are stupid

@Tort77019 @johnpaul2n44056 @larealestateguy @waitbutwhy Everybody dies

@Nulinf @johnpaul2n44056 @larealestateguy @waitbutwhy Your point? Reds still lives even if +50% press blue lmao There was no condition for the red button pushers to die lmao

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

@Tort77019 @johnpaul2n44056 @larealestateguy @waitbutwhy Blues won though, idiot

@johnpaul2n44056 @larealestateguy @Nulinf @waitbutwhy Thank you for being the first midwit I found in the wild. There’s no bad consequence to anybody pressing red. If you press red and +50% press blue, nothing happens. If you press red and less than 50% press blue, nothing happens. Therefore red if the logical option.

@larealestateguy @waitbutwhy Nah

@Nulinf @waitbutwhy Everyone pressing red is cooperative and collective self interest